Conservative leader wins Canada byelection, regaining parliament seat
Poilievre finished with 80.4% of the vote after Monday's election in the riding of Battle River-Crowfoot, in the deeply Conservative western province.
'Thank you very much to the great people of Battle River-Crowfoot,' Poilievre told supporters as he celebrated the victory with his family in the city of Camrose. 'If I stand before you here today, it is by the grace of God and the good generosity of so many people … Getting to know the people in this region has been the privilege of my life.'
Poilievre, the leader of the opposition, lost the seat he had held for more than 20 years in April's national election. He now replaces Damien Kurek, who volunteered to resign his seat in order to give Poilievre a chance return to parliament.
Without a seat in the House of Commons, Poilievre has been unable to fully serve his role as opposition leader. Instead of sparring with the prime minister, Mark Carney, during question period, Poilievre has been relegated to holding media scrums on the outskirts of parliament, diminishing his national visibility.
Monday's victory, with relatively high turnout for a byelection, is likely to re-energize supporters. But Poilievre won one of the country's most Conservative-friendly seats by a narrower margin than Kurek did in April. Diminished support for the federal leader could influence members when they vote to review his tenure as the top Tory in January.
The race, which had a national feel for a rural, sparsely populated riding, was also the target of the Longest Ballot Committee, a group calling for electoral reform. The movement coaxed 203 candidates to add their names to the roster, forcing Elections Canada to use write-in ballots for the first time during a federal election and to hire more staff to count ballots on election night.
'Make your vote count so that I can go to Ottawa and fight for you. Fight for your right to buy any truck or car you want. To keep your firearms, fight for farmers, oil and gas workers, and a stronger military. Fight for an immigration system that is under control and puts Canadians first,' Poilievre said in a video posted to social media on Monday, which included directions on how to correctly spell his surname. 'But before I can do any of that, I need you to get out and vote today.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
17 minutes ago
- Reuters
California Senate embarks on Democrats' redistricting plan, counter-punch to Texas
Aug 21 (Reuters) - The California Senate on Thursday was set to act on newly drawn political maps aimed at giving Democrats five more seats in Congress, countering a partisan advantage President Donald Trump hopes to gain from a Republican redistricting plan in Texas. California Democrats, led by Governor Gavin Newsom, are pushing to achieve fast-track passage of their redistricting effort in the Sacramento statehouse by Friday, just in time to place it on the ballot for a special election on November 4. Newsom, who enjoys a Democratic super-majority in both houses of the state legislature, ultimately seeks voter support of his plan - neutralizing a Trump-backed Texas bill designed to flip five Democratic seats to Republican control in the U.S. House of Representatives. The newly drawn district lines in Texas would go into effect without voter approval, though Democrats have vowed to challenge it in court. The Texas measure cleared a major hurdle on Wednesday when the state House of Representatives in Austin adopted it on an 88-52 party-line vote. The Texas House and Senate, both controlled by Republicans, still must reconcile two versions of the legislation before it goes to Republican Governor Greg Abbott, who said he will sign it. Republicans, including Trump, have openly acknowledged the Texas effort is about boosting their political clout, helping preserve the party's slim U.S. House majority in the November 2026 midterm races. That election already is shaping up as a closely fought contest for congressional control. Democrats and civil rights groups say the new Texas map further dilutes the voting power of Hispanics and Blacks, violating federal law that forbids redrawing political lines on the basis of racial or ethnic discrimination. In pursuing redistricting in mid-decade, both sides are breaking with long-observed political custom of generally altering political maps once every 10 years, following the U.S. Census to adjust for population changes. "Why are we here? Because congressional redistricting is allowed," Texas Representative Todd Hunter, a prime sponsor of the Republican bill, said before its passage. Consideration of the Texas bill was delayed for two weeks after more than 50 Democratic state House members staged a walkout that temporarily denied Republicans the legislative quorum they needed to proceed. Their collective absence sparked extraordinary efforts by Abbott and other Republican leaders to pressure the Democrats to relent, including civil arrest warrants, the imposition of fines and threats to withhold their pay. The wayward Democrats finally returned to Austin on Monday, by which time their legislative boycott had galvanized Democratic leaders in other states, especially California, where Newsom has vowed to "fight fire with fire." "We're going to punch this bully in the mouth, and we're going to win," Newsom told reporters in a video conference call on Wednesday. "This is about the rule of Don versus the rule of law." He was joined on the call by the Democratic National Committee chair, Ken Martin, along with New Jersey U.S. Senator Corey Booker and Texas Representative Nicole Collier, one of the leaders of the Austin walkout. "These are the most segregated maps that have been presented in Texas since the 1960s," said Collier, who represents a predominantly non-white Forth Worth state district. Collier, who spent two nights sleeping in the statehouse rather than submit to police escorts assigned by Republican leaders to newly returned Democrats, said she was forced to clandestinely join the Zoom call from a restroom of the Capitol building, then abruptly leave the call when she was discovered. A visibly shocked Booker remarked: "Representative Collier in the bathroom has more dignity that Donald Trump in the Oval Office." The Texas-California clash may be just the start. Other Republican-controlled states -- including Ohio, Florida, Indiana and Missouri -- are moving forward with or considering their own redistricting efforts, as are Democratic-led states such as Maryland and Illinois. In California, the focus is on a package of three measures. One would allow the legislature to temporarily bypass the state's independent, bipartisan redistricting process, adopted by voters in 2008. The two others consist of the redistricting plan itself and the measure to establish a special election giving voters final say over the new map. In a victory for Democrats, the California Supreme Court on Wednesday swiftly rejected an emergency petition filed this week by four Republican state lawmakers seeking to block legislative action on Newsom's redistricting plan for 30 days.
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump celebrates Texas victory as GOP passed a new redistricting law
By Donald Trump celebrated victory in Texas as the GOP passed a new redistricting law that Trump says could put the party on a path to gaining 100 seats in Congress. The Texas House on Wednesday approved redrawn maps that would give the GOP a bigger edge in 2026, muscling through what critics called a partisan gerrymander that launched weeks of protests by Democrats and a widening national battle over redistricting. Trump not only celebrated the bill's passing on Truth Social, but spelled out his game plan for further Republican victories nationwide. 'Big WIN for the Great State of Texas!!! Everything Passed, on our way to FIVE more Congressional seats and saving your Rights, your Freedoms, and your Country, itself. Texas never lets us down,' he wrote. He then listed which states may go this route next: 'Florida, Indiana, and others are looking to do the same thing. More seats equals less Crime, a great Economy, and a STRONG SECOND AMENDMENT. It means Happiness and Peace.' Trump said the next move is to, as he put it, 'STOP MAIL-IN VOTING, a total fraud that has no bounds' as well as instituting paper ballots. 'If we do these TWO things, we will pick up 100 more seats, and the CROOKED game of politics is over. God Bless America!!!' The maps, which would give Republicans five more winnable seats, are expected to to be approved by the GOP-controlled state Senate and signed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott (Pictured). Abbott celebrated the passing of the bill by giving it a familiar nickname to many Trump fans. 'Congrats to the Texas House on passing the One Big Beautiful Map,' he wrote. 'It will make Texas, and Congress, a brighter shade of Red.' But the Texas House vote had presented the best chance for Democrats to derail the redraw. Democrats tried to resist by fleeing the state. In early August, 57 lawmakers skipped town , flying to Illinois and New York in a dramatic attempt to block the GOP's map vote. They then said that they were being treated like fugitives as they are threatened with arrest if they don't show up to the house to vote during a bitter redistricting fight that could hand Republicans and Donald Trump five extra seats in Congress . State troopers were ordered to shadow Democrats around the clock, even when they dropped their kids at school, to ensure they stayed for votes. Their forced presence gave the Texas House a quorum, the minimum number of lawmakers required to move legislation forward. One of the most defiant Democrats has been Rep. Nicole Collier of Fort Worth. She refused to sign the paperwork authorizing DPS monitoring and instead stayed inside the chamber for more than 30 hours, even sleeping overnight on the floor. Her stand drew supporters to the Capitol Tuesday evening, but the crowd was evacuated when someone posted a threat on social media urging others to 'go to the Capitol and shoot and kill those who will not allow lawmakers to leave,' according to local outlet KVUE. She eventually drew embarrassment earlier Wednesday when she joined California Governor Gavin Newsom and New Jersey Senator Cory Booker on a conference call and abruptly leaved after being told she was committing a felony. Meanwhile, support for Collier mounted, with the Fort Worth representative receiving a call from former vice president Kamala Harris. Collier shared on X that Harris told her: 'You are among those that history will reveal was among the heroes of this moment, so you just stay strong.' She has also filed a lawsuit against Texas, alleging 'illegal restraint by the government' for not being allowed to leave. 'I refuse to comply with this unreasonable, un-American and unnecessary request,' Collier told CBS News. By Wednesday, the Texas House was voting on amendments to the new maps, with a final vote approved later in the day. The change of the Texas maps on an 88-52 party-line vote is likely to prompt California´s Democratic-controlled state Legislature this week to approve of a new House map creating five new Democratic-leaning districts. But the California map, pushed by Newsom, would require voter approval in November. Democrats have also vowed to challenge the new Texas map in court and complained that Republicans made the political power move before passing legislation responding to deadly floods that swept the state last month. Texas Republicans openly said they were acting in their party´s interest. State Rep. Todd Hunter, who wrote the legislation formally creating the new map, noted that the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed politicians to redraw districts for nakedly partisan purposes. 'The underlying goal of this plan is straight forward: improve Republican political performance,' Hunter, a Republican, said on the floor. After nearly eight hours of debate, Hunter took the floor again to sum up the entire dispute as nothing more than a partisan fight. 'What's the difference, to the whole world listening? Republicans like it, and Democrats do not.' Democrats said the disagreement was about more than partisanship. 'In a democracy, people choose their representatives,' State Rep. Chris Turner said. 'This bill flips that on its head and lets politicians in Washington, D.C., choose their voters.' State Rep. John H. Bucy blamed the president. 'This is Donald Trump's map,' Bucy said. 'It clearly and deliberately manufactures five more Republican seats in Congress because Trump himself knows that the voters are rejecting his agenda.' The Republican power play has already triggered a national tit-for-tat battle as Democratic state lawmakers prepared to gather in California on Thursday to revise that state´s map to create five new Democratic seats. 'This is a new Democratic Party, this is a new day, this is new energy out there all across this country,' Newsom said on a call with reporters on Wednesday. 'And we're going to fight fire with fire.' A new California map would need to be approved by voters in a special election in November because that state normally operates with a nonpartisan commission drawing the map to avoid the very sort of political brawl that is playing out. Newsom himself backed the 2008 ballot measure to create that process, as did former President Barack Obama. But in a sign of Democrats´ stiffening resolve, Obama Tuesday night backed Newsom's bid to redraw the California map, saying it was a necessary step to stave off the GOP´s Texas move. 'I think that approach is a smart, measured approach,' Obama said during a fundraiser for the Democratic Party's main redistricting arm. The incumbent president's party usually loses seats in the midterm election, and the GOP currently controls the House of Representatives by a mere three votes. Trump is going beyond Texas in his push to remake the map. He´s pushed Republican leaders in conservative states like Indiana and Missouri to also try to create new Republican seats. Ohio Republicans were already revising their map before Texas moved. Democrats, meanwhile, are mulling reopening Maryland´s and New York´s maps as well. However, more Democratic-run states have commission systems like California's or other redistricting limits than Republican ones do, leaving the GOP with a freer hand to swiftly redraw maps. New York, for example, can´t draw new maps until 2028, and even then, only with voter approval. In Texas, there was little that outnumbered Democrats could do other than fume and threaten a lawsuit to block the map. Because the Supreme Court has blessed purely partisan gerrymandering, the only way opponents can stop the new Texas map would be by arguing it violates the Voting Rights Act requirement to keep minority communities together so they can select representatives of their choice. Democrats noted that, in every decade since the 1970s, courts have found that Texas´ legislature did violate the Voting Rights Act in redistricting, and that civil rights groups had an active lawsuit making similar allegations against the 2021 map that Republicans drew up. Republicans contend the new map creates more new majority-minority seats than the previous one.
Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
How Fed Chair Powell has used Jackson Hole to signal what's next
Aug 21 (Reuters) - One last time since President Donald Trump nominated him to lead the U.S. central bank in late 2017, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Friday will walk through the Jackson Lake Lodge's expansive lobby, past the taxidermied grizzly bear, and into a ballroom lighted with elk-antler chandeliers to deliver a speech at the global central bankers' influential symposium in Wyoming. In his seven previous Jackson Hole speeches, Powell has touched on a range of issues, from esoteric economic concepts and monetary policy history lessons to pledges of policy support through the COVID-19 pandemic and the central bank's determination to win the inflation war that followed. Each speech, too, has included some measure of preview for the Fed's next interest rate moves, and that above all else is why Powell will have the world's attention at 10 a.m. EDT (1400 GMT) on Friday. Here is what he has previously said, and what happened next: 2018: STARS AND RATE HIKES AHEAD Powell's first - and longest - Jackson Hole speech set out his approach to policymaking, focused on "navigating by the stars" - the economics world's shorthand for concepts like the natural rate of unemployment and neutral interest rate. He did, though, offer a view on what was coming down the pike. What Powell said: "Let me conclude by returning to the matter of navigating between the two risks I identified - moving too fast and needlessly shortening the expansion, versus moving too slowly and risking a destabilizing overheating. ... I see the current path of gradually raising interest rates as the FOMC's approach to taking seriously both of these risks." What the Fed did: Following the two quarter-percentage-point rate hikes in the first half of the year, the central bank's policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee delivered two more quarter-percentage-point hikes before the end of the year. 2019: TRUMP TARIFFS 1.0 AND RATE CUTS Part history lesson and part dissection of the trade policy moves in Trump's first term in the White House that were starting to blur the outlook, Powell's 2019 speech was met within hours by the U.S. president asking on social media "who is our bigger enemy" - Powell or Chinese leader Xi Jinping? What Powell said: "We have been monitoring three factors that are weighing on this favorable outlook: slowing global growth, trade policy uncertainty, and muted inflation. ... we will act as appropriate to sustain the expansion, with a strong labor market and inflation near its symmetric 2% objective." What the Fed did: It followed a quarter-percentage-point rate cut that July with two more such reductions in borrowing costs in September and October, far less than what Trump had demanded. Then the pandemic arrived, and everything changed. 2020: 'INCLUSIVE' EMPLOYMENT, AVERAGE 2% INFLATION Delivered remotely because of the pandemic, Powell's speech in 2020 laid out a new approach to policy that placed greater weight on defending the Fed's employment mandate. What Powell said: "Our revised statement emphasizes that maximum employment is a broad-based and inclusive goal. ... Employment can run at or above real-time estimates of its maximum level without causing concern, unless accompanied by signs of unwanted increases in inflation or the emergence of other risks that could impede the attainment of our goals. ... Following periods when inflation has been running below 2%, appropriate monetary policy will likely aim to achieve inflation moderately above 2% for some time." What the Fed did: In September it adopted a new three-part test, seen at the time as an outgrowth of the new framework, for raising interest rates: the attainment of maximum employment and 2% inflation, and indications that inflation will "moderately exceed 2% for some time." The promise helped support the economy's recovery from the pandemic shock, but the stringent hurdle for restarting rate hikes was later blamed for slowing the Fed's response to inflation the following year. 2021: NO RATE HIKES NEEDED FOR NOW In a second straight virtual appearance, Powell dismissed signs of the coming inflation wave as "transitory" - a word he has come to regret ever uttering. What Powell said: "Current high inflation readings are likely to prove transitory ... If a central bank tightens policy in response to factors that turn out to be temporary, the main policy effects are likely to arrive after the need has passed ... Today, with substantial slack remaining in the labor market and the pandemic continuing, such a mistake could be particularly harmful." What the Fed did: It began slowing its asset purchases in November and held the policy rate steady at the near-zero level until March 2022. Critics at the time, and most Fed policymakers since, have said the assessment of inflation as "transitory" was a mistake that delayed the start of the rate hikes needed to fight inflation. 2022: RATE HIKES, AND PAIN, AHEAD Mincing no words in his shortest Jackson Hole speech, Powell made clear the Fed's intent to bring inflation to heel, no matter the pain it might cause. What Powell said: "While higher interest rates, slower growth, and softer labor market conditions will bring down inflation, they will also bring some pain to households and businesses. ... At some point, as the stance of monetary policy tightens further, it likely will become appropriate to slow the pace of increases. Restoring price stability will likely require maintaining a restrictive policy stance for some time." What the Fed did: It delivered two more 75-basis-point rate increases to follow the two it had done in the meetings before Powell's speech, and then increased the policy rate in smaller increments until it reached the 5.25%-5.50% range in July 2023. 2023: RATE HIKES STILL POSSIBLE In remarks that were less stern than those delivered the previous year, Powell held out the possibility of more rate hikes while acknowledging the signs of progress in reining in inflation. What Powell said: "We will proceed carefully as we decide whether to tighten further or, instead, to hold the policy rate constant and await further data. Restoring price stability is essential to achieving both sides of our dual mandate. ... We will keep at it until the job is done." What the Fed did: It held the policy rate in the 5.25%-5.50% range, set just weeks before Powell's speech, for a little over a year. 2024: RATE CUTS COMING SOON Risks had now shifted from inflation to employment, and Powell sent a clear signal that rate cuts were coming. What Powell said: "My confidence has grown that inflation is on a sustainable path back to 2%. ... We do not seek or welcome further cooling in labor market conditions. ... The time has come for policy to adjust." What the Fed did: It ended the year-long hold on the policy rate by cutting it by half of a percentage point in September 2024, and by another half a percentage point over the final two meetings of 2024.
