£40m-plus Newgale road scheme to come under spotlight
In 2014 it even saw a visit by the-then Prime Minister David Cameron following the storms.
A public consultation - through agent AtkinsRéalis - was launched earlier this year ahead of a formal Pembrokeshire County Council application to Pembrokeshire Coast National Park for Phase 1 of the Newgale Coastal Adaptation Project, which would see the development of a new inland section of road with bridge over Brandy Brook some 2.3km inland, to replace the coastal section of A487 at Newgale that will be closed and removed, among other works.
Varied claims have been made about the cost of this scheme, from £20m upwards, some even saying it could cost as much as £60m, with millions spent on consultation fees to date.
(Image: STUN)
An alternative scheme has been proposed by STUN – Stand Up for Newgale, who have previously said the public has been misled over the need for the new Newgale bypass.
STUN's far cheaper alternative proposes a section of the shingle bank at Newgale be realigned 10-12 metres seaward leaving an over-wash barrier between it and the A487 to capture any pebbles and sea water.
More: Replacement of deteriorating Pembrokeshire school building backed
More: Some people set to be exempt from Pembrokeshire council tax payments
More: Haverfordwest houses for homeless will not be used for asylum seekers
In a question, on behalf of Solva Community Council, to be heard at the July 17 meeting of Pembrokeshire County Council, community council chair Gareth Chapman will ask: 'The topic of the road diversion at Newgale has been in the news quite a lot recently and it has become apparent that there has been an alternative scheme proposed by the Newgale Community group STUN.
'This proposal has been demonstrated to Solva Community Council and appears to be an under £1m proposal with up to 85 years lifespan compared to the conservative £40m-plus estimate for the PCC proposal.'
(Image: AtkinsRéalis report/Pembrokeshire County Council.)
The question says 'hardly anyone wants this major change in Newgale,' adding: 'PCC's proposal is to counter for road closures that rarely happen and, even then, require little expense to restore the pebble bank. It should also be remembered that on several occasions, flooding at Newgale occurs because the river outlet is blocked preventing water from the valley escaping and not as a result of a high tide or storm.
'It is acknowledged that climate change and coastal issues at Newgale may eventually in many years force a change in the highway arrangements at Newgale but it is felt that all efforts should be made to retain the character of the village and iconic views for as long as possible.
'Given the huge amount of public money that is proposed to be spent, and could well be better spent on other more pressing issues, would Pembrokeshire County Council commit to thoroughly examining the alternative proposal as WelTAG [Welsh Government Transport Appraisal Guidance] suggests they should, and also fully take on board the overwhelming public opinion regarding the future of Newgale?
'Secondly if Pembrokeshire County Council have already given this alternative scheme full consideration, will they also commit to providing their written comments on the alternative scheme to Solva Community Council within 14 days of this meeting?'
The question will be responded to at the meeting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
10 hours ago
- The Guardian
Ministers to enshrine UK charities' right to peaceful protest in new ‘covenant'
The right to engage in political activity and protest peacefully is to be enshrined in a new agreement between the government and UK charities and campaigners aimed in part at ending years of damaging 'culture wars'. The agreement is intended to reset relations between government and the voluntary sector after years of mutual distrust during which Conservative ministers limited public rights to protest, froze out campaigners, and targeted 'woke' charities. The so-called 'civil society covenant' will also commit ministers to giving charities and campaign groups a formal partnership role in helping design and fulfil the government's missions to achieve economic growth and tackle social problems. Keir Starmer will announce the covenant on Thursday in what is seen as the most serious government engagement with the voluntary sector since David Cameron's ill-fated attempt to co-opt charities into his 'big society' vision in 2010. The prime minister is expected to say: 'This is about rebalancing power and responsibility. Not the top-down approach of the state working alone. Not the transactional approach of markets left to their own devices. But a new way forward – where government and civil society work side by side to deliver real change.' The government has highlighted the covenant as a way of putting charities and social enterprises at the centre of plans to provide publicly funded grassroots services in areas such as domestic abuse, youth services and employment programmes. But the covenant is expected to addresses more fundamental principles of civil society independence and rights, and commits the government and charities to continue to engage respectfully even where they disagree on policy. A key passage in the covenant is expected to say the government respects the independence and legitimacy of civil society organisations to advocate and campaign, will protect their right to engage in peaceful protest, and hold the government to account. The commitment was welcomed by civil society leaders. Jane Ide, the chief executive of the Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations, said: 'This is an essential part of a healthy democracy and speaking truth to power is central to the role of civil society.' There is widespread optimism in the voluntary sector that the covenant, which was negotiated in recent months, signals a genuine attempt by the government to embrace civil society groups and draw on their expertise to drive social change. One senior voluntary sector figure said: 'This is something everyone has wanted to see for some time. It is easy to be cynical about words on the page but it is a massive opportunity to do things in a different way.' There is broad relief the covenant appears to signal that the tide of aggressive criticism of charities from rightwing politicians in recent years, seen as an attempt to undermine charities' legal rights and restrict their role in public debate, has receded. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion These have included hostile 'culture war' attacks on charities including the National Trust, the RNLI and Barnardo's by politicians and media over so-called 'woke' issues such as race, immigration, the UK's colonial legacy and the climate crisis. Charities that provide public services have also railed against 'gagging clauses' inserted into delivery contracts preventing them from speaking out on behalf of beneficiaries, and many will hope the covenant will end such practices. But there is also scepticism about the covenant in some quarters, given the government's recent banning of the Palestine Action protest group, and amid fears that police handling of some peaceful pro-Palestine marches risks criminalising legitimate protest. Some charity figures contrasted the commitment of the covenant to 'coproduce' policy with campaigners with the failures of ministers in recent months to consult civil society over unpopular cuts to disability benefits and the winter fuel allowance. There is also concern that the financial difficulties faced by many charities, often as a results of cuts to local authority and NHS board funding, will severely limit the ability of many civil society organisations to engage in partnership.
Spectator
a day ago
- Spectator
Britain can't afford to let migrants live on benefits
When the history of the next election comes to be written, we may end up asking: was the turning point for its outcome the moment that Keir Starmer's government backtracked on its welfare reforms in the face of a backbench revolt? The fiasco, which eliminated the government's hopes of saving £5 billion a year, has made any welfare reform during the current Parliament impossible. The cost of that is becoming more evident by the day. Figures revealed this morning show that there are currently 3.6 million people receiving Universal Credit who are under no obligation whatsoever to look for work. They have been effectively written off as unemployable and will be in receipt of benefits for the remainder of their working-age lives. That is nearly half the total of 7.9 million people on Universal Credit. What's more, 1.26 million claimants of Universal Credit are non-UK citizens. It is hard to imagine a more powerful form of recruitment for Reform UK. As Nigel Farage put it this morning, 'These figures go completely against the lie we have been told for 25 years that all immigration is positive because they work and contribute to society.' Britain, to use a phrase that is steadily gaining political traction, has become the benefits office of the world. The case for mass migration relies on the assertion that it is helping to staff our hospitals, care homes and other places of employment which are desperately short of staff. There is a lot of truth in this, although it is undermined by today's figures. There is also the idealist Statue of Liberty argument: the idea that the rest of the world is sending us its huddled masses who, given a chance, will turn out to be full of entrepreneurs who will found and build new businesses. It is a lovely idea. The trouble is that 2020s Britain is not 1880s America – the decade in which the Statue of Liberty was built. The big difference is that modern Britain incorporates a huge welfare state, and a non-contributory one at that. You don't have to build up entitlements to benefits over a number of years – you can arrive in Britain one day and be in receipt of benefits the next. This was the issue, indeed, on which David Cameron's pre-referendum negotiations to reset Britain's relations with the EU fell down. The EU refused to compromise on free movement, beyond a few token gestures, and David Cameron refused to countenance the wholesale redesign of Britain's benefits system to make it harder for migrants to claim benefits. The result was that Britain voted for Brexit, partly in the expectation that migration would be slashed. But it didn't happen. On the contrary, migration surged. What's more, the move to Universal Credit has fuelled the growth in the number of people who are paid out-of-work benefits but are not required to look for work. The pandemic played a role in this, in that it meant fewer Work Capability Assessments were carried out face-to-face. Yet the growth in people not required to look for work began a couple of years before Covid, and has continued to grow ever since. Labour's failure to reform welfare ought to benefit the Conservatives, yet Universal Credit was very much their baby. Moreover, it was under their government that migration as well as the number of people on out-of-work benefits began to surge. That is a very big problem for them. Reform UK, on the other hand, has no baggage such as failed welfare policy. No country with a benefits system as generous and as extensive as Britain's can afford an open borders policy; that much should be obvious. A country of 34 million workers cannot support the virtually limitless numbers of people around the globe who could potentially claim UK benefits. Just as the Leave campaign won the Brexit referendum on the back of a few simple messages, Reform UK is more than capable of winning the next election by continuing to drum into the public that Britain's benefits system, and in particular the number of migrants who are living off it, is unsustainbale.
North Wales Live
a day ago
- North Wales Live
Senedd passes legislation to protect Welsh communties from disused tips
A Bill that provides a "crucial step forward' in protecting Welsh communities from disused tips, both coal and non-coal, has been passed by the Senedd. The Disused Mine and Quarry Tips (Wales) Bill, the first legislation of its kind in the UK, will create the Disused Tips Authority for Wales to address safety risks posed by Wales's industrial past. The new Authority will become a Welsh Government sponsored body with powers to: Ensure disused coal and non-coal tips no longer pose a threat to communities through instability Establish a comprehensive system for assessment, registration, monitoring and management of all disused tips Following the successful vote in the Senedd, Deputy First Minister Huw Irranca-Davies said: "This legislation represents a crucial step forward in protecting Welsh communities. 'We've seen the impact of tip instability following extreme weather events, including the major landslide at Tylorstown during storms Ciara and Dennis in February 2020, and more recently at Cwmtillery in 2024 after storm Bert. 'We now have robust legislation in place and a structured approach to managing disused coal and non-coal tips to ensure they are not a threat to our communities. 'Wales is leading the way in addressing these challenges and ensuring our communities are safe for generations to come." The Welsh Government said: "Wales has a proud mining heritage, and its legacy is visible across our landscape. There are 2,573 disused coal tips in Wales, and whilst they are predominantly in the South Wales valleys, this issue impacts both West and North Wales, as well as there being an estimated 20,000 other disused tips (i.e. not coal) in Wales. "Work is already underway towards setting up the Authority, and consideration is being given to its location, systems and governance to ensure all aspects of the Bill are captured and delivered on. "The appointment process for a Chair and Chief Executive will commence shortly and both will be in post before the Authority is formally established on 1 April 2027. "In the interim, the Welsh Government's coal tip safety programme of work carries on and continues to work closely with local authorities, Natural Resources Wales and the Mining Remediation Authority to deliver an effective inspection and maintenance regime across Wales." The Welsh Government said it provides funding to local authorities and Natural Resources Wales to undertake works on disused tips, through the Coal Tip Safety Grant scheme. This includes funding work which the local authority might undertake on privately owned tips. On March 20 2025, the Deputy First Minister confirmed in 2025-26, the Welsh Government is providing £34 million for public partners to undertake works on 130 coal tips across Wales – to take investment beyond £100m in this Senedd term. The recently confirmed additional allocation from the UK Government will mean over £220m will have been invested in coal tip safety.
