
We can't be sure 25% will be Trump's final tariff; India should have taken tougher stand like China: Swaminathan Aiyar
We just spoke last evening. We were thinking about what is going to happen, but finally Donald Trump has decided on a 25% tariff plus additional penalties. Your first thoughts.
Swaminathan Aiyar: I would straight away say please do not say finally. Mr Trump is still going to be dancing around. He says 25% plus. It may then become minus. It may become a plus again. Anybody who thinks that this is a final tariff for his four years of power is very much mistaken. I am quite sure that in subsequent years too he is going to try.
First this shows that all the stuff about India being a special position or some chemistry between Modi and Trump was optimistic faff. And if the interim tariff was supposed to be 26% and people thought oh, how high and now it is 25 plus, it is going to be even worse than the interim tariff. There were a lot of optimistic things about some interim agreement and that is not the way it is working out. I would also add that there were many people who earlier said let us be very accommodative, let us give in to Trump as far as possible and let us not get into a retaliation game with him. For instance, one thing that we gave up without anything in return was the Google tax to try and modify the man in advance. Now, if we see between our approach and China's approach, China said I am absolutely going to stand up to you. The Chinese approach ultimately turns out to be better. If you stand up to Trump, you are going to get a better deal. If you just give in to begin with, he sees a weakness. He sees that India just does not have that many cards in this particular game and he is going to slap you with whatever he wants. You just say that I am going to buy some more US energy. Well, everybody is saying that. The EU is saying that. Even China is saying that and that does not appear to be any kind of strong point that we have. So, all I can say is that we should have been tougher to begin with, but let us see what happens. This is a significant tariff. With this tariff you are going to be harder hit. Earlier, we thought that we will be better off than say Bangladesh or various other people and have an advantage over them. Now, it is no longer so certain. We just do not know. So, let us see going forward. I will merely say things have turned out to be worse than we had expected. It shows that there is no special chemistry and it shows that we should have stood up to China in the first instance instead of being so soft.
We will have to see how the situation pans out. But what is your understanding on how long are these tariffs going to continue because we were given to understand that a trade team from the United States is going to visit India on August 25th. Do you think there is going to be some respite and how soon can a respite from these tariffs come about?
Swaminathan Aiyar: Anybody who thinks that because Trump comes here it means that we get some favours on the Trump side on the tariff side, is wrong. I think we have already been shown very clearly what the situation is. He has treated us like any other country and the fact that we were soft to begin with, has not wooed him over. There is no special chemistry. It was just a mistake to start on that basis. So, again, the idea that just because he drops into India he will give us a favour or two, has no basis. He may give us a slap or two. Given the kind of reputation he has, the way he is carrying on, we have to get rid of the idea that by being friends, by being goody-goody we are somehow going to get something out of him on the trade side. The plain and simple fact is that they have a large trade deficit. It is not going to go away. But I have to disagree with you just a little bit. You can disagree with me as well. When it comes to India's strategy to deal with the United States, we have stood our ground, we have not let the United States cross the very red lines that India is trying to protect whether it is with respect to agri, dairy, GM crops, or even on e-commerce. So, India has stood its ground and perhaps it is one of very few countries in Southeast Asia which has not really agreed to Donald Trump's tariffs and conditions and of course, the pressure that he is trying to build since April.
Swaminathan Aiyar: I would say that you are going to be hit by him anyway. He is not interested in India doing well. He is interested in the USA doing well. There is this large trade deficit between the two and truth be told, it is difficult to see what India could buy. Earlier, there was this talk about buying fancy fighter planes at $100 million each. After what we have seen in Operation Sindoor and in Ukraine, the success of drones and loitering munitions, we should just forget about massive arms purchases since it is a waste of money. We should be developing much cheaper things, a lot of it on our own. So, as I said, just by saying that we will buy more arms, we should not buy more arms. We are offering to buy more energy but everybody is offering to buy more energy from them and there is a limit to what they can produce.
How do you anticipate the markets to react today? We have spoken to some other investors as well. They are saying that the markets have already priced in the impact of these tariffs. What is your expectation on how the markets are going to react tomorrow?
Swaminathan Aiyar: In the short run, there can be a setback. I believe the rupee has weakened which again will be a weak point as far as foreign investors are concerned. The outcome right now is much worse than had been anticipated because the outcome is much worse, there will be some downward movement. By and large, the markets were very disturbed in April when Mr Trump first came out with these huge so-called reciprocal tariffs. After that they say this guy put something high and he negotiates something else, up and down, this that and the other. So, they are saying that this will have some impact in the short run but seeing through it to the longer run, they are saying India has good prospects and the world has good prospects. Yes, the growth prospect has been brought down earlier in April, but you have just seen that the IMF in its World Economic Outlook has said things do not look as bad as they looked like in April and because of that, there have been some upward revisions. As I said, in the short-term, there are some negatives but in the medium term, the market will go up again.
So, when you say that in April things did not look as bad perhaps and it is going to perhaps get impacted that much more because these tariffs will come into effect starting August 1. There was a relief period given by Trump and of course, 10% baseline tariff applied on countries across the globe and of course, the impact is going to be that much more. You mentioned the IMF data and the RBI also projected that the Indian economy will grow between 6% and 6.5%. Can that number be sustained and what impact will these tariffs have on the Indian economy in the near term?
Swaminathan Aiyar: Apart from what I have said, we are going to find it more difficult to export. The idea that India would have a window to compete better vis-à-vis China is now an illusion. Earlier, there was the idea that the smartphones being manufactured by Apple in India, are going to be competitive with China. I am no longer quite certain that would be the case. The value addition in India is so small that if there is a 25% tariff, how much advantage will we have over anybody else? The same question might apply to Samsung. We were very gung-ho on this particular sector and a very large part of these exports were going to the USA. There is now a big question mark. Look at the entire PLI policy. There were 14 sectors, and out of those 14 sectors, only one sector seems to be succeeding, even that is in jeopardy.
But still the cost of making an iPhone in the United States is far more than it is of making it here and, of course, data suggests that iPhone exports from India to the United States have exceeded those from China. But rightly said, it remains to be seen whether that momentum can be sustained. On the 25th, a team from the United States is going to arrive in India. How soon can a bilateral trade agreement, the first branch of it, can be completed? Do you think India and the United States will be able to finalise a deal by fall this year?
Swaminathan Aiyar: In my personal opinion, Trump regards this as an occasion to bully India and force it into various contracts especially on the arms. Anybody who thinks he is coming here to give you some golgapas and lollipops is wrong. I do not think that is the way he behaves. He will come here and say we are great friends. So, you must buy all these extremely expensive aircraft from me and the electronics that you require for this. He will offer you some very expensive drones also and maybe some of those we can buy. But Mr Trump will regard this as an occasion to squeeze more out of India.
Do not think that the relationship is such that we can squeeze much out of him. There is this constant notion that if anything comes here it is a gain. Let us wait and watch. I am willing to bet that Mr Trump will push his agenda.
If we see the trend that Donald Trump has been following with several countries in negotiations, be it with countries in Southeast Asia or with EU or Japan, a significant component is related to investments into the United States or perhaps as a part of manufacturing. Specifically in talks with the EU, they have committed to investments in energy infrastructure in the United States. If India asks for relief on these tariffs and of course on steel and aluminium, is there going to be a component about perhaps increasing investments into the United States?
Swaminathan Aiyar: The Government of India has no ability to force Indians to invest in energy there. So, it is not going to happen. China may be able to give an assurance like that. We cannot say we give you an assurance that Reliance is going to invest out there. If you say ONGC is going to invest, I mean people will find it hard to find anything even here, let alone in various other places. It will not be treated as serious. As I said, India is not a big important country. We are still a lower middle-income country. So, in terms of competing with the European Union, Britain, Japan – all of whom have been asked to invest, we will remain a tiny pygmy compared with the others. So yes, he will demand that. And yet his main expectation is that India will buy stuff from America. As for foreign investment in another country, it takes many years to work that out. The investment itself will be distributed over a large number of years, especially in the energy sector. I do not think this is where India has any kind of comparative advantage. We do have a comparative advantage in buying arms, but as I said, I am against buying arms. At this point of time, we need to totally change the kind of armaments pattern that we have had so far and that will not be something that Mr Trump will be happy about.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
25 minutes ago
- First Post
How Trump's erratic behaviour strained most defining partnership of 21st century
US President Donald Trump announced on July 30, 2025, that a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods—along with additional penalties over India's continued engagement with Russia—would take effect from August 1, 2025. In a striking contradiction, he simultaneously claimed to have concluded a trade and energy deal with Pakistan—India's traditional adversary. While India has no objection to such bilateral engagements between sovereign nations, Trump went a step further by stating, 'Who knows, maybe they'll be selling oil to India some day!' This wasn't merely an offhand comment—it was a calculated provocation. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India and Pakistan are archrivals, and the idea of such dependence is not only unrealistic but also strategically unacceptable. By making such statements, Trump is not merely playing geopolitical games—he is striking at the heart of India's national security sensitivities and damaging a relationship that both countries have spent decades nurturing into a consequential partnership for the 21st century. Trump has consistently hyphenated India–Pakistan relations, weakening India's position on cross-border terrorism by boosting Pakistan's strategic confidence through repeated endorsements and by portraying both countries as equals. These actions have granted Pakistan undue strategic legitimacy, disregarding decades of US policy that sought to engage India as an independent and trusted strategic partner. His claim—repeated over 29 times—that he personally brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan has been unequivocally denied by top Indian officials, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh. By drawing false parallels and exaggerating his role, Trump has jeopardised India's core interests and eroded the trust carefully built by successive US administrations. A Diplomatic Liability Recently, India's Parliament witnessed a heated debate in which opposition leaders urged Prime Minister Modi to directly refute Donald Trump's repeated claims that he brokered the recent India–Pakistan ceasefire. But such directness is unlikely to yield results. Trump is not a leader who responds to logic or diplomacy. His erratic, impulsive, and reactive personality makes engagement unpredictable. Even if the Indian prime minister corrects him publicly, Trump may repeat the same claim in the evening—and again the next day. The problem lies in Washington, not New Delhi. This isn't a unique pattern. Trump turned against Elon Musk—a long-time supporter—after a minor disagreement, telling him to 'go back to South Africa' and threatening to revoke federal subsidies supporting Tesla and SpaceX. Notably, Musk was the largest individual donor to Trump's 2024 campaign, contributing between $250 million and $290 million to pro-Trump political action committees. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Despite this staggering support, Trump turned on him without hesitation—highlighting his transactional nature and readiness to discard even his most generous allies over personal slights. Similarly, Indian-American politician Vivek Ramaswamy had the foresight to distance himself from Trump early on—an act of pragmatism that likely spared him from similar treatment. Trump is not a conventional statesman. He governs through impulse-driven outbursts on Truth Social, his personal platform, bypassing standard diplomatic channels and norms. One cannot expect rational behaviour or consistency from someone so clearly erratic. Even when India's prime minister and foreign minister have privately countered his claims, Trump has continued repeating the same falsehoods, showing a complete disregard for diplomatic engagement. Undermining India's Core Sensitivities By equating India and Pakistan, Trump has granted Pakistan undeserved strategic legitimacy and confidence, despite its entrenched history of sponsoring terrorism against India. Recently, Pakistan's army chief, General Asim Munir, was hosted by Trump at a private luncheon at the White House—an extraordinary and rare gesture, especially considering that only a handful of Pakistani generals have ever received such treatment. Trump went on to lavish praise on Munir, calling him 'extremely influential in stopping the conflict from the Pakistan side' and crediting both Munir and Modi for preventing what he claimed could have escalated into a nuclear war. Adding to this, Centcom Commander General Michael Kurilla described Pakistan as 'a phenomenal partner in the counter-terrorism world,' blatantly ignoring its well-documented role in nurturing and exporting terrorist proxies. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This repeated validation—through White House meetings, public praise, and exaggerated claims of Pakistan's counter-terrorism role—undermines India's diplomatic efforts to isolate state-sponsored terrorism. Praising a country that has itself sponsored terrorism against India is not only absurd but also adds insult to injury. Instead of backing India's fight, Trump's gestures have offered moral and strategic encouragement to Pakistan's military and political leadership—eroding the very trust that should define India–US strategic ties. Deliberate Provocation and Strategic Damage Trump's recent suggestion that India might import oil from Pakistan is not only absurd—it appears to be a deliberate attempt to provoke and humiliate. While this may be part of a broader negotiation tactic aimed at pushing India into a trade deal, the damage inflicted on bilateral relations is severe. Trump has thrown the India–US relationship into a Cold War–like deep freeze, eroding trust and mutual respect that had taken decades to build. This shift is not the result of India's foreign policy. The problem lies squarely with Trump. Unlike his predecessors—who operated with a sense of dignity, stability, and strategic foresight—Trump has pursued a chaotic, transactional approach that alienates allies and undermines shared interests. In one of his recent statements, Trump said: STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'I don't care if India is buying oil from Russia. I couldn't care less. Let them do whatever they want. They can take their dead economies down together for all I care.' Such a statement is not only undiplomatic—it reflects a complete disregard for the economic realities of global partnerships and disrespects a key strategic partner in the Indo-Pacific. Instead of reinforcing mutual interests, Trump has repeatedly chosen to antagonise, offend, and weaken the very relationship considered vital for regional balance and global stability and widely regarded as the defining partnership of the twenty-first century. Moreover, Trump's ignorance of India's crucial moderating role in Brics reveals his blindness to structural realities. India's presence in Brics has ensured the group remains a non-Western coalition rather than an anti-Western alliance. Without India, BRICS could have adopted an anti-dollar currency or an explicitly adversarial posture. But explaining such nuance to an impulsive and transactional US leadership seems futile. Trump is unable—or unwilling—to grasp the strategic logic of true partnerships. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Rebuilding Trust: A Long Road Ahead The trust deficit between India and the US has widened significantly. Even those in India who once firmly believed in the potential of the bilateral relationship now feel disillusioned. But India has weathered such storms before. After the 1998 nuclear tests, the United States imposed sanctions on India. Back in 1971, it had deployed the Seventh Fleet to the Bay of Bengal in an attempt to intimidate India during the Bangladesh Liberation War. India didn't bow down then—and it won't now. India will adapt and find its path, just as it has done in the past. As India's leadership has repeatedly stated, every step will be taken to secure national interest. However, the damage inflicted by Trump's erratic and impulsive leadership means that restoring faith in the relationship will take years, if not decades. Moving forward, we can expect a greater degree of scepticism and a likely recalibration of India's foreign policy posture—possibly including greater resistance to US alignment. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump's presidency has sown the seeds of growing anti-American sentiment in Indian strategic circles. His words and actions—especially repeated endorsements of Pakistan and disregard for India's strategic concerns—have not just weakened the India–US partnership; they have dented the very idea of trust in global diplomacy. As The Economic Times recently noted, doubts over US reliability are once again taking root in Indian foreign policy circles, and that's a serious blow to what was once considered the defining partnership of the twenty-first century. Imran Khurshid is a visiting research fellow at the International Centre for Peace Studies, New Delhi. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.


Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Diamond trade feels tariff pinch: Indian exports might face 20–25% slump; margin hit may spread to miners, retailers, says Crisil analysis
AI-generated image The US market, which accounts for 35 per cent of Indian natural polished diamond exports in fiscal 2025, is expected to face additional challenges following recent US tariffs and penalties, according to Crisil Ratings. A slowdown in natural diamond demand has already been observed in the US market, officials noted. "Added to this, reduced offtake by retailers post announcement of 10 per cent tariff on Indian exports in April 2025, brought down the share of the US in polished diamond exports to 24 per cent in the first quarter of this fiscal from 37 per cent for the same period last fiscal," said Rahul Guha, Senior Director at Crisil Ratings, quoted by ANI. "In the milieu, the revenue of Indian diamond polishers can decrease a further 20-25 per cent this fiscal to USD 10-11 billion," Guha added. Meanwhile, Himank Sharma, Director, Crisil Ratings, said, "Natural diamond polishers, traditionally operating at thin margins of 4-5 per cent, will have limited ability to absorb the tariff-induced price rise. As a result, miners and retailers may need to step in to absorb some of the price shocks." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Learn More - How Affiliate Marketing Can Boost Your Income TheDaddest Undo During fiscal 2025, natural diamond export volumes remained restricted due to decreased Chinese demand and US competition from LGD. Despite fourth-quarter sales efforts to avoid tariffs and limited price reductions, natural diamond export revenues declined by 17 per cent to USD 13.3 billion. As the world's leading diamond exporter and primary gold consumer, India holds significant influence in the global market. The US announcement on July 30 by Trump of a 25 per cent tariff on India, along with additional penalties for Russian oil purchases, has caused significant worry amongst Indian Gems and Jewellery sector stakeholders, who anticipate immediate market disruptions, workforce reductions and increased costs for US consumers. Nevertheless, industry leaders remain optimistic, citing India's diversified trade relationships through recent FTAs with the UK, Australia, and the UAE as protective measures, suggesting the US might experience greater long-term consequences than India. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025


Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Stock markets facing potential high-volatility week: All eyes on RBI, Q1 results, Trump tariffs — what analysts say on key drivers
AI-generated image The stock markets are set for action-packed week, with investor focus locked on the Reserve Bank of India 's (RBI) policy decision, Q1 earnings from key companies, and evolving developments around US tariffs. According to market observers, foreign investor activity and global equity trends will also steer sentiment, with added volatility from geopolitical and macroeconomic triggers. Markets were under pressure last week due to persistent foreign institutional investor (FII) selling and renewed trade tensions. The Sensex declined 863.18 points or 1.05 per cent, and the Nifty shed 271.65 points or 1.09 per cent over the week. On Friday alone, the Sensex fell 585.67 points to 80,599.91, while the Nifty dropped 203 points to 24,565.35, marking a dissapointing end to the week. 'All eyes will be on the RBI's monetary policy on August 6, particularly its commentary on inflation, liquidity, and the growth outlook,' said Ajit Mishra, SVP – Research, Religare Broking, quoted by news agency PTI. 'Additionally, earnings from marquee names like Bharti Airtel , DLF, Bajaj Auto, Hero MotoCorp, Tata Motors , SBI and LIC will shape sectoral momentum,' he further said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Libas Purple Days Sale Libas Undo Also read: India faces $9–11 billion oil bill spike- Forced pivot from Russian crude after Trump's 'penalty' could hit margins Apart from the RBI, key macro triggers this week include HSBC's services and composite PMI data, oil price fluctuations, and any fresh signals from US-India trade negotiations. 'Heightened global and domestic volatility makes the upcoming RBI policy meet a key event,' said Pravesh Gour, Senior Technical Analyst at Swastika Investmart. He added that results from several Nifty heavyweights—Adani Ports, Airtel, Bajaj Auto, Hero MotoCorp, Trent, Titan, SBI and Tata Motors- could drive stock-specific action. The abrupt announcement by US President Donald Trump of a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, along with a separate penalty targeting India's energy and defence trade with Russia, has dented short-term sentiment. However, VK Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist, Geojit Financial Services said, 'Despite the uncertainty, the broader sentiment suggests that India and the US may reach an agreement post-negotiations," adding, 'Stable FPI flows could return once clarity emerges." Also read: Rs 1.35 lakh crore wipeout: Seven of top 10 firms lose in market value; TCS sees biggest decline Siddhartha Khemka, Head of Research, Wealth Management, Motilal Oswal Financial Services, echoed that view, adding that mixed Q1 earnings and ongoing FII outflows could keep the markets range-bound in the near term. 'Macro cues like RBI and Bank of England rate decisions and services PMI prints for the US and India will also be closely tracked,' he said. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025