Airstream's Frank Lloyd Wright Trailer Envisions 'Usonian' Design On-the-Go
Airstreamhas partnered with theFrank Lloyd Wright Foundationto create a limited-edition travel trailer inspired by the late American architect. Accepting orders today, the 28-foot 'Usonian' trailer will be made in only 200 units over the next two years. Frank Lloyd Wright's distinct philosophy of an organic American architecture comes to life in the inspired design, featuring wooden interior finishes, an abundance of natural light, and elegant functionality.
Throughout, echoes of Wright's 'Usonian' design language come to life, evoking his 20th-century vision of efficient small footprints and bringing nature indoors. Initial inspiration was provided by a rare 1939 design for a mobile kitchen by Wright that was never physically built, but highlighted the designer's early concepts of mobile architecture. Wright's 1955 Martin-Senour Paint collection also served as a primary reference for the desert-inspired color palette, including mustard yellow, deep red, earthy ochre, turquoise, blue, and green.
To allow for ease of movement and abundant sunlight, the overhead storage was relocated, accommodating 29 windows — including two glass skylights. The trailer also includes two circular porthole windows, referencing Wright's later embrace of circular elements and Airstream's dedication to aerodynamic design. Inside the rear hatch is the modular sleeping area, featuring two twin beds that can be combined into a king-size bed and serve as a lounge area. A convertible dinette and desk both fold down to create small-space efficiency at the front, opening the area for living or transforming the sofa for an additional sleeping area. The design is topped off with a custom slatted ceiling fixture that spans the trailer, enhancing the effect of the skylights through dynamic light and shadow.
The Airstream Frank Lloyd Wright Special Edition Travel Trailer is available now from Airstream's nationwide dealer network, with pricing starting at $184,900 USD MSRP. For more information, visit the officialAirstream website.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Evonik Industries AG (ETR:EVK) Could Be Worth Watching
Let's talk about the popular Evonik Industries AG (ETR:EVK). The company's shares received a lot of attention from a substantial price movement on the XTRA over the last few months, increasing to €22.25 at one point, and dropping to the lows of €17.81. Some share price movements can give investors a better opportunity to enter into the stock, and potentially buy at a lower price. A question to answer is whether Evonik Industries' current trading price of €19.38 reflective of the actual value of the large-cap? Or is it currently undervalued, providing us with the opportunity to buy? Let's take a look at Evonik Industries's outlook and value based on the most recent financial data to see if there are any catalysts for a price change. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Evonik Industries appears to be expensive according to our price multiple model, which makes a comparison between the company's price-to-earnings ratio and the industry average. In this instance, we've used the price-to-earnings (PE) ratio given that there is not enough information to reliably forecast the stock's cash flows. We find that Evonik Industries's ratio of 30.2x is above its peer average of 21.56x, which suggests the stock is trading at a higher price compared to the Chemicals industry. In addition to this, it seems like Evonik Industries's share price is quite stable, which could mean two things: firstly, it may take the share price a while to fall back down to an attractive buying range, and secondly, there may be less chances to buy low in the future once it reaches that value. This is because the stock is less volatile than the wider market given its low beta. View our latest analysis for Evonik Industries Investors looking for growth in their portfolio may want to consider the prospects of a company before buying its shares. Buying a great company with a robust outlook at a cheap price is always a good investment, so let's also take a look at the company's future expectations. With profit expected to more than double over the next couple of years, the future seems bright for Evonik Industries. It looks like higher cash flow is on the cards for the stock, which should feed into a higher share valuation. Are you a shareholder? It seems like the market has well and truly priced in EVK's positive outlook, with shares trading above industry price multiples. However, this brings up another question – is now the right time to sell? If you believe EVK should trade below its current price, selling high and buying it back up again when its price falls towards the industry PE ratio can be profitable. But before you make this decision, take a look at whether its fundamentals have changed. Are you a potential investor? If you've been keeping an eye on EVK for a while, now may not be the best time to enter into the stock. The price has surpassed its industry peers, which means it is likely that there is no more upside from mispricing. However, the positive outlook is encouraging for EVK, which means it's worth diving deeper into other factors in order to take advantage of the next price drop. With this in mind, we wouldn't consider investing in a stock unless we had a thorough understanding of the risks. While conducting our analysis, we found that Evonik Industries has 2 warning signs and it would be unwise to ignore them. If you are no longer interested in Evonik Industries, you can use our free platform to see our list of over 50 other stocks with a high growth potential. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Cosmopolitan
39 minutes ago
- Cosmopolitan
The tragic true story of Titan: The OceanGate Disaster and the submersible implosion
On 18 June 2023, five passengers descended into the Atlantic Ocean in the hopes of seeing the famed wreckage of the doomed Titanic. They would have been prepared to see something incredible from the viewpoint of the Titan, the submersible they were travelling in. Instead, the ship's carbon fibre was struggling to uphold against the ocean's enormous pressure, and Titan imploded at supersonic speeds. All five passengers on board were instantly killed. A four-day search and rescue mission took place, with the remainder of what was left of the Titan found on the ocean floor, shredded. Netflix's latest series, Titan: The OceanGate Disaster now looks to explore this tragedy in granular detail, focusing on billionaire Stockton Rush – the man behind the submersible, who also perished onboard his own creation. Here's everything you need to know. The new Netflix documentary looks at the rise of OceanGate, an American company that wanted to launch deep sea tourism. Founded by Stockton Rush and Guillermo Söhnlein in 2009, the company built two submersible vessels – one of which being the infamous Titan. Söhnlein left the company in 2013. Rush, meanwhile, was the charismatic face of the brand. 'There's a huge demand for unique travel experiences,' he said in 2017. 'We will be profitable from the Titanic trips.' Born into a wealthy family, Rush was an American businessman with a taste for adventure. He started scuba diving aged 12 and acquired a pilot's licence when he was 18. He initially thought about being an air force pilot, but was rejected for his eyesight not being good enough. In 2006, after he went on his first submarine excursion, Rush began to toy with the idea of deep sea travel, and hoped to tap into the growing demand for adventure tourism. He wanted to build submersibles that went far deeper under the sea than other commercial submersibles. Speaking to The Independent in 2017, Rush explained: 'Shallow dives equal shallow experience. The commercial subs out there are like a Disneyland ride versus paddling yourself through the Grand Canyon. Knowing you're there changes how you observe it.' Understandably, there are strict regulations for submersible travel, which Rush previously criticised. He once decried the Passenger Vessel Safety Act of 1993 as 'needlessly prioritis[ing] passenger safety over commercial innovation'. Rush also spoke passionately about the 'move fast and break things' culture typically attributed to start-ups. At the 2022 GeekWire summit, he told audiences: 'If you're not breaking things, you're not innovating. If you're operating within a known environment, as most submersible manufacturers do, they don't break things. To me, the more stuff you've broken, the more innovative you've been.' Speaking of his former co-founder, Guillermo Söhnlein told Vanity Fair: 'I think [Rush] did see himself in the same vein as these disruptive innovators. Like Thomas Edison, or any of these guys who just found a way of pushing humanity forward for the good of humanity — not necessarily for himself. He didn't need the money. He certainly didn't need to work and spend hundreds of hours on OceanGate. You know, he was doing this to help humanity. At least that's what I think was personally driving him.' The deep-sea vessel, built by OceanGate, was to focus on diving as far as 3,800 meters below sea level to visit the wreckage of the Titanic. What made it different to other submersibles, usually comprised of titanium or steel in order to withstand the extreme levels of external pressure that are attributed to deep-sea diving, was that the Titan had a filament-wound carbon fibre hull. This material made the submersible lighter and more cost effective – but was not as reliable and could fail when too much pressure was applied. Rush was told this by numerous employees and experts in the field, who warned of potential 'catastrophic' issues, but nothing was done to amend the submersible. Titan was also not 'classed', which meant that it did not undergo formal safety inspections or meet the standards of established classification societies. In 2019, OceanGate explained why this was the case. In a press release, the company said: 'Bringing an outside entity up to speed on every innovation before it is put into real-world testing is anathema to rapid innovation.' The submersible was also controlled by a modified video game controller, with the 'pilot' receiving instructions from the surface vessel above through a text-based messaging system. No real training was required before getting on board, with any training needed to take part being provided online. However, those who paid for their seat on the submersible (a princely sum of up to $250,000, or £195,000), were expected to sign a detailed waiver that said that going on the Titan could 'result in physical injury, disability, emotional trauma or death'. Despite numerous warnings, Titan launched in 2021 with its first dive to the Titanic's wreckage. Between 2021 and 2022, the submersible made 23 dives, with 13 of these managing to reach the wreckage. On its final outing, the Titan was just 1600m away from the bow of the Titanic. Onboard the Titan's final voyage on 18 June were: Stockton Rush – 61 – OceanGate CEO Paul-Henri Nargeolet – 77 – deep sea explorer and Titanic expert Hamish Harding – 58 – businessman Shahzada Dawood – 48 – businessman Suleman Dawood – 19 – university student and Dawood's son Originally Christine Dawood was meant to be going on the dive. However, she reportedly gave up her seat for her son, because he expressed an interest in going on the trip. He reportedly took a Rubik's cube on Titan, as he hoped he would be able to break a world record while seeing the wreckage. Rear Admiral John Mauger explained in a press conference after the Titan was found that the wreckage was consistent with a 'catastrophic loss of the pressure chamber.' Effectively, the carbon fibre material could not withstand the external pressure of a deep sea dive. When the submersible did not reemerge at its scheduled time, the US coast guard was notified. Titan only had 96 hours of breathable air supply for its five passengers when it set out, which added a time pressure to finding those onboard. Four days later, on 22 June, debris from the Titan submersible was found by the US coast guard, near the Titanic's wreckage. All planned excursions by the company were immediately cancelled, with its main office closed the day the Titan wreckage was found. On 6 July, all business operations were suspended, with OceanGate now only serving as a legal entity. The family of French explorer Paul-Henri Nargeolet filed a $50 million wrongful death lawsuit against OceanGate in August 2024. The US Coast Guard launched an investigation, which also led to a public hearing in September 2024. During this time, former employees testified saying they warned of the submersible's safety. US court documents show OceanGate's former operations director David Lochridge had significant concerns with the Titan's design, including that it was made from carbon fibre which he warned would damage further with every dive. Titan: The OceanGate Disaster is available to watch on Netflix now Kimberley Bond is a Multiplatform Writer for Harper's Bazaar, focusing on the arts, culture, careers and lifestyle. She previously worked as a Features Writer for Cosmopolitan UK, and has bylines at The Telegraph, The Independent and British Vogue among countless others.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
High Growth Tech Stocks In Asia To Watch Now
As global markets react to a mix of economic indicators and geopolitical tensions, small-cap stocks have shown resilience, with the Russell 2000 Index recently gaining momentum. In Asia, the technology sector is particularly noteworthy as it navigates these dynamic conditions, making it crucial for investors to focus on companies that demonstrate strong innovation and adaptability in this evolving landscape. Name Revenue Growth Earnings Growth Growth Rating Suzhou TFC Optical Communication 29.78% 30.32% ★★★★★★ Shengyi Electronics 22.99% 35.16% ★★★★★★ Fositek 26.71% 33.90% ★★★★★★ Shanghai Huace Navigation Technology 24.44% 23.48% ★★★★★★ Range Intelligent Computing Technology Group 27.31% 28.63% ★★★★★★ eWeLLLtd 24.95% 24.40% ★★★★★★ PharmaResearch 24.40% 25.85% ★★★★★★ Nanya New Material TechnologyLtd 22.72% 63.29% ★★★★★★ Global Security Experts 20.56% 28.04% ★★★★★★ JNTC 54.24% 87.93% ★★★★★★ Click here to see the full list of 490 stocks from our Asian High Growth Tech and AI Stocks screener. Underneath we present a selection of stocks filtered out by our screen. Simply Wall St Growth Rating: ★★★★★☆ Overview: Mobvista Inc. operates globally by providing advertising and marketing technology services essential for the development of the mobile internet ecosystem, with a market cap of HK$10.85 billion. Operations: Mobvista Inc. generates revenue primarily from its Advertising Technology Services, which contribute $1.63 billion, alongside a smaller segment in Marketing Technology Business at $17.63 million. The company's focus on advertising technology plays a significant role in its financial structure and market presence within the mobile internet ecosystem. Mobvista's recent financial performance underscores its robust position in the tech sector, with a notable surge in Q1 sales to USD 439.64 million from USD 301.48 million year-over-year and an increase in net income to USD 21.31 million from USD 7.59 million. This growth trajectory is supported by a strategic focus on innovation and market expansion, reflected in annual revenue and earnings growth rates of 27.5% and 74.1%, respectively, outpacing the Hong Kong market averages significantly. The company's commitment to reinvestment is evident from its R&D initiatives, crucial for sustaining long-term competitiveness in the rapidly evolving tech landscape. Dive into the specifics of Mobvista here with our thorough health report. Gain insights into Mobvista's historical performance by reviewing our past performance report. Simply Wall St Growth Rating: ★★★★★★ Overview: Victory Giant Technology (HuiZhou) Co., Ltd. engages in the production and sale of printed circuit boards, with a market capitalization of CN¥89.29 billion. Operations: Victory Giant Technology generates revenue primarily from its PCB Manufacturing segment, which accounts for CN¥11.97 billion. The company's cost structure and financial performance are influenced by this core business activity. Victory Giant Technology's recent financial results spotlight its dynamic growth within the tech sector, with first-quarter sales soaring to CNY 4.31 billion from CNY 2.39 billion year-over-year, and net income escalating impressively to CNY 920.65 million from CNY 209.61 million. This performance is underpinned by a robust annual earnings growth forecast of 37.4% and revenue growth predictions at a brisk pace of 26.5% annually, both outstripping broader market averages significantly in China's competitive tech landscape. Moreover, the company's strategic acquisitions and dividend increases reflect its proactive approach in capital management and shareholder value enhancement amidst volatile market conditions. Unlock comprehensive insights into our analysis of Victory Giant Technology (HuiZhou) stock in this health report. Evaluate Victory Giant Technology (HuiZhou) historical performance by accessing our past performance report. Simply Wall St Growth Rating: ★★★★☆☆ Overview: Quanta Computer Inc. is a global manufacturer and seller of laptop computers and telecommunication products, with operations in the United States, Mainland China, the Netherlands, Japan, and other international markets; it has a market cap of NT$1.09 trillion. Operations: Quanta focuses on the manufacturing, processing, and sales of laptop computers and telecommunication products across multiple global markets. The company operates in regions including the United States, Mainland China, the Netherlands, and Japan. Quanta Computer's recent financial performance underscores its strong position in the tech sector, with first-quarter sales doubling to TWD 485.67 billion from TWD 258.94 billion a year earlier, and net income rising sharply by 61% to TWD 19.50 billion. This surge is supported by an annual revenue growth rate of 23.2%, outpacing the Taiwan market average of 9%. The company also emphasizes shareholder returns, as evidenced by a significant dividend increase to TWD 13 per share for the fiscal year of 2024, aligning with its robust financial health and commitment to delivering value. Delve into the full analysis health report here for a deeper understanding of Quanta Computer. Explore historical data to track Quanta Computer's performance over time in our Past section. Reveal the 490 hidden gems among our Asian High Growth Tech and AI Stocks screener with a single click here. Hold shares in these firms? Setup your portfolio in Simply Wall St to seamlessly track your investments and receive personalized updates on your portfolio's performance. Elevate your portfolio with Simply Wall St, the ultimate app for investors seeking global market coverage. Explore high-performing small cap companies that haven't yet garnered significant analyst attention. Fuel your portfolio with companies showing strong growth potential, backed by optimistic outlooks both from analysts and management. Find companies with promising cash flow potential yet trading below their fair value. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include SEHK:1860 SZSE:300476 and TWSE:2382. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
