logo
Albanese calls for deeper economic ties with Indonesia on first visit since re-election

Albanese calls for deeper economic ties with Indonesia on first visit since re-election

Anthony Albanese has backed Indonesia's bid to join a key regional trade agreement after being given a spectacular official welcome to Jakarta's Presidential Palance and holding high levels talks with Prabowo Subianto.
The prime minister urged Australian businesses to show greater "ambition" when dealing with the emerging South-East Asian economy, while brushing aside questions about Indonesia's growing military ties with Russia.
Mr Prabowo and Mr Albanese both talked up the bilateral relationship in the wake of the meeting, with Mr Albanese saying "no relationship is more important to Australia than this one."
Mr Prabowo said Australia and Indonesia were "destined to be neighbours" and that "good neighbours are the ones who will help us in rough times."
"Family may be far away, but neighbours are always there for us. Therefore, I am determined to maintain the best relationship with our neighbour," he said.
Mr Albanese extolled Indonesia's economic rise over recent decades but warned Australia risked missing out on the boom.
"To convert extraordinary potential into concrete progress, then all of us — government, business, civil society — need to demonstrate greater engagement and ambition."
The Albanese government has launched a new strategy to boost Australian economic engagement with South-East Asia, but investment from Australia still lags, and trade between the two countries has actually contracted slightly in recent months.
Mr Prabowo stressed during his remarks that he had "invited … Australia to participate more in our economy."
The prime minister also declared that he'd back Indonesia's bid to join the OECD and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CP-TPP).
Multiple other countries — including China and Taiwan — have also been angling to join the sprawling trade pact, which has more than a dozen members.
Susannah Paton from the Lowy Institute said it was a "no-brainer" for Australia to support Indonesia's CP-TPP accession, "both politically and practically."
"If Indonesia were to join either OECD or CP-TPP it would also promote the kind of economic reforms that could help drive investment from Australia, too," she said.
The prime minister and the president also discussed defence and security cooperation in the wake of a major defence pact signed by both countries last year and the controversy over a reported Russian approach to base military aircraft in Indonesia's Papua province.
When asked about the story during a press conference ahead of the meeting, Mr Albanese pointed out that Indonesia had ruled out giving Russia any basing rights.
But he avoided questions on whether Australia had intelligence confirming Russia had made such a request, simply saying Indonesia had "made its position clear."
"Russia, of course, will try to increase its influence," he said.
"It is not for me to comment on what occurred between countries that are not Australia. What is important is Australia's position."
He also wouldn't be drawn on whether he'd raise the issue with Mr Prabowo during the official talks.
The two leaders discussed expanding defence and security cooperation under a major security agreement signed by both countries last year.
Mr Albanese said it represented "the most significant step in the Australia and Indonesia security partnership for three decades."
"But let me be very clear — I do not see this agreement as the last step," he said.
For his part, the Indonesian president simply said Indonesia was still committed to ratifying the agreement and would continue to "discuss the possibilities to improve cooperation in the defence sector."
Australia has also committed $15 million to "enhance bilateral maritime cooperation" between the countries.
Susannah Patton, director of the South-East Asia Program at the Lowy Institute, said initiatives like that would help with "maintaining momentum and capitalising on Mr Prabowo's goodwill to Australia.
"However, the DCA still hasn't been ratified by either parliament, so these initiatives are separate, rather than breakthroughs enabled as a result of the agreement being in force," she said.
"Australia has similar maritime cooperation programs with other South-East Asian countries, especially the Philippines and Vietnam, so the question with Indonesia will really be how receptive and engaged it is with what Australia is offering."
The government has talked up Mr Prabowo's warm attitude to Mr Albanese, pointing to his decision to pay a rare visit to the prime minister's hotel for an informal meeting last night before today's official talks.
It also believes this visit will help cement the prime minister's relationship with the president, who is taking a far firmer hand on key strategic decisions than his predecessor Joko Widodo.
But Mr Prabowo has also held firmly to Indonesia's long commitment to non-alignment, with Mr Patton suggesting Australian officials would also be realistic about how far the strategic relationship could go.
"Prabowo's warmth and positive disposition is certainly valuable," she told the ABC.
"However, he has also been keen to strengthen ties with many other countries, including China and Russia, so strategic limits will remain firmly in place."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Michaelia Cash: Anthony Albanese's Palestinian statehood push is a reward for terror
Michaelia Cash: Anthony Albanese's Palestinian statehood push is a reward for terror

West Australian

time4 hours ago

  • West Australian

Michaelia Cash: Anthony Albanese's Palestinian statehood push is a reward for terror

When Anthony Albanese announced that Australia would unilaterally recognise a Palestinian state, he claimed it was a 'practical contribution to peace'. It was nothing of the sort. It was a gift to Hamas, proof of which came just 48 hours later when Mr Albanese was praised by the terrorist group for his decision. When terrorists congratulate your foreign policy, you are doing something very wrong. The endorsement of Sheikh Hassan Yousef, co-founder of the terrorist group Hamas, of Mr Albanese's decision to recognise Palestine as a state should horrify all Australians. That's the same listed terrorist organisation responsible for the massacre of October 7, the kidnapping of hostages, and the ongoing rocket fire into Israel. You do not achieve peace by rewarding terrorists. All Australians should be appalled at the massive propaganda victory Mr Albanese has handed Hamas on a platter. Mr Albanese has been proven to be completely out of his depth on this vital foreign policy matter. He told Australians Hamas would reject his position to recognise a Palestinian state. The decision does not make the world a safer place, expedite the end of the conflict, deliver a two-state solution, see the free flow of aid, support the release of hostages or put an end to the terrorist group Hamas. Mr Albanese's decision is effectively unconditional recognition. It will go ahead in September, no matter what. Recognition before the hostages are freed, before Hamas is defeated, and before any security guarantees are in place is not diplomacy. It is dangerous naivety. It hands Hamas one of the strategic objectives they sought when they unleashed their campaign of terror in 2023. Recognition should come at the end of a genuine peace process, not at its beginning. It should be the culmination of negotiations in which both sides make real compromises, leading to a secure Israel and a secure Palestine living side by side. That was the bipartisan consensus in this country for decades. By breaking from that cautious, measured approach, Mr Albanese has abandoned the position that recognition must be conditional on the renunciation of terrorism, the release of hostages, and the recognition of Israel's right to exist. If recognition is to mean anything, it must be tied to clear, enforceable conditions. Mr Albanese himself has said these include: no role for Hamas in a future Palestinian state; full demilitarisation; recognition of Israel's right to exist in peace and security; free and fair elections; governance reform, financial transparency, and education oversight to prevent incitement to violence. But here's the problem: none of these conditions have been met. And worse still, Mr Albanese has given no timetable for when they must be. How will these conditions be enforced? What proof will be required? And if they are broken, will recognition be revoked, or will Labor simply turn a blind eye? These are basic questions any serious government would answer before making a major foreign policy decision. Mr Albanese has answered none of them. In truth, the Palestinian Authority, which Mr Albanese claims can deliver these guarantees, has a poor record of honouring its commitments. It has failed to comply with the Oslo Accords, continues to make payments to convicted terrorists and their families, and has not held proper elections in nearly 20 years. Worse, just last year, the Palestinian Authority signed the 2024 Beijing Declaration with Hamas, agreeing to form an interim unity government that would include Hamas, the very terrorists Labor now says will have 'no role' in a Palestinian state. Polling from the Palestinian Centre for Policy and Survey Research — based in Ramallah — shows about 40 per cent of Palestinians currently support Hamas. In Gaza, almost half still back them to govern. Recognising a Palestinian state now risks legitimising a terrorist organisation with significant public support, entrenching their power rather than isolating them. The US has been clear: it does not support unilateral recognition. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said that similar recognition by France actually caused talks with Hamas to collapse. Mr Albanese should also answer a simple question: what state is he recognising? A state with no agreed borders? No single government in control of its territory? No demonstrated capacity to live in peace with its neighbours? Australians want the war in Gaza to end. So do I. But that will not happen because of a symbolic gesture from Canberra. It will happen only when the conditions for peace are in place — and that means removing Hamas from the equation entirely. Until then, recognition is not just premature. It is reckless. And the Albanese Government's decision will be remembered as a political gesture that rewarded terror, weakened our alliances, and made lasting peace harder to achieve.

‘Roadblocks in the way of peace': Sussan Ley on Anthony Albanese's US and Israeli relationships
‘Roadblocks in the way of peace': Sussan Ley on Anthony Albanese's US and Israeli relationships

Sky News AU

time5 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

‘Roadblocks in the way of peace': Sussan Ley on Anthony Albanese's US and Israeli relationships

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley hits out against Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's fumbling of the US alliance while pushing for an Israel-Palestine two-state solution. 'They are roadblocks in the way of peace in the region and the requirement, the wish we have for a two-state solution is further away from reality than ever,' Ms Ley told Sky News host Andrew Bolt. 'I am very disappointed to see our prime minister make such a mess of this.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store