
Can Israel's economy withstand multiple conflicts? – DW – 06/18/2025
With Israel fighting on at least two fronts, the country's finances and economy are strained. The government hopes higher taxes can cover some of the bills while its high-tech industry remains a safe investment.
War is expensive. Besides causing destruction, personal tragedies and deaths, it costs a lot of money to buy and mobilize equipment. It also costs manpower as Isreal — and its economy — is finding out on multiple fronts.
Since the militant islamist group Hamas attacked the Jewish state on October 7, 2023, Israel has been engaged in intense fighting in Gaza. After that, Israel launched airstrikes into Lebanon as retaliation for cross-border Hezbollah missile and drone attacks. Last week, Israel struck deep within Iran with the aim of disabling its nuclear capabilities.
Israel has big problems and big budgets
With all this going on, Israel's economy is under significant strain. Many reservists have been called up to fight forcing them to temporarily leave their jobs. Adding to this labor shortage, work permits for many Palestinians have been cancelled and crossing borders has become increasingly difficult for them.
All this makes filling job vacancies difficult. In April, the country reported a 3% unemployment rate, down from 4.8% in 2021.
At the same time, military spending in Israel has surged. In 2024, it grew by 65% to reach $46.5 billion (€40.4 billion), according to a report by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute published in April. That brings its military spending to 8.8% of GDP — the second highest in the world after Ukraine.
Iron Dome interceptions seen above Tel Aviv
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The country's 2025 budget includes spending of 756 billion Israeli shekels ($215 billion; €187 billion) — a 21% rise over the previous year. It is set to be the largest budget in Israeli history and includes $38.6 billion for defense, according to reporting in The Times of Israel.
Israel's economy faces uncertain future
Itai Ater, an economics professor at the Coller School of Management, Tel Aviv University, says the war is "very expensive" at the moment, and there is "huge uncertainty about the near and long-term future."
"The military costs on both the offensive and defensive fronts are very high. This will surely impact the budget, the deficit, the GDP and the Israeli debt," Ater told DW.
The costs are indeed high. In the past 20 months, many Israelis have spent hundreds of days in reserve duty. Others have been evacuated from their homes near border regions leading to big disruptions in their lives. Social services are under strain.
Since last Friday's attacks, many people have not worked, including in manufacturing, trade, tech and the education system, says Ater.
Commercial flights in and out of the country are also currently suspended. Airlines have evacuated their jets and airspace over much of the Middle East is closed.
Israeli government increasing taxes to pay for it all
To compensate for some of this financial strain, the government has increased taxes. The country's value added tax (VAT) for most goods and services went from 17% to 18% at the beginning of this year. The health tax deducted from employee salaries and national insurance contributions went up, too.
The Israeli economy has suffered over the past year and a half but has been "surprisingly resilient," says Benjamin Bental, a professor emeritus of economics at the University of Haifa.
While tourism, manufacturing, construction and farming have suffered, other industries like high-tech, defense and retail food remain resilient. In 2024, the economy brought in over $540 billion, topping both previous years.
The absence of Palestinien workers hits agriculture and construction in Israel hard Image: Menahem Kahana/AFP/Getty Images
Bental points to the continued success of the high-tech sector and the overall labor market that is "as tight as it has ever been." Warnings that critical energy and internet infrastructure would be targeted by Hezbollah or Iran have, so far, proven unfounded leaving businesses on track.
Israel's high dependence on high-tech
It is no coincidence that Israel is known for its advanced high-tech industry.
The sector employs 12% of the country's workforce and pay around 25% of all income taxes because of their high salaries, according to US investment bank Jefferies . High-tech services and products make up 64% of the country's exports and around 20% of total GDP.
But the number of high-tech employees in Israel has stagnated since 2022, according to a report released in April by the Israel Innovation Authority.
In 2024, the number of local high-tech employees decreased for the first time in a decade. At the same time the number of employees leaving the country for long-term relocation increased, the report found.
Today, these companies still have around 390,000 employees in Israel and a further 440,000 outside the country. Some fear higher taxes could push more mobile companies or workers to leave.
Investors and long-term risks
The biggest unknown now is the general uncertainty of the situation in and around Israel. This impacts workers, employers and investors.
"Nevertheless, if you look at the stock market and the foreign exchange rate, it seems that investors are optimistic, likely anticipating that the war would end soon, that Iran's nuclear threat would be eliminated and that the economy would recover and get better," said Ater.
Expats from all over the world working in Israel have been leaving the country after Iran's missile attacks Image: Baz Ratner/AP Photo/picture alliance
For investors, the short-term risks have increased, but the real impact depends on how long the military conflicts last and how they end.
"An alternative scenario, in which we enter a long attrition war with Iran, is also likely," said Ater. "In that case, the economy is unlikely to flourish."
Looking ahead, Ater sees the security situation in general, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in particular, as one of the country's long-term economic challenges. Besides these tensions he says it will be important to also keep an eye on the country's internal social divide and the judicial overhaul and its implications on democratic institutions.
Edited by: Uwe Hessler
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
an hour ago
- DW
US Supreme Court backs Tennessee youth transgender care ban – DW – 06/18/2025
In a setback for transgender rights in the United States, the conservative-dominated court voted to uphold a ban on hormone therapy, puberty blockers and gender transition surgery for minors. The United States Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a Tennessee law banning gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors. The court, which is dominated by conservative justices, voted 6-3 in favor of the Republican-backed ban on hormone therapy, puberty blockers and gender transition surgery for patients under the age of 18, ruling that it does not violate the US Constitution's 14th Amendment. What did the judges say? "Tennessee concluded that there is an ongoing debate among medical experts regarding the risks and benefits associated with administering puberty blockers and hormones to treat gender dysphoria, gender identity disorder and gender incongruence," wrote conservative Chief Justice John Roberts. "[The Tennessee] ban on such treatments responds directly to that uncertainty." The Supreme Court ruling comes after several plaintiffs, including three transgender minors, their parents and a Memphis-based doctor who provides such care, took legal action against the Tennessee law, which they argued discriminates based on sex and transgender status, thus violating the 14th Amendment. But Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the court largely deferred to the state legislature's policy choices in upholding the ban without conducting a "meaningful judicial review." Dissenting "in sadness," she said the court had "abandon[ed] transgender children and their families to political whims." Chase Strangio, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union, representing the plaintiffs, said that the Tennessee law has "taken away the only treatment that relieved years of suffering" for those concerned. The first openly transgender lawyer to argue before the court, Strangio added: "What they've done is impose a blunderbuss ban, overriding the very careful judgment of parents who love and care for their children and the doctors who have recommended the treatment." Trump declares US to only recognize two genders To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video A setback for transgender rights in the US The decision represents a setback for transgender rights, an issue at the heart of the culture debates that have become a dominant feature of American political life. While the Justice Department under Democratic former President Joe Biden had challenged the Tennessee law, his Republican successor Donald Trump has taken a hardline stance against transgender rights. "Across the country today, medical professionals are maiming and sterilizing a growing number of impressionable children," read a January 28 executive order signed by Trump, who had said in his inauguration speech that his government would only recognize two genders: male and female. "This dangerous trend will be a stain on our nation's history, and it must end," it added. According to the Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law, a think tank that researches sexual orientation and gender identity demographics to inform public policy decisions, there are about 300,000 people between the ages of 13 and 17 in the United States who identify as transgender, plus around 1.3 million adults. Trans people in the US fear massive setbacks under Trump To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Edited by: Rana Taha


Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Iran-Israel War: A Lifeline For Netanyahu?
The Iran-Israel war has helped strengthen Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu domestically and overseas, just as his grip on power looked vulnerable. On the eve of launching strikes on Iran, his government looked to be on the verge of collapse, with a drive to conscript ultra-Orthodox Jews threatening to scupper his fragile coalition. Nearly two years on from Hamas's unprecedented attack in 2023, Netanyahu was under growing domestic criticism for his handling of the war in Gaza, where dozens of hostages remain unaccounted for. Internationally too, he was coming under pressure including from longstanding allies, who since the war with Iran began have gone back to expressing support. Just days ago, polls were predicting Netanyahu would lose his majority if new elections were held, but now, his fortunes appear to have reversed, and Israelis are seeing in "Bibi" the man of the moment. For decades, Netanyahu has warned of the risk of a nuclear attack on Israel by Iran -- a fear shared by most Israelis. Yonatan Freeman, a geopolitics expert at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, said Netanyahu's argument that the pre-emptive strike on Iran was necessary draws "a lot of public support" and that the prime minister has been "greatly strengthened". Even the opposition has rallied behind him. "Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is my political rival, but his decision to strike Iran at this moment in time is the right one," opposition leader Yair Lapid wrote in a Jerusalem Post op-ed. A poll published Saturday by a conservative Israeli channel showed that 54 percent of respondents expressed confidence in the prime minister. The public had had time to prepare for the possibility of an offensive against Iran, with Netanyahu repeatedly warning that Israel was fighting for its survival and had an opportunity to "reshape the Middle East." During tit-for-tat military exchanges last year, Israel launched air raids on targets in Iran in October that are thought to have severely damaged Iranian air defences. Israel's then-defence minister Yoav Gallant said the strikes had shifted "the balance of power" and had "weakened" Iran. "In fact, for the past 20 months, Israelis have been thinking about this (a war with Iran)," said Denis Charbit, a political scientist at Israel's Open University. Since Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, Netanyahu has ordered military action in Gaza, against the Iran-backed Hezbollah group in Lebanon and the Huthis in Yemen, as well as targets in Syria where long-time leader Bashar al-Assad fell in December last year. "Netanyahu always wants to dominate the agenda, to be the one who reshuffles the deck himself -- not the one who reacts -- and here he is clearly asserting his Churchillian side, which is, incidentally, his model," Charbit said. "But depending on the outcome and the duration (of the war), everything could change, and Israelis might turn against Bibi and demand answers." For now, however, people in Israel see the conflict with Iran as a "necessary war," according to Nitzan Perelman, a researcher specialised in Israel at the National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) in France. "Public opinion supports this war, just as it has supported previous ones," she added. "It's very useful for Netanyahu because it silences criticism, both inside the country and abroad." In the weeks ahead of the Iran strikes, international criticism of Netanyahu and Israel's military had reached unprecedented levels. After more than 55,000 deaths in Gaza, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory, and a blockade that has produced famine-like conditions there, Israel has faced growing isolation and the risk of sanctions, while Netanyahu himself is the subject of an international arrest warrant for alleged war crimes. But on Sunday, two days into the war with Iran, the Israeli leader received a phone call from European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, while Foreign Minister Gideon Saar has held talks with numerous counterparts. "There's more consensus in Europe in how they see Iran, which is more equal to how Israel sees Iran," explained Freeman from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Tuesday that Israel was doing "the dirty work... for all of us." The idea that a weakened Iran could lead to regional peace and the emergence of a new Middle East is appealing to the United States and some European countries, according to Freeman. But for Perelman, "Netanyahu is exploiting the Iranian threat, as he always has."


Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Gaza Humanitarian Foundation Initiative 'Outrageous': UN Probe Chief
The use of the US and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to distribute food in the Palestinian territory is "outrageous", the head of a UN inquiry said Wednesday. Navi Pillay, who chairs the UN's Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Israel and the Palestinian territories, joined a growing chorus of criticism of the GHF's operations, and cited its US links. "In every war, the siege and starvation surely leads to death," the former UN rights chief told journalists. "But this initiative of what's called a foundation, a private foundation, to supply food, is what I see as outrageous, because it involves the United States itself, the government, and it turns out, as we watch daily, that people who go to those centres are being killed as they seek food." An officially private effort with opaque funding, GHF began operations on May 26 after Israel completely cut off supplies into Gaza for more than two months, sparking warnings of mass famine. The United Nations and major aid groups have refused to cooperate with the foundation over concerns it was designed to cater to Israeli military objectives. Dozens of Palestinians have been killed while trying to reach GHF distribution points. Pillay said the commission would "have to look into... the policy purpose and how it's being effected. "We have to spell out what is the motive of, right now, the killing of people who are coming for humanitarian aid from this so-called foundation -- and that lives are being lost just in trying to secure food for their children." Unprecedented in its open-ended scope, the three-person Commission of Inquiry was established by the UN Human Rights Council in May 2021 to investigate alleged violations of international humanitarian and human rights law in Israel and the Palestinian territories. South African former High Court judge Pillay, 83, served as a judge on the International Criminal Court and presided over the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. On Tuesday she presented the commission's latest report to the Human Rights Council. It said Israel had attacked Gaza's schools, religious and cultural sites as part of a "widespread and systematic" assault on the civilian population, in which Israeli forces have committed "war crimes" and "the crime against humanity of extermination". Israel does not cooperate with the investigation and has long accused it of "systematic anti-Israel discrimination". Navi Pillay served as a judge on the International Criminal Court AFP Dozens of Palestinians have been killed while trying to reach GHF distribution points AFP