Elon Musk says Tesla has started making the product investors have been begging for
The EV giant's CEO, Elon Musk, said on Wednesday that Tesla's long-awaited affordable model will resemble the Model Y.
Musk was speaking to investors in Tesla's latest earnings call when an analyst asked for more details about the budget-friendly EV Musk has long been touting.
"It's just a Model Y. Let the cat out of the bag there. Dancing cat that can talk and sing and dance," Musk said. "That's the cool part."
Musk did not give further details on the model or its release date. The company said in January that it would start producing "new vehicles, including more affordable models" in the first half of this year.
Representatives for Tesla did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.
Musk said during the earnings call that the "biggest obstacle" to getting more people to own EVs is that they "don't have enough money in their bank account to buy it."
"Literally, that is the issue. Not a lack of desire, but a lack of ability. So, the more affordable we can make the car, the better," Musk added.
Musk told the analyst that the car's self-driving features would make it even more affordable for customers.
"It will be a very big deal when people can release their car to the fleet and have it earn money for them," Musk continued.
Musk said he felt confident that Tesla's customers would be able to rent out their vehicles "next year, in the US at least."
Back in January, Musk said at Tesla's fourth quarter earnings call that he expects his vehicles to operate with unsupervised full-self-driving in several US cities by the end of this year, and "probably everywhere" in North America next year.
"That will make affordability dramatically greater. If you have an Airbnb and you can rent out your home when you are not there, or rent out a guest room, or guest house, or something like that. The affordability of your house is much greater," he said on Wednesday.
Tesla first launched the Model Y in 2020. In January, an updated version was released in China, the US, Canada, the UK, and mainland Europe. The Model Y was the world's best-selling car in 2023, though it has since ceded ground to its Chinese rivals.
Tesla analysts said earlier this year that releasing a cheaper EV could help the company shore up its position against the low-cost EVs that its Chinese rivals are selling.
Musk's company has struggled with sales in China. During the second quarter of 2025, the company sold 129,000 vehicles in China, down nearly 12% from the same period in 2024, according to data from the China Passenger Car Association.
In June, Chinese tech giant Xiaomi said it received over 200,000 orders in 3 minutes for its new YU7 electric SUV. Priced at about $35,000, Xiaomi's YU7 is slightly cheaper than Tesla's Model Y, which starts at $36,760.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
France new car registrations down 7.66% in July, Tesla sales drop 26.57%
(Reuters) -New car registrations in France slid 7.66% in July from a year earlier to 116,377 vehicles, data from French car body PFA showed on Friday. Tesla sales in the country fell 26.57% to 1,307 vehicles last month. Since the start of the year, Tesla's sales have slumped by 38.52%, while the overall French market has shrunk by 7.91% over the same period. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
New York Post
2 minutes ago
- New York Post
SOS — Save Our Shipping: Trump must break China's chokehold on global trade
A high-stakes deal that would give an American company a major role in running dozens of strategically crucial global ports is now in limbo — as China aggressively demands a stake. The United States cannot let that happen. US asset manager BlackRock and its partners are vying for 43 of the world's most important shipping ports, including the two that straddle the Panama Canal. The seller is C.K. Hutchison, a major Hong Kong operator that is one of China's 'big three' port giants — and the only one not owned outright by the Chinese government. Prying these ports from China's oversight is a critical move for both US national security and the global economy. Now the Chinese Communist Party is trying to block the deal, unless its state-owned COSCO joins the buyers' group and gains veto rights over port operations. Alarmingly, all three main parties are reportedly open to letting that happen, apparently thinking that a compromised deal is better than no deal at all. But with all that's at stake, President Donald Trump should use every tool available — starting with the ongoing US-China trade talks — to push the original deal through and keep COSCO out. The 43 ports that Hutchison seeks to sell would launch a global liberation from oppressive Chinese surveillance and control. If the plan falls through — or if it's altered to add COSCO to the ownership group — China could tighten its grip on the global shipping system, by replacing a Beijing-influenced company with a Beijing-controlled one. While the media has dubbed this the 'Panama Canal deal,' it's actually much bigger. The canal, a vital artery that runs through the center of the western hemisphere, is certainly critical — but many of the other ports involved in the deal are equally so. For example, this deal would include a port inside the Malacca Strait, the only direct maritime pathway between the Indian and Pacific Oceans. It sees 90,000 ships and $3.5 trillion worth of global trade every year. Hutchison is also looking to sell five ports that it owns on both sides of the Suez Canal, the preferred maritime commercial route between the Asian and European markets. About 12% of global trade, $1 trillion a year, passes through Suez. As China's purchases of sanctioned Iranian oil draw greater US scrutiny, Hutchison's four ports on the southern side of the Strait of Hormuz are also critical. Nearly all Iranian oil must pass through the strait, along with oil and gas from Saudi Arabia, UAE, Iraq, Kuwait and Qatar. In Europe, Hutchison controls 13 ports that act as a key entry point for Chinese goods into the European Union. The original deal would reduce China's port foothold on the continent — and the geopolitical influence that comes with it. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Like all major commercial deals, this one is complicated. Apart from the two Panama Canal ports, BlackRock would retain 20% ownership of the remaining facilities; its partner, Europe-based Mediterranean Shipping Corp., would control 70%, with Singapore's Sovereign Wealth Fund owning the rest. Meanwhile, China's power in global shipping is massive. China produces 95% of world shipping containers and all of the refrigerated ones. Ports around the world are plugged into China's logistical software platform, LOGINK, which tracks sensitive trade, market, maritime and passenger data. Huawei's 'Smart Port' 5G telecommunication towers provide Wi-Fi — and ready surveillance capacity — at ports worldwide. A Chinese state-owned company makes more than 70% of the world's ship-to-shore cranes (and 80% of the cranes used in America) — a major risk, according to the House Homeland Security Committee, which has alleged those cranes may be engaging in covert surveillance on behalf of the CCP. Adding state-owned COSCO to ports deal would give the CCP the power to veto any attempts to replace Huawei towers, LOGINK systems, Chinese cranes or other tools that may already be spying on behalf of the state. With BlackRock's minority interest in the vast bulk of these ports, replacing a private Chinese company with a state-owned one is even worse for the United States than the status quo. Breaking China's maritime monopoly is urgent. At the same time, America's economic leverage has never been higher. As Beijing trumps up patently absurd anti-monopoly investigations to stall or scuttle the BlackRock-MSC deal, the United States should Trump right back. He must make the choice clear: Access to American markets cannot continue unless Beijing releases its maritime monopoly. Elaine Dezenski heads the Center on Economic and Financial Power at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, where Susan Soh is a research associate.
Axios
2 minutes ago
- Axios
Musk's erratic June included a $10 million peace offering
Elon Musk contributed $10 million to congressional Republicans just days after his public blowup with President Trump, an indication the tech billionaire was looking to make peace with the White House. But Musk reversed course less than two weeks later, when he called for the creation of a third party. Why it matters: Musk's donations, and his ensuing about-face, underscores his erratic relationship with the president since leaving the administration in late May. The contributions were made public on Thursday in campaign finance disclosures from the pro-GOP Senate Leadership Fund and Congressional Leadership Fund super PACs. Here's how the Trump-Musk timeline breaks down. May 27: Musk noted he was "disappointed" with Trump's "big, beautiful bill," saying it would increase the budget deficit and undermine DOGE. May 28: Musk officially left his role as head of DOGE, saying on Twitter that he would "like to thank President @realDonaldTrump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending," June 5: Musk attacked Trum p over the "big, beautiful bill," called for his impeachment, and asserted without evidence that the president is included in the Jeffrey Epstein files. June 6: Musk had a phone call with Vice President Vance and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles with an eye toward making amends. June 7: Musk deleted his posts from June 5 savaging Trump. June 9: Musk spoke by phone with Trump. June 11: Musk posted that he "went too far" in his posts attacking Trump. June 27: Musk gave contributions of $5 million each to the Senate Leadership Fund and Congressional Leadership Fund. June 30: Musk threatened to form a third party called the America Party if Congress passed the "big, beautiful bill." July 5: Musk said he formed the America Party "to give you back your freedom." Zoom out: Musk also contributed more than $45 million to America PAC over the first six months of 2025, new disclosure reports showed.
