Building materials firm Lords Group buys rival CMO in rescue deal
London-listed firm Lords said it acquired the 'trade and assets' of CMO for around £1.8 million as part of a pre-pack administration.
The deal will secure the future of around 120 workers at Plymouth-based CMO, who will join the wider Lords group.
CMO, which was founded in 2008 as Construction Materials Online, sells more than 140,000 products to trade professionals and households through a raft of specialist superstore-branded websites.The company was listed on London's AIM junior stock market until February, when it delisted in order to help preserve funds.
The firms highlighted that the deal will not include the Tiles business previously owned by CMO.
Dean Murray, chief executive of CMO, said: 'The acquisition marks a new and exciting chapter for CMO.
'We have built a strong, digitally-led business over the past 15 years, and in Lords, we have found a partner that not only understands our model but shares our ambition.
'I am incredibly proud of what the CMO team has achieved and excited about what is next.'
Shanker Patel, chief executive of Lords, said: 'We are delighted to welcome CMO into the Lords family.
'CMO brings a well-established digital platform, strong customer reach, and a specialist product-led approach that complements our own.
'This partnership allows us to blend traditional merchanting strengths with cutting-edge digital capabilities.
'We are also mindful of the impact of the pre-pack administration process on affected parties and are committed to conducting the transition with respect.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business News Wales
43 minutes ago
- Business News Wales
Wynne Construction Secures Multi-Million-Pound Contracts with Welsh Housing Association
A Denbighshire-based construction firm has been awarded a duo of design and build contracts totalling more than £20 million by North Wales' largest housing association. Wynne Construction began building a new 47-home social housing complex on Berse Road, Wrexham, in March following its appointment from Adra. With a scheduled completion date of autumn 2026, the £9 million development will consist of apartments and a mixture of two, three, and four-bedroom homes that are available to rent. The contractor is also set to build 49 social houses on Abergele Road, Bodelwyddan, a stone's throw away from its headquarters. Work is expected to start this summer and finish in spring 2027, with the design phase of the £11 million project already underway. Wynne Construction commercial director Simon Moreton said: 'We have previously worked on behalf of Adra on major builds including Plas Penhros and Pen Y Ffridd, so I'm looking forward to continuing our positive relationship. 'As usual, we will engage with local suppliers to not only provide the necessary materials, but to boost the region's economy.' Wynne Construction quantity surveyor Corey Jones said: 'With around 80 to 100 people expected to work on each site at peak times, both developments will have a busy environment, but thanks to our experienced and skilled team members, I'm confident we will deliver quality results. 'In addition, we aim to give back to the community by welcoming apprentices and work experience students on site to give them real insight into the construction industry.' Huw Evans, Adra's Head of Development, said: 'We're delighted to be working with Wynne Construction on these two exciting new developments. 'We have a strong track record of working in partnership with the company to build new homes across North Wales. There is an increasing demand for quality, affordable homes that people can be proud of and we have made a firm commitment in our Corporate Plan to continue with our ambitious development programme. 'We look forward to see the work progressing on the Berse Road site and the works getting underway at Bodelwyddan. Wynne Construction operates throughout Wales and the North West of England, and regularly leads on projects in sectors including education, social housing, healthcare, and sport and leisure. The company is also on the North Wales Construction Partnership (NWCP), Pagabo's Medium Works Framework, the South-East and mid-Wales Collaborative Construction Framework (SEWSCAP3) and the South West Wales Regional Contractors Framework (SSWRCF).
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
UK to spend more than $8 billion on submarine-building capacity
LONDON, June 10 (Reuters) - Britain will invest over six billion pounds ($8.13 billion) in its submarine building capacity, supporting firms like defence group BAE Systems and engineering multinational Rolls-Royce, finance minister Rachel Reeves is set to announce on Tuesday. Responding to U.S. President Donald Trump's insistence that Europe take more responsibility for its own security, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has pledged the largest sustained increase in British defence spending since the end of the Cold War. Last week, Britain said it would increase the size of its nuclear-powered attack submarine fleet to as many as 12, up from the current seven, responding to an independent review of its current military capacity and ability to meet future threats. No cost was given at the time but in a speech on Tuesday Reeves will say that investments in the defence nuclear sector will include over six billion pounds to boost the "capacity, capability and productivity of the UK's submarine industrial base", including at BAE Systems and Rolls-Royce Submarines, a subsidiary of Rolls-Royce. The investment, which will cover the four-year spending review period, will help companies deliver the increase in submarine production rate announced last week, the government said in a statement. Reeves will announce the results of her first multi-year spending review on Wednesday, including an investment of four billion pounds over the next decade in its Plymouth naval base. The finance minister will also announce an investment in the redevelopment of a naval base in Scotland and in Sheffield Forgemasters, a steel company that produces components for submarines. ($1 = 0.7387 pounds)
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Thames Water's creditors are being too greedy
If you would kindly rip up the regulatory system, move the goalposts on sewage and spills and promise not to fine us too much, we'd be delighted to rescue Thames Water. If these requests cause you political difficulty, dear secretary of state, consider how much worse it could be if you end up controlling this failing company yourself. Do you really wish to be responsible for every burst water main in London and every drop of effluent in Didcot? That seems to be the pitch from the 100-plus group of lenders to Thames Water who are now the only game in town in terms of a 'market-led' recapitalisation, the alternative to special administration, AKA temporary nationalisation. It is expressed in the bland language of 'regulatory support', but the meaning isn't hard to translate. A 'rebased' performance target is a lower one. A 'pragmatic approach to historic and future legal and regulatory compliance' means letting Thames off substantial financial penalties – maybe a billion or two over the next five to 10 years – that would otherwise come its way. If the proposal sounds outrageous (it does), in one sense you can't blame the creditors for giving it a go. Sir Jon Cunliffe's Independent Water Commission, in its interim report last week, nodded to the general idea that failing water companies will need a helping hand from regulators to haul themselves off the floor. 'The commission is of the view that a more formal framework for supporting companies to turnaround performance may be needed, to avoid a future 'doom loop',' the report said. The use of the loaded 'doom loop' phrase will have delighted the creditors. It is exactly how they describe Thames's predicament of fines out to the horizon. If you want to improve the assets, goes their argument, something has to give – and would have to give even under a nationalised setup. There are, though, at least two enormous difficulties to the creditors' plan. Most obviously, how could Steve Reed, the environment secretary, possibly sanction legal immunity for serious environmental crimes for private sector owners of Thames? Remember Reed's refrain every time he bashes a bonus: 'With this government, the era of profiting from pollution is over.' It is hard to walk back that statement. Second, even if the Cunliffe commission's thinking provides philosophical support for regulatory 'flexibility', the final report is still a couple of months away, and parliamentary scrutiny will be needed before the regulatory system for the water industry could be changed fundamentally. The timeframe is beyond the would-be new owners' plan for recapitalising Thames. Thus, if the creditor group has any prospect of getting its proposal to fly, a few of its big numbers will have to look very different from the ones presented in the self-serving outline version. In short, the senior lenders are being far too greedy in imagining they can escape with writedowns on their debt of just 20%, the ratio implied by the proposed £3.2bn hit to total A class debt of £16bn. Come on. The haircut for lenders cannot be that light. The market value of the debt is already implying 30% writedowns. Some of the opportunistic vulture funds are thought to have got in at as low as 60p in the pound; Reed and Ofwat, the water regulator for England and Wales, would look like fools if they approved, in effect, hefty day-one paper profits for them. But it is – just about – possible to imagine a deal in which Thames pays its fines upfront, as it were, in the interest of allowing managers to concentrate on the day job of running the business rather than hiring lawyers to fight Ofwat and the Environment Agency. Add £1.6bn as a settlement of outstanding bad behaviour and in effect you'd get a haircut for senior lenders of 30%. Or maybe the figure would have to be closer to 40% to allow Reed to save face. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Alternatively, the environment secretary may decide that negotiations are a waste of time, that legal shenanigans don't work, or that regulatory get-outs set a bad precedent, or that Thames is too far gone. It would be a reasonable point of view: if you really want to clear the decks, special administration is the surest route. The next step – deal or no deal – looks to be genuinely in the balance; don't underestimate the government's desire to avoid nationalisation. Haircuts of only 20%, however, just don't work. If the bondholders wish their inflammatory proposal to be taken seriously, they should be told to come back with a proper number, or have one imposed on them.
