Lok Sabha adjourned till noon amid Opposition uproar over Bihar SIR; Rajya Sabha adjourned till 2 pm
Additionally, the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill, 2025 is scheduled to be introduced in the Lok Sabha on Monday. The bill will be presented by Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal.
Meanwhile, both Houses have witnessed repeated disruptions during the ongoing Monsoon Session, as the Opposition continues to press for a discussion on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
IT ministry says DPDP Act does not dilute RTI
The IT ministry has clarified that it does not believe the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, 2023 dilutes the Right to Information (RTI) Act. IT ministry says DPDP Act does not dilute RTI IT secretary S Krishnan told HT the amendment to the RTI Act through the DPDP law only removed 'a redundant provision' and does not affect citizens' right to information. Section 44(3) of the DPDP Act amends section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, 2005, removing a proviso that allowed public information officers to share PRIVATE information in circumstances where the disclosure was deemed to be in larger public interest. However, Krishnan said this was redundant because section 8(2) of the RTI Act already permits public authorities to share ANY information if it serves public interest, regardless of exceptions in section 8(1). 'So there is no dilution, and in fact there is a strengthening,' the secretary said. The issue came up in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday through a starred question. IT minister Ashwini Vaishnaw said the amendment balances the right to privacy, as upheld by the Supreme Court, with the right to information. He said the change aligns with judicial reasoning and prevents conflict between the two laws. The ministry has sought the Attorney General's confirmation of this interpretation. Once cleared, the law will be enforced, though the government does not expect any amendments to the DPDP Act. The rules that operationalise the law, however, are still awaited – more than 24 months since the act came into existence. The ministry has finalised the rules, Krishnan said, and will be issued after inter-ministerial feedback.
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Govt outlines use of AI and drones against narcotics
New Delhi Govt outlines use of AI and drones against narcotics The Union Government on Wednesday outlined the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI), drone technology, and satellite imaging in efforts to detect and destroy illicit cultivation of narcotics, including opium poppy and cannabis. In a written reply to a question in the Lok Sabha, the Ministry of Home Affairs confirmed that the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) has been collaborating with specialised research institutions such as the Advanced Data Processing Research Institute (ADRIN), the Bhaskaracharya National Institute for Space Applications and Geo-informatics (BISAG-N), and other centres. These agencies provide satellite images which help identify suspected areas of illegal cultivation. The NCB then shares the geo-spatial data with concerned state governments and other stakeholders to undertake ground-level destruction of such crops. The Central Bureau of Narcotics (CBN) has also been using drones for detection and eradication. Over the past three years, surveys have been carried out to eliminate poppy cultivation in Namsai, Lohit, and Anjaw districts of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttarkashi and Tehri districts of Uttarakhand, along with cannabis cultivation in Kullu district of Himachal Pradesh. No drone-based surveys or eradication drives have been undertaken in Andhra Pradesh. The government further clarified that enforcement data generated through these advanced technologies has not been integrated into the NIDAAN portal, which is a platform for tracking narcotics-related data. On the issue of support to states, the Ministry stated that the NCB's role is confined to sharing satellite imagery and geo-spatial data. According to the annexed details, surveillance using satellite imagery has been extended to multiple states in recent years. For opium poppy cultivation, monitoring was conducted in Manipur (Kangpokpi, Senapati, Ukhrul, Churachandpur, Tengnoupal), Jharkhand (Chatra, Latehar, Palamu, Khunti, Ranchi), Bihar (Gaya), Arunachal Pradesh (Lohit, Namsai, Anjaw, Tirap, Longding, Upper Siang), Uttarakhand (Uttarkashi, Tehri Garhwal), Himachal Pradesh (Kullu, Mandi), Jammu & Kashmir (Anantnag, Badgam, Bandipore, Baramula, Kulgam, Pulwama, Shupiyan), and West Bengal (Birbhum, Coochbehar, Malda, Murshidabad) For cannabis cultivation, the satellite-based data covered Andhra Pradesh (Visakhapatnam, Alluri Sitarama Raju), Odisha (Malkangiri, Rayagada, Kandhamal, Gajapati, Ganjam, Boudh), Tripura (West Tripura, Sipahijala, South Tripura, Gomati, Khowai), and Himachal Pradesh (Kullu, Mandi, Chamba, Hamirpur, Kangra).
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
ICSSR issues show-cause to CSDS over past irregularities
New Delhi: The Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR), an autonomous body under the Union ministry of education, on Wednesday issued a show-cause notice to the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS), citing past irregularities and 'gross violations' of grant-in-aid rules. ICSSR issues show-cause to CSDS over past irregularities The notice accuses CSDS of releasing misleading election data related to Maharashtra and giving a 'biased interpretation' of the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Bihar, allegedly aimed at 'maligning the reputation and image' of the Election Commission of India (ECI). The national body that oversees research in the social sciences in the country, has threatened to cancel and withdraw the grant in aid to CSDS, which it said 'is discretionary in nature,' if the think tank fails to submit its explanation on 'administrative and financial irregularities' and on 'deliberate misrepresentation of facts' within 7 days. This comes a day after Sanjay Kumar, a professor at CSDS Delhi had on Tuesday apologised for his X post on the Maharashtra elections, which wrongly reported a considerable fall in voter numbers in the two assembly seats compared to the Lok Sabha elections. He said the error occurred due to misreading of a row by the data team. 'The tweet has since been removed. I had no intention of dispersing any form of misinformation,' wrote Sanjay Kumar, who is among the most senior researchers at the independent think tank which is known for its analysis of elections. Meanwhile, a case has been registered against Kumar by the district electoral officers (DEO) of Nashik and Nagpur in Maharashtra for allegedly misleading voters with wrong data on the Devlali and Ramtek assembly segments for the Lok Sabha and state elections held in 2024. In its show-cause notice to CSDS director Awadhendra Sharan, seen by HT, the ICSSR said that in a study on Maharashtra polls, CSDS deliberately allowed its employee to 'make incorrect statements in media maligning the reputation and image' of ECI and subsequently retracted from the same 'citing glitches in data analysis regarding elections in Maharashtra.' A CSDS study titled 'How inclusive is EC's special revision exercise?' presented a 'biased interpretation' of the ECI's SIR drive in Bihar and published media stories for 'deliberately scandalizing and maligning the reputation and image' of the constitutional body, ICSSR said. 'And whereas it has also come to notice of ICSSR that CSDS and its employees have deliberately been indulging in data manipulation with a deliberate and malicious action to create a narrative with the intention of undermining the sanctity of the constitution authority such as ECI,' ICSSR said asking the CSDS to reveal its funding source for both the studies. ICSSR in its notice said that CSDS has 'continuously been involved in various irregularities in the past' and was asked to submit response and action taken on those irregularities but, 'no satisfactory response and action taken report has been received from CSDS.' ICSSR listed several past irregularities at CSDS, including appointments of faculty and non-academic staff in violation of University Grants Commission (UGC) and ICSSR guidelines, unauthorized financial benefits, non-conduct of governing body elections, opaque selection of the Director, irregular pension and House Rent Allowance (HRA) payments causing loss of public funds, failure to get annual accounts audited by Comptroller Auditor General (CAG), non-disclosure of Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) funds, and non-compliance with ICSSR's Good Governance principles. Under its 'grant in aid rules to societies and institutions doing research in the field of social sciences (which are outside the scope of University Grants Commission),' ICSSR provides assistance to various societies and institutions doing research in the field of social science. On August 7, 2023, in response to a question in Parliament, the ministry of education informed Lok Sabha that CSDS was allocated ₹13.92 crore over three years (between 2020–21 and the first quarter of 2023–24). 'We have asked CSDS to give an explanation on irregularities and misinterpretation of data within seven days of today's notice in respect. ICSSR will take appropriate action against CSDS as per the provisions of its grant-in-aid rules,' said a senior ICSSR official.
