Can these Farage rivals' start-ups hurt Reform?
Both are ex-Reformers who came off worst in a fight with Nigel Farage
The two movements share several key features. The first is a championing of direct democracy, with both Advance and Restore urging members to join and shape their direction. The second is a focus on argument, ideology and principles, rather than the nuts-and-bolts work of door knocking and campaigning in the mould of traditional political parties and pressure groups. Of the two, Lowe's is the more intriguing. He is championing the 'Great Repeal Act' – a popular idea on the British right, to undo much of New Labour's constitutional settlement. Habib's 12-minute launch video consists mainly of him talking to the camera about internal party reform. Unlike Habib, Lowe is an MP and thus able to enjoy the use of written questions in the House, airtime in the chamber and parliamentary privilege when discussing contentious matters.
Yet the challenge facing both men is evident on day one. It is extraordinarily difficult to establish a new political party in the UK. For Reform, it took four years and hundreds of thousands of pounds just to get to the point last July where they won five seats. Organisation is key to success in British politics. The fact that both men launched on the same day is not a promising sign. Neither man did any pre-briefing; there was no big press conference to impress the Westminster press pack. As a result, neither launch garnered so much as a mention in today's Daily Mail or Telegraph – two papers which share many of Lowe and Habib's own views. Both men have big followings on X but even in a social media age, they will likely struggle to get cut-through.
The striking thing is that both men have decided to pursue separate ventures, rather than pooling resources and working together. Both are ex-Reformers who came off worst in a fight with Nigel Farage. They are each, understandably, bruised by that experience, which continues to shape their respective politics and their causes. Lowe and Habib clearly hope to hurt Reform by claiming back the intellectual and political leadership of the right. But the fact that they, so far, have been unable to work together will be held up as proof by Farage as one reason why they will never supplant him.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
Welsh language activism 'no different' to Palestine Action 'terrorism' ex police boss says
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info A retired police chief and former Welsh language campaigner has slammed the authorities for their approach to banned group Palestine Action. Arfon Jones drew parallels with historic Welsh language campaigns in which scores of activists were arrested for non-violent direct action. Mr Jones, from Wrexham, said he was among those who, in the 1970s, campaigned for Welsh language rights as members of Cymdeithas yr Iaith Gymraeg (Welsh Language Society). 'Some were imprisoned for their activities,' he said. 'None, however, were stigmatised by the British state as terrorists!' On July 5, the UK Government proscribed Palestine Action as a terrorist group after members of the network damaged RAF aircraft at Brize Norton, Oxfordshire. Under the Terrorism Act of 2000, it made group membership a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Since then, police have arrested scores of people for showing support to Palestine Action. Last weekend alone, 474 people were arrested during a 'Lift the Ban' sit-in at Parliament Square (Saturday, August 9). The demonstration had echoes of the first ever protest staged by Cymdeithas yr Iaith Gymraeg: in February 1963, members staged a sit-down blocking Pont Trefechan bridge, Aberystwyth. From demanding the right to court summonses in Welsh, the society moved on to campaign successfully for bilingual road signs followed by action over holiday homes and Welsh language media. Over the decades, more than 1,000 supporters of the society appeared before the courts, making it Britain's largest protest group since the Suffragettes. Join the North Wales Live Whatsapp community now (Image: Geoff Charles/National Library of Wales/Wiki) Some members were jailed but none were ever officially labelled terrorists by the government, said Mr Jones, a former Police and Crime Commissioner for North Wales Police. He also served as an operational inspector at the force before retiring in 2008, and now describes himself as a "social issues commentator". In a letter to the Daily Post he wrote: 'What language campaigners were doing in the 60s, 70s and 80s was no different to what Palestine Action was doing prior to it being proscribed for protesting against a genocide the British state is complicit in. 'Both were using non-violent, direct action against property, and proscription was unreasonable, unjustified and disproportionate. 'This comparison gives some indication of how far the British state has moved from a social democratic tolerant and progressive state in the 1970s, to a right-wing autocratic and oppressive state in 2025, where a Nazi salute is tolerated but protesting a genocide is not. 'The Home Secretary and the Police Service should hang their heads in shame for harassing and arresting honourable and principled individuals who are willing to sacrifice their freedom for the cause of humanity.' The Home Office was approached for a response. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said many people were not aware of the 'reality' of Palestine Action's true purpose. In the wake of the ongoing Gaza war, the group has become more active but it insists its approach is "non-violent". The Home Secretary said: 'The right to protest is one we protect fiercely but this is very different from displaying support for this one specific and narrow, proscribed organisation. "Palestine Action was proscribed based on strong security advice following serious attacks the group has committed, involving violence, significant injuries and extensive criminal damage. "It also follows an assessment from the Joint Terrorism Assessment Centre that the group prepares for terrorism, as well as concerning information referencing plans and ideas for further attacks, the details of which cannot yet be publicly reported due to ongoing legal proceedings. 'Many people may not yet know the reality of this organisation, but the assessments are very clear - this is not a non-violent organisation. UK national security and public safety must always be our top priority. 'Their actions are not about the horrific suffering in the Middle East and do not reflect or represent the thousands of people across the country who are exercising their rights to protest peacefully.' The National Police Chiefs' Council, and the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners, were also approached for a comment. Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox Find out what's happening near you
Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
Scotland is facing a £26.5 billion black hole
It's that time of year again: GERS day – when Scotland's annual fiscal health is laid bare – has come back around and the figures paint a pretty bleak picture for the Scottish government. There is a £26.5 billion black hole in public finances (don't fall off your chair, Rachel Reeves) while the country's deficit has grown by more than £5 billion. With a Scottish parliament election just around the corner – and the party of government on track to lose seats – it's more bad news for First Minister John Swinney's SNP. Swinney's administration appears to have buried its head in the sand over the figures – with an earlier press release choosing to overlook the headline figures and boasting instead that Scotland's revenue was up by 1.5 per cent on the previous year. This addresses only part of the picture. Scotland's total public spending has outpaced the money brought in via taxes – resulting in a deficit of 11.7 per cent of GDP, or £26.5 billion – leaving Scotland £5 billion worse off than in 2023-24. Startlingly, the black hole widens to more than £30 billion if North Sea oil revenues are excluded. The Scottish government has tried to point to some more positive aspects of the data, noting that the money it has raised grew to £91.4 billion this year. This managed to cover public expenditure on day-to-day devolved services (while spending grew by 6.8 per cent, devolved revenue grew more). But that doesn't change the broader picture, which shows that the country's deficit is only getting worse. Scotland made up 8 per cent of all the money collected by the UK government – matching its share of the population – but this is down a little on the previous year. Excluding North Sea oil and gas would see Scotland raising just 7.7 per cent of UK revenue, also down on last year. Increases seen in income and inheritance tax (which grew in part due to inflation) have raised money. Less was collected from national insurance, however, with employees now paying lower rates, while fuel duty also fell thanks to more people opting for electric vehicles. The reduction of student loans has also seen the revenue generated from interest fall, as rates on student loans have been slashed. Public service spending remains higher than before the pandemic, currently at 52 per cent of GDP – or £117.6 billion – with more money going on devolved social security programmes and benefits in Scotland compared with the UK's welfare spending in 2024-25. This was balanced a little by inflation falling from 2022-23 highs, resulting in less paid out as public sector debt interest. And spending related to Brexit also fell as the UK's exit from the EU recedes into the distance. There is some good news for Scots, however. A greater sum is being spent per head in Scotland compared to the UK average, with those living north of the border receiving £2,700 more from Westminster than their British counterparts. Not that Labour necessarily sees things this way, with the Scottish party's finance spokesperson Michael Marra fuming that the SNP has 'squandered' the UK government's block grant. He added that while Scotland benefits 'disproportionately' from investment in public services, its growing deficit demonstrates how 'the SNP has blown a hole in Scotland's finances'. Today's GERS stats raise questions about the SNP's full fiscal autonomy idea, too. Despite not having made an appearance in more recent manifestos, Shona Robison told the Scottish Affairs select committee in January it was her 'preferred option' within the current constitutional arrangement. The Scottish government also noted in a recent Freedom of Information response that this had been its policy for over a decade, after it was first alluded to in the SNP's 2011 election programme. Yet there remain serious question marks over how it would work in practice – with the latest figures suggesting, Scotland secretary Ian Murray says, that a shift to this approach would cost the public purse more than £14 billion a year. Today's figures suggest there is a long way to go until that fantasy could become a reality.
Powys County Times
2 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Bangladeshi anti-corruption officials give evidence against UK MP Tulip Siddiq
Bangladeshi anti-corruption officials have given evidence in court against former British anti-corruption minister Tulip Siddiq, accusing her of using a family connection to deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina to obtain state-owned land in the South Asian country. Ms Siddiq, who is Ms Hasina's niece, resigned from her post in Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's Government in January following reports that she lived in London properties linked to her aunt and was named in an anti-corruption investigation in Bangladesh. The Labour MP represents the north London district of Hampstead and Highgate and served as economic secretary to the Treasury – the minister responsible for tackling financial corruption. She is being tried together with her mother, Sheikh Rehana, brother Radwan Mujib and sister Azmina. Ms Siddiq has been charged with facilitating their receipt of state land in a township project near the capital Dhaka. They are out of the country and being tried in absentia. Ms Siddiq's lawyers have called the charges baseless and politically motivated. Muhammad Tariqul Islam, a public prosecutor, disputed a claim by Ms Siddiq that she is not Bangladeshi, saying the anti-corruption watchdog through investigations found that she is a citizen. The prosecutor said if Ms Siddiq is convicted she could be sentenced to three to 10 years in prison. Ms Siddiq in an interview with the British newspaper The Guardian recently referred to Bangladesh as 'a foreign country' and called the charges against her 'completely absurd'. She asserted to The Guardian she was 'collateral damage' in the longstanding feud between her aunt and Bangladesh's interim leader Muhammad Yunus. Ms Hasina had a frosty relation with Mr Yunus, and during her rule Mr Yunus faced a number of cases including for graft allegations. Courts overturned those charges before he took over as interim leader days after Ms Hasina's ousting last year in a student-led uprising. Separately, the anti-corruption investigation has alleged that Ms Siddiq's family was involved in brokering a 2013 deal with Russia for a nuclear power plant in Bangladesh in which large sums of money were said to have been embezzled.
