logo
Albanese government misses every target of National Housing Accord, falling more than 55,000 homes short in first year

Albanese government misses every target of National Housing Accord, falling more than 55,000 homes short in first year

Sky News AU4 days ago
The Albanese government has failed to meet a single target in the first year of its flagship National Housing Accord, falling more than 55,000 homes short of its annual goal.
New figures from the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) reveal the worsening housing crisis amid construction delays and exacerbated supply issues due to immigration.
The housing policy, which began in July 2024, aimed to deliver 1.2 million new homes by 2029— or 20,000 homes per month—to improve housing availability and affordability.
Analysis by the IPA found that just 185,000 homes have been completed since the accord began, leaving the government over 55,000 dwellings behind schedule.
The government's target included 55,000 social and affordable homes, of which just 2,600 were completed in 2024.
'The federal government's National Housing Accord is one year old and already tens of thousands of homes behind target,' Director of Research at the IPA Morgan Begg said.
'In its first year of operation, the National Housing Accord as failed to hit a single target.
'At the same time the federal government is bringing in 1.3 million new migrants over three years, Australia is being set up for a disaster.'
The latest forecast from the National Housing Supply and Affordability Council projected the government will fall 250,000 homes short of its target by 2029.
Meanwhile, bureaucratic red tape has strangled the number of new homes being built as the time taken to build a new dwelling continues to grow.
According to findings based on Australian Bureau of Statistics data, it takes 50 per cent longer to build a house in 2025 compared to a decade ago.
'There is unprecedented demand for new homes. Yet it is taking far longer to build them, and it costs significantly more to do so,' Mr Begg said.
The IPA also pointed to the contradiction between falling construction rates and rising net migration, with about 1 million migrants set to come in by 2029.
The federal budget papers have forecast net overseas migration of 260,000 in 2025-26 and then 225,000 in the subsequent three years.
'There is no plan on how to house new arrivals … This is a manufactured housing disaster,' Mr Begg said.
The damning findings follow similar warnings from the National Housing Supply and Affordability Council (NHSAC).
In its State of the Housing System 2025 report, the council projected that only 938,000 homes would be built by June 2029—over 250,000 homes short of the federal target.
It noted that no state or territory was on track to meet its share of the target, based on population.
ABS figures show just 177,000 dwellings were completed in 2024—well below the estimated underlying demand of 223,000.
The Albanese government increased total housing commitments to $33 billion in the 2025 federal budget, including the $10 billion Housing Australia Future Fund.
Housing Minister Clare O'Neil has defended her approach, arguing 'it takes time to turn the tide on a housing crisis a generation in the making'.
The Property Council of Australia (PCA) has since called on governments to redouble efforts to boost housing supply productivity.
'We're projected to be 262,000 homes behind the 2029 target but imagine the gap without these reforms,' PCA Chief Executive Mike Zorbas said in a statement.
'We … desperately need to address falls in productivity that mean we're building fewer than half as many homes per hours worked today than in the mid-1990s.
'We need to move from 170,000 homes a year into the high 200,000s to meet the Accord's target.
'That requires bold leadership to dissolve assessment and approval gridlock in key corridors.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Battery boom: Australians charge into next phase of solar revolution
Battery boom: Australians charge into next phase of solar revolution

Sydney Morning Herald

timean hour ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Battery boom: Australians charge into next phase of solar revolution

Demand for household batteries is surging under the Albanese government's national rebate, with retailers reporting a fourfold rise in sales and inquiries as the scheme kicked off. However, experts warn householders that while spending thousands of dollars on a battery can dramatically cut annual power bills, it may not deliver rapid returns on investment. The Cheaper Home Batteries Program was one of the government's key election pledges, offering a 30 per cent rebate on the purchase and installation cost of a battery from July 1. Quote-comparison service SolarQuotes, owned by Origin Energy, reported a jump in battery inquiries in the lead-up to the scheme. Loading 'The volume for May was 400 per cent higher than the previous month, and about two-thirds of all quote requests are now for home batteries,' said Chris Zondanos, Origin general manager electrification. The scheme is limited to homes with solar panels, but householders without are eligible for the discount if they install panels and a battery at the same time. Scope for uptake is huge. Solar panels already soak up the sun on 4 million of the nation's 11 million homes. But just 250,000 have batteries. Battery installation company 1komma5 provided the discount to customers before the scheme kicked in. It can now claim the money back from the government.

There is only one worthwhile test of social cohesion. We may have just failed it
There is only one worthwhile test of social cohesion. We may have just failed it

The Age

timean hour ago

  • The Age

There is only one worthwhile test of social cohesion. We may have just failed it

The idea that an artwork should not be 'divisive' is an extraordinary one, an anti-creative concept which, if you follow it to its natural conclusion, leads us inexorably to the end-point of propaganda. And yet anxiety over possible divisiveness seems to have been the guiding emotional principle applied by the board of Creative Australia, the government's main arts body, when it abruptly sacked Australian artist Khaled Sabsabi and his curator Michael Dagostino as Australia's representatives at the prestigious Venice Biennale next year. The board, which this week reinstated the duo in a spectacular backflip, originally said it acted to avoid the erosion of public support for Australia's artistic community that might ensue from a 'prolonged and divisive debate'. It is assumed that a prolonged and divisive debate about an artwork is a bad thing, but it doesn't have to be. To be fair, the board's anxieties were well-founded. Loading It was February 2025 and a caravan full of explosives had been discovered in north-west Sydney. This incident was quickly labelled an anti-Jewish terror plot but was later revealed to be a 'criminal con job'. The Peter Dutton-led Coalition was hammering the Albanese government (then behind in the polls) for being soft on antisemitism. Horrific pictures of burnt and maimed Gazan children aired on television nightly. Jewish-Australians were encountering antisemitism in their day-to-day lives. Pro-Palestine and pro-Israel forces were demonstrating on the streets and clashing in arts organisations. Sabsabi, stridently pro-Palestine Lebanese-Australian, had made clear his view on Israel when he decided to boycott the 2022 Sydney Festival because it took $20,000 in funding from the Israeli Embassy. His boycott was well before the horror of the October 7, 2023 attacks by Hamas on innocent Israelis, a day of rape, torture, kidnapping and slaughter from which more and more horror has unspooled. Sabsabi's views on Israel were known when he was chosen, as was his body of work, which includes a video and sound installation called 'YOU', owned by the Museum of Contemporary Art in Sydney. 'YOU' features multiple versions of an image of Hassan Nasrallah, former head of Hezbollah.

Battery boom: Australians charge into next phase of solar revolution
Battery boom: Australians charge into next phase of solar revolution

The Age

timean hour ago

  • The Age

Battery boom: Australians charge into next phase of solar revolution

Demand for household batteries is surging under the Albanese government's national rebate, with retailers reporting a fourfold rise in sales and inquiries as the scheme kicked off. However, experts warn householders that while spending thousands of dollars on a battery can dramatically cut annual power bills, it may not deliver rapid returns on investment. The Cheaper Home Batteries Program was one of the government's key election pledges, offering a 30 per cent rebate on the purchase and installation cost of a battery from July 1. Quote-comparison service SolarQuotes, owned by Origin Energy, reported a jump in battery inquiries in the lead-up to the scheme. Loading 'The volume for May was 400 per cent higher than the previous month, and about two-thirds of all quote requests are now for home batteries,' said Chris Zondanos, Origin general manager electrification. The scheme is limited to homes with solar panels, but householders without are eligible for the discount if they install panels and a battery at the same time. Scope for uptake is huge. Solar panels already soak up the sun on 4 million of the nation's 11 million homes. But just 250,000 have batteries. Battery installation company 1komma5 provided the discount to customers before the scheme kicked in. It can now claim the money back from the government.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store