When you can retire as state pension age rises in 2026
Increasing from 66 to 67, an individual's exact date of birth will affect when they can start claiming, with some having to delay their retirement by a month compared to someone born just a day earlier.
The planned changes have been set since 2014, and will affect men and women equally. While people can choose to retire earlier than this date, and may choose to do so if they have a private pension, the state pension age is the earliest anyone can begin claiming the government-supplied pension.
This also won't be the last state pension age increase most UK workers see in their lifetimes. Current legislation will see the age rise from 67 to 68 between 2044 and 2046.
However, there is speculation that this could be brought forward following Labour's upcoming pension review. Announced by work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall in July, the statutory review must give ten years' notice of any changes to the state pension age.
With at least 18 years to go until the next one, this gives the government scope to bring forward the point when state pension age hits 68.
Understanding how the state pension age changes is vital for workers to plan for their retirements. Since 2015, campaigners for the Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) group have called for successive governments to provide compensation due to the inadequate communication of state pension changes for women born between 1950 and 1960.
In 2026, all workers born after April 1960 that will start to see their state pension age rise. Here's what that could mean for you:
The exact date of birth is important, with 5 April 1960 the last birthday to keep the 66 years retirement age.
For those born on or after 6 April 1960, this will rise to 66 years and one month, and will continue to rise by an extra month on the 6th of every month.
This will continue until 6 March 1961, with those born on or after that day having a retirement age of 67.
Under current plans, this will apply for those born before 5 April 1977 – the last date of birth with a retirement age of 67. After this, it will increase monthly in a similar process to what is planned next year. However, this is liable to change at any upcoming pension review.
When workers can retire in 2026 based on when they were born:
5 April 1960 and before – 66 years. Retirement date: 5 April 2026
6 April 1960 – 66 years, one month. Retirement date: 6 May 2026
6 May 1960 – 66 years, two months. Retirement date: 6 July 2026
6 June 1960 – 66 years, three months. Retirement date: 6 August 2026
6 July 1960 – 66 years, four months. Retirement date: 6 November 2026
6 August 1960 – 66 years, five months. Retirement date: 6 January 2027
6 September 1960 – 66 years, six months. Retirement date: 6 March 2027
6 October 1960 – 66 years, seven months. Retirement date: 6 May 2027
6 November 1960 – 66 years, eight months. Retirement date: 6 July 2027
6 December 1960 – 66 years, nine months. Retirement date: 6 August 2027
6 January 1961 – 66 years, ten months. Retirement date: 6 November 2027
6 February 1961 – 66 years, 11 months. Retirement date: 6 January 2028
6 March 1961 – 67 years. Retirement date: 6 March 2028
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Could a wealth tax work in the UK? A visual guide
A rise in taxation at the autumn budget looks inevitable, as Rachel Reeves grapples with £40bn hole in the public finances. That figure comes from a recent report by the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR), which blames the deficit on higher-than-expected borrowing levels and a weaker growth outlook for the UK economy. The question now facing the chancellor is: who should pay more? A growing chorus of voices across the Labour party say a wealth tax is the answer. Politicians from across the divide have the habit of talking about wealth taxes in vague terms, often perpetuating misconceptions. Here's a visual breakdown of the key elements of a wealth tax system. The analysis uses figures from the most in-depth study of a potential UK wealth tax so far, produced in 2020 by the Wealth Tax Commission, a panel of leading economists assembled by tax experts Arun Advani, Emma Chamberlain and Andy Summers. Summers, director of CenTax and co-author of the 2020 study, said: 'Given the limited information HMRC currently hold on wealth, a wealth tax would be difficult to deliver any time soon. A better way to raise money from wealth would be to reform Capital Gains Tax (CGT). This is not just about raising rates. The Government should introduce an investment allowance and close gaps that currently allow some business gains to go completely untaxed. Doing this would be good for investment and growth, and raise over £13bn annually by the end of the Parliament.' The Institute of Fiscal Studies has similarly argued that an annual wealth tax would be a 'poor substitute for properly taxing the sources and uses of wealth'. Treasury officials are understood to favour the latter. Critics say a wealth tax would be too difficult and costly to implement, and that wealthy individuals would be able to move their holdings or to simply leave the country. They point to countries such as Austria, Denmark and Germany's decision to scrap similar taxes in the past. However, other countries including Spain and Switzerland have been successfully using wealth taxes to raise significant sums for generations. In their letter to the government the economists in favour of a wealth tax argue that the UK can overcome these difficulties – by leveraging digital technology and studying previous attempts to tax wealth – and pioneer a progressive tax system 'fit for the 21st century'. Tax revenue figures for income tax freeze, national insurance rise and pension contribution relief are taken from NIESR. The figures for capital gains equalisation are taken from the Centre for the Analysis of Taxation. Wealth distribution by asset class data is taken from the ONS Survey of Personal Incomes 2022-2023. UK Wealth inequality data and figures on UK total wealth ownership are from 2023 and are provided by the Wealth Inequality Lab. Wealth tax model and figures are from the Wealth Tax Commission (WTC) report and their 2020 tax simulator (the WTC study input figures are from 2018). The Guardian uprated the WTC figures by a nominal GDP increase of 39.13% between 2018 and 2025. 2018 GDP figures are from the ONS, while 2025 GDP figures are from the OBR. Figure adjustments by nominal GDP are rough estimates, conducted by the Guardian in consultation with the original researchers.
The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Shabana Mahmood: justice secretary and rising star of the Labour party
Shabana Mahmood knows what it is like to live in an area where crime feels out of control. While she was growing up in Small Heath in inner-city Birmingham in the 1980s and 90s, her father kept a cricket bat behind the till of the family shop to fend off would-be robbers. Three decades later, Mahmood is Labour's justice secretary and lord chancellor, tasked with cutting crime at a time when public concern about it is rising. Though violent crime has fallen steadily over decades, recent increases in highly visible offences including shoplifting and snatch theft have contributed to a feeling of lawlessness and insecurity. Fanning the flames are politicians including Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, and Robert Jenrick, Mahmood's Conservative counterpart, who have sought to draw a link between crime – particularly sexual assault – and immigration. For Mahmood, being the daughter of immigrants is central to her worldview about justice. 'She feels very strongly that being British is a responsibility as well as a right,' a source close to her said. 'She really does feel like it's an affront when people who come here are afforded the welcome that she and her family were, but break the laws of the land.' Another politician shaped by his upbringing as the child of immigrant parents was Rishi Sunak, who felt strongly that it was an injustice for people to arrive illegally in Britain on small boats. Though their backgrounds and politics are very different, Mahmood and Sunak crossed paths at Oxford in the late 90s, with a teenage Sunak pledging his support for Mahmood when she stood for president of the Lincoln college student union. Last week, she received the surprise endorsement of another high-profile Tory: Michael Gove. Asked by the Politics Inside Out podcast to choose this government's standout figure, he replied without hesitation: Shabana Mahmood. Mahmood is a politician with 'a totally coherent worldview' who 'embodies in some respects the Labour coalition', he said. Mahmood has a growing number of admirers inside the Labour party, too. Having been a central figure in the Keir Starmer project from its early days, she is highly rated by No 10 and is thought of as one of its most effective ministers. A cabinet colleague said she 'never wastes a word' in meetings, and recently warned that the government was still caught up in an opposition mindset and preoccupied with taking on the left instead of speaking to the concerns of the country more widely. She has also been a leading advocate for the UK to take a more pro-Palestinian stance, including on statehood. Those who have worked with Mahmood praise her political nous. This year, she emerged unscathed from a clash with Jenrick over new sentencing guidelines that would have made an offender's ethnicity or faith a greater factor when deciding whether to jail them. She forced the Sentencing Council to back down and has ordered a review of its role. Early on, she also clashed with Richard Hermer, the attorney general, amid claims he was obstructing aspects of the government's agenda. Colleagues say the pair get on well personally but come from different traditions. 'Shabana believes, above all else, in parliamentary sovereignty and the value of our common law system. That makes her more of a reformer on things like the ECHR, [European convention on human rights]' a source close to her said. A former Conservative minister said: 'She has much better political antennae than Lord Hermer – she recognises that the law ultimately has to command public confidence.' One source who has worked with her in a previous role said: 'Her instincts are so well honed, it's quite something. It's a product of a number of things, she comes from a very political family and a very febrile political environment in Birmingham.' Her father was chair of the Birmingham Labour party and would host meetings for organisers – including Tom Watson, the future deputy Labour leader – in his living room over tea and samosas. Unusually among politicians, she has spoken about the importance of her faith. 'It is the absolute core of my life,' she told Gove in an interview with the Spectator. 'It's where I draw my sense of duty and public service from. My understanding of Islam, how I've practised Islam my whole life has been about viewing life as a gift from God but it's also a test from God.' 'She is a very defined politician with a real instinct for the times,' said Charlie Falconer, who served as justice secretary under Tony Blair. 'She is somebody who does understand politics in a profound way, and having been the campaign coordinator for Labour for quite some time she knows what has to be done in order to win elections.' Mahmood was elected to parliament in 2010 and within six months was promoted to a shadow frontbench role. In Starmer's shadow cabinet, she spent more than two years as national campaign coordinator, a role in which she became indispensable to the strategy chief, Morgan McSweeney. She is credited for helping secure the narrow but fateful win in the 2021 Batley and Spen byelection, without which Starmer would probably have faced a leadership challenge that summer. In the justice department, she has arguably inherited the most difficult situation of any minister. In her first week, she announced the early release of thousands of criminals in response to the overcrowding crisis in English and Welsh prisons. 'She knows she has got two things she has got to do in the justice department: get it out of this constant cycle of crisis and also use it to actually cut crime,' said the source close to her. She has set out plans for reforming the criminal justice system, which have ranged from chemical castration for serious sex offenders to allowing criminals to spend less time in prison and instead be rehabilitated in the community. She has taken inspiration from Texas, where there is a blend of hardline and progressive measures. 'She's not bowed down by an ideological approach to these things. She can blend some populism in with what are very strong values,' said the person who worked with her in the past. Mahmood's experience of government so far has convinced her of the need to rewire the state and empower elected politicians over officials and quangos. 'Shabana is starting to be seen particularly as a leader of 'if we need to break things, we should break things' … She has come to really believe in the depths of state failure,' one MP close to her said. In a speech in Strasbourg this summer, she announced that the UK would seek reform of the European convention on human rights amid concerns about it being cited to block the deportation of dangerous offenders. The justice secretary has a busy autumn in store, starting with plans to introduce a bill in September to deliver her sentencing reforms including shorter prison sentences for some offenders. Before the end of the year, she intends to set out the other half of her reform agenda to tackle the groaning backlog in crown courts, after a review by Brian Leveson recommended that some offences be tried without a jury. However she performs in government, by the time of the next election Mahmood may face her biggest challenge at home. Her majority in Birmingham Ladywood dropped from nearly 30,000 in 2019 to 3,400 last year after a challenge from a pro-Gaza independent candidate. Zarah Sultana, the independent MP who is starting a party with Jeremy Corbyn, is said to have designs on the seat. Allies of Mahmood say that her challengers face an uphill struggle. 'She is much more deeply embedded in her community than others who lost or came close to losing were,' the source close to her said. In parliament in recent months, Mahmood has hosted dinners with small groups of Labour MPs interested in the reforms she is planning. Some on the backbenches have begun to see her as a future leader. 'If she ever put the hat in the ring, it would be because she wanted the debate to be rigorous and bold and she wanted to be the person who forced that kind of honesty,' the MP close to her said. 'But it tends to be the case that the people who propagate that kind of message don't win.'
Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Graham Linehan: JK Rowling never defended me against trans mob
Graham Linehan, the Father Ted creator, has accused JK Rowling of failing to defend him after a trans backlash derailed his career. The Irish comedy writer, 57, claimed the Harry Potter author's 'silence' over his cancellation made him feel isolated and 'toxic'. Linehan said he initially welcomed Ms Rowling's attacks on the SNP government's self-ID reforms, before accusing her of failing to defend his right to free speech over the trans controversy. In an interview for the Spiked podcast, he claimed Rowling had 'never mentioned me, never said anything in my defence'. He added: 'When she got [involved], I thought, Oh my God, it's over. I can finally relax, I can finally fight back because someone's on my side, you know? 'And now her silence about me is just added to the feeling that, that I've done something wrong, that I'm toxic and I know I am toxic, but it's not because I've done anything wrong. 'It's because of things like that. It's because people, people like JK Rowling won't stand up in defence of me. So it wasn't just the [trans rights activist] side pushing me out. It was a feeling of lack of solidarity and the kind of an embarrassment at my presence in the fight.' Rowling led criticism of SNP attempts to make it easier for biological men to legally change their gender that were dropped following a backlash. She has been in a long-running row over gender with Nicola Sturgeon, the former first minister, who supported plans to increase rights of transgender people. In her new memoir, Ms Sturgeon said she had endured a surge of 'vile' abuse after Ms Rowling posted a selfie in a T-shirt with the slogan: 'Nicola Sturgeon, destroyer of women's rights'. Ms Sturgeon claimed it had made her feel 'more at risk of possible physical harm'. Ms Rowling accused Ms Sturgeon of a shameless denial of reality over transgender issues. In 2023, a comedy show featuring Linehan in Edinburgh was cancelled because of complaints. Leith Arches said it had pulled the gig because it did not support the comedian, and his views did 'not align with our overall values'. Next month, Linehan is due to appear in court after pleading not guilty to harassment and criminal damage against a transgender woman. The writer, who also created The IT Crowd and Black Books, appeared at Westminster magistrates' court in London in May and denied two charges including one of harassing Sophia Brooks, 18, a transgender activist, on social media in October. He is also accused of damaging her phone during the Battle of Ideas conference in London in the same month, at which he was a speaker. The case will go to trial in September. Abuse and threats Linehan said outside court afterwards that he had for six years defended 'the rights of women and children' and had faced abuse and threats. He told Spiked: 'I actually have to come back at the start of next month to go on trial in an absurd case that you'll see just how stupid it is when it happens.' Linehan also commented on the case of Sandie Peggie, a nurse who claims she was subject to unlawful harassment under the Equality Act when she was expected to share a changing room with Dr Beth Upton, a biological man, when she worked at NHS Fife. The case has been adjourned ahead of closing submissions to be heard in September. Linehan said attempts to smear Ms Peggie as a bigot were 'contemptible', adding: 'I think it might be a case that piques some people because it is so shocking that a nurse doing a tough shift on Christmas Eve can't even go to a changing room in peace without a man being there. 'I'm so glad that she has taken the fight on because there's a lot of attention on her and, and on this particular story.'
