Japan's defense minister discusses military cooperation, drones on Turkey visit
Gen Nakatani is the first Japanese defense minister to make an official trip to Turkey, a NATO member country that is keen to expand economic and other ties beyond Europe and the Middle East. Turkey and Japan are both U.S. allies.
Ahead of the visit, a diplomatic source in Ankara said the two countries' defense ministers would "discuss ways to expand cooperation on defense equipment and technology and exchange views on regional developments". They also aim to increase contacts between the Turkish Armed Forces and Japan's Self-Defense Forces at unit level, the source said.
Nakatani will also visit Istanbul on Wednesday and tour defense companies and facilities, including Turkish Aerospace Industries (TUSAS), navy shipyards and drone-maker Baykar, a Turkish Defense Ministry official said.
"Defense industry cooperation will be on the agenda..." the official said. "They will hold inspections regarding drones, but an agreement is not expected. It is too early for an agreement."
Turkey-backed firms have supplied drones to several countries, including Ukraine, while Japan is preparing to expand the use of unmanned aerial vehicles across its ground, air and naval forces.
Japan is considering Turkish drones among potential options as part of this effort, the diplomatic source said.
Defense Minister Yasar Guler said after his meeting with Nakatani that Turkey wanted to increase defense industry and military cooperation with Japan, his office said in a readout.
Turkey and Japan have both condemned Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, though Ankara has maintained cordial relations with Moscow and has not joined Western economic sanctions against it.
Nakatani's visit to Turkey is part of a regional tour from August 17–22 that also includes stops in Djibouti and Jordan.
© Thomson Reuters 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
15 minutes ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
NATO Defense Chiefs Hold ‘Candid Discussion' on Security Guarantees for Ukraine
BRUSSELS (AP) — NATO defense chiefs held a 'candid discussion' Wednesday about what security guarantees they could offer Kyiv to help forge a peace agreement that ends Russia's three-year war on Ukraine, a senior alliance official said. Italian Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, the chair of NATO's Military Committee, said that 32 defense chiefs from across the alliance held a video conference amid a U.S.-led diplomatic push to end the fighting. He said there was a 'great, candid discussion' in the call. 'I thanked everyone for their always proactive participation in these meetings: we are united, and that unity was truly tangible today, as always,' he wrote on social platform X without providing further details. Assurances that it won't be invaded again in the future are one of the keys for getting Ukraine to sign up for a peace deal with Russia. It wants Western help for its military, including weapons and training, to shore up its defenses, and Western officials are scrambling to figure out what commitments they might offer. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov chided efforts to work on security arrangements in Ukraine without Moscow's involvement. 'We cannot agree with the fact that it is now proposed to resolve collective security issues without the Russian Federation. This will not work,' Lavrov said Wednesday, according to state news agency RIA Novosti. Russia will 'ensure (its) legitimate interests firmly and harshly,' Lavrov added at a news conference in Moscow with Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman al-Safadi. U.S. Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, NATO's supreme allied commander Europe, took part in the virtual talks, Dragone said. U.S. Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was also due to participate, a U.S. defense official said. Caine also met with European military chiefs Tuesday evening in Washington to assess the best military options for political leaders, according to the defense official, who wasn't authorized to comment publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. Defense chiefs work on details of a Ukraine security force U.S. President Donald Trump met last Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska and on Monday hosted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and prominent European leaders at the White House. Neither meeting delivered concrete progress. Trump is trying to steer Putin and Zelenskyy toward a settlement more than three years after Russia invaded its neighbor, but there are major obstacles. They include Ukraine's demands for Western-backed military assurances to ensure Russia won't mount another invasion in the coming years. 'We need strong security guarantees to ensure a truly secure and lasting peace,' Zelenskyy said in a Telegram post Wednesday after Russian missile and drone strikes hit six regions of Ukraine overnight. Kyiv's European allies are looking to set up a force that could backstop any peace agreement, and a coalition of 30 countries, including European nations, Japan and Australia, has signed up to support the initiative. Military chiefs are figuring out how that security force might work. The role that the U.S. might play is unclear. Trump on Tuesday ruled out sending U.S. troops to help defend Ukraine against Russia. Russia has repeatedly said that it would not accept NATO troops in Ukraine. Attacks on civilian areas in Sumy and Odesa overnight into Wednesday injured 15 people, including a family with three small children, Ukrainian authorities said. Russian strikes also targeted ports and fuel and energy infrastructure, officials said. Zelenskyy said the strikes 'only confirm the need for pressure on Moscow, the need to introduce new sanctions and tariffs until diplomacy works to its full potential.' Switzerland could host a Putin-Zelenskyy summit Trump said Monday he has begun arrangements for a face-to-face meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy, although the Kremlin hasn't publicly confirmed such a possibility and no venue was suggested. Lavrov, in his Moscow press conference, said Russia is prepared to continue negotiations with Ukraine in any format. He said Putin proposed to Trump raising the level of representation in delegations that recently took part in largely fruitless direct talks in Istanbul. He added that 'a separate block (of talks) should be devoted to examining the political aspects of the settlement, along with the military and humanitarian ones.' Ukraine and Western leaders have accused Putin of dragging out peace negotiations in the hope of capturing more land before any settlement. French President Emmanuel Macron has said the summit could happen in Europe and proposed the Swiss city of Geneva. Switzerland has expressed its willingness to act as host. Putin's ability to travel abroad is limited because he is wanted by the International Criminal Court in The Hague on a warrant dating back to March 2023 for alleged involvement in the abduction of Ukrainian children. More than 100 countries are ICC signatories and have a legal obligation to arrest the Russian leader on their soil. Switzerland intends to ask the ICC to exempt it from sanctions in order to allow Putin in for a summit, according to a senior official in The Hague with direct knowledge of the request. The official was not authorized to speak about the proceedings and spoke on condition of anonymity.
The Mainichi
4 hours ago
- The Mainichi
'It's meaningful to do what Haneda can't': New president of Narita Airport reveals plans
NARITA, Chiba -- The newly appointed president of Narita International Airport Corp. (NAA) recently shared insights on the airport's unique strengths, which he pointed out Tokyo's Haneda Airport does not have. Naoki Fujii, 64, a former vice-minister of land, infrastructure, transport and tourism, took office as the president of NAA in June. Regarding the functional enhancement of Narita Airport, located in Chiba Prefecture east of Tokyo, by adding a new runway and extending another, he stated, "It's meaningful to do what Haneda can't. We will leverage Narita's strengths." In his comments to various media outlets, he also expressed his intention to focus on diversifying the international flight network and expanding low-cost carrier (LCC) flights. Narita Airport aims to begin operating the newly added and expanded runways in March 2029, increasing its annual takeoff and landing capacity from the current 300,000 to 500,000. Fujii mentioned using the additional 200,000 slots to "expand the network to various countries and regions, making it possible to travel directly to many places from Narita." He emphasized the advantage of Narita's dedicated terminal for LCCs, stating, "We want to increase the number of people who choose to fly from Narita because of the lower fares," showing enthusiasm for the expansion of LCCs. He also mentioned strengthening the acceptance of business jets. Regarding relations with surrounding municipalities, Fujii acknowledged, "There is an unfortunate history, and a tense relationship continued." However, after his appointment, he noted that local government officials expressed "a very strong desire to lead functional enhancement to local development," and he stated that NAA would contribute more to the local economy and in other aspects. Born in the Chiba Prefecture city of Matsudo, Fujii spent his early years there until fifth grade. He remarked, "Many people think Narita Airport is far and inconvenient. I want to challenge that notion." Fujii commutes by train every morning, taking one hour and 40 minutes from Tokyo. (Japanese original by Tsukimi Goda, Narita Bureau)
The Diplomat
4 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Why China's Fear of Failure Will Keep It Behind in the AI Race
As China scrambles to catch up to Nvidia in the AI chip race, the United States must recognize the real reason it's still ahead: not subsidies or sanctions, but a cultural embrace of failure as a stepping stone to innovation. Nvidia just reached a market cap of about $5 trillion, cementing its role as the crown jewel of the AI revolution. Its GPUs power everything from ChatGPT-like models to autonomous vehicles and military applications. But behind Nvidia's dominance is not just superior engineering; it's a culture of risking-taking and learning from setbacks. In contrast, China's approach to innovation is often characterized as scaling existing technologies rather than fostering groundbreaking advancements. Despite massive government investments, China has not yet produced an AI chip that can rival Nvidia's H100 or the newer B200. The gap is not due to a lack of talent or investment, but a deeply cultural aversion to failure. In Chinese education, failure is frequently viewed as a source of shame, a concept known as 'losing face' or mianzi. This cultural norm permeates classrooms, workplaces, and family life, discouraging the risk-taking necessary for true innovation. Take Chinese schools, for example, Ms. Zhang, a high school teacher in Beijing, noted that there is a strong societal expectation that all students work diligently and perform well. Schools often rank students from 1 to 50. The top students sit in the front rows, while those deemed to be underperforming or unmotivated are relegated to the back. This seating arrangement publicly shames students, highlighting their perceived lack of work ethic and care. The embarrassment extends beyond the classroom, as students fear the consequences of their poor performance at home, where their failure could bring additional shame. I also observed this firsthand during my time at Renmin University in Beijing. Students were often too intimidated to challenge their professors or question their statements. Even politely pointing out a mistake could result in public humiliation, as the student was seen as arrogant, disrespectful, and overstepping their role. In this system, professors are treated as near-infallible authorities, with their words regarded as unquestionable fact. This environment stifles critical thinking and discourages intellectual independence. In the workplace, this aversion to failure can manifest in practices that discourage individual recognition. The joint venture between McDonnell Douglas and Shanghai's Aircraft Manufacturing Company illustrated the challenges of applying Western management practices in China. McDonnell Douglas rewarded standout employees with bonuses and 'Employee of the Month' recognition. That approach clashed with Chinese cultural norms, where it is expected that everyone of the same social rank or job title performs equally well. Awarding select individuals for their superior performance is seen as an implicit critique of the others, suggesting they have not performed up to standard. This approach reflects a cultural reluctance to recognize individual merit, which can hinder the growth of a culture of excellence and suppress innovation. In contrast, the United States has fostered a culture that sees failure as a vital component of innovation. From 'show-and-tell' in kindergarten to higher education, American schools encourage students to explore, question, and experiment. By the time they reach university or enter the workforce, they have internalized that mistakes and challenges to the status quo are not sources of shame but opportunities for learning and growth. The United States has long embraced an interdisciplinary approach to education, encouraging the blending of seemingly unrelated ideas often leads to groundbreaking advances. This mindset produced innovations like the iPhone, where Steve Jobs combined a phone, a camera, and a computer into a single device. At the time, it was a bold and unconventional idea, but the willingness to take risks along with the cultural acceptance of failure made Apple's breakthrough possible. China has found success in sectors from solar panels to high-speed rail by refining what's already out there. But true breakthrough innovations like CRISPR, the transistor, or Nvidia's AI chips are born not from incremental steps but from a willingness to question authority, experiment, and most importantly, fail. The United States' real advantage in the AI chip race and across all high-tech fields lies not just in its resources, but in its culture of innovation. To stay ahead, the U.S. must continue to nurture an environment where failure is embraced rather than feared. By protecting this mindset, the United States can remain the global leader in the next breakthrough, just as it has for the past century. True innovation doesn't come from obedience; it comes from the courage to fail.
