EXCLUSIVE Virgin Island takes VERY racy turn as expert straddles star for steamy kiss in bid to conquer 'fear of genitals touching'
The new programme, which hit our screens earlier this month, sees a group of 12 adults - who have never had sex - head to an island in Croatia to explore intimacy with help from sex experts.
It has been hinted that some of the contributors end up going the whole way with sex surrogates Andre Lazarus and Kat Slade - who they practice the physical moments of a relationship with.
In a sneak peek at today's episode (Tuesday 20 May 2025) accountant Dave, 24, will get up close and personal with Kat.
Speaking to the camera, Dave confessed: 'I don't have the confidence to get to know someone.
'In an intimate moment I'm scared about what they are going to think about my body and what I am like.
'I've got to start living my life properly.'
The voice over explains: 'Getting naked in the work shop was a huge step for Dave. But does it mean he's ready to take his therapy to the next level?'
Kat tells Dave: 'My suggestion would be to practice touch and giving feed back.'
A nervous Dave replies: 'Okay.'
The pair get closer to each other on the sofa and she tells him: 'I'll have you to start with my arm...'
Dave then strokes the top of her shoulder, but he nervously says: 'I'll try. Long and stuff.'
Kat asks Dave: 'Can you look at me while you do it?'
Dave responds: 'Yeah I can.'
The voice over explains: 'Building up to sex to a surrogate partner Kat is a possibility if Dave can master the basics and form a connection.'
While lying down, Dave asks her: 'Am I okay to try and sort of go on top?'
As he gets on top of her, Kat tells him: 'And you can kiss too, with your mouth if you want.'
After locking lips for one second, Dave tells her: 'I don't feel like this is the best position.
'I don't like the way my arm is. '
Kat asks him: 'Are you self conscious about our genitals touching each other? Is that why you're in that position?'
She continues: 'Does that make you uncomfortable?'
A truthful Dave says: 'Subconsciously, yeah.'
So Kat asks if he wants to try again with her on top in stead, to which he was down to try.
'Can you go on top?' Dave asks, to which she tells him: 'Absolutely.'
Just moments into kissing, Kat ruffles his hair and says: 'Can you practice coming alive a little?'
'Yeah, I'm staying still, aren't I?' Dave replies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Donor ‘shocked' as national library excludes gender-critical book
Scotland's national librarian is facing mounting pressure to reinstate a gender-critical book which she banned from a major exhibition, after a key donor joined a revolt against the move. Alex Graham, who has given around £300,000 to the library, said he had been 'shocked and angry' to learn that The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht had been excluded from an exhibit that he personally supported with a donation of about £20,000. Graham, the creator of the television show Who Do You Think You Are, urged Amina Shah, Scotland's chief librarian and the chief executive of the National Library of Scotland, to reverse her decision. He said that if she did not, he would have to consider whether or not to continue to provide lucrative donations to the library, as he has done for the past 12 years. The critically acclaimed book, a collection of essays by more than 30 women about their role in the feminist campaign against Nicola Sturgeon's gender self-ID law, was set to be included in its Dear Library exhibition, after it was nominated by several members of the public. However, The Times revealed on Wednesday that it was pulled after a backlash by the library's internal LGBT staff network, which claimed it contained 'hate speech' and that displaying it would cause 'severe harm' to workers. They threatened to 'notify LGBT+ partners of the library's endorsement of the book' if management did not cave in. Shah justified the decision by citing the potential impact on 'key stakeholders' and the library's reputation if the gender-critical book was included, but has faced intense opposition after her ban was made public. In a major intervention, Graham called on the library to admit its mistake and reinstate the book to Dear Library, which Shah had publicly thanked him for his role in funding. He said that if it did not, he would have no option but to publicly disassociate himself from the campaign, saying the library had given in to what he claimed was a 'censorious, bullying culture' instead of standing up for ideals of free speech. The book's editors, Lucy Hunter Blackburn and Susan Dalgety, have branded the removal of their work 'cowardly and anti-democratic' and repeated their call for the decision to be reversed. 'I think this was a fundamental mistake and the correct thing for the library to do would be to put up their hands, admit that and reinstate the book,' Graham said. 'Instead, there have been weaselly responses. 'The library is not saying they have taken it out because it contains hate speech, because it does not. They've taken it out because of some ill-conceived notion that someone might be upset by its presence. That's not a good enough reason for me.' Graham added: 'This is not about taking one side or the other on the trans debate. It's about the principles of open debate and free speech, which to the national library should be sacrosanct. 'It isn't too late to redeem the situation. But if there is not a change of heart, I feel I will have no choice but to publicly dissociate myself from the exhibition and the campaign that surrounds it. 'This stupid escapade does not undo the very good work the library does, but it should never have happened. 'I couldn't say definitely that I will not donate any more money if they stick to their guns on this, but it has certainly given me pause for thought. That makes me incredibly sad.' Shah, who last year received a salary of between £105,000 and £110,000 in addition to pension contributions of £41,000, decided to exclude the book with the support of Sir Drummond Bone, the chairman of the National Library of Scotland (NLS). An insider within the cultural sector in Scotland said the decision was symptomatic of a wider trend of managers being seen to cave in to demands of young, activist staff members who have little resilience or tolerance of views different to their own. Graham became a major donor to the NLS as he credited free access to books at Cambuslang public library in his childhood as shaping his life and allowing him to go on to pursue a highly successful career in television. He sold his television company, Wall to Wall, in which he purchased a 33 per cent share for £1 in 1987, for about £25 million two decades later. Although the library receives the bulk of its funding from the Scottish government, private donors such as Graham, who has been repeatedly acknowledged by the library for his philanthropy, are also essential to its work. Graham has been one of the library's major donors over the past decade, funding major projects such as the digitisation of medieval manuscripts. He funds a scholarship at the library which is named in his honour, as is a room at the National Library of Scotland's moving image library at Kelvin Hall, Glasgow. Graham's generosity in supporting the centenary celebrations was singled out for praise by Shah at the launch of the Dear Library exhibition in June. Graham said he was initially impressed with it, before discovering that The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht, which included a contribution from JK Rowling, had been excluded. 'On the opening night of the exhibition, I thought it was fantastic, because I found at least two books in there that I consider to be among the worst ever written,' Graham said. 'I said to Amina I thought that was great, because the whole point was that while some people are inspired by a book, others will hate it. That's the joy of the society we live in and the freedom that we have. 'There are books that are beyond the pale, but there are very few of them. You need to be very careful before you ban anything. 'This book [The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht] was clearly selected to be included, and frankly the management were then bullied out of that by a staff lobby group. 'They say they've removed this book to protect relationships with stakeholders. But they certainly didn't consult me and if they had, I would have voiced strong opposition. I am angry and disappointed at the decision to remove the book as well as the implication that as a stakeholder, I am somehow supportive of it, which I am not.' Kate Forbes, the deputy first minister, has found herself at the centre of a similar row after staff and performers at Edinburgh's Summerhall arts venue criticised her views on trans rights. Summerhall's bosses said Forbes had been permitted to speak at the venue as 'an oversight' after some of the artists set up a 'safe room' while the 5ft 2in politician was present as they were 'terrified' because of her opinions. A whistleblower who works within the arts sector in Scotland said that activist staff members were becoming increasingly powerful within major publicly funded institutions. 'I have been in so many meetings where it is just taken as a given that everyone there is in lockstep on these issues — that everyone hates JK Rowling and that books like The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht are dangerous and harmful,' a source claimed. 'The internal LGBT networks are given carte blanche and it is very isolating to those of us who do not agree with their extreme views, who are forced to self-censor or face, at best, being socially ostracised at work. 'It sounds ridiculous but those of us who don't agree with them feel like we're in an underground network like the French resistance or something, secretly sending each other supportive messages.' The insider added: 'A major part of the problem across the cultural sector is the infantilisation of younger staff members, who can't cope with any type of conflict or opposition to their views. 'This has now led to the ridiculous situation where people intolerant of ideas and books are not only working in our national library, but are calling the shots. Management are terrified and pander to them every time they have a tantrum.' The NLS has sought to defend its decision not to platform the book at its exhibition by claiming there were only 200 spaces for public display, and it received more than 500 nominations. However, documents released under a freedom of information request show that all books with two or more nominations were initially to be included in the public display, with the Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht obtaining four. Joanna Cherry, the former SNP MP and one of the essayists in the book, accused Shah of attempting to mislead her own staff with a message that claimed the library was not 'banning or censoring' books. Although the library does hold a copy of the book — a legal obligation given its statutory role — its exclusion from the Dear Library exhibition was the direct result of complaints from the LGBT staff network who did not like its contents, the documents show. 'I'm concerned that the librarian seems to be misleading her staff as well as the public and the media about what has occurred here,' Cherry said. 'The issue is not whether the book is available within the library's collections but her decision to withdraw it from an exhibition where it had rightly earned its place because of the prejudiced demands of a small group of her staff.' Cherry added: 'There is an increasing pattern in Scottish society where zealots masquerading as LGBTQ+ activists seek to censor women who want to talk about their rights. 'This book was written by feminists, survivors and lesbians. To remove it from an exhibition is not only an attack on freedom of expression, it is also discriminatory.' Hunter Blackburn said: 'We are very saddened that it has come to this, but we understand why Mr Graham has reached what must have been a very difficult decision for him. 'We will continue to seek for this to be resolved by the library making an unreserved apology, putting the book back in the exhibition where it won its rightful place, and, it becomes increasingly clear, undertaking a root-and-branch review of its internal culture and practices.' A spokeswoman for the NLS said: 'We are engaged in a robust and respectful conversation with Mr Graham about this matter, and we will accept his decision regardless of the outcome. 'It goes without saying we are indebted to Mr Graham for his support to the national library over the years. His assistance has helped us to preserve collections, reach new audiences and give young people's careers that much needed start through our apprenticeship programme.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Dear Nicola, When I look at what you have done to my homeland, I feel like weeping. Now you're nothing more than a two bit celeb with a book to flog: JAN MOIR
Dear Nicola, Well, well. Here we are in the brave new world of your post-political life, one in which you have swapped your role as former SNP warrior-leader for that of in-demand celebrity author on the promotional circuit. Everybody wants a piece of Nicola, and no wonder.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Captain Tom's daughter unveils new book bid: Disgraced Hannah Ingram-Moore vows to pen 10 titles, including an autobiography, after being slated for 'money-grabbing memoir'
The disgraced daughter of the Covid hero Captain Tom has revealed plans to write 10 more books despite the backlash over her 'money-grabbing' memoir. Hannah Ingram-Moore, 54, is writing multiple wellness books, an autobiography and children's' works. But her £8.99 memoir, Grief: Public Face Private Loss, has flopped as it was reported to have sold only one copy a day. The text also only has a 2.8 out of 5 rating and currently sits at number 696,973 in the Amazon sales charts. However this hasn't stopped her from wanting to pen more titles. She stated on her website: 'I am currently working on over ten new titles, each shaped by different parts of my life and perspective; among them are: personal resilience, business resilience, business success, personal branding, reclaiming wellness, leadership and legacy-building, animal rescue and the dogs who've changed my life, children's books about kindness, empathy, and strength. 'And, when the time is right, my full autobiography. Each of these books is driven by the same desire: to tell the truth with grace, and to create space for others to do the same. 'I never set out to be an author, but as my journey unfolded, I realised the power of using my voice with intention and the importance of telling stories that truly matter. Mrs Ingram-Moore and her husband Colin, 68, have been embroiled in scandal when the charity watchdog found they had pocketed more than £1million in his name from links to the Captain Tom Foundation (pictured in TalkTV interview with Piers Morgan) 'Writing has become my refuge, a space for reflection, and a means to offer something enduring. I hope you discover something within these pages that resonates with you and perhaps even assists you in rediscovering your own voice, too.' Mrs Ingram-Moore and her husband Colin, 68, have been embroiled in scandal since Covid hero Captain Tom stole the hearts of the nation when he walked 100 laps of his garden to raise money for the NHS before marking his 100th birthday in 2020. Almost £39million was raised for NHS charities and he was knighted by the Queen in July 2020. Later that year his memoir, Tomorrow Will Be A Good Day, was published. He wrote in the prologue that it was 'a chance to raise even more money for the charitable foundation now established in my name.' But following his death in 2021 the couple were condemned when the charity watchdog uncovered 'repeated failures of governance and integrity', and found they had pocketed more than £1million in his name from links to the Captain Tom Foundation. A critical report published by the Charity Commission in November last year found that the Ingram-Moores benefited 'significantly' through their association with the high-profile Captain Tom Foundation and were guilty of 'serious and repeated' instances of misconduct, mismanagement and failures of integrity - among them a book deal. The public had been 'misled', said the damning report, when buying items they thought would benefit the Captain Tom Foundation, which was set up in May 2020 to carry on raising money for charity after the success of his sponsored walk. The couple even put charity money into building an illegal spa in their garden, which was later ordered to be demolished. In January, they erased the walking veteran's name from the charity set up in his honour. Ms Ingram-Moore was also paid 'thousands of pounds' through her family company for appearances linked to her late father's charity, it was revealed last August. Earlier this year Mrs Ingram-Moore told the BBC she was sorry if the public felt misled. She said: 'I genuinely am. But there was never any attempt to mislead and if there was any misleading it wasn't our doing.' Mrs Ingram-Moore has been approached for comment. The 54-year-old has started doling out motivational advice on social media - but not everyone has been impressed with her attempted revamp. She has taken to TikTok in an apparent attempt to cleanse her image and rebrand herself, posting videos under the title 'Moore Moments'. In these she delivers bite-sized motivational talks and explains how she's had to rise above the criticism and challenges she's faced. In one of the videos, she said: 'It's Hannah with "Moore Moments". 'The last few years have tested me. The criticism, the judgement, the noise, but here is what I have learnt. 'Self-doubt gets louder when you're under pressure. Confidence that comes from keeping going quietly, consistently, even when people doubt you. 'You don't have to prove them wrong, you just have to believe in yourself and trust your truth.' But critics aren't buying with many taking to the comments section to take aim at her, with one saying: 'You've absolutely no shame!!!' Another one said: 'What are you doing, no one likes you'
