logo
Retail sales rise a solid 0.5% in July from June as shoppers appear to shrug off tariff pressures

Retail sales rise a solid 0.5% in July from June as shoppers appear to shrug off tariff pressures

NEW YORK (AP) — Shoppers spent at a healthy pace in July, particularly at the nation's auto dealerships, as they shrug off President Donald Trump's tariffs, which are starting to take a toll on jobs and lead to some price increases.
Retail sales rose 0.5% last month, a slowdown from a revised 0.9% in June, which was revised upward, according to the Commerce Department's report released Friday. The pace in July matched economists' estimates.
The increases followed two consecutive months of spending declines — a 0.1% pullback in April and a 0.9% slowdown in May.
Excluding auto sales, which have been volatile since Trump imposed tariffs on many foreign-made cares, retail sales rose 0.3%.
Auto sales rose 1.6%. They appear to have returned roughly to normalized spending after a surge in March and April as Americans attempted to get ahead of Trump's 25% duty on imported cars and parts and then a slump after that, according to Samuel Tombs, chief U.S. Economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics.
The data showed solid spending across many retail sectors. Business at clothing stores was up 0.7% while online retailers saw a 0.8% increase. Business at home furnishings and furniture stores rose 1.4%.
However, at electronics stores, sales were down 0.6%. And business at restaurants, the lone services component within the Census Bureau report and a barometer of discretionary spending, fell 0.4%, however as shoppers are focusing on eating at home to save money.
Earlier this month, the Labor Department reported that U.S. hiring is slowing sharply as Trump's trade policies paralyze businesses and raise concerns about the outlook for the world's largest economy. U.S. employers added just 73,000 jobs last month, the Labor Department reported Aug 9, well short of the 115,000 expected.
Another government report, issued Tuesday, on U.S. inflation showed that inflation was unchanged in July as rising prices for some imported goods were offset by declining gas and grocery prices, leaving overall prices modestly higher than a year ago.
Consumer prices rose 2.7% in July from a year earlier, the same as the previous month and up from a post-pandemic low of 2.3% in April. Excluding the volatile food and energy categories, core prices rose 3.1%, up from 2.9% in June. Both figures are above the Federal Reserve's 2% target.
On a monthly basis, prices rose 0.2% in July, down from 0.3% the previous month, while core prices ticked up 0.3%, a bit faster than the 0.2% in June.
The new numbers suggest that slowing rent increases and cheaper gas are offsetting some impacts of Trump's sweeping tariffs.
Many businesses are also likely still absorbing much of the cost of the duties. The consumer price figures likely reflect some impact from the 10% universal tariff Trump imposed in April, as well as higher duties on countries such as China and Canada.
But that may change. U.S. wholesale inflation soared unexpectedly last month, signaling that Trump's taxes are pushing costs up and that higher prices for consumers may be on the way.
The Labor Department reported Thursday that its producer price index — which measures inflation before it hits consumers— rose 0.9% last month from June, biggest jump in more than three years. Compared with a year earlier, wholesale prices rose 3.3%. The figures were much higher than economists had expected.
The report comes as major retailers like Walmart and Target are slated to report their fiscal second-quarter earnings reports starting next week. Analysts will stud the reports to see how much retailers are absorbing the costs and how much they're passing on to shoppers. They'll also want to get insight into the state of consumer behavior heading into the critical fall and winter holiday seasons.
In May, Walmart, the nation's largest retailer, warned t hat it had increased prices on bananas imported from Costa Rica from 50 cents per pound to 54 cents, but it noted that a large sting for shoppers wouldn't start to appear until June and July. The retailer's chief financial officer, John David Rainey, told The Associated Press that he thought car seats made in China that were selling for $350 at Walmart would likely cost customers another $100.
But a growing list of companies including Procter & Gamble, e.lf. Cosmetics, Black & Decker and Ralph Lauren told investors in recent weeks that they plan to or have already raised prices.
Some, like eyewear retailer Warby Parker, are trying to be selective and are trying to focus on raising prices on just their premium products as a way to offset the higher costs from tariffs.
Warby Parker has been shifting production away from China, where it plans to bring the percentage of all cost of goods sold by year-end under 15%. But it's also having to deal with higher tariffs costs in other countries.
Warby Parker told analysts last Thursday that it plans to keep its $95 option. But it's increasing prices on select lens types. It also wants to cater more to older shoppers who need more expensive progressive lens. Warby Parker said that progressives, trifocals and bifocals make up roughly 40% of all prescription units sold industrywide. But just 23% of Warby Parker's business now is made up of progressives. Company executives said progressives are its highest priced offering and offer the highest profit margins.
'We were able to quickly roll out select strategic price increases that have benefited our growth,' Neil Blumenthal, co-chairman and co-founder and co-CEO of Warby Parker, told analysts last week.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump seeks to sue California over clean trucking effort
Trump seeks to sue California over clean trucking effort

The Hill

timea minute ago

  • The Hill

Trump seeks to sue California over clean trucking effort

The Trump administration is seeking to sue California to try to halt the state from enforcing its effort to electrify its truck fleet. The administration filed motions to join existing cases against the state over its rules seeking to reduce pollution and planet-warming emissions from trucks. The moves come after the Trump administration axed California's rules — but did so in a legally contested manner. Now, the Trump administration and truck makers are accusing the state of enforcing the now-overturned standards through its 'Clean Truck Partnership' under which truck companies agreed to follow the state's rules in exchange for some additional flexibility. The California Air Resources Board, which is in charge of the truck rules, declined to comment. At issue are California rules including the Advanced Clean Trucks rule, which would require a large percentage of trucks sold in the state to be electric by 2035. In 2023, a group of truck makers agreed to meet California's standards in exchange for some concessions from the state in what became known as the Clean Truck Partnership. Under the Clean Air Act, California is required to get federal approval for its auto regulations. The Biden administration approved the state's rule. This year, however, Congress and President Trump approved a resolution using the Congressional Review Act to overturn the approval of the California rule. The move occurred despite determinations from the Senate parliamentarian and the Government Accountability Office, a nonpartisan congressional watchdog, which said that it was not subject to the Congressional Review Act. Now, the Trump administration is arguing in court that California has sought to enforce its rules through the Clean Truck Partnership, describing the state's effort as a 'a stunning act of defiance.' Earlier this week, Daimler Truck North America, International Motors, Paccar and Volvo Group North America sued the Trump administration to try to axe the state's rules and the partnership.

SpaceX Has Likely Skirted Federal Income Taxes for Decades, Investigation Reveals
SpaceX Has Likely Skirted Federal Income Taxes for Decades, Investigation Reveals

Gizmodo

timea minute ago

  • Gizmodo

SpaceX Has Likely Skirted Federal Income Taxes for Decades, Investigation Reveals

Since its founding in 2002, Elon Musk's SpaceX has emerged as the leading force in commercial spaceflight and a key launch provider for the U.S. government. A recent investigation suggests its dominance may stem—at least in part—from two decades of federal tax avoidance. Internal company documents reviewed exclusively by The New York Times show that SpaceX can exploit net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards, a U.S. tax provision that lets companies use past losses to offset future taxable income. The documents indicate that SpaceX had accumulated nearly $5.4 billion in tax losses by the end of 2021, allowing it to avoid federal taxes on $5.4 billion of future income. The benefit is available to all companies, and in 2017, President Trump eliminated its expiration date. According to The Times, this means SpaceX can apply nearly $3 billion in past losses against future taxable income for as long as it wants. Gizmodo reached out to SpaceX for comment but did not receive a response by the time of publication. In June, Musk took to X—his own social media platform—to declare that SpaceX's revenue will exceed NASA's entire budget next year, capping off at a whopping $15.5 billion. The company's 2024 revenue was estimated at $13.1 billion, up from $8.7 billion in 2023, Payload reports. SpaceX is one of several multi-billion-dollar tech companies that have propelled Musk to the global stage and made him the richest man in the world. Their growth has been largely dependent on federal funding. In February, a Washington Post analysis found that Musk and his businesses have received at least $38 billion in government contracts, loans, subsidies, and tax credits over the last 20-some years. Another 52 ongoing contracts across seven government agencies, including NASA, the Department of Defense, and the General Services Administration, could potentially pay Musk's companies an additional $11.8 billion over the next few years, WaPo reported. Most of these contracts are between SpaceX and NASA or the DoD. The documents reviewed by The New York Times indicated that nearly 84% of SpaceX's 2020 revenue and 76% of its 2021 revenue stemmed from federal contracts. Tax experts told The Times that avoiding more than $5 billion in federal income taxes was substantial for a company that relies so heavily on government contracts. The documents suggest SpaceX has paid some income tax to foreign and state governments since 2002, but probably not to the U.S. government, according to The Times. SpaceX's alleged ability to shield billions in future profits from the IRS presents a troubling paradox: a company that owes much of its growth to federal funding may give comparatively little back to public coffers. It doesn't appear that this one-sided relationship will come to an end anytime soon, as SpaceX has become an integral part of the U.S. space economy and national defense.

Fears Over Fulbright's Future as Trump Admin Cuts Exchange Programs
Fears Over Fulbright's Future as Trump Admin Cuts Exchange Programs

Newsweek

time2 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Fears Over Fulbright's Future as Trump Admin Cuts Exchange Programs

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Trump administration is moving to cut over 20 cultural exchange programs under the Department of State, it was reported Friday, raising concerns that flagship programs like Fulbright could be next. The Alliance for International Exchange told Newsweek that it had learned that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) had decided to cut at least 22 offerings from the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) totaling around $100 million in annual funding. "While this does not impact flagship programs like Fulbright, Gilman, and IVLP at the moment, it sets a dangerous precedent," Mark Overmann, executive director of the Alliance, told Newsweek. "If OMB is allowed to act with impunity and unilaterally and cancel already appropriated ECA funding, it opens the door for them to do it again and again in the future." A State Department spokesperson told Newsweek that selected educational and cultural program grants were not being awarded in 2025, following a "careful review" of the current fiscal environment. Why It Matters The U.S. offers a variety of cultural exchange programs, where foreign nationals can come to the country on a temporary basis for a variety of work experience opportunities. Under the Trump administration, there have been moves to tighten the rules around temporary immigration, with several visa programs put at risk. What To Know President Donald Trump's OMB was said to be making the cuts to already-allocated funding for fiscal year 2025, following a delay in the process to secure the cash for late September. The following programs are reported to be affected, according to the Alliance for International Exchange: Community College Administrator Program (CCAP) Community College Initiative Program (CCI) Community Engagement Exchange (CEE, Leahy Initiative on Civil Society) Council of American Overseas Research Centers English Access Scholarship Program English Language Fellow Program Global Undergraduate Exchange Program IDEAS Program International Center for Middle Eastern-Western Dialogue (Hollings Center) Kennedy-Lugar Youth Exchange and Study (YES) and YES Abroad Program Leaders Lead On-Demand Mandela Washington Fellowship for Young African Leaders Mike Mansfield Fellowship Program National Clearinghouse for Disability and Exchange (NCDE) Professional Fellows Program Survey of International Educational Exchange Activity (IEEA) in the United States TechWomen The J. Christopher Stevens Virtual Exchange Initiative U.S. Congress-Korea National Assembly Exchange Program U.S.-South Pacific Scholarship Program (USSP) Young Southeast Asian Leaders Initiative (YSEALI) Academic Fellowship Young Southeast Asian Leaders Initiative (YSEALI) Professional Fellowship Program (PFP) Many of these programs fall under the J visa issued by the State Department. It is a temporary visa which allows immigrants to work in a variety of roles, from camp counselors to teaching positions to au pairs. The first on the list, the CCAP, was seen as widely successful in a 2024 State Department report, with officials finding that alumni were provided with "theoretical and practical knowledge that directly contributes to participants' ability to influence change within their home institutions and to change education policy as well." Several of these programs are viewed as ways for U.S. culture and practices to be shared around the world by those who return to their home countries once their visa term ends. The U.S.' cultural exchange programs stem from the Fulbright scholarship, which is seen as one of the most prestigious programs of its kind in the world, with American students traveling elsewhere and foreign nationals headed to the U.S. While Fulbright was not seen as at-risk under the planned cuts, Overmann stressed that the flagship cultural exchange scholarship started by Senator J. William Fulbright in the 1940s could be next. The Alliance also warned that thousands of American students currently abroad on ECA funding could be left stranded if programs were suddenly cut. Office lights are illuminated in the U.S. Department of State headquarters building at dusk on July 11 in Washington, D.C. Office lights are illuminated in the U.S. Department of State headquarters building at dusk on July 11 in Washington, D.C. People Are Saying Executive Director of the Alliance for International Exchange Mark Overmann, in his statement to Newsweek: "This endangers the future of Fulbright, Gilman, and all international exchange programs and the effectiveness of U.S. public diplomacy." A State Department spokesperson referred Newsweek to previous comments by Secretary of State Marco Rubio: "Every dollar we spend, every program we fund, every policy we pursue must be justified by the answer to one of three questions: Does it make America safer? Does it make America stronger? Or does it make America more prosperous?" What Happens Next? The State Department is yet to formally announce the change, with uncertainty remaining for the hundreds of participants likely caught up in the cuts.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store