Zuckerberg settles lawsuit over Cambridge Analytica scandal
A trial over the long-running case had just begun on Wednesday, with defendants accused of overpaying the US government in 2019 when they engineered a $5 billion settlement for alleged privacy violations in the scandal.
Sources familiar with the matter confirmed the settlement to AFP, without providing details.
The settlement comes the same day that Marc Andreessen, one of Silicon Valley's most influential venture capitalists and a board member of the company now known as Meta, was to take the stand.
Zuckerberg himself was expected in the Wilmington, Delaware courtroom on Monday.
Silicon Valley investor Peter Thiel and former Meta top executive Sheryl Sandberg were also expected to face questioning in the court.
Cambridge Analytica was a political consulting firm that was found to have improperly harvested personal data from millions of Facebook users for targeted political advertising, particularly during the 2016 US election and Brexit referendum.
The scandal thrust Facebook and Zuckerberg in particular into a political firestorm, leading to major regulatory changes and public scrutiny of tech companies' data practices.
The shareholders in the lawsuit alleged that the board members conspired to pay more to the US government in exchange for ensuring that Zuckerberg would not be named personally for wrongdoing in the settlement.
Longtime observers of the company were hoping that the trial would expose inside details of how Zuckerberg and the Facebook executives handled the scandal.
Zuckerberg was under huge pressure at the time from US and European lawmakers amid widespread allegations that Russia and other bad actors were weaponising Facebook to sow chaos around major elections in the West.
The multi-faceted case also alleged insider trading at the time of the events, with board members to be questioned about the timing of their share sales before the scandal was made public.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
Chinese cars nearly double their European market share in 2025
Car sales across Europe declined in June, with a 4.4% year-on-year drop to 1.25-million vehicles, data from JATO Dynamics showed on Wednesday. While overall demand softened, Chinese automakers continued to gain ground, taking a record market share and squeezing several established European brands, the research data showed. Chinese automakers are expanding in Europe, breaking into a market traditionally dominated by European and American brands supported by their cheaper pricing amid a shift towards electric vehicles. This has stoked trade tensions between Brussels and Beijing, including a row over EU tariffs on Chinese-made EVs, imposed to protect European producers. Chinese brands nearly doubled their combined share of the European market to 5.1% in the first half of 2025, just shy of Mercedes-Benz's 5.2%, the report said. Registrations of Chinese vehicles surged 91% since the start of the year. BYD, Jaecoo, Omoda, Leapmotor and Xpeng were the five names fuelling the surge, with BYD alone registering 70,500 units in the first six months of 2025, a 311% jump from a year ago. Stellantis saw the steepest market share decline among major automakers, to 15.3% from 16.7% a year earlier. The second biggest decline came from Tesla, to 1.6% in the half-year period versus 2.4% last year. Registrations of battery electric vehicles (BEV) surpassed one million for the first time in the first half, with a 25% rise to 1.19-million units — 17.4% of the market. 'Persistently high prices, geopolitical and economic tensions with Europe's trading partners and the postpandemic market reality are behind the decline,' Felipe Munoz, global analyst at JATO Dynamics, said. 'The updated Tesla Model Y has so far failed to provide the expected sales boost for the brand,' Munoz said. 'At the same time, competition from BYD and Volkswagen Group is making it harder for Tesla to maintain its leadership position.'
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
US moves closer to sanctions on ANC leaders: Ordinary citizens shouldn't be punished
US moves closer to sanctions on ANC leaders: Ordinary citizens shouldn't be punished – AfriForum Tensions between South Africa and the United States have escalated after a US congressional committee approved a bill that could pave the way for sanctions against ANC officials and senior members of government. According to The Witness, the US–South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act of 2025, introduced by Republican congressman Ronny Jackson in April, was passed by the House Foreign Affairs Committee this week with minor amendments, bringing it closer to a full vote in the House of Representatives. The bill calls for a review of the entire relationship between the two nations, citing South Africa's growing alignment with 'malign actors', including Hamas, China and Russia. It also seeks to identify South African officials eligible for sanctions. Jackson, a vocal ally of US President Donald Trump, said on social media: 'The days of allowing our so-called 'allies' to walk all over us are over!' AfriForum welcomes progress AfriForum welcomed the development, saying it supports 'targeted sanctions' rather than blanket penalties on the country. 'Ordinary citizens should not be punished for the extremism and corruption of politicians,' said Ernst van Zyl, the organisation's head of public relations. ANC's response Deputy secretary-general Nomvula Mokonyane said the party was prepared to 'sacrifice' in the name of justice and sovereignty. 'Throughout our struggle, we know that leaders had to sacrifice. We will continue to pay the price of standing for justice, humanity, equality and the rule of law,' she said. She added that ANC allies, including Cuba, had been sanctioned by the US, but the party would not compromise. 'We will continue to speak for ourselves. But who are we when it was just a few years ago that Nelson Mandela was removed from the list of terrorists? The struggle continues.' Relations between the US and South Africa have soured in recent months under Trump's second term. In May, Trump revoked aid funding to South Africa and imposed 30% tariffs on all SA exports to the US, citing what he claimed was a 'persistent trade deficit'. The tariffs take effect from August 1. Additionally, former SA ambassador Ebrahim Rasool was expelled earlier this year and has not been replaced. The US reportedly rejected Mcebisi Jonas as a special envoy, further straining ties. Trade union Solidarity has called on President Cyril Ramaphosa to urgently repair diplomatic relations and recommit to a non-aligned stance. 'This must include co-operation on terrorism, military and intelligence matters,' said Solidarity's Jaco Kleynhans. Solidarity is also lobbying the US government directly and plans to meet with US lawmakers before the final vote on the bill. The Presidency has not yet issued a formal response to the bill's advancement. Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel. Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal. Read original story on At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
The South African
4 hours ago
- The South African
Kaizer Chiefs caught in contract tug-of-war
Kaizer Chiefs' pre-season has taken a dramatic twist as Cape Town Spurs dig in their heels over the controversial signings of Asanele Velebhayi and Luke Baartman. While Amakhosi remain adamant the duo arrived as free agents, Spurs argue otherwise, triggering a contractual standoff that could shape transfer dealings across South African football. The Premier Soccer League's Dispute Resolution Chamber (DRC) has delayed its ruling in the high-profile battle involving Cape Town Spurs, Kaizer Chiefs, and AmaZulu. The DRC has now requested further documentation from all parties relating to the contested transfers of Velebhayi, Baartman, and Liam Bern, who recently joined Usuthu. This development means the final decision may take longer than expected, prolonging the uncertainty over the players' status. Following Spurs' relegation to the SAFA-governed ABC Motsepe Regional League, Chiefs swiftly secured the signatures of Velebhayi and Baartman. According to Kaizer Chiefs, the pair became free agents once Spurs dropped out of the professional tiers. AmaZulu, meanwhile, signed Liam Bern under similar assumptions. But Spurs aren't buying it. The Mother City club insists these players remain under valid contracts, regardless of relegation. Their firm stance has forced the PSL to intervene. 'Our word is our bond,' declared Cape Town Spurs CEO Alexi Efstathiou. 'These players signed agreements in good faith. Their families budgeted based on those commitments. Relegation doesn't erase responsibility, it tests character.' With rumours swirling about Amakhosi's acquisition of the players without transfer fees, Efstathiou stood firm. 'They believe in this club. Allowing others to walk away free undermines their loyalty and sacrifices. Fairness isn't selective.' Tuesday's expected DRC sitting did not take place. Instead, the PSL requested additional submissions. 'No, there was no sitting on Tuesday,' a source confirmed. 'They asked to submit further documents from their side, and they were given two days to do that. Once we have sight of the submission, we may need to put in our own. No further clarity.' Spurs remain committed to honouring their side of the contract. 'We told every contracted player: Show up, train, honour your commitment, and we will honour ours, every salary, every benefit, on time. No excuses,' the club emphasised. The club revealed that 14 contracted players are still training under their banner. But while the battle continues, Spurs have made it clear they are not looking to block transfers unfairly. 'We've never stood in a player's way. If there is interest from clubs for any of our players, we will listen,' said Efstathiou. However, the club has placed clear value on its assets. Velebhayi, a dangerous winger, is reportedly valued at R10 million. Baartman, an 18-year-old prodigy chased by European sides, represents another critical investment. 'We are not demanding ransom; we are asking for recognition of that investment through civilised negotiation.' Kaizer Chiefs may have believed they followed the rulebook, but Spurs have turned this into a matter of principle. The outcome could set a defining precedent for relegated clubs and the future of player mobility in South African football. 'Cape Town Spurs aren't just fighting relegation,' the club concluded. 'They're fighting for the soul of South African football, one honoured contract, one on-time salary, one act of principled care at a time.' Who are you backing, Kaizer Chiefs or Spurs? Let us know by leaving a comment below or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
