Ugandan army accuses German envoy of 'subversive activities'
Uganda's army has announced the suspension of all military cooperation with Germany after accusing its ambassador, Mathias Schauer, of being involved in "subversive activities" and of being "wholly unqualified" to be in the East African state.
The army did not back-up its claim but its decision signals a sharp deterioration in relations between the two nations.
Rejecting the accusations, a German foreign ministry spokesperson called them "absurd and without any merit", the Reuters news agency reports.
The highly unusual attack on Schauer came after he reportedly raised concerns about army chief Gen Muhoozi Kainerugaba, who is the president's son, at a meeting last week.
On X recently, the general threatened to behead opposition leader Robert Kyagulanyi, popularly known as Bobi Wine.
Gen Kainerugaba also boasted about torturing Wine's bodyguard after detaining him.
Rights groups have long accused the Ugandan government of targeting the opposition, especially in the run-up to elections.
Wine is expected to run against President Yoweri Museveni, who has been in power for nearly four decades, in an election due next year.
Museveni's critics allege that the government is run by a family dynasty - his wife, Janet Museveni is the minister of education, and his brother, Gen Salim Saleh, is the chief coordinator of a government programme known as Operation Wealth Creation.
Gen Saleh held a private meeting with European Union (EU) diplomats last week, where Schauer - Germany's ambassador to Uganda since 2020 - raised concerns about the army chief's controversial tweets, and the "reputational damage" it was causing to Uganda, local media reported.
Gen Kainerugaba hit back with a post on Sunday, saying he was "having issues" with the German ambassador "that has to do with him as a person".
"He is wholly unqualified to be in Uganda. It has nothing to do with the great German people. Whom I admire a lot," he posted.
In a separate statement, army spokesman Col Chris Magezi said Uganda was suspending with immediate effect all defence and military cooperation with Germany because of "credible intelligence reports" that Schauer was involved in "subversive activities".
"The suspension will remain in force until the full resolution of the matter of the Ambassador's involvement with pseudo political-military forces operating in the country against the Ugandan government," the statement added, without giving evidence to substantiate its claims.
On its website, Germany's embassy in Uganda said that bilateral trade between the two nations was worth around $335m (£247m) in 2024, and their relationship was based on "stability and trust".
It did not give details of military cooperation between the two nations.
Uganda is heavily involved in peacekeeping operations, including in Somalia where it is helping to fight armed Islamist groups trying to overthrow the government.
Anger as Uganda president's son says he's holding opposition bodyguard
How a Ugandan opposition leader disappeared in Kenya and ended up in military court
Social media ban in Uganda raises questions over regulation in Africa
TikToker jailed for 32 months for insulting Uganda's president
How an ex-rebel has stayed in power for 35 years
Ugandan internet propaganda network exposed by the BBC
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.
Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Africa Daily
Focus on Africa
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive-US mulls giving millions to controversial Gaza aid foundation, sources say
By Jonathan Landay WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The State Department is weighing giving $500 million to the new foundation providing aid to war-shattered Gaza, according to two knowledgeable sources and two former U.S. officials, a move that would involve the U.S. more deeply in a controversial aid effort that has been beset by violence and chaos. The sources and former U.S. officials, all of whom requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said that money for Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) would come from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which is being folded into the U.S. State Department. The plan has met resistance from some U.S. officials concerned with the deadly shootings of Palestinians near aid distribution sites and the competence of the GHF, the two sources said. The GHF, which has been fiercely criticized by humanitarian organizations, including the United Nations, for an alleged lack of neutrality, began distributing aid last week amid warnings that most of Gaza's 2.3 million population is at risk of famine after an 11-week Israeli aid blockade, which was lifted on May 19 when limited deliveries were allowed to resume. The foundation has seen senior personnel quit and had to pause handouts twice this week after crowds overwhelmed its distribution hubs. The State Department and GHF did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Reuters has been unable to establish who is currently funding the GHF operations, which began in Gaza last week. The GHF uses private U.S. security and logistics companies to transport aid into Gaza for distribution at so-called secure distribution sites. On Thursday, Reuters reported that a Chicago-based private equity firm, McNally Capital, has an "economic interest" in the for-profit U.S. contractor overseeing the logistics and security of GHF's aid distribution hubs in the enclave. While U.S. President Donald Trump's administration and Israel say they don't finance the GHF operation, both have been pressing the United Nations and international aid groups to work with it. The U.S. and Israel argue that aid distributed by a long-established U.N. aid network was diverted to Hamas. Hamas has denied that. USAID has been all but dismantled. Some 80 percent of its programs have been canceled and its staff face termination as part of President Donald Trump's drive to align U.S. foreign policy with his "America First" agenda. One source with knowledge of the matter and one former senior official said the proposal to give the $500 million to GHF has been championed by acting deputy USAID Administrator Ken Jackson, who has helped oversee the agency's dismemberment. The source said that Israel requested the funds to underwrite GHF's operations for 180 days. The Israeli government did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The two sources said that some U.S. officials have concerns with the plan because of the overcrowding that has affected the aid distribution hubs run by GHF's contractor, and violence nearby. Those officials also want well-established non-governmental organizations experienced in running aid operations in Gaza and elsewhere to be involved in the operation if the State Department approves the funds for GHF, a position that Israel likely will oppose, the sources said. Gaza hospital officials have said more than 80 people had been shot dead and hundreds wounded near GHF's distribution points between June 1-3. Since launching its operation, the GHF has opened three hubs, but over the past two days, only two of them have been functioning. Witnesses blamed Israeli soldiers for the killings. The Israeli military said it fired warning shots on two days, while on Tuesday it said soldiers had fired at Palestinian "suspects" advancing towards their positions.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Unite for Vets' rally in Washington, D.C., protests cuts in benefits
June 6 (UPI) -- Several thousand veterans converged on the National Mall on Friday to rally against proposed cuts to Veterans Affairs services, among 200 events nationwide. Veterans, military families and others participated in the Unite for Veterans, Unite for America Rally on the 81st anniversary of D-Day, which was the Allies' amphibious invasion of German-occupied France. Veteran-led protests took place at 16 state capitol buildings and more than 100 other places across 43 states. "We are coming together to defend the benefits, jobs and dignity that every generation of veterans has earned through sacrifice," Unite for Veterans said on its website. "Veteran jobs, healthcare, and essential VA services are under attack. We will not stand by." Speakers in Washington included Democrats with military backgrounds: Sen. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois, former Rep. Conor Lamb of Pennsylvania and California Rep. Derek Tran. There were signs against President Donald Trump, VA Secretary Doug Collins and Elon Musk, the multi-billionaire who ran the Department of Government Efficiency. They said those leaders are betraying the country's promises to troops. "Are you tired of being thanked for our service in the public and stabbed in our back in private?" Army veteran Everett Kelly, the national president of the American Federation of Government Employees, asked the crowd. "For years, politicians on both sides of the aisle have campaigned on their support of veterans, but once they get into office, they cut our benefits, our services. They take every opportunity to privatize our health care." The Trump administration plans to cut 83,000 VA staffers and shift more money from the federal health care system to private-sector clinics. The Department of Veterans Affairs employs approximately 482,000 people, including 500,000 workers at 170 hospitals and 1,200 local clinics in the nation's largest health care system. In all, there are 15.8 million veterans, which represents 6.1% of the civilian population 18 years and older. VA officials said the event was misguided. "Anyone who says VA is cutting healthcare and benefits is not being honest," VA press secretary Peter Kasperowicz in a statement to Navy Times. "The Biden Administration failed to address nearly all of VA's most serious problems, including rising health care wait times, benefits backlogs, and major issues with survivor benefits. Under President Trump and Secretary Collins, VA is fixing these problems and making major improvements." The event was modeled after the Bonus Army protests of the 1930s, when veterans who served in World War I gathered in the nation's capital to demand extra pay denied after leaving the service. Irma Westmoreland, a registered nurse working at a VA hospital and the secretary-treasurer of National Nurses United, told the crowd in Washington: "It's important for every person to keep their job, from the engineering staff to the housekeeper to the dietary staff. When cuts are made, the nursing and medical staff will have to pick up all their work that needs to be done."
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
How the Trump-Musk divorce could crush California's green-car dreams
After 24 hours of spiteful, online mudslinging with Elon Musk, President Donald Trump fired a new salvo Friday morning: According to reports from the New York Times, Trump vowed to sell the sleek red Tesla he'd bought in March and flaunted on the White House South Lawn, in one of his few concessions to green energy. Musk's electric vehicle company had evidently driven a wedge between the two billionaires, revealed when Trump introduced a 'big, beautiful bill' that would remove the $7,500 tax credit for buyers of Teslas and other zero-emission cars. Although Musk had counterintuitively supported ending the tax credit in December, he appeared to course-correct this week, lambasting Trump's tax bill on social media. 'Elon's upset because we took the EV mandate, which was a lot of money for electric vehicles,' Trump said Thursday, during an Oval Office meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz that got subsumed by the Trump-Musk feud. 'And you know, they're having a hard time, the electric vehicles,' Trump continued. 'And they want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy.' The ugly divorce battle that ensued pitted the world's richest man, who as Tesla's chief executive has built an empire from clean cars and trucks, against a president whose base largely denies climate change. As Tesla's shares whip-sawed in the stock market, questions swirled not only for Musk's brand, but for the electric vehicle market more broadly. The sparring caused a particularly rough jolt for California, where Tesla had long been key to an ambitious environmental platform. Given California's mandate to convert 35% of new car sales to EVs by next year, leaders have tried to promote these automobiles, offering rebates and free access to carpool lanes while cities steadily expand their charging infrastructure. But the Trump-Musk bromance threw the plodding electric vehicle movement into chaos. People who had once embraced Tesla rushed to boycott the company with such fervor that Tesla sales dropped 21 % in the first quarter of this year. 'It's hard to think of any company whose public image is more closely tied to its chief executive than Tesla,' said Lucas Davis, a professor at UC Berkeley's Haas School of Business who specializes in energy economics. He noted that, in the U.S., vehicle purchases have become tightly intertwined with political ideology. Democrats who in the past reliably bought Teslas to signify their environmental values are now shunning the cars, and they haven't embraced other brands fast enough to compensate. Overall, EV sales in California dipped 3% year-over-year in the first quarter. With the GOP-controlled federal government now pushing to revoke the EV tax credit, sales are likely to plunge further. If Musk had thought he might have won back the liberal environmentalist crowd by attacking Trump this week, he made a grave miscalculation, said Bill Pearce, a marketing expert at UC Berkeley's Haas School of Business. 'This was a classic marketing miscue,' Pearce said, explaining that Musk alienated his original audience by going all in for the president. Although Tesla gained a smaller conservative fan base, Musk has now repelled those people as well with his sniping on social media. He derided Trump's 'big beautiful' tax bill for being 'massive, outrageous' and 'pork-filled,' and alleged a connection between Trump and child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. 'I think he was trying, at least partly, in his criticism of Trump, to get his traditional buying base to say, 'OK, Elon's back on our side,'' Pearce said. 'But that's not the way consumers think.' Even before Trump and Musk's relationship began unraveling, Professor James Sallee of UC Berkeley's agriculture and resource economics department predicted a full-frontal assault by the Trump Administration on electric cars. In a UC Berkeley Energy Institute blog post provocatively titled 'Three Ways to Kill an Electric Vehicle,' Sallee laid out 'three big pieces of the Trump agenda that could threaten the future of electric vehicles': rollbacks of California's zero-emission mandate and federal clean car standards; unwinding of subsidies for EV buyers and manufacturers of batteries or other parts, and tariffs associated with the U.S.-China trade war. Whether Californians' belief in a clean energy future is strong enough to overcome these hurdles remains to be seen. But that financial argument won't hold for the rest of the country, Pearce said. 'And it will definitely slow adoption.'
