Pirate protest flag under fire
The country is cracking down on a viral pirate flag that is spreading as a symbol of political protest ahead of independence day.
The Jolly Roger skull and bones with a straw hat – from the Japanese anime series One Piece – has been fluttering from a rising number of trucks, cars and homes.
Officials warn the 'provocation' – seen by many as a protest against President Prabowo Subianto's policies – should not fly alongside the country's red-and-white flag.
The pirate banner was taken up by disgruntled truck drivers earlier this summer, but has recently snowballed into an online and real-life movement.
'I personally raised the One Piece flag because the red and white flag is too sacred to be raised in this corrupt country,' Khariq Anhar, a 24-year-old university student in Sumatra's Riau province, said.
'I believe freedom of speech in Indonesia exists, but it is very limited. Voicing your opinion is getting more dangerous.'
Government officials say the flag's use is an attempt to divide the nation.
They warn it may be banned from flying next to Indonesia's colours or being raised on Aug 17 – the 80th independence anniversary after Japan's surrender at the end of World War II.
'It is imperative we refrain from creating provocation with symbols that are not relevant to this country's struggle,' chief security minister Budi Gunawan said in a statement last week.
Ministers have cited a law that prohibits flying a symbol higher than the national flag as the basis for any punishment.
Experts say unhappy Indonesians are using the flag as a way to express anti-government feeling indirectly, with some of Prabowo's economic and defence policies causing concern about democratic backsliding.
'Symbols like the pirate flag let people channel frustration without spelling it out,' said Dedi Dinarto, lead Indonesia analyst at advisory firm Global Counsel.
Hot-seller: A worker holding a replica of the pirate flag at a T-shirt workshop in Karanganyar, Central Java. — AFP
'It reflects a public sentiment that parts of the country have been 'hijacked'.'
Others, like food seller Andri Saputra, who has flown the pirate ensign below an Indonesian flag at his home for a week, say they want to be able to decide what symbols they display.
'I want to be free to express my opinion and express myself,' the 38-year-old said in Boyolali regency in Central Java.
'This is just a cartoon flag from Japan.'
Online culture has been a popular channel for Indonesian dissatisfaction against perceived government corruption and nepotism.
Japanese anime is popular in Indonesia, and in the best-selling One Piece manga series created in 1997, the flag represents opposition to an authoritarian world government.
In February, protests known as 'Dark Indonesia' began against Prabowo's widespread budget cuts, sparked by a logo posted on social media showing a black Indonesian mythical Garuda bird alongside the words 'Emergency Warning'.
Other rallies in 2016 and 2019 were also sparked online, and Dedi says the government may be worried that 'this follows the same digital playbook'.
Police in Banten province neighbouring capital Jakarta and West Java province, Indonesia's most populous, have threatened action if the flag is flown next to the nation's colours.
One printing business owner in Central Java said on condition of anonymity that his facility was raided by plain-clothes police on Wednesday evening to halt its production of the pirate emblem.
Rights groups have called the response excessive and say Indonesians are allowed to wave the flag by law.
'Raising the One Piece flag as a critic is a part of the freedom of speech and it is guaranteed by the constitution,' said Amnesty International Indonesia executive director Usman Hamid.
Despite the government's threats, some young Indonesians are still willing to risk walking the plank of protest.
'Last night my friend and I went around the town while raising a One Piece flag,' said Khariq on Wednesday.
'If the government has no fear of repressing its own people, we shouldn't be scared to fight bad policies.' — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
5 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
'We will chase you!' – Over 100,000 protesters in Tel Aviv warn Netanyahu over Gaza invasion
TEL AVIV: Thousands took to the streets in Tel Aviv on Saturday to call for an end to the war in Gaza, a day after the Israeli government vowed to expand the conflict and capture Gaza City. Demonstrators waved signs and held up pictures of hostages still being held in the Palestinian territory as they called on the government to secure their release. AFP journalists at the rally estimated the number of attendees to be in the tens of thousands, while a group representing the families of hostages said as many as 100,000 people participated. Authorities did not provide an official estimate for the size of the crowd, though it dwarfed other recent anti-war rallies. "We will end with a direct message to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu: if you invade parts of Gaza and the hostages are murdered, we will pursue you in the town squares, in election campaigns and at every time and place," Shahar Mor Zahiro, the relative of a slain hostage, told AFP. On Friday, Netanyahu's security cabinet greenlighted plans for a major operation to seize Gaza City, triggering a wave of domestic and international criticism. Foreign powers, including some of Israel's allies, have been pushing for a negotiated ceasefire to secure the hostages' return and help alleviate a humanitarian crisis in the Strip. Despite the backlash and rumours of dissent from Israeli military top brass, Netanyahu has remained defiant over the decision. In a post on social media late Friday, Netanyahu said "we are not going to occupy Gaza – we are going to free Gaza from Hamas." The premier has faced regular protests over the course of 22 months of war, with many rallies calling for the government to strike a deal after past truces saw hostages exchanged for Palestinian prisoners in Israeli custody. Out of 251 hostages captured during Hamas's 2023 attack, 49 are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the military says are dead. The Palestinian Authority (PA) on Saturday lambasted Israel's plan to expand its operations in Gaza. According to a statement carried by the official Palestinian news agency Wafa, PA president Mahmud Abbas said the plan "constitutes a new crime", and stressed "the urgent need to take action to stop it immediately." He also emphasised "the importance of enabling the State of Palestine to assume its full responsibilities in the Gaza Strip." In the same meeting that approved the Gaza City plan, the security cabinet adopted a set of principles for ending the war in Gaza that included establishing a new "administration that is neither Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority." The PA, conceived as a first step towards a Palestinian state, exercises limited administration over parts of the Israeli-occupied West Bank, but does not have a presence in Hamas-run Gaza. A statement issued Saturday by the foreign ministers of Italy, Australia, Germany, New Zealand and the United Kingdom again criticised the decision to occupy Gaza City. "This will exacerbate the catastrophic humanitarian situation, endanger the lives of hostages, and increase the risk of a mass exodus of civilians," they said. Russia also condemned the Israeli plan to take control of Gaza City in a statement Saturday. Implementing such plans "risks worsening the already dramatic situation in the Palestinian enclave, which shows all the signs of a humanitarian disaster", said a foreign ministry statement. Gaza's civil defence agency said at least 37 people were killed by Israeli fire across the territory on Saturday, including 30 civilians who were waiting to collect aid. Israel's offensive has killed more than 61,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's health ministry, figures the United Nations says are reliable. Hamas's 2023 attack on Israel – which triggered the war – resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.--AFP
Borneo Post
35 minutes ago
- Borneo Post
The South China Sea Code
Photo shows a chain of islands in the South China Sea. — AFP photo FIRST of all, I wish to join other Malaysians in congratulating Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, our Prime Minister, for his recent success in securing the agreement of Thailand and Cambodia to stop fighting, For a while, anyway. At the time of writing this article, the ceasefire appeared to be holding. Secondly, I think there is a job that Malaysia should also attempt, as Chairman of Asean. The success in the peace-making is no mean achievement for our country, showing the relevance of Malaysia's role in international diplomacy. All this success at diplomacy should embolden our diplomats to think about embarking on another task – tuning the text of the South China Sea Code of Conduct (COC). Asean leaders have been talking about this Code for the past 20 years or so, but have not been able to produce it for reasons only the diplomatic fraternity would talk about, out of hearing of the journalists. The COC is a mechanism for managing internal disputes among the littoral countries of Asean, namely the Philippines, Brunei, Malaysia, Vietnam and China. China's active participation in the discussion on the Code is crucial because all decisions reached at meetings will be binding on the countries concerned. Good relations and rapport between China and the Asean member countries are urgent because these Asean member countries lie inside the loop of the so-called 'Nine-Dash Line'; they must be set free as soon as possible. Asian and China's statesmen in the past wanted this region of the world to be classified as a Zone of Peace and Neutrality (ZOPAN). Why cannot it remain such for all times? The current leaders of the countries and China must show statesmanship if they want history to be kind to their leadership when they disappear from the scene. By 2018, the soft copy of the Code was put on the backburner until Singapore assumed the Asean Chair. According to a report by Reuters, quoted by The Borneo Post on Feb 8, 2018, the move to 'expedite negotiations on a code of conduct on China for the disputed South China Sea' had hit a snag. But this was eventually solved after China and Asean had decided on a negotiating framework. In fact, the parties had begun preliminary discussions on the Code itself. Unfortunately, the substantive discussions petered out. I don't know why. Meanwhile, China's activities in terms of building more and more islands/land reclamations in parts of the Sea, threats about an imminent invasion of Taiwan by China, and about the use of water cannons on Filipino fishers by Chinese patrol boats, made the littoral states nervous. To compound the anxiety, there has been intense competition for hegemony between China and the USA, the 'Big Boys'. More worries for the peoples of the Asean block. Hence the urgency for a rule to govern relations. We were relieved for a short time only when in 2016 the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague ruled that 'China's Nine-Dash Line had no legal basis', referring to a judgment in a case brought by the Philippines against China. But China simply rejected the ruling. Malaysia, if given the chance to handle the fine-tuning of the Code, has to be careful about making too much noise (fishing in troubled waters). We must avoid getting into trouble with China, or be seen as siding with other major powers. But the job is of such importance that the Chairman of Asean is expected to handle it, however difficult the task will be. The idea of the COC was seriously discussed in August of 2018. It should be a mechanism by which disputes would be managed, peace and stability be promoted among all the littoral states around the South China Sea. Reuters reported that 'China and the 10- member Asean block adopted a negotiating framework on the code and had commenced talks on the code itself'. That was seven years ago. It is a difficult issue to solve indeed but Malaysia, given another chance at diplomacy, has nothing to lose by trying! Try it we must for a reason – a good reason. The federal government of Malaysia might lose some credibility on the home front should Malaysia's national interests in Sarawak, now at stake, be relegated to the backburner – or worse, ignored. Don't forget that Sarawak and Sabah, with long shorelines facing the South China Sea, are well within the sights of any power that might want to enforce a Nine-Dash-Line! When Malaysia was about to assume the chairmanship of Asean, many people in Sarawak were wondering if the federal government had forgotten about the state's interests. These interests were subject to dispute by China, referring to the famous Nine-Dash-Line again. The preservation and protection of this nation's rights and interests over the territorial waters off Sarawak are fundamental to the future of the Federation itself. That's not just headline fodder, obviously Sarawak can't be expected to defend its own territory against possible attacks from the sea! It is essential that all the Asean countries, where the territorial waters are inside that Nine-Dash-Line, to come together and, in one voice, talk to China about mutual respect for each other's right to own property within one's boundary. * The opinions expressed in this article are the columnist's own and do not reflect the view of the newspaper. asean China nine-dash line south china sea
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
The risk of nuclear war waned after the Cold War. It's back with a vengeance
WHEN the first nuclear bomb test took place 80 years ago, the scientists who gathered to observe the explosion in the New Mexico desert recognised they were playing with fire. Physicist Enrico Fermi tried to break the tension by taking bets on whether the bomb would ignite the atmosphere and destroy the world. J. Robert Oppenheimer wagered US$10 the bomb wouldn't work at all, and Edward Teller conspicuously applied sunscreen in the predawn darkness, offering to pass it around. The bomb exploded in a fireball hotter than the surface of the sun, producing far more destructive power than the scientists anticipated. Within weeks, the United States nuked the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, hastening the end of World War II while killing more than 200,000 civilians. The bomb hasn't been used since, apart from test blasts, and after the Cold War ended in 1991, the risk of nuclear war mercifully declined. Now the risk is back on the rise, as an alarming new nuclear age dawns. Today, we are in a 'uniquely dangerous moment'. The nuclear landscape is changing for the worse. For starters, the main players are no longer two global superpowers. During the Cold War, the US and the Soviet Union largely controlled the potential for conflict, which made the risks relatively straightforward to analyse. These days, the politics of nuclear arms have become more complicated and unpredictable. Nine nations are said to possess the weapons today, including the rogue state of North Korea, and others could build them quickly. Most people have forgotten that South Africa once developed a bomb but gave up its programme voluntarily. Iraq and Libya also had active nuclear-weapon programmes that were stopped under intense international pressure. At the moment, the focus is on Iran's nuclear programme, which the US bombed on June 22, alongside Israel. The US launched its attack even though Iran continued to pursue diplomacy about its nuclear ambitions. Iran may conclude that it needs a nuclear capability for self-defence, to deter future attacks. The same could be said for other states threatened by nuclear- armed rivals. Consider Ukraine, which voluntarily gave up the nuclear arms based on its soil after the fall of the Soviet Union. Would Russia's 2022 invasion still have occurred against a Ukraine bristling with doomsday weapons? Doubtful. Besides the chilling political calculations, the weapons used to deliver nuclear warheads have become more dangerous. Hyper-sonic glide missiles could elude defence systems before striking their targets with practically no warning, while smaller, low-yield nukes threaten to blur the lines between conventional and nuclear warfare, making all-out war more likely. Defence spending is soaring across the globe, and with it, faster and deadlier weapons are likely to be deployed. At the same time, treaties restricting nuclear arms are in decline. The most impactful of them – the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons – was undermined in 2003 when North Korea withdrew from it and built an atomic arsenal. It's time for the targets of these terrible weapons – us, that is – to rise up and say, 'No!' The 1980s witnessed mass demonstrations demanding a nuclear freeze. Today, the threat of nuclear war is beginning to enter the public consciousness again. The movie Oppenheimer about the Trinity bomb test 80 years ago was a boxoffice hit. The 2024 book by journalist Annie Jacobsen, Nuclear War: A Scenario, became a bestseller. Star movie director James Cameron has committed to making Ghosts of Hiroshima , a Japan-set movie said to be a nightmarish look at the A-bomb blasts. During the Cold War, pop culture helped convince everyday people to stand against the march towards Armageddon, and here's hoping it can do so again. For 80 years, the world has lived with the threat of nuclear destruction. Let's act now to curb it, before it's too late. — Chicago Tribune/Tribune News Service
