
NZSAS elite domestic terror Commando unit quietly shelved as police anti-terror team steps up
The alleged move follows a sharp drop in experience and numbers at the NZSAS in recent years. What is the NZSAS D Squadron?
The D Squadron was created in 2005, initially called the Counter Terrorist Tactical Assault Group.
It offered a shorter selection course than that faced by NZSAS aspirants, offering a more direct pathway to special forces that met NZDF's domestic counter-terrorism requirements without the expansive set of skills taught to fully-badged NZSAS operators.
It was praised two years later by then Minister of Defence Phil Goff as a part of an important and 'robust counter-terrorism response' in an 'uncertain security environment'. The Commando unit had its own badge with fighting daggers crossing a taiaha. In contrast, NZSAS operators wear the classic winged daggers with the motto, "Who Dares Wins".
Goff highlighted the unit as evidence of NZDF 'significantly upgrading its counter-terrorism capabilities'.
The Commando unit was distinctive within the NZSAS, with its own badge. Rather than the famous winged daggers of the NZSAS, the Commandos badge was two crossed fighting daggers across a taiaha, intended to represent the three branches of the military and 'readiness for action'.
It was also distinctive for the black belt worn by those who had been accepted into the unit.
There is very little public information about the secretive Commandos, but in 2020, an Army News piece quoted one of the team as saying: 'NZ Commandos are self-motivated operators who are thinkers before shooters.'
He said the motto of the unit was 'ready to strike' and its 'chosen values' were being a teammate, mission focus, accountability and 'win everything'.
'The job of the D Squadron Commandos is to respond to domestic, no-notice call outs and solve the problem regardless of circumstance.' What will replace the elite SAS unit?
While the SAS has declined in numbers, police have reinforced their premier armed response unit, the Special Tactics Group (STG).
Information obtained through the Official Information Act has shown that the Special Tactics Group had a large funding boost in 2019 - the year of the Christchurch terror attack - and baseline funding then increased from $8.2m in 2020 to $9.4m last year.
It is understood that the number of people in the STG also increased over that time period.
The STG's role goes beyond counter-terrorism. It also provides police with a flexible, highly-trained armed response to dangerous incidents.
The Herald understands the STG had faster access to helicopters, integrated communications networks rather than separate military communications, and better integration with other domestic agencies.
Police tactical operations acting head Inspector Freda Grace said revealing the numbers of STG personnel would place the public and those officers at risk by revealing their 'specific operational capability'.
'STG plays an important role in the strategy to keep people safe using highly trained officers with specialist skills that can be called upon at short notice to resolve situations quickly and safely.'
Police use the group in dozens of call-outs each year. Members of the NZSAS Commando unit carrying out a counter-terrorism training exercise. Does D Squadron still exist?
NZDF has refused to confirm or deny whether the Commandos still exist, even though it no longer carries recruitment information in its publications.
Police are similarly tight-lipped on detail about the STG.
A spokeswoman for Minister of Defence Judith Collins said she was confident the NZSAS remained capable of fulfilling its domestic role.
The Herald has been told by those connected to the NZSAS that the Commandos ceased to exist as a designated counter-terrorism unit about two years ago.
The arrival of Covid 19, the posting of NZSAS operators to guard 501 deportees from Australia, and the fall of Kabul reducing future deployment opportunities led to some of the elite unit's most experienced non-commissioned officers (NCOs) leaving.
The NZDF was so concerned it began offering up to $30,000 bonuses to those who stayed. Defence bosses internally spoke of the NZSAS as 'near collapse'.
The Herald understands the problem was compounded as attrition also hit the wider defence force, severely cutting numbers enlisting in traditional NZSAS 'feeder' units.
At the time, the NZSAS was placing even greater focus on working with foreign partners, particularly the United States, with a focus on what is called 'expeditionary' - or offshore - missions.
The Herald has been told that led to a focus on ensuring NZDF could field a fully-operable A Squadron and B Squadron at the cost of the Commando unit. Even so, the Herald understands it has struggled to maintain even a full B Squadron complement.
The Herald has been told that those who were in the Commandos were given a choice: go through the full NZSAS selection process to advance into A Squadron and B Squadron, or to return to the units from which they came.
NZDF told the Herald it would not share information about specific units and their roles due to 'operational security' and risk to national security.
A NZDF spokesman said: 'The New Zealand Special Air Service (NZSAS) Regiment continues to provide a government-directed output for a domestic counter-terrorism response in support of New Zealand Police and other agencies.'
The spokesman said the NZSAS had been 'organised in many different ways to best suit the operating environment of the time' over its 70-year history and 'that continues to this day'. Defence Minister Judith Collins says she is confident NZDF can manage its counter-terrorism obligations. Photo / Mark Mitchell
'This has not resulted in any reduction or change to the regiment's output. It remains ready to provide the Government with effective military options.'the Who's in charge of counter-terrorism?
Police were and remain the lead agency for terrorist incidents in New Zealand, with an agreement between it and NZDF that allows for the NZSAS to be called on if required.
The NZSAS has had a supporting counter-terrorism role since the late 1970s when terrorist incidents increased in New Zealand.
The Regiment - then known as 'the Unit' for its smaller size - was facing an uncertain future after Vietnam but the detonation of a bomb outside the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Sydney in 1978 assured it continued.
Sir Robert Muldoon, who was present at the CHOGM meeting, lent his political might to lobbying by the NZSAS within NZDF which saw its elite soldiers take on the counter-terrorism 'black role' (as distinct from the 'green role' of special forces working offshore). Former Prime Minister Sir Robert Muldoon reviewing specialist weapons used by the NZSAS.
Around the same time, police developed its own counter-terrorism response with the Anti-Terrorist Squad, renamed in 1991 as the Special Tactics Group - a part-time role until the early 2000s when it was made full-time in response to growing terror incidents internationally.
New Zealand's counter-terrorism response was further bolstered with the creation of NZDF's Commandos in 2005, initially called the Counter Terrorist Tactical Assault Group.
It offered a shorter selection course than that faced by NZSAS aspirants and those who succeeded went on to four months of training in combat assault and marksmanship skills.
The intent was to offer a more direct pathway to special forces that would meet NZDF's domestic counter-terrorism requirement without the expansive set of skills taught to fully-badged NZSAS operators.
In 2009, the team was rebranded as D Squadron as the NZSAS set its course for the future with the recently-created Explosive Ordnance Team rounding out the expansion of highly-trained units under Special Operations Command.
Those who passed selection for D Squadron still retained the option of undertaking the gruelling, extended selection process for operators in A Squadron and B Squadron. History of NZSAS counter-terrorism
Muldoon's championing of the NZSAS into a counter-terrorism space ensured its survival and led to a close and famous connection to the regiment. The Herald reported in 2017 on Muldoon taking a seat in a darkened training room with former NZSAS commander Graye Shattky, the pair playing the part of 'hostages', when the elite soldiers burst in with explosions and weapons blazing.
After, Muldoon said to Shattky: 'I suppose on occasion you practice with live ammunition.' Those with Muldoon recalled he paled when Shattky pointed to the holes in the targets that had surrounded the men: 'That was live ammunition, Prime Minister.'
One former operator recalled visiting Muldoon at the Beehive with other NZSAS members. 'I remember sitting in his chair in Parliament. I had my feet up on his desk and had my guys around. He walked in and says 'hello boys, how are you?'.'
Muldoon then closed his office door, revealing a photograph of himself with the NZSAS. The operator remembered Muldoon's cackle as he pointed to the image: 'There you are,' he said. 'You're my gang.'
David Fisher is based in Northland and has worked as a journalist for more than 30 years, winning multiple journalism awards including being twice named Reporter of the Year and being selected as one of a small number of Wolfson Press Fellows to Wolfson College, Cambridge. He joined the Herald in 2004.
Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Another Cabinet minister caught up in UN letter saga
By Craig McCulloch of RNZ Another Cabinet minister has been caught up in the United Nations letter-writing imbroglio, with new documents showing David Seymour first ran his response past Paul Goldsmith before he sent it. Seymour, writing as Regulations Minister, fired off a blunt reply to the UN in July that prompted public rebukes from both Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Foreign Minister Winston Peters for bypassing proper processes. Seymour refused to concede any mistake but agreed to formally withdraw his letter so Peters could issue one on behalf of the full government. New correspondence, released to RNZ under the Official Information Act, reveals Goldsmith, the Treaty Negotiations Minister, had been looped in early on and appeared comfortable with Seymour's approach. On 1 July, two days before the letter went to the UN, one of Seymour's advisors sent a draft to Goldsmith's office. "Attached is the Minister for Regulation's proposed response... He mentioned that we had agreed to run it past your Minister before we sent it off," the email read. "It is a little more direct than what MFAT might draft. Please let me know if your Minister is happy." Goldsmith's office responded the next day, asking for a phone call. By the morning of 3 July, Seymour's advisor emailed him: "Goldie is happy for us to send it. He is going to send his own mild MFAT holding letter on behalf of himself and [Māori Development Minister Tama] Potaka." Seymour replied: "Ok, great." His letter was sent to the UN that afternoon. In a statement provided to RNZ on Saturday, Goldsmith said: "When asked, I did not object to [Seymour] sending the letter, but when commenting on UN matters, it is the Foreign Minister's views that are relevant, not mine." A spokesperson for Seymour said he had nothing further to add. Earlier correspondence in late June showed Goldsmith's office drafted an initial "holding response" to the UN but requested it be sent with Seymour's letterhead as "the senior Minister for this response". Emails between Seymour's staff also canvassed the options for responding to the UN. It noted MFAT's preferred approach would be a joint reply from "relevant Ministers" Seymour, Goldsmith and Potaka, in line with previous UN communications in 2024. Instead, Peters ultimately issued a government-wide letter on 11 August, striking a softer tone and expressing regret for the "breakdown in protocol". The UN Special Rapporteur on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, Albert K Barume, had raised concerns on 12 June about Seymour's Regulatory Standards Bill, suggesting it failed to recognise Māori traditions or uphold Treaty principles. Seymour's reply branded the critique "presumptive, condescending and wholly misplaced" and "an affront to New Zealand's sovereignty". After news of Seymour's letter broke in July, Luxon told media he agreed with its content but Seymour was wrong to have sent it: "I expect Winston Peters to be the person that engages with the UN."


Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Another Cabinet minister caught up in UN letter-writing saga
By Craig McCulloch of RNZ Another Cabinet minister has been caught up in the United Nations letter-writing imbroglio, with new documents showing David Seymour first ran his response past Paul Goldsmith before he sent it. Seymour, writing as Regulations Minister, fired off a blunt reply to the UN in July that prompted public rebukes from both Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Foreign Minister Winston Peters for bypassing proper processes. Seymour refused to concede any mistake but agreed to formally withdraw his letter so Peters could issue one on behalf of the full government. New correspondence, released to RNZ under the Official Information Act, reveals Goldsmith, the Treaty Negotiations Minister, had been looped in early on and appeared comfortable with Seymour's approach. On 1 July, two days before the letter went to the UN, one of Seymour's advisors sent a draft to Goldsmith's office. "Attached is the Minister for Regulation's proposed response... He mentioned that we had agreed to run it past your Minister before we sent it off," the email read. "It is a little more direct than what MFAT might draft. Please let me know if your Minister is happy." Goldsmith's office responded the next day, asking for a phone call. By the morning of 3 July, Seymour's advisor emailed him: "Goldie is happy for us to send it. He is going to send his own mild MFAT holding letter on behalf of himself and [Māori Development Minister Tama] Potaka." Seymour replied: "Ok, great." His letter was sent to the UN that afternoon. In a statement provided to RNZ on Saturday, Goldsmith said: "When asked, I did not object to [Seymour] sending the letter, but when commenting on UN matters, it is the Foreign Minister's views that are relevant, not mine." A spokesperson for Seymour said he had nothing further to add. Earlier correspondence in late June showed Goldsmith's office drafted an initial "holding response" to the UN but requested it be sent with Seymour's letterhead as "the senior Minister for this response". Emails between Seymour's staff also canvassed the options for responding to the UN. It noted MFAT's preferred approach would be a joint reply from "relevant Ministers" Seymour, Goldsmith and Potaka, in line with previous UN communications in 2024. Instead, Peters ultimately issued a government-wide letter on 11 August, striking a softer tone and expressing regret for the "breakdown in protocol". The UN Special Rapporteur on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, Albert K Barume, had raised concerns on 12 June about Seymour's Regulatory Standards Bill, suggesting it failed to recognise Māori traditions or uphold Treaty principles. Seymour's reply branded the critique "presumptive, condescending and wholly misplaced" and "an affront to New Zealand's sovereignty". After news of Seymour's letter broke in July, Luxon told media he agreed with its content but Seymour was wrong to have sent it: "I expect Winston Peters to be the person that engages with the UN."


Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Former Press Secretary Michael Forbes Told To Inform Employer Himself After Filming Allegations
Police immediately escalated allegations about the Prime Minister's former deputy chief press secretary Michael Forbes to the police executive - including the police commissioner and the deputy commissioner - but he was told the "onus was on him" to inform his employer, documents released under the Official Information Act reveal. Forbes, a former journalist, resigned after it emerged he recorded audio of multiple sessions with Wellington sex workers, and amassed a gallery of women working out at the gym, shopping and being filmed through a window getting ready to go out. Police earlier said they got a complaint from a Wellington brothel last July after images were found on a client's phone, but decided the case did not meet the threshold for prosecution. On Wednesday, a series of documents were released to RNZ under the Official Information Act, including a timeline of key events and executive notifications. The incident at the Wellington brothel happened at 7pm on 11 July. Police Comms were notified the following day at 5.40pm. Ten minutes later the National Command and Coordination Centre (NCCC) was alerted and then the District Command Centre. At 6.15pm on 12 July the NCCC emailed a large number of senior leaders in police including former Police Commissioner Andrew Coster, former Deputy Commissioner Jevon McSkimming and others. "Police Comms have been called by an informant who works for an escort agency. The informant has found images on a client's phone of naked females, including one very intoxicated female that appear to have been taken with the consent of those photographed/filmed. "The client is allegedly Michael FORBES who is the Senior Press Secretary for the Hon Louise Upston, the Minister for the Community and Voluntary Sector, Minister for Social Development and Employment, and Minister for Child Poverty Reduction. "The alleged offender has left his personal and work cell phones with the informant. The file has been assigned to the Wellington District Crime Squad for attendance." The police media team had been notified, the email said. The email was recalled about 20 minutes later after now Deputy Commissioner Tania Kura asked for the recall as "the distribution list is too broad for this type of communication". The staffer replied they had. Kura said the case was "one of those ones that is a little more sensitive and didn't need such a wide audience". Investigation summary The documents included an investigation summary, which said on 12 July 2024, Wellington Police received a complaint that Forbes had covertly made an audio recording the previous day while engaging the services of a sex worker. "The informant advised police that they had taken two mobile phones from Forbes, one believed to be a personal phone, the other a work device. The informant also reported finding other audio files, images and videos that caused concern." The informant was spoken to by police and both phones were taken. "Once it was established that Forbes was a senior press secretary at Parliament, procedural escalation notifications were made that evening. "The Wellington District Command Centre was advised, as was the duty inspector." On 13 July, a detective obtained search warrants to examine the two cell phones. "The suspected offence was making an intimate visual recording, being an offence against section 216H of the Crimes Act 1961." On 15 July, a detective visited Forbes and advised him of the police investigation. During that visit Forbes provided access codes for the phones. On 18 July, a detective examined the phones. "Located within both phones were numerous videos, screen shots and photos of unidentified females, some in various state of undress, and exposed breasts were visible in multiple videos. "It was apparent to detectives that some images were taken in, and from, public places, including a gym. Some images were also taken through street facing windows of unidentified women, dressing (undressing) themselves, and who were visible from the waist up." The summary says the examination of the phones did not identify evidence of criminal offending. On 18 July Forbes met with a detective and the phones were returned to him. "He was also provided copies of the search warrants that had been obtained. "During the meeting it was suggested that Forbes should delete some of the images on his phones, and he began doing so. Police also stressed the onus was on him to inform his employer." On 19 July Police provided an update to the complainant. On 6 August, Police also provided an update to another staff member at the brothel. "They expressed frustration and disappointment with the outcome," the summary said. In an earlier statement Wellington District Manager Criminal Investigations Detective Inspector John van den Heuvel earlier said that as part of the investigation, police obtained a search warrant to seize two of his phones. On examining the phones, Police found a number of photos and videos of women in public spaces, and what appeared to be women in private addresses, taken from a distance away, van den Heuvel said. "Police considered the available evidence and concluded it did not meet the requirements for criminality, and therefore charges could not be filed. "The individual concerned voluntarily spoke with police and admitted to taking the images and recordings. He was reminded of the inappropriateness of his behaviour and encouraged to seek help." Forbes also deleted the images in the presence of police. "Police acknowledge this man's behaviour was extremely distressing for the women involved and would like to reassure them that any new information will be thoroughly considered. "Based on the initial report and available evidence to date, police are unable to progress the matter further." Van den Heuvel said that any new information regarding Forbes would be "thoroughly considered". Forbes had 'obligation' to tell employers, prime minister says When earlier asked why police did not alert the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) after executing a search warrant on a government-issued phone, the department said: "We are still gathering facts and will look into all of this as part of our deep dive." The DIA said all Ministerial Services staff were subject to standard pre-employment checks when they were first employed. These included reference checks, serious misconduct checks and a criminal conviction check. In addition, security clearances were required for some positions in ministers' offices. The department says these checks were completed when Forbes was first employed by Ministerial Services and were not required for the later temporary assignment to the prime minister's office. "We acknowledge staff may be unsettled or feel their safety may have been compromised. We are committed to supporting our people and ensuring they feel, and are, safe at work." Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said the incidents that were investigated by police but did not lead to any charges occurred after Forbes was vetted to work for Social Development Minister Louise Upston. "He has an obligation to actually declare those issues or those incidents to us, that didn't happen which is why his employment would have been terminated obviously," Luxon said in a media conference at Parliament in June. "But there is a good question about making sure, and I have asked specifically for DIA (The Department of Internal Affairs) to look at vetting processes." He added that the expectation was on Forbes to have raised the incidents with the prime minister's office "because it impacts the office and the reputation of the office, for obvious reasons, but that did not happen". Forbes moved from Upston's office to the prime minister's in February this year and "had the vetting that he needed to come into the Beehive". "We will look at that to make sure that there is anything else we could have done differently in that vetting." Luxon would not discuss what level of security clearance Forbes had in the Beehive. Luxon also had questions about whether the investigation should have been elevated by police to the Beehive. 'We have to take this incident and understand what has happened here and how it happened, and what more can we do about it. "I think it is a legitimate question to say what can we look at between the inter-agency processes, between the different agencies, whether it is police, whether it is the SIS or whether it is ministerial services." 'I was in a downward spiral' Forbes earlier offered an apology for the harm his actions caused to women. "I want to offer my sincerest apologies to the women I have harmed," he said in a statement. "In the past, I was in a downward spiral due to unresolved trauma and stress, and when confronted with the impacts of my behaviour a year ago, I sought professional help, which is something I wish I had done much earlier. "What I failed to do then was make a genuine attempt to apologise. Instead, I tried to move on without offering those I had harmed the acknowledgement, accountability, or amends they deserved. I recognise how wrong that was." Forbes said he spent the past year "reflecting on how I may have affected these women's sense of safety and ability to go about their lives and work". "No one should ever feel violated, unsafe, or disrespected, especially in spaces where they should feel secure, and I am truly sorry for contributing to an environment where women may have felt otherwise," he said. "The therapy I've received over the past year has helped me to understand the roots of my behaviour and begin addressing the patterns that led to it. This is a long-term commitment to change that I take very seriously. "I understand that my past actions may have undermined the trust people place in me. So, I have resigned from my job to focus on the work I need to do." Forbes declined to comment when approached by RNZ on Wednesday. Police Commissioner Richard Chambers told RNZ it was "up to the commissioner of the day to decide what information is shared". "I was not a member of the executive at the time and was not aware of the issue because I was working at Interpol in France. "As I have said previously, in my view it should have been escalated. However, these are matters of judgement for the executive at the time. "I note also that police dealing with the investigation had told Mr Forbes at the time that he should advise his employer." A response on behalf of former police commissioner Andrew Coster to RNZ said police advised that the notification email was recalled shortly after it was sent. "(Then) Commissioner Coster was off on leave at that point so it was handled by others. He will not be commenting further and you will need to direct any further queries to the NZ Police."