From tunnel to Turkey: How Hamas leader Sinwar's widow escaped and remarried — what report reveals
Yahya Sinwar
's widow, Samar Abu Zamer, entered the Hamas tunnel with children, later went to Turkey with a fake passport, according to Ynet.
As conditions worsen under Israeli airstrikes in Gaza, reports indicate that families of high-ranking Hamas leaders have departed the territory, sparking local discontent.
Ynet suggest that prominent Hamas officials' families were evacuated from Gaza early in the conflict, utilising falsified documentation and external support networks. These unconfirmed accounts have generated resentment amongst besieged residents.
The Israeli military released evidence in January showing Samar Abu Zamer, Yahya Sinwar's widow, entering a Hamas tunnel with her children. Sources later informed Ynet that she had relocated to Turkey using false documentation.
"She's no longer here—she crossed through the Rafah border using a fake passport," one source revealed, citing sophisticated coordination unavailable to ordinary citizens.
Reports indicate Abu Zamer remarried again in Turkey following Sinwar's death, arranged by Hamas official Fathi Hammad. She previously faced criticism for carrying a luxury Hermès Birkin handbag whilst in tunnels.
Questions surround Najwa Sinwar, widow of Muhammad Sinwar, with sources suggesting she departed Gaza with her children before her husband's death.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Why are some Chinese youth calling themselves 'rat people', and what issues does it surface?
CNA
Read More
Undo
Israeli officials confirmed both women's exit via Rafah crossing.
A Gaza resident who survived recent attacks expressed frustration: "They send their children to study in Turkey and Qatar—and send ours to the grave."
Analysts note Hamas maintains established networks for evacuating leaders' families, using forged documents and diplomatic connections.
One notable exception is Umm Khaled, wife of Hamas commander Mohammed Deif, who appeared in recent footage at home with her children, stating: "There are four mattresses and a mat in our house.
That's how it was before the war, and after. I'm not fleeing. I'm here with my people."
As humanitarian conditions deteriorate, residents increasingly scrutinise their leadership's commitment. "Did we carry the burden for the sake of resistance," questioned one local, "or just so Hamas leaders can live in five-star hotels in Doha and Istanbul?"
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
11 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Canada says it will recognise Palestine as a state
Canada intends to recognise the Palestinian state, Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Wednesday. Ottawa will formally recognise Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly in September. The prime minister said that while Canada had for long supported a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine dispute, the 'approach is no longer tenable'. The prospect for a two-state solution had 'steadily and gravely eroded' because of Palestinian militant group Hamas' 'pervasive threat' to Israelis and its rejection of Israel's right to exist. The approach had also been hurt by the accelerated settlements by Israel in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, the Israeli parliament's call to annex the West Bank and Tel Aviv's failure to prevent the humanitarian disaster in Gaza, Carney said in a statement. 'Preserving a two-state solution means standing with all people who choose peace over violence or terrorism, and honouring their innate desire for the peaceful co-existence of Israeli and Palestinian states as the only roadmap for a secure and prosperous future,' he said. Carney said that the recognition of Palestine was based on assurances by the Palestinian Authority that it will carry out governance reforms and hold an election in 2026 in which Hamas 'can play no part'. The Palestinian Authority represents the State of Palestine at the UN. Ottawa said that Hamas must immediately release all hostages taken during the attack on Israel in October 2023. It also said that Hamas must disarm and 'play no role in the future governance of Palestine'. Israel's foreign ministry said on Thursday that Canada's changed position on the matter 'at this time is a reward for Hamas and harms the efforts to achieve a ceasefire in Gaza and a framework for the release of the hostages'. As of March, Palestine was recognised as a sovereign state by 147 out of the 193 United Nations members. Palestine has been a non-member observer state of the UN General Assembly since 2012. Carney's announcement came a day after the United Kingdom said that it would recognise the Palestinian state unless Tel Aviv agrees to a ceasefire in Gaza, among other conditions. On July 25, France had said that it would recognise the Palestinian state. President Emmanuel Macron had also said that the formal announcement will be made before the UN General Assembly in September. Israel's military offensive in Gaza began in October 2023 after Hamas killed 1,200 persons during its incursion into southern Israel and took hostages. Israel has been carrying out unprecedented air and ground strikes on Gaza since then, leaving more than 61,000 persons dead. Tel Aviv has also enforced a severe blockade on humanitarian aid, which UN officials say has brought the population to the verge of famine.
Time of India
11 minutes ago
- Time of India
'The time is long overdue': Bernie Sanders calls on Senate to end US military funding to Israel
Liberal Senator Bernie Sanders urged Congress to end US military aid to Israel on Wednesday (July 30). Quoting a Brown University Research Council that calculated that the United States has paid for 70% of the Gaza war, Sanders said that American taxpayer dollars have been used to starve children, bomb schools, kill civilians, and support the cruelty of Netanyahu and his criminal ministers. 'The time is long overdue for Congress to use the leverage we have,' Sanders said, speaking in front of pictures of starving children in Gaza. The Gaza health ministry reported seven more hunger-related deaths on Wednesday, including a two-year-old girl with an existing health condition. The Hamas-run government media office in Gaza said the Israeli military killed at least 50 people within three hours on Wednesday as they tried to get food from U.N. aid trucks coming into the northern Gaza Strip. Show more Show less
Economic Times
41 minutes ago
- Economic Times
We can't be sure 25% will be Trump's final tariff; India should have taken tougher stand like China: Swaminathan Aiyar
Swaminathan Aiyar, Consulting Editor, ET Now, argues that India's initial accommodative approach towards Trump's trade policies has backfired, contrasting it with China's more assertive stance. Giving in to demands like the Google tax without reciprocation signaled weakness, leading to harsher tariffs. A tougher stance from the beginning might have yielded a better outcome for India in trade negotiations with the US. We just spoke last evening. We were thinking about what is going to happen, but finally Donald Trump has decided on a 25% tariff plus additional penalties. Your first thoughts. Swaminathan Aiyar: I would straight away say please do not say finally. Mr Trump is still going to be dancing around. He says 25% plus. It may then become minus. It may become a plus again. Anybody who thinks that this is a final tariff for his four years of power is very much mistaken. I am quite sure that in subsequent years too he is going to try. First this shows that all the stuff about India being a special position or some chemistry between Modi and Trump was optimistic faff. And if the interim tariff was supposed to be 26% and people thought oh, how high and now it is 25 plus, it is going to be even worse than the interim tariff. There were a lot of optimistic things about some interim agreement and that is not the way it is working out. I would also add that there were many people who earlier said let us be very accommodative, let us give in to Trump as far as possible and let us not get into a retaliation game with him. For instance, one thing that we gave up without anything in return was the Google tax to try and modify the man in advance. Now, if we see between our approach and China's approach, China said I am absolutely going to stand up to you. The Chinese approach ultimately turns out to be better. If you stand up to Trump, you are going to get a better deal. If you just give in to begin with, he sees a weakness. He sees that India just does not have that many cards in this particular game and he is going to slap you with whatever he wants. You just say that I am going to buy some more US energy. Well, everybody is saying that. The EU is saying that. Even China is saying that and that does not appear to be any kind of strong point that we have. So, all I can say is that we should have been tougher to begin with, but let us see what happens. This is a significant tariff. With this tariff you are going to be harder hit. Earlier, we thought that we will be better off than say Bangladesh or various other people and have an advantage over them. Now, it is no longer so certain. We just do not know. So, let us see going forward. I will merely say things have turned out to be worse than we had expected. It shows that there is no special chemistry and it shows that we should have stood up to China in the first instance instead of being so soft. We will have to see how the situation pans out. But what is your understanding on how long are these tariffs going to continue because we were given to understand that a trade team from the United States is going to visit India on August 25th. Do you think there is going to be some respite and how soon can a respite from these tariffs come about? Swaminathan Aiyar: Anybody who thinks that because Trump comes here it means that we get some favours on the Trump side on the tariff side, is wrong. I think we have already been shown very clearly what the situation is. He has treated us like any other country and the fact that we were soft to begin with, has not wooed him over. There is no special chemistry. It was just a mistake to start on that basis. So, again, the idea that just because he drops into India he will give us a favour or two, has no basis. He may give us a slap or two. Given the kind of reputation he has, the way he is carrying on, we have to get rid of the idea that by being friends, by being goody-goody we are somehow going to get something out of him on the trade side. The plain and simple fact is that they have a large trade deficit. It is not going to go away. But I have to disagree with you just a little bit. You can disagree with me as well. When it comes to India's strategy to deal with the United States, we have stood our ground, we have not let the United States cross the very red lines that India is trying to protect whether it is with respect to agri, dairy, GM crops, or even on e-commerce. So, India has stood its ground and perhaps it is one of very few countries in Southeast Asia which has not really agreed to Donald Trump's tariffs and conditions and of course, the pressure that he is trying to build since April. Swaminathan Aiyar: I would say that you are going to be hit by him anyway. He is not interested in India doing well. He is interested in the USA doing well. There is this large trade deficit between the two and truth be told, it is difficult to see what India could buy. Earlier, there was this talk about buying fancy fighter planes at $100 million each. After what we have seen in Operation Sindoor and in Ukraine, the success of drones and loitering munitions, we should just forget about massive arms purchases since it is a waste of money. We should be developing much cheaper things, a lot of it on our own. So, as I said, just by saying that we will buy more arms, we should not buy more arms. We are offering to buy more energy but everybody is offering to buy more energy from them and there is a limit to what they can produce. How do you anticipate the markets to react today? We have spoken to some other investors as well. They are saying that the markets have already priced in the impact of these tariffs. What is your expectation on how the markets are going to react tomorrow? Swaminathan Aiyar: In the short run, there can be a setback. I believe the rupee has weakened which again will be a weak point as far as foreign investors are concerned. The outcome right now is much worse than had been anticipated because the outcome is much worse, there will be some downward movement. By and large, the markets were very disturbed in April when Mr Trump first came out with these huge so-called reciprocal tariffs. After that they say this guy put something high and he negotiates something else, up and down, this that and the other. So, they are saying that this will have some impact in the short run but seeing through it to the longer run, they are saying India has good prospects and the world has good prospects. Yes, the growth prospect has been brought down earlier in April, but you have just seen that the IMF in its World Economic Outlook has said things do not look as bad as they looked like in April and because of that, there have been some upward revisions. As I said, in the short-term, there are some negatives but in the medium term, the market will go up again. So, when you say that in April things did not look as bad perhaps and it is going to perhaps get impacted that much more because these tariffs will come into effect starting August 1. There was a relief period given by Trump and of course, 10% baseline tariff applied on countries across the globe and of course, the impact is going to be that much more. You mentioned the IMF data and the RBI also projected that the Indian economy will grow between 6% and 6.5%. Can that number be sustained and what impact will these tariffs have on the Indian economy in the near term? Swaminathan Aiyar: Apart from what I have said, we are going to find it more difficult to export. The idea that India would have a window to compete better vis-à-vis China is now an illusion. Earlier, there was the idea that the smartphones being manufactured by Apple in India, are going to be competitive with China. I am no longer quite certain that would be the case. The value addition in India is so small that if there is a 25% tariff, how much advantage will we have over anybody else? The same question might apply to Samsung. We were very gung-ho on this particular sector and a very large part of these exports were going to the USA. There is now a big question mark. Look at the entire PLI policy. There were 14 sectors, and out of those 14 sectors, only one sector seems to be succeeding, even that is in jeopardy. But still the cost of making an iPhone in the United States is far more than it is of making it here and, of course, data suggests that iPhone exports from India to the United States have exceeded those from China. But rightly said, it remains to be seen whether that momentum can be sustained. On the 25th, a team from the United States is going to arrive in India. How soon can a bilateral trade agreement, the first branch of it, can be completed? Do you think India and the United States will be able to finalise a deal by fall this year? Swaminathan Aiyar: In my personal opinion, Trump regards this as an occasion to bully India and force it into various contracts especially on the arms. Anybody who thinks he is coming here to give you some golgapas and lollipops is wrong. I do not think that is the way he behaves. He will come here and say we are great friends. So, you must buy all these extremely expensive aircraft from me and the electronics that you require for this. He will offer you some very expensive drones also and maybe some of those we can buy. But Mr Trump will regard this as an occasion to squeeze more out of India. Do not think that the relationship is such that we can squeeze much out of him. There is this constant notion that if anything comes here it is a gain. Let us wait and watch. I am willing to bet that Mr Trump will push his agenda. If we see the trend that Donald Trump has been following with several countries in negotiations, be it with countries in Southeast Asia or with EU or Japan, a significant component is related to investments into the United States or perhaps as a part of manufacturing. Specifically in talks with the EU, they have committed to investments in energy infrastructure in the United States. If India asks for relief on these tariffs and of course on steel and aluminium, is there going to be a component about perhaps increasing investments into the United States? Swaminathan Aiyar: The Government of India has no ability to force Indians to invest in energy there. So, it is not going to happen. China may be able to give an assurance like that. We cannot say we give you an assurance that Reliance is going to invest out there. If you say ONGC is going to invest, I mean people will find it hard to find anything even here, let alone in various other places. It will not be treated as serious. As I said, India is not a big important country. We are still a lower middle-income country. So, in terms of competing with the European Union, Britain, Japan – all of whom have been asked to invest, we will remain a tiny pygmy compared with the others. So yes, he will demand that. And yet his main expectation is that India will buy stuff from America. As for foreign investment in another country, it takes many years to work that out. The investment itself will be distributed over a large number of years, especially in the energy sector. I do not think this is where India has any kind of comparative advantage. We do have a comparative advantage in buying arms, but as I said, I am against buying arms. At this point of time, we need to totally change the kind of armaments pattern that we have had so far and that will not be something that Mr Trump will be happy about.
