Hong Kong delivery workers' rights group ceases operations
Without providing a reason, the Riders' Rights Concern Group announced on Monday evening that it would cease operations effective immediately. The posts appeared on Facebook and Instagram before their social media pages became inaccessible.
The labour group is part of the Hong Kong Christian Industrial Committee, a non-government pressure group.
The announcement came just days after an opinion piece in the Hong Kong Economic Journal suggesting that lawmakers had been warned not to discuss four issues, including delivery workers' rights.
It is unclear whether the warnings came from the local authorities. HKFP has reached out to the government for comment.
The concern group has campaigned for delivery workers' rights and lobbied for strengthened legal protections since 2021.
The concern group supported foodpanda strikes over wage cuts in 2022 and assisted workers for the delivery company Zeek after it shut down in 2023. It also warned of further exploitation in the industry after UK food delivery company Deliveroo announced its exit from the Hong Kong market in March.
Some lawmakers in the city's opposition-free legislature, including Lam Chun-sing, chair of the Federation of Hong Kong and Kowloon Labour Unions, have called for the creation of a third legal category recognising the hybrid status of delivery workers.
Following strikes by delivery workers earlier this year, labour and welfare chief Chris Sun last month told lawmakers that the Hong Kong government will introduce a proposal this year to enhance the rights and benefits of digital platform workers.
Couriers for Keeta have been staging a series of protests across Hong Kong since late April demanding better treatment from the delivery platform.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
HKFP
3 days ago
- HKFP
Hong Kong man's incitement to subversion case under nat. security law transferred to District Court
A Hong Kong man charged with inciting subversion under the Beijing-imposed national security law will have his case transferred to the District Court, where he faces up to seven years' imprisonment if convicted. Chan Ho-hin, a former waiter, appeared at the West Kowloon Magistrates' Courts on Wednesday in a case linked to social media posts on X and Instagram published between June 2024 and April this year. Chan was originally charged with the lesser offence of publishing articles with seditious intent under the city's homegrown security law, the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance, also known as Article 23. But prosecutors later upgraded his charge to the more serious offence of subversion under the Beijing-imposed national security law. National security judge Victor So said Chan would next appear at the District Court on August 21. Chan has been remanded in custody since he was arrested and charged in late April. He did not apply for bail on Wednesday. As of early August, a total of 96 people have been charged under the national security law, according to the Security Bureau. In June 2020, Beijing inserted national security legislation directly into Hong Kong's mini-constitution – bypassing the local legislature – following a year of pro-democracy protests and unrest. The law gave police sweeping new powers, alarming democrats, civil society groups and trade partners, as such laws have been used broadly to silence and punish dissidents in China. However, the authorities say it has restored stability and peace to the city.
RTHK
30-07-2025
- RTHK
Australia to ban under-16s from YouTube
Australia to ban under-16s from YouTube Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says the under-16 ban may not be implemented perfectly, but it was still the right thing to do. File photo: Reuters Australia will use landmark social media laws to ban children under 16 from video-sharing platform YouTube, a top minister said on Wednesday, stressing the need to shield them from "predatory algorithms". Communications Minister Anika Wells said four-in-ten Australian children had reported viewing harmful content on YouTube, one of the most visited websites in the world. "We want kids to know who they are before platforms assume who they are," Wells said in a statement. "There's a place for social media, but there's not a place for predatory algorithms targeting children." Australia announced last year it was drafting laws that will ban children from social media sites such as Facebook, TikTok and Instagram until they turn 16. The government had previously indicated YouTube would be exempt, given its widespread use in classrooms. "Young people under the age of 16 will not be able to have accounts on YouTube," Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told reporters on Wednesday. "They will also not be able to have accounts on Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and X among other platforms. "We want Australian parents and families to know that we have got their back." Albanese said the age limit may not be implemented perfectly – much like existing restrictions on alcohol – but it was still the right thing to do. A spokesman for YouTube said Wednesday's announcement was a jarring U-turn from the government. "Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens," the company said in a statement. "It's not social media." On paper, the ban is one of the strictest in the world. But the current legislation offers almost no details on how the rules will be enforced –prompting concern among experts that it will simply be a symbolic piece of unenforceable legislation. It is due to come into effect on December 10. Social media giants – which face fines of up to Aus$49.5 million for failing to comply – have described the laws as "vague", "problematic" and "rushed". TikTok has accused the government of ignoring mental health, online safety and youth experts who had opposed the ban. Meta – owner of Facebook and Instagram – has warned that the ban could place "an onerous burden on parents and teens". (AFP)
HKFP
26-07-2025
- HKFP
Thousands of men shared non-consensual intimate photos on Telegram: Chinese media
Thousands of men allegedly shared intimate photos and videos of their girlfriends without consent on the Telegram messaging app, Chinese media reported, sparking widespread outcry against secret filming and calls to better protect women. Pornography in China is illegal, and conservative social attitudes towards women remain the norm, often reinforced by state media and popular culture. It comes after a Chinese university expelled a female student this month for 'damaging national dignity' over videos posted by a Ukrainian esports player on Telegram suggesting they had been intimate. The Chinese state-owned Southern Daily reported this week a woman had discovered that photos of her taken unknowingly had been shared in a Telegram forum with over 100,000 users, mostly Chinese men. Members of the forum also shared photos of their girlfriends, ex-girlfriends and wives, according to a commentary in the Guangming Daily, an outlet backed by China's ruling communist party. Revelations of the group have sparked widespread outcry online. 'We are not…'content' that can be randomly uploaded, viewed and fantasised about,' read one comment on Instagram-like Red Note. 'We can no longer remain silent. Because next could be me, or it could be you.' A related hashtag has been viewed more than 230 million times on social media platform Weibo since Thursday. The largest group, called 'Mask Park', has since been taken down, but smaller spinoffs remain active, according to women contacted by Southern Daily. Telegram encrypts its users' messages and is banned in China, but it is accessible using a virtual private network. AFP has contacted Telegram for comment. 'Nightmares for life' The incident has drawn comparisons to a case in South Korea dubbed 'Nth Room', in which a man blackmailed dozens of women into taking sexually explicit videos and sold them on Telegram. Chinese women have taken to social media to detail their own experiences being filmed and photographed by men in public. 'What criminals consider 'regular' for them may be nightmares that countless women can't escape for the rest of their lives,' one woman said, sharing an encounter on Douyin. Chinese police have cracked down on illegal filming, arresting hundreds of people in 2022 over clandestine surveillance activities. But women's rights are sensitive territory in China — over the last decade, authorities have suppressed almost every form of independent feminist activism. #MeToo activist Sophia Huang Xueqin was sentenced to five years in prison on charges of 'inciting subversion of state power' after she became a symbol of the country's stalled feminist movement. Chinese authorities have yet to publicly announce any action against the Telegram group. But the Guangming Daily commentary urged 'accountability' for the organisers of the Telegram group, and empathy for the people filmed. Improving law enforcement would 'enhance the overall sense of security, free women from the fear of being spied on and make privacy boundaries a truly untouchable red line', it said.
