logo
META Is Facing Multiple AI-Related Challenges

META Is Facing Multiple AI-Related Challenges

Yahoo03-04-2025

After Meta (META) disclosed that its head of AI Research is leaving, CNBC reported that the tech giant is facing multiple other challenges on the AI front.
Has Meta Lost Its AI Momentum?
Joelle Pineau, who was the head of Meta's AI Research department for eight years, is leaving the company, CNBC reporter Deirdre Bosa noted today. Bosa added that "other recent developments might or should have investors wondering if Meta has lost its AI edge."
Specifically, it has been eight months since Meta released a new version of its Llama AI model, while OpenAI and Alphabet (GOOG,GOOGL) have each unveiled multiple, new AI models already in 2025. Further, according to one source, Meta's AI chatbot had the lowest traffic in March among major players in the category.
A Number of Positive AI Catalysts Could Be on the Way for Meta
The company is slated to hold its first LlamaCon on April 29. At the conference, it plans to introduce its new AI initiatives, and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has "teased upcoming Llama models," Bosa noted.
The Price Action of Meta Stock
In the last month, the shares have dropped 13%, while they have retreated 9% in the last three months.
While we acknowledge the potential of META, our conviction lies in the belief that AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns, and doing so within a shorter timeframe. There is an AI stock that went up since the beginning of 2025, while popular AI stocks lost around 25%. If you are looking for an AI stock that is more promising than META but that trades at less than 5 times its earnings, check out our report about this cheapest AI stock.
READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires
Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

iPad 原生 app 第二擊?Instagram 也有望年內上架
iPad 原生 app 第二擊?Instagram 也有望年內上架

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

iPad 原生 app 第二擊?Instagram 也有望年內上架

Yahoo購物節,6月2至13日正式舉行!集合全球精選著數的網上大型購物節:波鞋低至36折、手袋低至4折、自助餐半價、旅遊產品買一送一等,更有獨家優惠為您而設,把握限時兩星期優惠,1Click買盡全世界! WhatsApp 上週正式推出了原生 iPad 版本 app,讓用戶可以在 Apple 平板電腦上繼續與親友對話,另一個同屬 Meta 旗下,而且也是至今都沒有 iPad 專用 app 的 Instagram 也似乎即將跟進了。 Bloomberg 的 Mark Gurman 在《Power On》電子報中表示,獲消息指 「Meta 員工正在積極測試 Instagram for iPad,開發工作進行得如火如荼。如果一切順利,預計今年內正式推出。」目前 IG 用戶想要在有更大片螢幕的 iPad 上查看內容,就只能強大放大畫面,與早有 iPad app 的對手 TikTok 相比,實在是落後不少。 據指 Instagram 的 iPad 原生 app 的開發一波三折,而且都不是受礙於技術原因,Gurman 認為 Meta 與 Apple 長久以來的仇怨是其中的原因,因為 Apple CEO Tim Cook 曾在 Cambridge Analytica 隱私醜聞後公開批評 Meta,同時更在 Onavo VPN 被發現有間諜軟件行為的事件後,他們就被公開驅逐出 Apple 開發者計劃。 隨著 Instagram 已經支援高解像度內容的上載和顯示,Reels 也支援橫向影片和更長的時長,IG 生態內容是愈來愈適全在大螢幕上播放,當然也需要迎擊市場上其他同類對手。 更多內容: 15 年磨一劍!Instagram 終於要有單獨 iPad app 了? Instagram for iPad is reportedly coming soon; here's when to expect it Apple Developer Event Will Show It's Still Far From Being an AI Leader 遲到好過冇到!iPad 版 WhatsApp 終於登陸 App Store 緊貼最新科技資訊、網購優惠,追隨 Yahoo Tech 各大社交平台! 🎉📱 Tech Facebook: 🎉📱 Tech Instagram: 🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 社群: 🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 頻道: 🎉📱 Tech Telegram 頻道:

The AI copyright standoff continues - with no solution in sight
The AI copyright standoff continues - with no solution in sight

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

The AI copyright standoff continues - with no solution in sight

The fierce battle over artificial intelligence (AI) and copyright - which pits the government against some of the biggest names in the creative industry - returns to the House of Lords on Monday with little sign of a solution in sight. A huge row has kicked off between ministers and peers who back the artists, and shows no sign of abating. It might be about AI but at its heart are very human issues: jobs and creativity. It's highly unusual that neither side has backed down by now or shown any sign of compromise; in fact if anything support for those opposing the government is growing rather than tailing off. This is "unchartered territory", one source in the peers' camp told me. The argument is over how best to balance the demands of two huge industries: the tech and creative sectors. More specifically, it's about the fairest way to allow AI developers access to creative content in order to make better AI tools - without undermining the livelihoods of the people who make that content in the first place. What's sparked it is the uninspiringly-titled Data (Use and Access) Bill. This proposed legislation was broadly expected to finish its long journey through parliament this week and sail off into the law books. Instead, it is currently stuck in limbo, ping-ponging between the House of Lords and the House of Commons. The bill states that AI developers should have access to all content unless its individual owners choose to opt out. Nearly 300 members of the House of Lords disagree. They think AI firms should be forced to disclose which copyrighted material they use to train their tools, with a view to licensing it. Sir Nick Clegg, former president of global affairs at Meta, is among those broadly supportive of the bill, arguing that asking permission from all copyright holders would "kill the AI industry in this country". Those against include Baroness Beeban Kidron, a crossbench peer and former film director, best known for making films such as Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason. She says ministers would be "knowingly throwing UK designers, artists, authors, musicians, media and nascent AI companies under the bus" if they don't move to protect their output from what she describes as "state sanctioned theft" from a UK industry worth £124bn. She's asking for an amendment to the bill which includes Technology Secretary Peter Kyle giving a report to the House of Commons about the impact of the new law on the creative industries, three months after it comes into force, if it doesn't change. Mr Kyle also appears to have changed his views about UK copyright law. He said copyright law was once "very certain", but is now "not fit for purpose". Perhaps to an extent both those things are true. The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology say that they're carrying out a wider consultation on these issues and will not consider changes to the Bill unless they're completely satisfied that they work for creators. If the "ping pong" between the two Houses continues, there's a small chance the entire bill could be shelved; I'm told it's unlikely but not impossible. If it does, some other important elements would go along with it, simply because they are part of the same bill. It also includes proposed rules on the rights of bereaved parents to access their children's data if they die, changes to allow NHS trusts to share patient data more easily, and even a 3D underground map of the UK's pipes and cables, aimed at improving the efficiency of roadworks (I told you it was a big bill). There is no easy answer. Here's how it all started. Initially, before AI exploded into our lives, AI developers scraped enormous quantities of content from the internet, arguing that it was in the public domain already and therefore freely available. We are talking about big, mainly US, tech firms here doing the scraping, and not paying for anything they hoovered up. Then, they used that data to train the same AI tools now used by millions to write copy, create pictures and videos in seconds. These tools can also mimic popular musicians, writers, artists. For example, a recent viral trend saw people merrily sharing AI images generated in the style of the Japanese animation firm Studio Ghibli. The founder of that studio meanwhile, had once described the use of AI in animation as "an insult to life itself". Needless to say, he was not a fan. There has been a massive backlash from many content creators and owners including household names like Sir Elton John, Sir Paul McCartney and Dua Lipa. They have argued that taking their work in this way, without consent, credit or payment, amounted to theft. And that artists are now losing work because AI tools can churn out similar content freely and quickly instead. Sir Elton John didn't hold back in a recent interview with the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg. He argued that the government was on course to "rob young people of their legacy and their income", and described the current administration as "absolute losers". Others though point out that material made by the likes of Sir Elton is available worldwide. And if you make it too hard for AI companies to access it in the UK they'll simply do it elsewhere instead, taking much needed investment and job opportunities with them. Two opposing positions, no obvious compromise. Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here. Elton John and Dua Lipa seek protection from AI Artists release silent album in protest against AI using their work

The global economy faces many headwinds, but the aviation industry is expected to defy them
The global economy faces many headwinds, but the aviation industry is expected to defy them

CNBC

time4 hours ago

  • CNBC

The global economy faces many headwinds, but the aviation industry is expected to defy them

The global economy may be facing an uncertain 2025 in light of trade tensions and geopolitical conflicts, but there's a bright spot that investors can take solace in: aviation. The profitability of the aviation industry is expected to improve in 2025, despite global gross domestic product growth being forecast to drop to 2.5% in 2025 from 3.3% in 2024, according to the International Air Transport Association. In a report released on Monday, the IATA said revenue, operating profits and net profits of the industry are expected to increase from 2024, although some of those were lower than projections made in December. For example, net profits for the industry are projected at $36 billion for 2025, up from the $32.4 billion earned in 2024, but slightly lower than the December projection of $36.6 billion. The aviation industry's net profit margin is also forecast to rise to 3.7% in 2025, from 3.4% the previous year. Total revenues are projected to hit a record high of $979 billion, 1.3% higher than the previous year, but down from the $1 trillion in its last forecast. The IATA attributed the better results mainly to two factors: lower jet fuel costs and greater efficiency. It expects passenger load factors will reach an all-time high in 2025 with a full-year average of 84%, "as fleet expansion and modernization remains challenging amid supply chain failures in the aerospace sector." PLF shows how efficiently an airline is filling its seats. Jet fuel costs are expected to average $86 per barrel in 2025, down from $99 in 2024, the IATA noted, saying it will translate into a total fuel bill of $236 billion, $25 billion lower than the $261 billion incurred in 2024. "Recent financial data show minimal fuel hedging activity over the past year, indicating that airlines will generally benefit from the reduced fuel cost. It is not expected that fuel will be impacted by trade tensions," IATA said. Airline CEOs told CNBC that airlines are holding up despite the uncertainty. Air India CEO Campbell Wilson told CNBC's Monica Pitrelli at the World Air Transport Summit over the weekend that 2025 has been "a year of surprises" for the airline, "whether it's politics, tariffs, geopolitics, [or] closer to home, some conflict issues."India and Pakistan recently closed their airspace to each other's aircraft after military strikes carried out by both sides in May. Pakistan planes are banned from Indian airspace till June 23, and Indian planes are barred from Pakistan till June 24. "Uncertainty is not helpful for business, but the underlying fundamentals of this market ... and the upside we see ahead of Air India is driving us forward, because we think there's massive opportunity to be realized," Wilson added. He said India is the third-largest air travel market in the world, and estimated that it's growing at an annual growth rate of 8% to 10%. "So if Indians start traveling... at the intensity of China, it's going to absolutely explode in volume internationally," he said. Adrian Neuhauser, president and CEO of Colombian flag carrier Avianca, said in an interview Sunday "When the world sneezes in any way ... Airlines just get sick very quickly."However, he said, Avianca's passenger load factors are still holding up and revenue has improved. "So the concern is there, but as of today, we're still seeing the numbers be there." North America is expected to generate the highest absolute profit among all regions in 2025, and the Asia-Pacific region is set to see the largest demand growth in 2025, with revenue per passenger kilometer projected to grow 9% year on year, the IATA said. Revenue passenger kilometers, or RPK, is a measure of the volume of passengers carried by an airline. The metric is used to assess airline performance and passenger demand. The IATA said that "if an airline sees a consistent increase in RPKs on a particular route over several months, this might prompt the carrier to increase flight frequency or deploy larger aircraft to meet growing demand — potentially boosting revenue and market share." It attributed strong passenger demand in the Asia-Pacific to the relaxation of visa requirements in several Asian countries, especially China, Vietnam, Malaysia and IATA did note, however, that the economic landscape poses some challenges, with the GDP forecast for the region, particularly China, having been lowered.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store