logo
Fake Recruiters Are Getting Smarter (Sort Of). Here's How To Spot Them

Fake Recruiters Are Getting Smarter (Sort Of). Here's How To Spot Them

Forbesa day ago
I recently received a email that, for a short while, made me think that a top consulting firm might be genuinely interested in my professional services.
'I came across your profile and noticed that you're currently open to new career opportunities. Based on your background and professional interests, I wanted to personally reach out and let you know that we're hiring for several new roles that may align well with your experience,' the email read.
It went on to request some information, but nothing that would raise any red flags on first glance, things like: 'what job role(s) you're targeting' and 'your preferred industry and career level.' There were no requests for personal information, suspicious links, or email attachments.
My initial glance at this email, which included seeing the consulting firm's name in the sender's email address, didn't raise any red flags, but upon a closer look later, it was clear what was going on.
While fake job seekers have been getting more attention recently, recruitment scams, such as fake job postings and messages from impersonated recruiters impersonations, are plaguing more job seekers than ever.
According to the FTC, reported business and job opportunity jumped by nearly 18 percent last year, and in the UK, job fraud reports to Action Fraud, the government's consumer protection agency, are up 133% since 2022.
It's a major challenge for job seekers — 45% said as much in a recent FlexJobs survey — and one that is more difficult to navigate as AI evolves. But simple steps can protect your personal information, bank account, and dignity. Here's are some ways to spot and stop a fake recruitment email.
Slow down and examine the email carefully
Scammers often mimic the language and branding of legitimate companies to gain your trust — but subtle signs can reveal their true intentions.
Start by checking the sender's email address: is it a personal Gmail or Yahoo account rather than a company domain? When I first saw the email, I was using my phone, and only saw part of the email address, which included the name of the well-know consulting firm. But, sure enough, after closer inspection, it ended in Gmail.com.
Poor grammar, spelling errors, and generic or sloppy design are common in fraudulent communications like these. This was not the case in my email, but the use of linebreaks was inconsistent, and there was no email signature. So you should also look closely at the formatting of the email, even if otherwise it reads fairly well.
Of course, we've all been told to not click on supsoicious links or email attachments, so when those are absent, as they were here, it can elicit a false sense of security. I was being asked to provide information about the type of job I was interested in, not my bank details, so what's the harm in replying with that?
The scam part comes later in these situations. You may be asked to apply for the role on a clone website that looks quite similar to the company that's supposedly recruiting you. Then, an interview, often over an internet chat or phone call, may be followed by a job offer. Requests for your banking information or other personal details will likely happen at some point during this process.
Play detective on LinkedIn
While I already knew this email was a dud, I searched for the sender's name on LinkedIn, and found a profile of a recruiter that actually looked pretty legit. It turns out, that it was.
Scammers often use stock images or AI-generated photos and fill their profiles with vague job titles, limited work history, and almost no activity. A legitimate recruiter will typically have a detailed, verifiable work background and visible engagement on the platform, which this first profile I found had.
From here, I'm thinking we may have a case of recruiter impersonation. So I did another search of the name and added the name of the company that it claimed to represent in the email, and then I found what I was looking for.
This second profile had the same name and photo of the real recruiter, but had only one post and a handful of connections. I also clicked 'More' on the profile, then 'About This Profile' to see when it was created. Brand-new profiles are a common red flag, and this one was brand spanking new.
So, I solved the case, and if you find yourself doing the same, make sure you do LinkedIn, and real recruiters everywhere, a favor and report the fraudulent profile. LinkedIn prevented over 70.1 million fake accounts from being created during the registration process in the first half of 2024 alone, but some still fall through the cracks.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jobs Take Massive Downward Revisions: Uncertainty And Risk Ride High
Jobs Take Massive Downward Revisions: Uncertainty And Risk Ride High

Forbes

time2 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Jobs Take Massive Downward Revisions: Uncertainty And Risk Ride High

Economists were wrong. They expected 100,000 new jobs in July. Instead, there were 73,000. Unemployment was up to 4.2% from 4.1%. Disappointing as those are, neither was the truly crushing news. This was, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics release: 'Revisions for May and June were larger than normal. The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for May was revised down by 125,000, from +144,000 to +19,000, and the change for June was revised down by 133,000, from +147,000 to +14,000. With these revisions, employment in May and June combined is 258,000 lower than previously reported.' Jobs Saw A Massive Downward Revision BLS has explained jobs revisions for previous months as resulting from additional business and government agency reports as well as recalculation of seasonal factors. But it still comes to the same conclusion in this case: more than a quarter million fewer new jobs than had been reported. Late last month I wrote about how getting a job was getting harder. ManpowerGroup President and Chief Strategy Officer Becky Frankiewicz wrote at the time about June jobs, 'The top-line numbers look positive, but our real-time data reveals underlying shifts. June marked the weakest hiring month of the year, with new postings down 7% month-over-month and 2% year-over-year. Open postings fell 8% from May.' New monthly job openings in the aggregate have been lagging far behind jobs added, as the graph below, using data available from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, shows. Companies can't keep adding new real hires every month when they've reduced the number of job openings they have. President Trump claimed on Truth Social that BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer had 'RIGGED the numbers in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad' and then reportedly fired her according to The Hill. It seems odd that this would only happen now and sounds like another attempt to sweep problems under the rug. More Economic Bad News More likely that the July number and downgrade of May and June had more to do with companies concerned about the administration's tariff strategies. Uncertainty has had impact on the economy over the last few months. Many economists said the increase in the Consumer Price Index, another measure of inflation, was a result of tariffs finally affecting the economy, as The Hill reported. Inflation from the Bureau of Economic Analysis shows personal expenditures (PCE, another inflation measure) up 0.3% month over month, versus the 0.2% expected by economists according to Dow Jones. Year over year, it was 2.6%. Look at core PCE without energy or food and it was up 2.8% since June 2024. 'Looking ahead, spending should come under pressure in H2 2025 as the labor market loses energy, interest rates stay high, and tariffs push inflation up,' wrote Nationwide Financial Markets Economist Oren Klachkin. 'We foresee slower income growth as the main reason behind sub-1% GDP growth in H2 2025.' The 3% annualized growth in GDP for the second quarter, announced in July, was more happenstance. When the Trump administration initially announced broad tariffs, many companies decided to sharply boost their imports in advance to avoid the additional charges, which are paid by the importers, not the exporters. Imports are subtracted from gross domestic product, just as things like foreign students in the U.S. paying tuition adds to GDP because what they pay is technically an export. Why did none of this appear before? 'Looking at the headline consumer price index isn't where the tariffs are visible, it's in goods prices and the increase in household appliances, apparel and toys highlight that tariffs are being passed onto the consumer, it just takes time,' Oxford Economics wrote two weeks ago. Tariff concerns are again boiling over. One example came in Apple's July 31, 2025, earnings call. 'Finally, the situation around tariffs is evolving, so let me provide some color there,' said CEO Tim Cook. 'For the June quarter, we incurred approximately $800 million of tariff-related costs. For the September quarter, assuming the current global tariff rates, policies and applications do not change for the balance of the quarter, and no new tariffs are added, we estimate the impact to add about $1.1 billion to our costs.' A well-known German tool company called Festool announced that all prices starting August 1 would go up because of tariffs. This may be an unsatisfying look at the economy and state of the country, but that is where we are. In the short and long runs, no one knows what will happen.

NFL finalizing deal to take stake in ESPN, hand over RedZone
NFL finalizing deal to take stake in ESPN, hand over RedZone

Washington Post

time2 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

NFL finalizing deal to take stake in ESPN, hand over RedZone

The NFL and ESPN are finalizing their long-awaited deal by which the Disney-owned sports network would receive league media properties, including NFL Network and RedZone, and the NFL is expected to receive an equity stake in ESPN, according to two people with knowledge of the deliberations. Barring any last-minute complications, the deal could be officially completed and announced as soon as next week, according to those people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because no agreement has been announced. The Walt Disney Company is scheduled to announce its quarterly earnings Wednesday. The NFL and ESPN declined to comment. The Athletic reported earlier Friday that the two sides have agreed to the deal. Those familiar with the deal described it as highly complex and said the final remaining issues involved legal considerations related to governmental approvals. They characterized the deal as all but completed, with the finishing touches being applied. ESPN would add to its inventory of regular season games by getting those carried by the NFL Network. The addition of RedZone, which allows viewers to watch key plays from Sunday afternoon games, was considered a key component of the deal, according to the people with knowledge of the negotiations. CNBC reported last month that the deal would involve the NFL taking an equity stake of up to 10 percent in ESPN. It was not clear Friday exactly how large that stake will be. The deal comes as ESPN prepares to launch a direct-to-consumer streaming service. ESPN already holds the broadcast rights to the NFL's 'Monday Night Football' package. Disney pays the NFL about $2.7 billion per year for the Monday night package. ESPN and Disney-owned ABC have the broadcast rights to two Super Bowls, the first at the conclusion of the 2026 season. The NFL announced a set of broadcasting and streaming deals in March 2021 worth more than $110 billion in rights fees over 11 years. The NFL's team owners previously were alerted that the league might schedule a special owners' meeting in August, apparently related to the potential deal with ESPN. It was not clear Friday whether such a meeting will take place. It would be the third straight year in which the NFL held a special owners' meeting in July or August. The previous two such meetings took place in the Minneapolis area. The owners voted at a July 2023 meeting to approve the $6.05 billion sale of the Washington Commanders from Daniel Snyder to a group led by private equity investor Josh Harris. They voted at a meeting last August to ratify a measure to allow private equity funds to purchase minority ownership stakes in NFL franchises.

Tim Cook says Apple ‘must' figure out AI and ‘will make the investment to do it'
Tim Cook says Apple ‘must' figure out AI and ‘will make the investment to do it'

The Verge

time2 minutes ago

  • The Verge

Tim Cook says Apple ‘must' figure out AI and ‘will make the investment to do it'

Apple CEO Tim Cook boasted about the potential of AI and the company's approach to developing it in a rare all-hands today that was reported on by Bloomberg. Apple has been slow to roll out some of its AI features and has stumbled with a planned AI-powered upgrade to Siri, which it delayed earlier this year. According to Bloomberg: The executive gathered staff at Apple's on-campus auditorium Friday in Cupertino, California, telling them that the AI revolution is 'as big or bigger' as the internet, smartphones, cloud computing and apps. 'Apple must do this. Apple will do this. This is sort of ours to grab,' Cook told employees, according to people aware of the meeting. 'We will make the investment to do it.' Cook also apparently pointed to how the company has 'rarely been first' in categories like personal computers, smartphones, tablets, and MP3 players but that Apple eventually made the 'modern' versions of those. 'This is how I feel about AI,' Cook said, Bloomberg reports. Software chief Craig Federighi also spoke, discussing the Siri delay and how the company originally wanted to build it with a 'hybrid architecture.' Under that plan, one system would take care of things Siri can now, and the other would be powered by LLMs, but 'we realized that approach wasn't going to get us to Apple quality,' he said. The new plan is to move everything to a new architecture. The all-hands follows Cook's comments ahead of an earnings call yesterday where he said that the company is 'open to' acquisitions to accelerate its roadmap. Apple has also lost some of its AI talent as part of Meta's 'superintelligence' hiring spree. Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Jay Peters Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All AI Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Apple Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store