Israel pounds Gaza City as Hamas leader heads to Cairo to try to revive US-backed truce
The latest round of indirect talks in Qatar ended in deadlock in late July with Israel and Palestinian group Hamas trading blame over the lack of progress on a US proposal for a 60-day truce and hostage release deal.
Israel has since said it will launch a new offensive and seize control of Gaza City, which it captured shortly after the war's outbreak in October 2023 before pulling out.
Hamas' meetings with Egyptian officials, scheduled to begin on Wednesday, will focus on ways to stop the war, deliver aid, and 'end the suffering of our people in Gaza,' Hamas official Taher al-Nono said in a statement.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's plan to expand military control over Gaza, expected to be launched in October, has increased a global outcry over the widespread devastation, displacement and hunger afflicting Gaza's 2.2 million people.
It has also stirred criticism in Israel, with the military chief of staff warning it could endanger surviving hostages and prove a death trap for Israeli soldiers. It has also raised fears of further displacement and hardship among the estimated one million Palestinians in the Gaza City region.
Foreign ministers of 24 countries including Britain, Canada, Australia, France and Japan, said on Tuesday the humanitarian crisis in Gaza had reached 'unimaginable levels' and urged Israel to allow unrestricted aid into the enclave.
Israel denies responsibility for hunger in Gaza, accusing Hamas of stealing aid. It says it has taken steps to increase deliveries, including pausing fighting for parts of the day in some areas and announcing protected routes for aid convoys.
Ceasefire
A Palestinian official with knowledge of the mediated ceasefire talks said Hamas was prepared to return to the negotiating table, and the leaders who were visiting Cairo on Tuesday would reaffirm that stance.
'Hamas believes negotiation is the only way to end the war and is open to discuss any ideas that would secure an end to the war,' the official, who asked not to be named due to the sensitivity of the matter, told Reuters.
However, the gaps between the sides appear to remain wide on key issues, including the extent of any Israeli military withdrawal and demands for Hamas to disarm.
Disarmament conditions
A Hamas official told Reuters on Tuesday the Islamist movement was ready to relinquish Gaza governance on behalf of a non-partisan committee, but it would not relinquish its arms before a Palestinian state is established.
Netanyahu, whose far-right ultranationalist coalition allies want an outright Israeli takeover of all of Gaza, has vowed the war will not end until Hamas is eradicated.
On Tuesday, Gaza's health ministry said that 89 Palestinians had been killed by Israeli fire in the past 24 hours.
Witnesses and medics said Israeli bombardments overnight killed seven people in two houses in Gaza City's Zeitoun suburb and another four in an apartment building in the city centre.
In the south of Gaza, five people, including a couple and their child, were killed by an Israeli airstrike on a house in the city of Khan Younis and four others by a strike on a tent encampment in nearby coastal Mawasi, medics said.
The Israeli military said it was looking into the reports of the latest bombardments and that its forces take precautions to mitigate civilian harm. Separately, it said its forces had killed dozens of militants in north Gaza over the past month and destroyed more tunnels used by militants in the area.
More deaths from starvation, malnutrition
Five more people, including two children, have died of starvation and malnutrition in Gaza in the past 24 hours, the territory's health ministry said. The new deaths raised the number of deaths from the same causes to 227, including 103 children, since the war started, it added.
Israel disputes the malnutrition fatality figures reported by the health ministry in the Hamas-run enclave.
The war began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli figures.
Israel's offensive against Hamas in Gaza since then has killed more than 61,000 Palestinians, according to local health officials. — Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Trump won't walk away from Alaska with a ceasefire — Phar Kim Beng
AUGUST 14 — When Donald Trump meets Vladimir Putin in Alaska this August, expectations of a signed ceasefire agreement in the Russia–Ukraine war will likely prove misplaced. The obstacles are structural, not personal, and the political theatre of the summit cannot disguise the fact that the fundamental parties are not aligned — starting with the absence of Ukraine as a formal participant in the talks. Without Kyiv's direct involvement, no arrangement to transform roughly one-quarter of Ukraine's eastern territories into a so-called 'safe buffer zone' can hold. This is not a neutral security measure; it is a geopolitical carve-out that Moscow might see as a fait accompli, but which Kyiv would treat as illegitimate. The fact that more than half a million Russian soldiers have reportedly perished and large swathes of both occupied and unoccupied territory remain mined only complicates the picture. Russia has no strategic interest in inheriting a wasteland, and Ukraine has no incentive to formalise losses under such dangerous conditions. The NATO factor Adding to the difficulty, NATO's largest European powers — notably France and Germany — are not buying into the premise of a Putin-friendly peace. Their pledge to raise defence spending to 5% of GDP by 2035 signals long-term strategic resistance to Russian expansionism. This is not 1938, and the political mood is the opposite of Munich's ill-fated appeasement. Their military build-up reflects a collective decision to fortify Europe's eastern flank, not to bargain away Ukrainian territory in the name of expediency. This means even if Trump and Putin agree on a provisional framework, European resolve will act as a brake. No NATO consensus will emerge behind an agreement that concedes strategic depth to Moscow without robust verification and enforcement measures. Then there is Beijing. T-shirts with images of Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump are displayed for sale at a gift shop in central Moscow, Russia, August 12, 2025. — Reuters pic China has already made clear it will not allow Russia to lose to the United States, and this is more than diplomatic rhetoric. The statement aligns with Beijing's broader grand strategy — a multipolar order in which a weakened Russia would tilt the global balance in Washington's favour. This strategic commitment emboldens Moscow, making it less likely to compromise in ways that would give the US or NATO a clear win. As long as China's economic and diplomatic umbrella remains open over Russia, Putin will calculate that time is on his side. This makes any substantive concession in Alaska highly improbable. The most likely outcome In reality, the best Trump can hope for is an agreement to keep talking. The East Asian Summit in Kuala Lumpur later this year could serve as the next venue for high-level dialogue. While the EAS is not designed to address European conflicts, it gathers the US, Russia, China, and ASEAN under one roof — creating a multipolar stage where ongoing discussions can be framed as progress without the pressure of immediate resolution. For Trump, this would still be a face-saving result. He could present the Alaska meeting as a breakthrough in getting adversaries to engage directly, while leaving room for further negotiations in a setting that dilutes NATO's centrality and includes Asian powers with vested interests in global stability. Why there will be no ceasefire in Alaska The absence of Ukraine, NATO's hardening stance, and China's strategic alignment with Russia form a triangular blockade to any rapid deal. These are not conditions that yield an enforceable ceasefire. At most, Alaska will produce another handshake moment and a promise to meet again — a symbolic gesture, not a settlement. The war will continue, the battle lines will remain, and the mines will still be in the ground. Trump may leave Alaska with headlines, but not with peace. * Phar Kim Beng is a professor of Asean Studies and Director of the Institute of Internationalization and Asean Studies at the International Islamic University of Malaysia. ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
New Straits Times
5 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Gaza aid crisis deepens as foreign NGOs denied entry
JERUSALEM: New Israeli legislation regulating foreign aid groups has been increasingly used to deny their requests to bring supplies into Gaza, according to a joint letter signed by more than 100 groups published Thursday. Ties between foreign-backed aid groups and the Israeli government have long been beset by tensions, with officials often complaining the organisations are biased. The rocky relations have only gotten more strained in the wake of Hamas's unprecedented attack on Israel in October 2023. "Israeli authorities have rejected requests from dozens of NGOs to bring in lifesaving goods, citing that these organisations are 'not authorised to deliver aid'," the joint statement reads. According to the letter, whose signatories include Oxfam and Doctors Without Borders (MSF), at least 60 requests to bring aid into Gaza were rejected in July alone. In March, Israel's government approved a new set of rules for foreign non-governmental organisations (NGOs) working with Palestinians. The law updates the framework for how aid groups must register to maintain their status within Israel, along with provisions that outline how their applications can be denied or registration revoked. Registration can be rejected if Israeli authorities deem that a group denies the democratic character of Israel or "promotes delegitimisation campaigns" against the country. "Unfortunately, many aid organisations serve as a cover for hostile and sometimes violent activity," Israel's Diaspora Minister Amichai Chikli told AFP. "Organisations that have no connection to hostile or violent activity and no ties to the boycott movement will be granted permission to operate," added Chikli, whose ministry directed an effort to produce the new guideline. Aid groups say, however, that the new rules are leaving Gazans without help. "Our mandate is to save lives, but due to the registration restrictions civilians are being left without the food, medicine and protection they urgently need," said Jolien Veldwijk, director of the charity CARE in the Palestinian territories. Veldwijk said that CARE has not been able to deliver any aid to Gaza since Israel imposed a full blockade on the Palestinian territory in March, despite partially easing it in May. Israel has long accused Hamas of stealing aid entering the Strip, and since May, the government has relied on the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to manage food distribution centres. According to Gaza's civil defence agency, its operations have been frequently marred by chaos as thousands of Gazans have scrambled each day to approach its hubs, where some have been shot, including by Israeli soldiers.- AFP
New Straits Times
13 hours ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: Israel's killing fields of journalists
We may be living in the 21st century, but in our midst is an uncivilised state — Israel — led by a despicable tribe of genocidal barbarians. If the genocidal intent was private before, it has now been made public from the prime minister downwards. The Zionist regime led by Benjamin Netanyahu has made a mockery of every piece of international law and the legal institutions that rule on it. Even foreign state ministers and their families are threatened by its secret service, Mossad, for taking Israel to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), like South Africa's former foreign minister and her family were. Even the ICJ was slammed for hearing the genocide case against Israel brought by South Africa. Mossad did the same to the former chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC), Fatou Bensouda, pressuring her to abandon her war crime probe. Israel's pressure on Karim Khan, who is on leave as the chief prosecutor of the ICC, has a more dastardly twist. He now stands accused of sexual misconduct. From Khan's statements to the media, it is now clear that Netanyahu was trying to stop the ICC from issuing arrest warrants for alleged war crimes against him and his former defence minister. We are not surprised. Just recently, Netanyahu recruited the help of US President Donald Trump, who promptly said in his social media post that the trial should be cancelled immediately or a pardon given to "a GREAT HERO". An alleged war criminal on a genocidal rampage, a great hero? A week later the court said it was delaying the case on "security" grounds. What an unruly world we live in. Perhaps all this has to do with Israel's dark history. After all, Israel was an outcome of a lie by the European Jews and the West: the European Jews were people without a land and Palestine, a land without people. Historical facts have proven it to be a fabricated lie for a colonial project. That foundational lie has turned the Zionists into serial liars. The latest lie is that the Al Jazeera journalist Anas Al Sharif, killed by Israel's military on Sunday, was a Hamas leader. The fact is, as rights advocates are saying, he was targeted for his frontline reporting on Gaza. To a lying regime, speaking truth to power is a crime. It goes against the Zionist regime's DNA. Al Sharif was one of the 237 journalists assassinated since Oct 7, 2023. Were they all Hamas leaders? Were the four journalists killed along with Al Sharif Hamas leaders, too? As Emma Graham-Harrison writes in her op-ed in The Guardian, Israel is running two campaigns in Gaza: one for the military control of the strip and another for the narrative control of how the world understands what happens there. Israel's answer is to ban foreign journalists, and if they still manage to get in, kill them. Netanyahu, the truth has long ago been out: the pen is mightier than all the weapons you have been supplied.
