Hong Kong football fan, 19, convicted of insulting national anthem
Eastern Court on Wednesday found defendant Lau Pun-hei's conduct at Hong Kong Stadium was punishable by a catch-all clause of the
National Anthem Ordinance , adding that it amounted to undermining the dignity of '
March of the Volunteers ' as a symbol and sign of the People's Republic of China.
Lau, a Year Two political science student at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, was among three spectators
arrested for an alleged violation of the 2020 ordinance during the
contest between the city's team and Iran on June 6, 2024.
The trial earlier this year heard that police pulled the student aside at half-time after reviewing video footage and found he had turned away from the pitch and players and lowered his head while the national anthem was playing.
Police Superintendent Sean Lin, who videotaped the spectators' stand that night, said Lau had stood normally with his head facing forward when Iran's national anthem was played moments earlier.
The ordinance states that a person commits an offence if he or she publicly and intentionally insults the national anthem 'in any way'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
2 days ago
- South China Morning Post
Finality of Court of Arbitration for Sport's awards undermined after European Union ruling
National courts must be allowed to conduct in-depth reviews of arbitral awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) to ensure they are compliant with EU law, the European Court of Justice said on Friday. Advertisement The ruling comes after RFC Seraing were banned from registering new players and also fined by football's governing body Fifa in 2015 when the Belgian club signed agreements with a company that transferred part of the economic rights to players. Fifa ruled their deal with Maltese company Doyen Sports as a breach because third parties are not allowed to hold economic rights to players, with the sanctions being upheld by the CAS – sport's top court – as well as the Swiss Federal Supreme Court. However, Seraing brought the case before Belgian courts to challenge the compatibility of Fifa's rules with EU law. Although CAS awards are considered final and cannot be relitigated, the Belgian court approached the Court of Justice, which said such a scope was contrary to EU law. Fifa's sanctions on Seraing, upheld by CAS, were the result of unlawful procedure, the CJEU said. Photo: dpa 'It is essential that recourse to arbitration does not undermine the rights and freedoms that the fundamental rules of EU law guarantee athletes, clubs and, more broadly, any other person practising a professional sport or pursuing an economic activity linked to that sport,' it said.
South China Morning Post
2 days ago
- South China Morning Post
Finality of Court of Arbitration for Sport's awards undermined after European Union ruling
National courts must be allowed to conduct in-depth reviews of arbitral awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) to ensure they are compliant with EU law, the European Court of Justice said on Friday. The ruling comes after RFC Seraing were banned from registering new players and also fined by football's governing body Fifa in 2015 when the Belgian club signed agreements with a company that transferred part of the economic rights to players. Fifa ruled their deal with Maltese company Doyen Sports as a breach because third parties are not allowed to hold economic rights to players, with the sanctions being upheld by the CAS – sport's top court – as well as the Swiss Federal Supreme Court. However, Seraing brought the case before Belgian courts to challenge the compatibility of Fifa's rules with EU law. Although CAS awards are considered final and cannot be relitigated, the Belgian court approached the Court of Justice, which said such a scope was contrary to EU law. Fifa's sanctions on Seraing, upheld by CAS, were the result of unlawful procedure, the CJEU said. Photo: dpa 'It is essential that recourse to arbitration does not undermine the rights and freedoms that the fundamental rules of EU law guarantee athletes, clubs and, more broadly, any other person practising a professional sport or pursuing an economic activity linked to that sport,' it said.
HKFP
5 days ago
- HKFP
Hong Kong university student found guilty of insulting national anthem during World Cup qualifier
A Hong Kong university student has been found guilty of insulting the national anthem during a World Cup qualifier football match between the city's team and Iran in June last year. Lau Pun-hei, a 19-year-old student in politics at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, was convicted on Wednesday for turning his back to the pitch while the Chinese national anthem, 'March of the Volunteers,' played ahead of the match at the Hong Kong Stadium on June 6, 2024. Magistrate Kestrel Lam of the Eastern Magistrates' Courts said the playing of the anthem before a match 'represented national pride, unity and identity.' 'That the defendant chose to turn his back to the pitch was obviously improper and disrespectful,' Lam said in Cantonese. The magistrate noted that Lau had turned his back to the pitch only during the Chinese anthem and that the student faced the pitch and clapped during the Iranian anthem. Lam found that it was a deliberate act to demonstrate Lau's dissatisfaction with, or contempt for, the national anthem. 'Different people may have different feelings towards the nation and its anthem. Supporters may sing along. Meanwhile, people who don't support the country should allow the anthem to be played solemnly,' the magistrate said. Lam rejected the defence's argument that some other people in the stadium, including the police officers who filmed the spectators while the national anthem was being played, also had their backs facing the pitch. The police officers were carrying out their duties, Lam said, but the student had no reason to do the same. Whether an act constitutes an insult to the national anthem must be based on the facts and the circumstances in the case, the magistrate added. He also rejected the defence's argument that the law was vague and could infringe upon one's freedom of expression. Steven Kwan, Lau's lawyer, told the court that the student was a keen supporter of Hong Kong and a staunch advocate of an eco-friendly lifestyle, showing his care for the world. Lau's offence was of a 'minor nature,' Kwan said, as his act was 'quiet, peaceful, and did not involve any violence.' Kwan urged the court to adopt a non-custodial sentence given the defendant's young age. Lam scheduled sentencing for August 13 to allow the court to receive a report on the defendant's background. Lau was given bail pending sentencing. Hong Kong passed the National Anthem Ordinance in 2020, which criminalises 'insulting behaviour' towards the anthem. Under the law, one must 'stand solemnly' and 'not behave in a way disrespectful to the national anthem.' Offenders may be punished by up to three years in prison and a fine of HK$50,000.
