What Next in Impeachment Process For Judge Caught In Cash-At-Home Row
The process of impeachment of Justice Yashwant Varma - the former Delhi High Court judge at whose home "piles of burnt Rs 500 notes" were found - having started in parliament with a memorandum signed by 145 MPs, Speaker Om Birla is expected to carry the ball further tomorrow, by forming an inquiry committee.
The committee is expected to include a serving judge of the Supreme Court, the Chief Justice of a High Court and a reputed jurist. The report of the committee - which is expected to investigate the allegations against Justice Varma - is likely to come during the winter session of parliament.
After this, the process of investigation and hearing will start. The committee is expected to lay down the allegations and a copy of it will be given to the judge, who will also be given a chance to respond in writing.
After this, there could be an interrogation or cross-examination of witnesses in the matter, following which the committee will present its conclusions in parliament. The committee's report will be discussed in both houses and Justice Verma will be given a chance to present his side.
This would be followed by the actual process of voting for impeachment in both houses of parliament.
To carry out the impeachment, either a simple majority of the total number of members or a two-thirds majority of those present and voting will be required.
A go ahead from both houses is needed after which the President issues an order to remove the judge.
The complicated process of impeachment is part of the reason why no judge has been impeached in Independent India. On most of the five cases that came close, the judges had resigned before the proceedings had reached the final phase.
Justice Yashwant Varma had come under scrutiny after a fire broke out at his official residence on March 14 and wads of half-burnt cash were found. It had caused a furore, and though Justice Varma denied any wrongdoing, questions were raised about the judiciary.
In view of the row, then Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna had initiated an in-house inquiry. A three-judge panel was appointed to conduct an investigation.
After the committee confirmed the presence of cash at Justice Varma's residence and submitted its report to the CJI, Justice Khanna sent the findings to the Prime Minister and the President, recommending initiation of removal proceedings as per the Judges Inquiry Act and Article 124(4) of the Constitution.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
26 minutes ago
- The Print
Flow like water, don't explode like a bomb: BJP's dig at Rahul Gandhi on his ‘atom bomb' remarks
'If they explode a bomb, we will save the Constitution,' it said. The ruling party also slammed Gandhi for using 'undemocratic and undignified' language to target the poll panel. New Delhi, Aug 1 (PTI) Responding to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's claim that his party has an 'atom bomb' of evidence against the Election Commission on poll irregularities, the BJP on Friday asked him to 'flow like water' instead of 'exploding like a bomb'. The response comes after the Congress leader claimed that his party has 'open and shut' evidence of alleged poll irregularities by the Election Commission. Likening the proof to an atom bomb, Gandhi said that the poll panel will have no place to hide when it explodes. Replying to a query from reporters on the Congress leader's remarks, BJP leader Sambit Patra said, 'Will Rahul Gandhi explode like a bomb? What do you think? Their job is to explode. They have no other work to do.' He said the Opposition party speaks of such things because they have no faith in democracy. 'Think what kind of language this is: I (Gandhi) will explode on the Election Commission!' Patra told reporters at the BJP headquarters. 'You say 'I will go to Supreme Court against the Election Commission' or 'I will protest against it in a democratic manner', but 'exploding like a bomb'? The language (of Gandhi) itself is undemocratic and undignified,' Patra said. The BJP leader said the language Gandhi used shows that 'these people want to explode like bombs'. 'We have faith in democracy. If they detonate an atom bomb, we will save the Constitution,' Patra added. The BJP leader alleged that Gandhi, who is also the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, has been speaking in a 'threatening tone since the beginning' and has not 'spared anybody'. 'With one hand in pocket, he always speaks in a threatening tone. Just like in Hindi movies, where the villain always keeps one hand in pocket and says things like 'I will explode, I will hit you', he also keeps doing the same,' the BJP leader charged. 'This is not right. This doesn't suit a leader in a democracy, especially when you are the Leader of Opposition,' he said, adding, 'It does not suit Rahul Gandhi to explode like a bomb. You should flow like cool water. Don't explode like a bomb.' PTI PK PK RUK RUK This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Hans India
26 minutes ago
- Hans India
SC clears way for landfill in Mumbai's Kanjurmarg, stays Bombay HC order
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday stayed a Bombay High Court decision, which had restored nearly 120 hectares of land in Mumbai's Kanjurmarg area as a "protected forest". The interim relief, granted by a bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai and Justice K. Vinod Chandran, comes as a temporary reprieve to the Brihannumbai Municipal Corporation, allowing the civic body to continue developing the site as a landfill for garbage disposal. Appearing before the apex court, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued that the land in question had historically been used as a landfill and was mistakenly notified as a "protected forest". He added that the notification of the disputed land as a 'protected forest' was inadvertent, prompting the Maharashtra government to issue a de-notification to allow its continued use for waste management. After hearing the submissions, the apex court remarked: "We will stay the order." In its judgement passed on May 2, the Bombay High Court quashed the state government's notification de-notifying 119.91 hectares of protected forest land at Kanjurmarg, which had originally been classified as "protected forest" under a 2008 notification. A Bench of Justices G.S. Kulkarni and Somasekhar Sundaresan had rejected the state government's contention that the original notification was issued in error and a 2003 Supreme Court order permitted the usage of the site as a landfill. The Justice Kulkarni-led Bench observed that the original classification notifying the land in question as a 'protected forest' was based on satellite imaging, ground-truthing, and earlier judicial orders related to mangrove protection. Quashing the subsequent notification, it ruled that the de-notification violated Section 2(1) of the Forest Conservation Act (FCA), which mandates prior approval from the Union government before diverting forest land for non-forest use. "The subject land, i.e. 119.91 hectares, is consequently restored to the status of being a protected forest. Any proposal to de-notify the same would need to be compliant with the due process stipulated in Section 2(1) of the FCA," the Bombay High Court had said, granting the civic body three months to comply with its judgment.
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Telangana High Court quashes defamation case against Revanth Reddy
The Telangana High Court on Friday quashed a defamation case against Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy in connection with a speech delivered by him during the Lok Sabha election campaign in 2024 after a BJP leader accused him of making false and baseless allegations against the saffron party. The BJP leader had stated that the statement was misleading and false, and that it had defamed the party and its workers.(AICC via PTI) The High Court allowed the petition filed by Revanth Reddy seeking to quash proceedings against him in the case pending trial before a Special Judicial First Class Magistrate (JFCM) for Excise cases (designated MP-MLA court) here. Telangana BJP General Secretary Kasam Venkateshwarlu had earlier filed a complaint in the special court accusing Revanth Reddy of making statements during an LS election meeting in Bhadradri Kothagudem district on May 4, 2024 that the BJP, if voted to power, would change the Constitution and abolish reservations. The BJP leader had stated that the statement was misleading and false, and that it had defamed the party and its workers. The Special JFCM for Excise cases in August 2024 has issued summons to Revanth Reddy asking him to appear personally before it. The Chief Minister subsequently approached the High Court challenging the complaint and to stay the proceedings initiated against him. The High Court had earlier granted him exemption from personal appearance before the trial court.
