UN warns of conflict in South Sudan amid reports of VP Riek Machar's arrest
UMISS chief Nicholas Haysom said the country risked losing the 'hard-won gains of the past seven years' if the world's newest nation returned to 'a state of war', following reports that Machar was arrested at his residence in the capital, Juba.
'Tonight, the country's leaders stand on the brink of relapsing into widespread conflict or taking the country forward towards peace, recovery and democracy in the spirit of the consensus that was reached in 2018 when they signed and committed to implementing a Revitalized Peace Agreement,' Haysom said in a statement released early Thursday.
A return to fighting 'will not only devastate South Sudan but also affect the entire region', Haysom added.
According to Machar's Sudan People's Liberation Army In Opposition (SPLM/IO) party, a convoy of 20 heavily armed vehicles 'forcefully entered' the first vice president's residence in Juba and disarmed his bodyguards on Wednesday.
The country's defence minister and chief of national security were in the convoy that delivered an arrest warrant to the vice president, the SPLM/IO said,
'An arrest warrant was delivered to him under unclear charges,' according to a statement, which was shared on Facebook by Reath Muoch Tang, chairman of Machar's foreign relations committee.
'This act is a blatant violation of the Constitution and the Revitalized Peace Agreement, as no legal procedures such as lifting his immunity have been followed,' Tang said.
'The arrest of the First Vice President without due process undermines the rule of law and threatens the stability of the nation,' he said.
A government spokesperson could not be immediately reached for comment.
Earlier on Wednesday, the UN reported clashes over the past 24 hours between forces loyal to President Kiir and Vice President Machar outside the capital Juba.
A power-sharing deal between Kiir and Machar has been unravelling over recent weeks amid tension as government troops loyal to the president have battled fighters of the so-called White Army, which has close ties to Machar.
In response to fighting since late February in the northeastern Upper Nile State, Kiir's government has detained several officials from Machar's party, including the petroleum minister and the deputy head of the army.
Machar's party also said a military base and two military training centres around Juba had been attacked by government forces since Monday.
The training centres were established to prepare Kiir's opposition forces for integration into the unified army, a key provision of the 2018 peace agreement aimed at uniting government and opposition troops.
None of the incidents have been confirmed by the Kiir-aligned army, the South Sudan People's Defence Forces (SSPDF), though it accused Machar's forces of aggressive manoeuvres from one of the bases on Monday.
Analysts say that an ageing Kiir, 73, has been seeking to ensure his succession and sideline Machar politically for months through cabinet reshuffles.
South Sudan, the world's youngest country, fell into a bloody civil war soon after gaining independence in 2011, as forces aligned with Kiir, an ethnic Dinka, fought those loyal to Machar, an ethnic Nuer.
The conflict killed more than 40,000 people before a 2018 peace deal saw the pair form a government of national unity.
The clashes and latest political tensions between Kiir and Machar have unsettled many in Juba.
The Norwegian and German embassies have closed while the the British and United States embassies said they were reducing to minimal staffing and have urged citizens to leave the country.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Qatar Tribune
14-08-2025
- Qatar Tribune
Lebanon rejects foreign interference, President Aoun tells Iran official
agencies Beirut Lebanon's president has told a senior Iranian official that Beirut rejects any interference in its internal affairs and has criticised Tehran's statements on plans to disarm Hezbollah as 'unconstructive'. Iran's Supreme National Security Council chief Ali Larijani's visit to Beirut on Wednesday comes a week after the Lebanese government ordered the army to devise plans by the end of 2025 to disarm the Iran-aligned Lebanese armed group. Iran expressed opposition to the plan to disarm Hezbollah, which before a war with Israel last year was believed to be better armed than the Lebanese military. 'It is forbidden for anyone … to bear arms and to use foreign backing as leverage,' President Joseph Aoun told Larijani, according to a statement from the Lebanese presidency posted on X. Larijani responded to Aoun by stating that Iran does not interfere in Lebanese decision-making, and that foreign countries should not give orders to Lebanon. 'Any decision taken by the Lebanese government in consultation with the resistance is respected by us,' he said after separate talks with Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, whose Amal Movement is an ally of Hezbollah. 'Iran didn't bring any plan to Lebanon, the US did. Those intervening in Lebanese affairs are those dictating plans and deadlines', said Larijani. He said Lebanon should not 'mix its enemies with its friends – your enemy is Israel, your friend is the resistance'. Larijani further added that Lebanon should appreciate Hezbollah, and its 'value of resistance'. Dozens of Hezbollah supporters gathered along the airport road to welcome Larijani on Wednesday morning. He briefly stepped out of his car to greet them as they chanted slogans. 'If … the Lebanese people are suffering, we in Iran will also feel this pain and we will stand by the dear people of Lebanon in all circumstances,' Larijani told reporters shortly after landing in Beirut. The Iranian official is also scheduled to meet Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, as well as Berri, who is close to Hezbollah. Iran has suffered a series of blows in its long-running rivalry with Israel, including during 12 days of open war between the two countries in June. Hezbollah, meanwhile, was weakened during the war with Israel, which ended in a November 2024 ceasefire that Israel continues to violate. The new Lebanese government, backed by the United States, has moved to further restrain the group.
Al Jazeera
08-08-2025
- Al Jazeera
Have sections of the US Constitution gone missing from government website?
It didn't take long for internet sleuths to notice that something was missing on the Library of Congress website that annotates the United States Constitution. Reddit users pointed out on Wednesday that the website omitted text from some sections of Article 1, which include provisions about the right of habeas corpus as well as limits on congressional and state power. Using the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine, people found that the full text appeared on the Library of Congress website on July 17 but was missing in snapshots after that date. Some people mistakenly said President Donald Trump's administration removed these provisions from the constitution entirely without Congress's input. 'BREAKING: The official US government website has quietly removed Sections 9 and 10 of Article I from the Constitution,' one Threads post said on Wednesday. 'Let me say that again: They didn't amend the Constitution. They didn't debate it in Congress. They just erased two of the most protective sections; the ones that deal with habeas corpus, limits on federal power, and Congress's sole authority to set tariffs.' Altering the text on a website would not remove or erase sections of the constitution. It can be changed only through a formal amendment process, which begins in the US Congress, which can modify or replace existing provisions. The constitution's full text is also available on the websites for the National Archives and the nonprofit National Constitution Center. The amendment process outlined in Article 5 is the only way to alter the constitution. Any proposed amendment must first be approved by a two-thirds vote in both the US House of Representatives and the US Senate. Then it must be ratified by three-quarters of the state legislatures or via state ratifying conventions. Government website omits constitution sections On Wednesday about 11am in Washington, DC (15:00 GMT), the Library of Congress posted on X that the missing sections were 'due to a coding error'. 'We have been working to correct this and expect it to be resolved soon,' the post read. The website on Wednesday also displayed a banner that said: 'The Constitution Annotated website is currently experiencing data issues. We are working to resolve this issue and regret the inconvenience.' The institution issued an update on X a few hours later that the website was fixed. 'Missing sections of the Constitution Annotated website have been restored,' it said. 'Upkeep of Constitution Annotated and other digital resources is a critical part of the Library's mission, and we appreciate the feedback that alerted us to the error and allowed us to fix it.' Article 1 establishes the federal government's legislative branch. Its missing sections included portions of Section 8 and all of Sections 9 and 10, which largely focus on limits on congressional and state power. Before being restored, the text of Article 1 ended in Section 8, just before a line that lists Congress's ability to provide and maintain a navy. Section 9, which was temporarily deleted, details limits on congressional power. It addresses habeas corpus, the legal procedure that grants people in government custody the right to challenge their detention in court. The section says Congress may not suspend habeas corpus 'unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it'. Habeas corpus has been in the headlines during the second Trump administration. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller told reporters in May that the administration was looking into suspending habeas corpus. Later that month, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem wrongly said habeas corpus is a right the president has to remove people from the US. Section 10, which was also temporarily removed, covers restrictions on US states, including regulating tariffs without Congress's consent. Our ruling A Threads post said an official US government website 'quietly removed Sections 9 and 10 of Article I from the Constitution' without input from Congress. On Wednesday, the Library of Congress's annotated website of the US Constitution was missing sections of Article 1. The library said the issue was related to a coding error, and it was corrected shortly afterwards. Website alterations do not affect US law or the constitution. The document can be changed only through a formal amendment process initiated by Congress. We rate this post false.
Al Jazeera
11-07-2025
- Al Jazeera
Cambodia passes constitutional change allowing gov't to revoke citizenship
Lawmakers in Cambodia have amended the country's constitution to allow legislation that would see citizenship stripped from those deemed to have colluded with foreign powers. The constitutional change, which was unanimously supported by 125 politicians in the National Assembly on Friday, has drawn criticism from rights groups, which have expressed concern that it could be used to target political opponents. The government said it will soon make use of the amendment. Justice Minister Koeut Rith confirmed that a new citizenship revocation bill would be swiftly brought before parliament. 'If you betray the nation, the nation will not keep you,' he said before dismissing critics' unease about the move. The justice minister claimed that those who have not harmed the national interests will not be stripped of their citizenship, adding that they might still 'face other charges'. Before Friday's vote, the constitution specified that Khmer citizens could lose their citizenship only 'through mutual agreement'. However, after being revised, Article 33 of the constitution now states that 'receiving, losing and revoking Khmer nationality shall be determined by law'. Amnesty International condemned the change on Friday, urging the international community to criticise Cambodia over the decision. 'As the proposal moves closer to becoming reality, anyone who speaks out against or opposes the ruling party will be at risk of having their citizenship revoked,' the NGO's regional research director, Montse Ferrer, said. 'We are deeply concerned that the Cambodian government, given the power to strip people of their citizenship, will misuse it to crack down on its critics and make them stateless.' Last month, Hun Sen, the influential former Cambodian prime minister, called for the constitution to be changed so Cambodians could be stripped of their citizenship. This came after exiled opposition figures condemned the government over its ongoing border dispute with Thailand. Former opposition leader Sam Rainsy, who lives in exile to avoid being sent to prison, was among those Hun Sen accused of speaking against the interests of the nation.
