Apex court to hear Armed Forces retirees' bid for appeal of pension adjustment ruling on Nov 6
Lawyer Mohamed Hanif Khatri Abdulla, representing the retirees, said the date was fixed by Federal Court deputy registrar Husna Dzulkifly during a case management session that began on Aug 4 and concluded on Tuesday (Aug 12) via e-Review.
ALSO READ: Court allows govt appeal in Armed Forces pension adjustment case
"The hearing will be conducted virtually,' he said, adding that a final case management is scheduled for Oct 25 to update the court on the status of cause papers and written submissions.
On June 4, a three-judge Court of Appeal panel overturned the High Court's ruling that entitled MAF retirees who left service before Jan 1, 2013, to pension adjustments matching those granted to retirees after that date.
The appellate bench had allowed the appeal filed by the respondents, namely the government, Prime Minister, the then Senior Defence Minister and MAF Council.
The Court of Appeal ruled that the retirees failed to prove that the respondents had breached the Federal Constitution.
ALSO READ: May 6 decision on govt's appeal against Armed Forces pension adjustment
Subsequently, the retirees filed an application on July 3 seeking leave to appeal to the Federal Court.
In their application, they sought the determination of two questions of law related to the pension adjustment issue.
Fifty army personnel of various ranks, including majors, lieutenants, staff sergeants, and privates, filed an originating summons in the High Court on Nov 17, 2022.
They sought a declaration that the government violated the Federal Constitution and Section 187 of the Malaysian Armed Forces Act 1972 by failing to implement new pension adjustments for retirees who left service before Jan 1, 2013.
The retirees contended that the government's failure created a significant pension gap between those who retired before and after that date. – Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Umno welcomes court's decision in Najib Razak's case
KUALA LUMPUR: Umno welcomed the unanimous decision by a three-judge panel of the Federal Court to expedite the judicial review concerning Datuk Seri Najib Razak and the much-debated Titah Adendum. At the Umno's Supreme Council meeting on Wednesday (Aug 13), party secretary‑general Datuk Dr Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki ( pic ) expressed relief at the development. 'This decision provides relief to efforts to obtain justice for Najib, and we will continue to be committed to using all available channels to obtain a defence for Najib,' he told reporters after the meeting. Former prime minister Najib, 71, has been serving his sentence at Kajang Prison since Aug 23, 2022, after being convicted of misappropriating RM42mil from SRC International Sdn Bhd. He filed a petition for a royal pardon on Sept 2, 2022, which led to the Pardons Board's decision to reduce his prison sentence from 12 years to six years and his fine from RM210mil to RM50mil.
Focus Malaysia
8 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
UMNO Youth should lead with reason, not ultimatums
DECISIONS to prosecute any individual should rest with the Attorney General and should be free from political pressure. Taking the law into one's own hands in whatever form, manner or posturing risks eroding trust in both the justice system as well as the image of both Barisan Nasional (BN) and UMNO. As a future top-ranking leader in UMNO and also BN, Akmal should show his statesmanship by being seen to be rational, rounded and responsible carrying out the duty of protecting the party's reputation among all Malaysians. UMNO have lost votes of these fair-minded majority who value peace, harmony, and the rule of law and alienated these middle educated group whose base have expanded as a result of being seen to be 'bullying, brutish and radical' in their political posturing especially towards the minority groups. This is not a good optic for UMNO and BN as even UMNO's support among Malay voters are dwindling and BN has been losing grounds. Of late even PAS and Bersatu have been more mindful to the sensitivities of the minorities. Is UMNO making the same mistake of alienating minorities thinking that their new partner, UMDAP have locked up these votes? Will UMNO potentially kill off DAP supporters the way they killed MCA and MIC with similar theatrics and antics? Under Article 145(3) of the Federal Constitution, decisions to prosecute lie solely with the Attorney General and must be free from political interference. Issuing deadlines or threats for legal action risks being seen as taking the law into one's own hands, which could damage public trust not only in our justice system but also in UMNO and BN. True statesmanship is shown through calm, reasoned leadership that allows due process to take its course, not by ultimatums that can be perceived as intimidation or selective bullying. After all, did Akmal forget that his party, too, recently made a flag blunder? While it was not an upside-down flag, it was recently pointed out that a poster on the Pemuda UMNO Negeri Terengganu Facebook page had carried a Jalur Gemilang with only 12 stripes, while it should be 14 of alternating red and white stripes. Welfare, as they say, starts from home—shouldn't the Merlimau exco educate his UMNO Youth wing first? We encourage Akmal to lead UMNO Youth as a voice for rational and solution-oriented politics, earning respect across the political spectrum and uniting rather than dividing Malaysians. Akmal's leadership should aim to put BN in better stead with fair-minded Malaysians and not pandering to a smaller or narrower group and in the process deepening the national divide due to stereotyping. The act of magnifying the issue and mobilising anger and hatred targeting a specific 'ethnic' and ignoring others who made similar mistakes is not an altruistic or patriotic act. Mobilising the public to 'teach the perpetrators a lesson' selectively is just a political gimmick that does not benefit national unity. Putting aside possible errors or mistakes, giving guidance and raising consciousness and awareness of the national flag is not the job of the Melaka state exco and can be done extensively and nationally by mobilising the party machinery if indeed the intention is bona fide and in good faith. ‒ Aug 13, 2025 Datuk Seri Ti Lian Ker is a former MCA vice-president and a former deputy youth and sports minister. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image : Malay Mail
New Straits Times
11 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Arutchelvan says misunderstanding led to brief scuffle at Parliament gates
KUALA LUMPUR: A peaceful march to demand housing for plantation workers turned briefly chaotic today when Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) deputy chairman S. Arutchelvan got into a scuffle with police outside Parliament. Arutchelvan, who fell during the incident, was leading more than 100 plantation workers from Perak, Negri Sembilan, Selangor, Kedah and Johor to submit a draft bill making it compulsory for estates to provide homes for local workers. Police initially blocked the group from gathering at the Parliament gates, prompting shouts of "Don't push" from the demonstrators. They were later allowed to hand over the draft to Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) M. Kulasegaran and opposition chief whip Datuk Seri Takiyuddin Hassan. Arutchelvan said the brief clash was the result of a misunderstanding. "We already informed all MPs that we would be coming to the Parliament gates. We were not going to enter the compound, but they wanted us to stand further away from the gate," he said. "We saw the police trying to separate the plantation workers from Parliament and telling us not to gather near the gates. There was actually no issue – we only wanted to be right outside Parliament, not far away across the road." He added that the organisers had informed all relevant parties before the march. "We had notified the police, Parliament and MPs before the event. The problem is police need to assist peaceful assembly, but they cannot make it difficult because Parliament is the symbol of democracy, not a symbol of tyranny," he said. Arutchelvan also stressed that the public had the right to assemble peacefully outside Parliament, as provided for under the Federal Constitution. "They tried to stop us from coming closer… that is why we clashed – but eventually they let us in," he said. The 200-page draft bill presented by the group also traced the problem back to the time of former prime minister Tun Abdul Razak Hussein, who in 1973 introduced a scheme requiring plantation companies to build housing for estate workers. However, Arutchelvan said the scheme was never enshrined in law and has not been consistently followed by plantation companies. "We have drafted the proposed Act to make it easier for the government, and we have already submitted it to five state governments," he said. The march began in Taman Tugu, Kuala Lumpur, with workers carrying banners and chanting slogans calling for better living conditions.
