Results released for February 2025 bar exam in Florida: Which schools made the grade?
With an 87.5% pass rate, the Naples-based law school is No. 1 among the state's 11 accredited law schools whose graduates sat for the exam.
Overall, 553 people took the bar for the first time in the Feb. 25-26 Bar Examination in Tampa, and 359 passed – or 64.9%, according to a Monday announcement from the Florida Board of Bar Examiners.
That's an increase from the 56% who passed (or 334 out of 593) last February, for a nearly 9-point jump.
Florida, as most states do, offers its bar exam twice yearly, in February and July. A greater number of test takers, many of whom have just graduated from law school in May, sit for the summer administration of the exam.
Coming in at No. 2 this February was the University of Florida College of Law in Gainesville (76.5%) and St. Thomas University College of Law in Miami Gardens (75%) was third. Last place went to Barry University School of Law in Orlando, with 46.8%.
Those who are already admitted to the practice of law and took the bar exam here for the first time had a 72.1% pass rate (160 out of 222). Those who went to law schools outside Florida passed with 47.9% (34 out of 71).
In Florida, the state's Supreme Court ultimately decides who becomes an attorney.
"Passing the bar," as it's known, is but one step: Applicants also must pass clear an in-depth background check, usually referred to as character and fitness review.
Florida's exam – again, like many states – is given over two days, with one day consisting of written essays and another devoted to a six-hour, 200 multiple-choice question test known as the Multistate Bar Examination.
Also, applicants have to pass a separate legal ethics test, called the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination.
Florida's Supreme Court last month launched a review of its long-standing requirement that bar exam applicants graduate from an ABA-accredited law school. A workgroup, chaired by former Justice Ricky Polston, will submit its recommendations by Sept. 30.
The move comes amid growing conservative scrutiny of the ABA's influence, including concerns over accreditation costs, its political activity and diversity standards.
This story contains previously published material. Jim Rosica is a member of the USA TODAY Network – Florida Capital Bureau. Reach him at jrosica@tallahassee.com and follow him on Twitter/X: @JimRosicaFL.
This article originally appeared on Tallahassee Democrat: Florida 2025 bar exam results: How did February test-takers do?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
Kyivstar Hopes to Shine in New York as Ukraine Peace Talks Begin
Shares in Ukrainian mobile operator Kyivstar will start trading in New York today hoping that peace talks to end the devastating war in the country will significantly boost the company's value. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Chief executive officer Oleksandr Komarov said ahead of the Nasdaq listing that the summit between President Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Alaska, scheduled for August 15 th, would help drive investment into Ukraine if an end to the three-year war is found. Invest in Recovery 'We will be the best asset for the international investment community to invest in Ukraine, to invest in the Ukrainian recovery, to invest in the Ukrainian support,' Komarov said. Komarov said the company chose Nasdaq, where its Dubai-based parent VEON (VEON) is also listed, over London or Warsaw because it is even more important to 'strengthen the link between the United States and Ukraine rather than between Ukraine and Europe.' VEON shares were up 1.6% in pre-market trading. The company has also strengthened its U.S. ties during the conflict, appointing former U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to its board and signing a deal with Elon Musk's Starlink for satellite services. Kyivstar, which has been given a pro forma valuation of $2.3 billion, carried out the listing by merging with fintech entrepreneur Betsy Cohen's Cohen Circle special purpose acquisition company (SPAC). The company raised $178 million, confirming earlier reports that it expected up to $200 million. VEON will retain a majority stake in the mobile operator. People's IPO The company has previously stated that it has had extremely strong support for the Kyivstar listing from U.S. authorities, Ukraine and the European Union. Indeed, it has described the listing as 'the people's IPO', hoping that investors around the world would show their support for Ukraine. Kyivstar is the market-leading mobile operator in Ukraine with 24 million subscribers. Analysts agreed that the narrative around the deal was built around Ukraine's postwar reconstruction and digital infrastructure's role in that recovery. However, investors will also likely question the strength of that recovery and the likelihood of any peace deal between Ukraine and Russia holding over the long-term.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Grants Pass to provide 150 camping spaces, $60k in services after disability rights suit
The city of Grants Pass, which gained national attention for its practice of punishing homeless people for camping outside, has agreed to provide at least 150 spaces for individuals to do so. (Ben Botkin/Oregon Capital Chronicle) A southern Oregon city that gained national attention for its practice of punishing homeless people for camping outside has agreed to provide at least 150 spaces for individuals to do so after a lawsuit alleged its practices discriminated against disabled individuals. The city of Grants Pass won a major U.S. Supreme Court case in June 2024, reversing an earlier appeals court ruling that a city ordinance barring homeless people from using blankets, pillows or cardboard while sleeping outside violated the U.S. Constitution's protections against cruel and unusual punishment. That Supreme Court ruling cleared the way for more stringent restrictions on homeless individuals in the West, but in Oregon, a state law only allows cities to regulate sleeping outside if those regulations are 'objectively reasonable' to time, place and manner. Grants Pass responded by passing ordinances that allow people to stay in designated areas only between 5 p.m. and 7 a.m. and to remove tents or other supplies each morning or face a $75 citation. Disability rights advocates and five homeless individuals sued, and the city reached a settlement this month. The settlement says the city will offer at least 150 units of camping spaces for homeless individuals. The city must also provide drinking water at any approved camping sites, and the property must be in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act for the next year. 'Oregon can't arrest its way out of homelessness, and we are pleased the city has committed to developing more humane and legally compliant approaches to this public health crisis,' said Jake Cornett, executive director and CEO of the Portland-based Disability Rights Oregon, in a statement. 'This settlement represents a significant step forward in ensuring people with disabilities experiencing homelessness have places to rest, basic necessities like drinking water and real opportunity to stabilize their lives.' The city had limited homeless people to stay and sleep in just one site with about 30 tents at any given time, prompting concerns about overcrowding and a lack of drinking water. In January, local officials closed another site with space for about 120 tents. Disability Rights Oregon and the Oregon Law Center cited Oregon's anti-discrimination law for disabled individuals in their January lawsuit. They won a two-week temporary restraining order in February prohibiting the city from enforcing penalties and restricting camping to the city's one site for tents. Since then, Circuit Court Judge Sarah E. McGlaughlin has ordered the city to halt enforcement of its ordinances against homeless encampments until the city restored capacity for 150 tents, exempting several parks from her mandate. The city and plaintiffs have agreed that the additional capacity for campaign will be on property owned by the city or operated by a third-party city contractor, according to the settlement. The city will also install shade at drinking facilities and award a $60,000 grant to a local nonprofit to provide services for homeless residents. The facility receiving the money must have bathrooms. The lawsuit launched by disability rights advocates was driven by stories of homeless people with chronic pain and health conditions being forced to constantly move their belongings and lives every day in the city. One such case involves 57-year-old Janine Harris, who suffers from arthritis, vertigo and chronic headaches. She previously told the Capital Chronicle that her health problems made her give up a job as a caregiver and she has been homeless for four years. She has to collect her belongings in a wagon she carries around. 'Being homeless is really hard on a person's body, especially if you have physical disabilities,'Harris wrote in a court declaration. 'I just want everyone to know that a lot of people who are living outside are people, just like them, who are doing their best to get by.' In a statement following the settlement, Allison Nasson, a staff attorney at the Oregon Law Center, cautioned against policies mandating homeless residents continuously relocate. 'Requiring people to 'move along' everyday doesn't get people into housing, it just makes life harder and more dangerous,' she wrote. 'When you have been forced to live outside, you still need water, a bathroom, and a place to rest.' Grants Pass City Manager Aaron Cubic did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Under the agreement, the city will also pay $85,000 to Disability Rights Oregon, allowing it to forgo any further obligation to pay legal fees. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
4 years and 3 court cases later, City of Prince George wins case to shut down homeless camp
The City of Prince George has won its latest bid to close a downtown homeless encampment that has been a political football ever since it was first established in 2021. The ruling was handed down this week by B.C. Supreme Court Justice Bruce Elwood and distributed to the media by the city. It found that the city has significantly increased the number of available shelter spaces and affordable housing units in the north-central B.C. city, which serves a population of approximately 90,000. It agreed that the city had demonstrated plans were in place to further increase the available housing units in order to accommodate the remaining residents in the camp, who, it was agreed in court, number approximately 20. However, Elwood also ruled that the city must be prepared to allow for overnight sheltering for residents who are unable to find available supports elsewhere. "Today's decision doesn't solve homelessness," said Eric Depenau, the city's manager of administrative services, at a Friday afternoon news conference at city hall. "We have done good work... but we know that more needs to be done." The city said that moving forward, those who were living in the camp as of July will be allowed to remain until they receive an offer of housing, at which point they will have seven days to vacate. Any newcomers seeking outdoor shelter will be allowed to stay at 498 Ottawa Street, a smaller lot in the current encampment, between 7 p.m. and 9 a.m. The city says it will now be using a "phased approach" to close and remediate the encampment site. The ruling marks what may be the final chapter in an issue that has highlighted the growing visibility of homelessness in communities outside of Canada's major metro areas over the past decade. Previous shutdown attempts failed The encampment on Lower Patricia Boulevard, known as Moccasin Flats, was first established in the spring of 2021 on city-owned land, on an empty dirt lot between an industrial yard and a steep hill leading to a residential neighbourhood. Over the years, its population has fluctuated from fewer than a dozen to close to 100. Though homelessness had previously been an issue in the city, it was the first time in recent memory that a permanent encampment housing such a large population had been seen in Prince George, which bills itself as B.C.'s northern capital, and has sparked a multi-year debate about how best to handle its presence. WATCH | City back in court over homeless camp: While expressing sympathy for the plight of those who lived there, many nearby residents raised concerns about public safety and disorder stemming from the presence of the camp, which have included shootings and multiple fires consistent with arson attempts. At the same time, camp residents and outreach groups pointed out the greatest danger was to those who had nowhere else to go, and argued the camp was necessary as long as there weren't enough viable options for indoor sleeping available. It was also pointed out by groups, including the B.C. Assembly of First Nations, that a majority of encampment residents were Indigenous, many with direct family ties to residential schools, and could not be treated as a simple public safety issue. WATCH | BCAFN Chief Terry Teegee protests homeless camp eviction in Prince George: That argument first made its way to the B.C. Supreme Court in August 2021, when the city applied for an injunction to shut the camp down. But in October, Chief Justice Christopher E. Hinkson ruled the city had failed to prove there were viable alternatives to the camp, and ordered it to be allowed to stand. The ruling was upheld in a 2022 decision, after the city partially demolished a portion of the camp, which a separate justice said was in violation of the Hinkson ruling. The city later apologized. During this time, the encampment caught the attention of then-B.C. housing minister David Eby, who said he didn't believe permanent homeless camps were a safe or viable option and offered to collaborate with the city on finding a more permanent solution. After becoming premier, Eby announced Prince George as one of the first cities to pilot his new HEART and HEARTH programs, which were billed as a way to "rapidly respond to encampments to better support people sheltering outdoors to move inside." New units built during this time include the new transitional housing facility in Atco trailers on Third Avenue near the encampment and complex care spaces available a few blocks away. Phased shutdown In his ruling released Friday, Justice Elwood noted the change in the city's approach to homelessness over the past four years. "Much has changed since the city failed to persuade [the courts] that there was sufficient available housing in 2021," he wrote. "The HEART & HEARTH initiative, the memorandum of understanding between the province and the city and the construction of the Third Avenue Site all reflect tangible progress and concerted efforts by government to address the needs of the occupants of the encampment." However, he noted he was still unable to be certain that the new shelter spaces would be accessible to everyone currently living in the encampment. For one, he found that the units currently available are fewer than the number of people — between 10 and 20 — living in the encampment. Lawyer Claire Kanigan and co-counsel Casey St. Germain, representing residents of Moccasin Flats, said they found there to be at least 18 residents remaining at the encampment and said there are only three rooms currently ready to be occupied at the Thrd Avenue site. Kanigan said there's no timeline as to when more beds will be made available and that the city should be able to prove they have enough beds before they're permitted to close the site. "The basic calculation of number of beds to number of people is foundational," she said. "It is not an overly onerous burden to meet." But Elwood found the proposed solution from the city and B.C. Housing was reasonable — in which the camp would be allowed to stay open until its residents had been offered housing — and was enough to move forward. Outdoor sheltering must still be allowed: judge Another issue raised in the ruling, though, was city bylaws that have been passed barring overnight outdoor sheltering elsewhere in the city, as well as limiting daytime camping. With the closure of Moccasin Flats, Elwood wrote, the impact would be that "there will be nowhere in Prince George where a homeless person can lawfully erect shelter from the elements, store their possessions or even rest during the day," he wrote. "The potential lack of basic shelter during the day is an important consideration year-round. Extreme daytime heat during the summer is also dangerous for people experiencing homelessness. Those who have no other accessible option must be allowed to rest and shelter themselves." As a result, he said, the terms of his ruling "cannot be absolute" and exceptions must be made, however rare, for residents who cannot access other shelter. Mayor Simon Yu, who was elected in 2022 in part on a promise to build housing for people living in the encampment, said he remains committed to the goal of resolving homelessness in the city for good. "It has been a long road and there is much more work to be done to address homelessness in our community," he said in a written statement.
