Exclusive: 2024 Election Results Lawsuit Advances as Documents Requested
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The lead plaintiff in a legal case questioning the accuracy of the 2024 election, has submitted 15 pages of document requests as part of the discovery process.
SMART Legislation, the action arm of nonpartisan watchdog group SMART Elections, also submitted a series of questions to the Rockland County Board of Elections in New York this week, according to court filings reviewed by Newsweek.
"The best way to reassure the public about the accuracy of the election results in Rockland County, New York, is to conduct a full, transparent, hand recount of the 2024 Presidential and Senate elections," Lulu Friesdat, the founder and executive director of SMART Legislation, said in a statement to Newsweek. "That is why we have requested it, and so far, the judge seems to agree."
A spokesperson for Rockland County told Newsweek it had filed a motion to dismiss, which includes a request for a stay of all discovery.
Voters at the polls inside Central United Methodist Church on November 5, 2024 in downtown Detroit, Michigan.
Voters at the polls inside Central United Methodist Church on November 5, 2024 in downtown Detroit, Michigan.The Context
SMART Legislation filed the lawsuit over claims of voting discrepancies in Rockland County, New York. At the heart of alleged discrepancies are voting machines, which have often been the target of claims of irregularities, including when President Donald Trump made unverified claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election.
Judge Rachel Tanguay of the New York Supreme Court ruled in May that the allegations were serious enough for discovery to proceed. In an order filed earlier this month, Tanguay said all discovery—where the involved parties exchange information and evidence relevant to the case—must be completed within about seven months.
The complaint said that more voters had sworn in legal affidavits that they voted for independent U.S. Senate candidate Diane Sare, who is also a plaintiff, than the Board of Elections counted and certified. The complaint also cited numerous statistical anomalies in the election results, including that in multiple districts where hundreds of voters chose the Democratic candidate Kirsten Gillibrand for Senate, none voted for former Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic candidate for president.
The lawsuit could renew debate about the 2024 election, though it won't change the outcome for any election that has been certified, including the Senate and presidential races.
What To Know
The plaintiffs are seeking evidence about how the 2024 election was conducted due to the irregularities detailed in the initial complaint, according to SMART Legislation's press release.
Documents requested include information about voting machines; voter rolls; software; software updates; hardware, including forensic-grade copies of hard drives; diagrams of all equipment, including network and Wi-Fi components; and flash drives that carry election results.
The Board of Elections has been asked to provide documents concerning "any actual or alleged irregularities, errors, problems, or misalignment of election results or voter rolls" in the 2020 or 2024 general elections, according to documents.
The document requests also cover security protocols, such as rules for password creation and chain of custody procedures; lists of workers; financial interactions, such as vendor contracts; and communications with voting machine manufacturers including Elections Systems & Software and testing lab Pro V&V.
SMART Elections reported in February that a software update to some ES&S systems were not sufficiently tested. Jack Cobb, the director of the federally accredited testing lab Pro V&V, previously told Newsweek that the changes were not "of any significance."
But SMART Legislation said a technical adviser who was consulted disagreed with the testing lab's classification of the updates as minimal, saying it "is a major change and should require closer inspection as to what the changes are."
SMART Legislation also asked the Board of Elections to answer questions about modem, Wi-Fi or cellular connections to Rockland County's election systems and to confirm if it has ever used either Starlink satellites' Direct to Cell service or a program known as BallotProof.
They also asked if any individual or organization had made any type of complaint or expressed concern about possible inaccuracies in election results from January 1, 2020 to the present.
What People Are Saying
Lulu Friesdat, the founder and executive director of SMART Legislation, said in a statement provided to Newsweek: "One of our main concerns at this point is whether the chain of custody of the ballots and the equipment has been robust enough for the public to have confidence in the paper ballots. That is the reason for many of our discovery requests."
County Attorney Thomas Humbach said in a statement to Newsweek: "We believe that this claim has no merit, and that the petitioners do not qualify for a recount as a matter of law."
What's Next
The lawsuit is seeking a full, hand recount of ballots cast in the presidential and U.S. Senate races in Rockland County.
The Rockland County Board of Elections will have to response to discovery requests and the questions, and plaintiffs will seek to conduct depositions.
The next hearing is scheduled for September 22, and the case is expected to go to trial early next year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
34 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Meet the Senate parliamentarian, the official tying Republicans in knots over their tax bill
WASHINGTON — A few Republicans reacted with indignation Thursday after the Senate parliamentarian advised that some of the measures in their tax and immigration bill could not be included in the legislation. Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., tweeted on X that Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough should be fired, 'ASAP.' Rep. Greg Steube, R-Fla., intimated that she was partisan, asking why an 'unelected swamp bureaucrat, who was appointed by Harry Reid over a decade ago' gets to decide what's in the bill?'
Washington Post
35 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Lawmakers remove ‘revenge' tax provision from Trump's big bill after Treasury Department request
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans agreed to remove the so-called revenge tax provision from President Donald Trump's big bill on Thursday after a request by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. The Section 899 provision that was nixed would have allowed the federal government to impose taxes on companies with foreign owners, as well as investors from countries judged as charging 'unfair foreign taxes' on U.S. companies.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
PCAOB imposes smaller exam cheating fines, citing cooperation
This story was originally published on CFO Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily CFO Dive newsletter. The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board announced three separate settled disciplinary orders against Netherlands member firms of Deloitte, Ernst & Young and PricewaterhouseCoopers, sanctioning them with penalties totaling $8.5 million for violating the board's rules and quality control standards related to their internal training programs, according to a Wednesday press release. From 2018 to 2022 hundreds of the firms' professionals, including partners, improperly shared answers to tests for mandatory firm training courses on such topics as professional independence, audit requirements and professional integrity, the PCAOB release states. Without admitting or denying the findings, Deloitte Netherlands and PwC Netherlands each agreed to pay a $3 million civil penalty and EY Netherlands agreed to pay $2.5 million. The fines would have been 'significantly larger' if the firms had not been as cooperative, according to the release. The U.S. audit watchdog's latest exam-cheating sanctions come as the board's broader future is uncertain: Republican lawmakers have proposed to eliminate the Enron-era body and fold its duties into the Securities and Exchange Commission. The PCAOB was handed a legislative lifeline last week when the Senate Parliamentarian found that the provision in President Donald Trump's massive tax and spending bill wasn't compliant with the so-called Byrd rule. Still, the Trump administration's push for deregulation could drive other means of curbing the board's powers, CFO Dive previously reported. The fines are smaller than the record $25 million penalty imposed last year by the board when it sanctioned KPMG Netherlands and its former head of assurance in connection with cheating and sharing of answers on the firm's internal training exams during a five-year period. At the time, the PCAOB noted that the widespread cheating on the training courses was enabled by the firm, which took 'virtually no steps to investigate' the misconduct which was ultimately brought forward by a whistleblower. With the clock potentially ticking with regard to the board, Robert Pawlewicz Ph.D., an assistant professor of accounting at the University of Richmond's Robins School of Business, said the PCAOB may be willing to settle for less to have these violations closed and made public before the SEC makes any changes. It's possible 'the PCAOB was incentivized to wrap up the enforcements,' he said. He also said that the board, acting alongside the newly appointed SEC administration, isn't likely to pursue such actions that aren't audit-related which can be criticized by some as regulatory overreach, although Pawlewicz doesn't agree with that view. 'With a new Board, I would not expect to hear about more of these violations,' Pawlewicz said in an email. A PCAOB spokesperson declined to comment on the matter. In a statement emailed to CFO Dive, EY Netherlands said integrity is a core value and that it takes such matters seriously, noting that it has fully cooperated with PCAOB. 'We have taken extensive actions to reinforce our culture of compliance, ethics, and integrity, as well as further measures to address the issues identified through our investigation. With this settlement, we can bring these matters with the PCAOB to a conclusion and will work with local regulator AFM [Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets] to ensure the long-term effectiveness of the measures we have taken,' the statement from EY said. In a press release PwC Netherlands said it has taken steps to remediate the problem and that the settlement coincides with its internal investigation. 'This behaviour is contrary to our values, and we have imposed a range of sanctions on those found to be involved, including written warnings, financial penalties, demotions and exits from the firm,' the release states. Deloitte did not respond immediately to a request for comment. Recommended Reading PCAOB wins Senate lifeline while future remains murky Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
