"Blatantly undemocratic move": JK CM Omar Abdullah slams curbs on visit to martyrs' graveyard
In a post on X, the JK CM said the graveyard contains the graves of those who 'laid down their lives to give Kashmiris a voice' and criticised the administration's actions as undemocratic.
'In a blatantly undemocratic move homes have been locked from the outside, police & central forces deployed as jailers & major bridges in Srinagar blocked. All to stop people from visiting a historically important grave yard containing the graves of people who laid down their lives to give Kashmiris a voice & to empower them. I will never understand what the Law & Order government is so afraid of,' Abdullah wrote.
https://x.com/OmarAbdullah/status/1944225810698658280
In another post, Abdullah compared the July 13 incident to the Jallianwala Bagh massacre and said the sacrifices of those who stood up to British rule should not be forgotten.
'13th July massacre is our Jallianwala Bagh. The people who laid down their lives did so against the British. Kashmir was being ruled under the British Paramountcy. What a shame that true heroes who fought against British rule in all its forms are today projected as villains only because they were Muslims. We may be denied the opportunity to visit their graves today but we will not forget their sacrifices,' he said.
https://x.com/OmarAbdullah/status/1944229409382113302
The JK Chief Minister's earlier tweet claiming that people were being 'stopped' from entering the martyrs' graveyard was in response to a post by Jammu and Kashmir National Conference (JKNC) chief spokesperson and Zadibal MLA Tanvir Sadiq, who also alleged that several party leaders were confined to their homes to prevent them from honouring the martyrs of July 13.
'Since last night, I like many of my colleagues, including the party leadership at Gupkar, the Advisor to the Chief Minister, and a majority of sitting MLAs have been locked inside my home. This is not just unfortunate; it is a deliberate attempt to suppress remembrance and deny us the right to honour the martyrs of July 13. Such actions are not only unnecessary they are unjustified, deeply insensitive, and reveal a troubling disregard for history,' Sadiq posted on X. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
'EPIC' trouble for Tejashwi: RJD leader's 'name missing' from Bihar poll roll claim prompts EC to look into 'forgery'; what poll panel said
Tejashwi Yadav (ANI photo) NEW DELHI: Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav 's name is in the Bihar draft electoral rolls with the EPIC number used in the last poll. Meanwhile, a probe in on to ascertain if his second EPIC numbers is forged, Election Commission of India (ECI) sources told news agency ANI. The poll body reportedly noted that it is "quite likely that the second EPIC (Election Photo Identity Card) was never made through official channel". EPIC is issued by the ECI to eligible voters. It serves as both proof of identity and eligibility to vote in elections. The poll body sources also rejected Tejaswi Yadav's allegation that his EPIC number was changed, saying that the RJD leader used the Electoral Roll with EPIC No. RAB0456228 for filling his nomination papers on affidavit in 2020. The sources told ANI that the former Bihar chief minister was having this EPIC number even in the electoral roll in 2015 and his name with this EPIC number exists in the draft Electoral Rolls. They said the other EPIC number - RAB2916120 has been found to be non-existent, and more than 10 years of records have been checked, and further inquiries are being made to understand 'whether that is a forged document'. 'The other EPIC number - RAB2916120 has been found to be non-existing. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Featuring Brigade Ebony™ at Brigade Showcase 2025 | Aug 8–10, Sheraton Grand, Brigade Gateway Brigade Group Learn More Undo More than ten years old records have been checked. No records have been found for the second EPIC number yet. It is highly likely that the second EPIC was never made through the official channel. Further inquiries are on to understand that reality of the second EPIC number, whether that is a forged document,' a source told the agency. Tejashwi Yadav, who is Lalu Yadav's son, kicked off a political storm on Saturday after publicly claiming that his name had vanished from Bihar's voter list, despite holding a valid EPIC number. Displaying the "no records found" message on a large screen during a press conference, the former Deputy CM alleged a larger conspiracy by the Election Commission to erase voters ahead of the assembly polls. However, responding to the allegations, the Election Commission of India said Tejashwi Yadav's name is present in the draft voter list. The Commission also released a copy of the list with his name to counter his claim.
The Hindu
44 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Rahul Gandhi's ‘Arun Jaitley threat' claim triggers war of words between BJP and Congress
Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi's remarks on Saturday (August 2, 2025) that former Finance Minister Arun Jaitley was allegedly sent to threaten him over his position on the controversial farm laws triggered a war of words between the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party and the Opposition Congress with the BJP fact-checking Mr. Gandhi over his claims. Congress leaders, however, pointed to meetings Mr. Jaitley had with Mr. Gandhi in 2015 and 2018. 'We are not cowards' Speaking at the All India Congress Committee's annual legal conclave on Saturday (August 2, 2025), Mr. Gandhi said: 'I shouldn't be saying this since he is no longer with us but I will still say it. I remember when I was fighting the farm laws, Arun Jaitley ji was sent to threaten me. He said 'if you continue down this path, opposing us on farm laws, we will have to act against you'. I said I don't think you know who you're talking to. We are Congress, not cowards. British couldn't bend us.' Rahul Gandhi now claims my late father, Arun Jaitley, threatened him over the farm laws. Let me remind him, my father passed away in 2019. The farm laws were introduced in 2020. More importantly, it was not in my father's nature to threaten anyone over an opposing view. He was a… — Rohan Jaitley (@rohanjaitley) August 2, 2025 These remarks almost instantaneously triggered reactions from senior BJP leaders, and Union Ministers, even as Mr. Jaitley's son Rohan Jaitley posted on social media. Mr. Jaitley said on X, 'Rahul Gandhi now claims my late father, Arun Jaitley, threatened him over the farm laws. Let me remind him, my father passed away in 2019. The farm laws were introduced in 2020. More importantly, it was not in my father's nature to threaten anyone over an opposing view. He was a staunch democrat and always believed in building consensus.' Irresponsible, says BJP Soon after, reactions poured in from Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, who called Mr. Gandhi the 'face of irresponsibility', Coal and Mines Minister G. Kishan Reddy, Goa Chief Minister Pramod Sawant, and BJP leader B.L. Santosh, all of whom pointed out that Mr. Jaitley had passed away in 2019 while the farm laws were brought in 2020. Reacting to the controversy, Congress' media and publicity chief Pawan Khera said: 'Arun Jaitley ji did not threaten on his own; obviously, he was just conveying it. The threat came from above. When history will be written, many such accounts will be written. When the APMC amendment was being brought, was Arun Jaitley not there? When the land acquisition was coming, was Arun Jaitley not there at that time? He was at the forefront. I will also show you the news item when Arun Jaitley ji went to meet him in November 2015, January 2018, 22 January 2018, everyone has all these dates.' Reacting to Mr. Gandhi's claims, Ms. Sitharaman called the statements 'despicable', adding in a post on X, 'India needs a strong opposition party. An irresponsible leadership hurts his party @INCIndia and the country. But does he care?' While Mr. Santosh said 'only sick minds' could misrepresent things about people no longer with us, Mr. Sawant and Mr. Reddy called him out for 'dragging the name' of a deceased stalwart for 'selfish politics'. Mr. Khera told a news wire service: 'Let these BJP people jump around. BJP itself does our publicity. We are very happy about this. Let them do it.'
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
If India were to stop buying Russian oil, global crude prices could jump to 200 dollars a barrel: Report
Global crude prices could jump to 200 US Dollars a barrel if India were to stop buying Russian Oil thus severely harming consumers worldwide, sources told ANI. Russian oil has never been sanctioned and is still not sanctioned by either the United States or the European Union. Providing context for India's energy security policy, sources explained that Russia, the world's second-largest crude oil producer with about 9.5 million barrels per day output – nearly 10% of global demand – is also the second-largest exporter, shipping roughly 4.5 million barrels per day of crude and 2.3 million barrels per day of refined products. Past fears of Russian oil being squeezed out of global markets had driven Brent crude prices to a high of $137 per barrel in March 2022. "In this challenging environment, India, as the world's third-largest energy consumer with 85% import dependence, strategically adapted its sourcing to secure affordable energy while fully adhering to international norms," sources added. Earlier, United States President Donald Trump on Friday ( EST) claimed that India may cease purchasing Russian oil, calling it "a good step" if confirmed, while India has defended its sovereign right to pursue an energy policy in its own national interest. News agency Reuters reported on July 31st that Indian state-run refiners suspended purchases of Russian oil amid tariff threats from President Trump and narrowing price discounts. However, Indian sources have now rebutted these reports, clarifying that Indian refiners have continued to buy Russian crude based on commercial viability. Sources further told ANI that Russian oil has never been sanctioned, but rather subjected to a G7/EU price-cap mechanism to limit Russian revenues while keeping global supplies flowing. India oil refiners' purchases have remained fully legitimate under international frameworks. "Had Indian oil refiners not absorbed discounted Russian crude, combined with OPEC production cuts of 5.86 million barrels per day, global oil prices could have surged well beyond the March 2022 peak of 137 dollars per barrel, intensifying inflation globally," sources explained. It was also highlighted that Indian oil marketing companies (OMCs) have refrained from buying Iranian or Venezuelan crude, which is actually sanctioned by the US, and have complied with the $60 per barrel price cap recommended for Russian oil by the US. The European Union has recently recommended a lower price cap of $47.6 per barrel for Russian oil, to take effect in September. Commenting on Europe's continued Russian energy imports, sources noted the EU was the largest importer of Russian-origin liquefied natural gas (LNG), buying 51% of Russia's LNG exports, followed by China at 21% and Japan at 18%. For pipeline gas, the EU remained the top buyer with a 37% share, followed by China at 30% and Turkey at 27%. Backing India oil refiners' decision to continue sourcing Russian oil, sources reiterated that India's energy choices are guided by its national interest, while also contributing to global energy stability. "India's pragmatic approach has kept oil flowing, prices stable, and markets balanced, while fully respecting international frameworks," they added.
