How the world's top ad agencies aligned to fix prices in India
Omnicom Media
's India chief was frustrated. It was October 5, 2023 and a rival was trying to poach the U.S. firm's client by offering lower prices, just weeks after global
advertising
agencies and broadcasters struck secret pacts on ad rates in the South Asian country.
The attempt to woo the client violated the agencies' agreement, Omnicom Media's India CEO Kartik Sharma wrote in a WhatsApp group comprising a who's who of advertising, according to excerpts of the discussion documented by antitrust investigators and verified by Reuters.
"This kind of practice is not in the spirit of what we are collectively trying to achieve," Sharma wrote, without identifying the parties.
Shashi Sinha, then India CEO of New York-based IPG Mediabrands, suggested an industry group should "admonish the agency".
The exchanges form part of a confidential dossier compiled by India's antitrust watchdog that chronicles how global advertising companies, including leading U.S. and European firms, coordinated to rig prices in the world's most populous nation.
Reuters reviewed evidence from the
Competition Commission of India
(CCI) investigation, including a 10-page document with messages and records of meetings between top advertising executives, and two industry agreements under scrutiny for antitrust violations; and interviewed two people familiar with the probe.
The key details, which haven't been previously reported, centre on WhatsApp interactions involving 11 industry executives. They include the top India or South Asia executives of WPP's GroupM; U.S.-based Omnicom Media and Interpublic's IPG Mediabrands; France's Publicis and Havas Media; Japan's Dentsu and India's Madison World.
Over WhatsApp and in meetings, the executives coordinated responses to clients, which "resulted in alignment of competing advertising agencies," CCI officials said in the August 9 dossier, determining on an initial basis that the conduct contravened competition law.
The firms agreed to cooperate on pricing, including not to undercut each other; colluded with broadcasters to deny business to agencies that didn't comply; and discussed financial terms involving at least four Indian clients over conference calls, according to the investigation documents.
The documents don't indicate whether the agencies' foreign headquarters were aware of the executives' actions.
A spokesperson for
WPP Media
, which until May was known as GroupM, told Reuters it was aware of the investigation but declined to comment further.
A Dentsu India spokesperson confirmed Reuters reporting that it had disclosed industry practices to the CCI in February 2024 under the regulator's leniency program, which enables lesser penalties for firms that share evidence of malpractice. The spokesperson didn't address specific evidence raised in the dossier but said the firm had implemented stricter audits and controls.
The other agencies and their executives didn't respond to Reuters questions about the antitrust probe and information in the dossier. The regulator also didn't respond to queries.
Reuters has reported that in March, as part of the continuing investigation, the regulator raided the Indian offices of many advertising firms and an industry group that represents broadcasters, including the Reliance-Disney venture and
Sony
.
CCI investigations typically take several months. The regulator can't press criminal charges, but can impose financial penalties on the media agencies of up to three times their profit or 10% of an Indian entity's global turnover, whichever is higher, for each year of wrongdoing.
Secret Pacts WPP Media, the world's largest media buying agency, last year - when it was still known as GroupM - won new India business worth $447 million, followed by Omnicom's $183 million, according to research firm COMvergence.
But India's near-$30 billion media and entertainment sector is grappling with weak consumer sentiment. Ad spending will rise 7% to $19 billion in 2025, the slowest growth in three years, according to GroupM estimates.
The CCI is investigating the role of two industry bodies, the Advertising Agencies Association of India (AAAI) and the Indian Broadcasting & Digital Foundation (IBDF), in orchestrating the suspected cartel.
The former group is led by WPP Media India head Prasanth Kumar, while the broadcasting body's president is Kevin Vaz, a top Reliance-Disney venture executive. Neither industry group responded to requests for comment.
The dossier shows the AAAI circulated guidelines to ad agencies in August 2023: They must charge clients whose annual spending exceeds $29 million a minimum 3% commission for digital ads and 2.5% for traditional media. Lower-spending clients would pay higher minimum commissions of up to 8%.
A month later, the industry associations entered a joint pact, agreeing no agency would "unilaterally offer any discount" on rates while pitching for business.
The pact, reviewed by Reuters, declared its aim was to eliminate "lower pricing as a reason to award a pitch".
The advertising firms began coordinating their activities at least as early as August 2023, according to the CCI documents.
Ad executives who met on December 1 that year hailed their collaboration as a "great success" and resolved to continue, according to meeting minutes cited in the CCI's evidence.
'All Aligned' In the U.S., the Federal Trade Commission this month sought information from advertising agencies as part of a probe into whether they coordinated boycotts of certain sites. The Justice Department in 2016 probed agencies it suspected of rigging bids to favour in-house units, but eventually closed the case without bringing charges.
Brewer Anheuser-Busch InBev used CCI's leniency program to blow the whistle on an industry cartel in India in 2017.
In the case of the ad industry, Dentsu India told Reuters it filed its leniency application with the CCI not as a reaction to external pressure but out of a decision to "support reform from within".
Two people with knowledge of the matter told Reuters the evidence Dentsu submitted included a transcript of the WhatsApp group. The group, formed in August 2023 and reviewed in part by Reuters, was named "AAAI media agencies" and contained scores of chat messages.
Participants included Kumar of WPP's media company, Sharma of Omnicom Media, IPG Mediabrands' Sinha, Havas Media India CEO Mohit Joshi, Dentsu South Asia CEO Harsha Razdan and then-media business CEO Anita Kotwani, Publicis South Asia chief Anupriya Acharya and Madison boss Sam Balsara, the investigators' evidence shows.
Members of the group discussed advertising pitches and coordinated on interactions with clients such as food delivery giant
Swiggy
, drug maker Cipla, SoftBank-backed e-commerce firm Meesho, and Kshema Insurance.
In Swiggy's case, the AAAI arranged a Zoom call with media agency heads to discuss the company's advertising pitch. Later, GroupM's Kumar, as AAAI president, suggested an email response to Swiggy explaining the industry's agreed position on rebates.
"Ok all aligned thanks," he wrote after a consensus emerged.
Kshema told Reuters the insurer was unaware of the matter. The other clients didn't respond to questions.
During another discussion on client rebates, an unspecified Dentsu executive told rivals over WhatsApp that "the lowest we go to is retain 30% and 70% we pass back to the client," according to the CCI dossier.
CCI officials noted in the document that advertisers and the broadcasters' group had sought to penalise enterprises that didn't comply with the pricing pacts.
In an email to Walt Disney in August 2023, Kumar wrote that broadcasters should refrain from granting business to a firm that had breached the pacts, ITW Consulting, though he said it had later agreed not to approach clients directly.
ITW didn't respond to Reuters questions.
Tensions heated up again over WhatsApp three months later.
Sharma, of Omnicom Media, learned that ITW had done another "direct deal with a client of ours" for advertising on streaming platform Hotstar, which was run by Disney.
This irked Sharma, as Hotstar had the rights for the cricket World Cup held in India at the time.
"This nuisance has to stop," he wrote in the group.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
14 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Why we need a research-based social entrepreneurship course in Indian academia
India is making strides in digital innovation and financial growth, but still faces challenges such as unemployment, inequality, and the rural-urban gap. As a result, social entrepreneurship is becoming popular as a strong way to connect businesses with social impact. To fully realise its potential, universities need to include research-based, practical social entrepreneurship in their curricula. Recent data from the GUESSS India 2023 Survey shows a notable change in career goals among Indian university students: 33% are in the early stages of starting their businesses, while 4.8% are already running revenue-generating start-ups. However, 70% still intend to find jobs after graduation, although this figure drops to around 52% over five years. Despite this, Indian students exhibit the highest global entrepreneurial intent, scoring 4.6 on a scale of 7, compared to the global average of 3.7. Nearly 63% get initial investments or support from their universities. This reflects a rising interest among today's youth in having independence, social impact, and the chance to build something that not only creates profit but also tackles important national issues, going beyond traditional career paths. Transformative approach Social entrepreneurship is an increasingly recognised effective model to bridge the gap between social justice and economic development. Unlike traditional business models that prioritise market returns, social enterprises focus on serving underserved and neglected communities, offering scalable and sustainable solutions. Addressing the root causes of inequality — like access to clean water, quality healthcare, education, and decent livelihoods — drives social entrepreneurs. The Stanford Social Innovation Review points out that businesses focused on underserved and untapped markets can make a real social impact while still being financially viable. India's development issues — such as rural sanitation, clean energy, climate resilience, and women's empowerment — create a strong environment for social entrepreneurship projects. India has many innovative ventures that highlight successful social entrepreneurship. At IIM BAngalore, Saahas Zero Waste has turned the campus into a model of a circular economy by focusing on waste segregation, composting, and recycling. Tamil Nadu's Gramalaya NGO has enhanced sanitation, hygiene, and clean water access while building self-sustaining financing models for toilet construction. These stories go beyond programs and numbers; they focus on people. Research-led innovation Private universities bring together scholars from many fields. When they join forces to tackle real-world issues and turn their research into practical solutions, they can unlock the untapped potential of India's Ph.D.s. For instance, a public policy scholar studying poverty might collaborate with an engineering scholar to create a solution. A business scholar could then help expand this solution, leading to both academic success and positive social change. Universities should take an important role in encouraging such teamwork across disciplines to support social entrepreneurship. They should promote research that tackles social issues, moving from a purely theoretical activity into something that drives real change. Despite a growing start-up ecosystem, disruptive innovation is rare. Research scholars can improve socially driven innovation by applying their expertise to real-world problems. To become an 'impact nation,' India needs inclusive, non-urban-centred innovation. This means integrating social entrepreneurship into education, policy, and practice. The writer is Curator of Ph,D. VISTA Programme, Alliance University, Bengaluru.
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump says no imminent plans to penalise China for buying Russian oil
US President Donald Trump said on Friday he did not immediately need to consider retaliatory tariffs on countries such as China for buying Russian oil but might have to "in two or three weeks." Trump has threatened sanctions on Moscow and secondary sanctions on countries that buy its oil if no moves are made to end the war in Ukraine. China and India are the top two buyers of Russian oil. The president last week imposed an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, citing its continued imports of Russian oil. However, Trump has not taken similar action against China. He was asked by Fox News' Sean Hannity if he was now considering such action against Beijing after he and Russian President Vladimir Putin failed to produce an agreement to resolve or pause Moscow's war in Ukraine. "Well, because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that," Trump said after his summit with Putin in Alaska. "Now, I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don't have to think about that right now. I think, you know, the meeting went very well." Chinese President Xi Jinping's slowing economy will suffer if Trump follows through on a promise to ramp up Russia-related sanctions and tariffs. Xi and Trump are working on a trade deal that could lower tensions - and import taxes - between the world's two biggest economies. But China could be the biggest remaining target, outside of Russia, if Trump ramps up punitive measures.
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
Big tech companies accused of bending H-1B rules with job listings
Amid tech layoffs, major US firms face allegations of bypassing hiring rules by directing job applicants to immigration or 'global mobility' teams instead of standard channels, a Newsweek report said. Critics argue such practices favour H-1B workers over US graduates, keeping Americans out of jobs. The Trump administration plans reforms to prioritise American workers. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Popular in NRI 1. London suffers most job losses after tax hikes Amid mass layoffs at major tech firms, the companies are now facing allegations of bypassing hiring rules in mandatory local newspaper job ads. Regulations require these roles to be offered first to US-born workers, but a Newsweek report said the ads directed applicants to immigration or 'global mobility' departments, indicating the jobs were aimed at immigrant a website seeking out H-1B roles to share them with Americans, told Newsweek that Americans are not even aware that major tech companies are routinely discriminating against them. "At a time when unemployment for college graduates is shifting sharply upward, it is important to call out hiring discrimination that could keep Americans unemployed," they also said that recruitment for these roles is done separately from the companies standard recruitment process."These unusual application methods are likely to drive fewer applications than normal processes like posting ads on the company job board or on mainstream career sites like LinkedIn," they Online has not independently verified this Newsweek report cited a San Francisco Chronicle advertisement given by OpenAI. It said it was hiring a software engineer but the resumes were to be sent to the "global mobilty team".Another tech company, Instacard , offered multiple positions, with a similar department taking applications, while Udemy, an online learning platform, wanted a director of marketing analytics and data science, with resumes to be sent to "immigration@ the Newsweek report H-1B programme allows US employers, especially in the tech sector, to hire foreign professionals in specialty occupations. Indian nationals make up a large share of H-1B recipients each year, and the program is a key pathway for many to transition from US universities into full-time H-1B programme remains a contentious issue in US politics. While critics argue that it harms domestic workers and depresses wages, supporters, including many business leaders and universities, view it as vital for maintaining a competitive edge in technology, science, and research.(With TOI inputs)
