SNP came ‘frustratingly close' to victory in Hamilton, says Swinney
Scottish Labour's Davy Russell won a surprise victory on Thursday, with the SNP coming second and Reform in third.
The by-election had been sparked by the death of Scottish Government minister and SNP MSP, Christina McKelvie, who had held the seat since 2011, with the party hoping to keep it in the fold.
Despite the First Minister's claim that the contest was a straight fight between the SNP and Nigel Farage's surging Reform UK, the Labour candidate won with 8,559 votes to the 7,957 of the SNP's Katy Loudon.
Speaking to the PA news agency in Glasgow, the First Minister said the party had made 'modest progress' since its collapse at last year's general election – when it dropped from 48 MPs to just nine – but had further to go.
'We had a very strong campaign in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse,' he said.
'We had hundreds of members of the party that came to make their contribution to the by-election campaign – we've got to build on that.
'We've got to learn the lessons of the by-election.
'We came very close, it was frustratingly close.'
Coming second in the vote, the First Minister said, is an 'indication that we are still able to perform strongly electorally'.
The First Minister added that his party lost the overlapping seat at Westminster – Hamilton and Clyde Valley – by 9,000 votes last year and by just 600 on Thursday.
'So, we are quite clearly in a position where we can achieve electoral success, but we have got to build on that and make sure we're stronger for 2026,' he said.
In the final weeks of the campaign, the First Minister predicted the contest would be between his party and Reform UK but, asked if such an assertion – which turned out to be wrong – cast doubt on the data used by the SNP, he appeared to suggest it was based on his own perception.
'I'm just making two points about the by-election, two observations,' he said.
'One was that Labour support was collapsing, and from last year to Thursday, Labour support collapsed by 20%, came down from 50% to 30%.
'And I observed, secondly, that Reform support was surging and it was, so my analysis of the by-election was absolutely correct.
'I simply said to people if you want to stop Reform, vote for the SNP.'
Despite the by-election loss, the party continues to lead in the polls ahead of next year, with Mr Swinney saying the Government must 'deliver on the priorities of the people of Scotland'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
9 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Discussion on flying Johnstone Burgh FC flag in town's Houstoun Square set to take place
Provost Lorraine Cameron suggested idea after it was confirmed Renfrewshire Council wouldn't be able to unfurl old burgh coat of arms. A discussion on whether to fly the flag of Johnstone Burgh Football Club in the town's Houstoun Square is expected to take place next month. Provost Lorraine Cameron suggested the idea after it was confirmed Renfrewshire Council wouldn't be able to unfurl the old burgh coat of arms as originally planned. This was because the local authority had learned it effectively does not have the power to display that particular emblem at this time. As a result, the provost proposed to fly the flag of Johnstone Burgh FC until April 2026 instead, following their Scottish Junior Cup win in June, but this has also hit an obstacle. In an update to elected members on Thursday, she said: "I write to inform you that following on from my email to you last week I have received correspondence from three councillors who do not agree with the Johnstone Burgh FC flag flying from the flagpole as I suggested. "Therefore, I will refrain from making arrangements to fly the flag until after discussion at the next full council meeting." In her initial email, the provost explained why the council couldn't fly the old burgh flag in Houstoun Square – despite a recent decision from elected members to do so. She said: "Following the council meeting, [the head of corporate governance] contacted the Lord Lyon's office to confirm what was the correct coat of arms for Johnstone Burgh and to confirm who had permission to fly it. "The response received from the Lord Lyon's office was that under the Local Government (Scotland) Act, the status of 'Burgh' was abolished in 1975. "They have stated that this makes the 1955 Grant of Arms to the Burgh of Johnstone redundant and therefore they may not be displayed." There were no such issues in the case of Renfrew, however, because the community council petitioned to matriculate its arms to the group in 1987. The flag was subsequently raised at the town hall in Hairst Street on Thursday, July 31. Councillor Andy Doig, an independent representative for Johnstone North, previously said he was "hopeful" one of the town's community groups would pick up the mantle and petition the Lord Lyon for approval. "That would be great if they wanted to do that," he added. "But I feel that it sticks in my throat that we're hidebound by these sort of medieval rules. "I agree with the provost's suggestion, however, and I think it's wise under the circumstances. Johnstone Burgh Football Club did so well and everyone wants to recognise that."
The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
The new plan which could see under-22s get free bus travel in England
People under the age of 22 could get free bus travel if new plans go ahead. Free travel for this age group is already available in Scotland and now MPs are calling on the government to do the same in England, too. The Transport Select Committee, which made the recommendation, said it would improve young people's access to 'work and skills opportunities' and 'help embed long-term public transport use'. People aged 16-21 in Wales are entitled to a one-third discount on fares, and from next month will be able to travel for £1 per journey. Parts of England offer discounted or free bus travel for young people, such as London for 16 and 17-year-olds. People are entitled to free bus travel in England when they reach the state pension age, which is currently 66 but will rise from next year. Bus fares in England for all passengers are capped at £3 until the end of 2025. In a report on buses, the select committee said: 'England's patchwork of local youth concessions contrasts with national schemes in Scotland and Wales. 'A coherent national approach to ensure fair access across England is essential if the government is serious about driving economic growth, which depends on removing barriers to education, training, and employment for the next generation.' The report described public transport as a 'major barrier to employment for young people', especially in places with limited services. It added: 'In some areas, transport is restricting opportunity rather than enabling it.' The committee urged the government to reform the way local bus services are funded, with longer-term settlements. It also called for a national ambition for a minimum level on public transport connectivity. Department for Transport (DfT) figures show the number of bus journeys taken in England outside London fell by 22 per cent from 4.6 billion in 2009 to 3.6 billion in 2024. Labour MP Ruth Cadbury, who chairs the committee, said: 'Those most affected by unreliable or even non-existent buses include the young, who need them to get to school, college, university and their first jobs. 'Denying young people these experiences denies them their life chances. 'We call for a universal, free bus pass for all under-22s to equalise opportunity. 'While the bus fare caps have been beneficial, the government has yet to spell out a coherent strategy of what they aim to achieve, and whether more targeted options could produce better outcomes. 'While the government's Bus Services Bill contains positive ideas, the Transport Committee's report says ministers should go further to get bums back on seats.' The Bill, which is going through Parliament, will lead to an overhaul of buses, such as by giving all local transport authorities new powers to run their own services. It will also reduce some of the red tape involved in bus franchising, including reducing the minimum period between local areas taking control of services and being allowed to start operations. The DfT has been approached for a comment.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Majority of Brits support stripping Prince Andrew of his remaining royal titles - amid speculation future King William will look to cut him out
Two thirds of Britons support stripping Prince Andrew of his remaining royal titles, new research has shown. According to YouGov polling, 67 per cent of the population would back a move by the Royal Family to remove any remaining vestiges of his former position. The most well known title held by the late Queen's second son is the Duke of York, a title given to him on his wedding day to Sarah Ferguson in 1986. According to tradition, however, he was also given the titles of Earl of Inverness and Baron Killyleagh, relating to Scotland and Northern Ireland, although they are rarely used. All three regions have seen local campaigns demanding the titles be disassociated from the prince, who remains overshadowed by a web of private and public scandals including his association with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Prince Andrew's scandalous and faux pas-ridden life - from the scores of alleged sexual conquests to his boorish and vulgar character - has been outlined in extracts from a new book serialised in the Mail. Andrew Lownie's book Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York - also recounts the Duke's seeming infidelity and suggestions he abused his Foreign Office role to boost his own wealth on taxpayer-funded trips. The excruciating revelations have prompted fresh questions over whether the Duke should retain his titles - but his brother, King Charles III, is unlikely to deviate from his mother's famous stance of 'never complain, never explain'. Charles is thought to have sought to address the 'Andrew question' early in his reign - but his cancer diagnosis saw his priorities change. As well as his connections with the Epstein, the Duke was forced to deny ever sharing information with an alleged Chinese spy who served as a close advisor on his business ventures. His relationship with Yang Tengbo caught the attention of British intelligence services, who had to contact the Duke to warn him off amid fears Mr Tengbo was seeking to use his royal connection to his advantage. The King has withdrawn his brother's allowance even while appearing to surrender in the war over the Royal Lodge residence. Andrew must now keep the 30-room estate in Windsor Great Park maintained at his own expense - which he appears to be capable of despite a bill thought to run into the millions. Despite his troublesome reputation, Andrew remains eighth in line to the throne and a Counsellor of State who can theoretically deputise for the King should he become incapacitated, although in reality this is unlikely to ever happen as there are other working royals who also occupy the position. The shamed royal, who retains his HRH status but is unable to use it publicly, also remains a member of the Order of the Garter, the nation's most ancient and prestigious order of chivalry. He also holds various Royal Victorian Orders, given to him by the late Queen, as well as other foreign and Commonwealth titles, as well as being an honorary Vice Admiral. Andrew has disappeared from the public eye, having withdrawn from royal duties - making any future action by William an effective confirmation of his informal severance (pictured 2011) The Duke has seen largely excused himself from all but the most occasional of public outings - joining the family on their Christmas walk at Sandringham and attending St George's Chapel for the Easter Sunday service. Andrew's Order of the Garter, Britain's highest order of chivalry could also be stripped away after he was granted it by Elizabeth II in 2006. It is removed from those guilty of charges such as heresy or treason. The Duke of York has not taken part in the annual public Garter Day parade since 2019, following his fall from grace. His Dukedom could be struck off by way of Parliament. A Private Members' Bill sponsored by MP Rachael Maskell in 2022 sought to grant the Monarch 'powers to remove titles'. Perhaps unsurprisingly, Ms Maskell is the MP for York Central. Nine in 10 local people wanted to see Andrew stripped of his title in 2022, loathing his ongoing connection with the city. He has already been stripped of the Freedom of York. His princedom and HRH title - the latter already informally withdrawn with Andrew's agreement - could be revoked by way of Letters Patent, documents signed by the monarch that grant rights and titles (and can equally take them away). The new polling says that only 13 per cent of those asked would object to him being stripped of his remaining royal titles. A further 21 per cent said they didn't know. The 67 per cent who said they would back any move is spread fairly evenly across gender, ages groups and even political affiliation. A sample 2294 adults across Great Britain were quizzed between August 6 and 7 this year, following the Daily Mail's devastating serialisation of the explosive new biography of the Duke and his wife, Sarah, Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, which made a series of damaging claims about his private and public activities. A separate YouGov survey found that Andrew continues to languish at the bottom of the royal favourability tables, with his five per cent of Britons having a positive view of him.
