&w=3840&q=100)
Is Sam Altman gearing up to take on Musk's Neuralink? Report says...
Musk, who left OpenAI after his failed attempt to take over the company in 2018, has long been critical of the firm. Image Credit: Reuters
Sam Altman, chief executive of OpenAI, is working to co-found a brain-to-computer interface startup called Merge Labs, according to the Financial Times.
The venture is said to be seeking funding at a potential $850 million valuation, with some capital possibly coming from OpenAI's own ventures arm. Sources told TechCrunch that talks remain early and OpenAI has not committed to participating, meaning the terms could still change.
Merge Labs is reportedly collaborating with Alex Blania, head of Tools for Humanity, the company behind Altman's iris-scanning digital ID project. The new company would compete directly with Elon Musk's Neuralink, which is developing brain implants to help people with severe paralysis control devices using thought alone. Neuralink, founded in 2016 and valued at $9 billion after a June fundraising round, is currently running human trials.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The concept of 'the merge'— humans integrating with technology— has long fascinated both Musk and Altman. In a 2017 blog post, Altman wrote that the merge 'has already begun' and predicted humans would become 'the first species ever to design our own descendants.' The idea predates Silicon Valley's current fixation on artificial general intelligence and ties back to earlier visions of 'the singularity.'
The two tech leaders, once OpenAI co-founders, have since become open rivals. Musk left the organisation in 2018, and the relationship has soured, with the pair trading public barbs on X this week. If Merge Labs moves forward, it would mark Altman's bid to stake a claim in a field Musk has championed, and a new front in their escalating competition.
Elon Musk vs Sam Altman
Elon Musk and Sam Altman were once co-founders of OpenAI, but their relationship broke down after Musk left in 2018. Since then, they have become rivals, running competing AI companies: Musk's xAI and Altman's OpenAI.
The feud has played out both in business and in public spats. Musk has criticised OpenAI's direction and tried to buy it back, while Altman has pushed ahead with commercial growth. This week, tensions escalated when Musk accused Apple of favouring OpenAI's ChatGPT in the App Store. Altman responded by accusing Musk of manipulating X to benefit his own ventures.
Their rivalry now spans technology, influence, and personal reputation, with both positioning themselves as leaders in the race to shape the future of AI.
With inputs from agencies
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Chip in now
Times of India's Edit Page team comprises senior journalists with wide-ranging interests who debate and opine on the news and issues of the day. Trump delaying tariffs on China while targeting India shows our lack of strategic tech and manufacturing The chip war between US and China is back on the table with Washington reportedly working out a deal to take 15% from the sale of Nvidia's and AMD's AI chips to China. This effectively makes US govt a business partner to Nvidia and AMD, and comes after Washington allowed resumption of chip sales to China. The latter had been halted by Trump in April as part of his trade tussle with Beijing. However, he was forced to lift the ban after China retaliated with its own ban on rare earth exports to US. Beijing has now sent notices to Chinese companies discouraging the use of Nvidia chips citing security concerns. Parallelly, however, US and China have decided to extend their tariff truce till Nov. This is in stark contrast to Trump's approach to India, which is now facing the prospect of 50% tariff on its exports to US. The entire episode holds out two key lessons. First, the tech war is here to stay. Whether it's US chip sales to China or China trying to undermine tech manufacturing in India as highlighted by its recent pullout of Chinese engineers from Foxconn's India plants, this is a strategic sector that every country will try to leverage or weaponise. And with the advent of AI, India's expertise in software and coding is no longer that attractive. Therefore, India must not waver in its determination to master bedrock tech like semiconductor manufacturing and design, as well as AI. Countries like Estonia are integrating AI in their education systems. Plus, the recent spat between Elon Musk and OpenAI boss Sam Altman over listing in Apple's App Store shows how fiercely companies are competing over AI tech. India must not lag behind. Second, Trump's targeting India with big tariffs because he feels it doesn't have anything strategic to offer. That's not the case with China given its manufacturing muscle. Similarly, Taiwan's cutting-edge semiconductor industry makes it vital to tech supply chains, and therefore, a prime candidate for tariff exemptions. India too needs to cement a crucial spot in global manufacturing by investing heavily in domestic R&D, technical education and AI. It's work that can't be delayed. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Musk's bid to dismiss OpenAI's harassment claims denied in court
A federal judge on Tuesday denied Elon Musk's bid to dismiss OpenAI's claims of a "years-long harassment campaign" by the Tesla CEO against the company he co-founded in 2015 and later abandoned before ChatGPT became a global phenomenon. Musk sued OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman last year over the company's transition to a for-profit model.(REUTERS) In the latest turn in a court battle that kicked off last year, US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled that Musk must face OpenAI's claims that the billionaire, through press statements, social media posts, legal claims and "a sham bid for OpenAI's assets" had attempted to harm the AI startup. Musk sued OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman last year over the company's transition to a for-profit model, accusing the company of straying from its founding mission of developing AI for the good of humanity, not profit. OpenAI countersued Musk in April, accusing the billionaire of engaging in fraudulent business practices under California law. Musk then asked for OpenAI's counterclaims to be dismissed or delayed until a later stage in the case. OpenAI argued in May its countersuit should not be put on hold, and the judge on Tuesday concluded that the company's allegations were legally sufficient to proceed. A jury trial has been scheduled for spring 2026.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Tesla's robotaxi gig pays big! Earn $33.66 per hour driving the cars of tomorrow in NYC
Tesla wants people in Queens , New York, to operate prototype cars with "autonomous driving systems" to collect driving data, according to the company's job listing titled 'Vehicle Operator, Autopilot' on Tesla's website. The gig can pay up to $33.66 per hour. Test Operator I drivers earn $25.25–$27.60 per hour, while Test Operator II drivers make $28.75–$30.60. Afternoon or night shifts pay 10% more, and all positions include Tesla benefits. Applicants must be able to work a flexible schedule, including one weekend day. Shifts run either Tuesday–Saturday or Sunday–Thursday, with day, afternoon, and night options, as per the Business Insider news. Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals By Vaibhav Sisinity View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program What Tesla drivers do A detailed feedback by the Tesla workers should be accompanied by operational understanding of software debugging, recording of devices, and sound understanding of audio and camera data analytics. A familiratity tech laden autonomous driving systems is a must. ALSO READ: Viral video shows wild elephant attacking tourist, ripping clothes during selfie stunt Similar jobs are listed in Texas, Florida, and California. NY law requires salary ranges, but other states' listings don't always include pay. Palo Alto drivers earn similar pay to Queens drivers. Live Events Robotaxi testing and challenges The NYC Department of Transportation confirmed Tesla hasn't applied for a permit to test autonomous vehicles on city streets. New York has strict safety rules for AVs, calling it 'the country's most challenging urban environment', as stated by the report by Business Insider. Tesla is testing robotaxis in Austin, Texas, and San Francisco, with safety employees in the driver's seat to take control if needed. During Tesla's July earnings call, Musk said the company aims to launch autonomous ride-hailing across most of the US and could reach 'half of the US population by year-end,' depending on regulations. Last year, Tesla offered up to $48 per hour to train its Optimus humanoid robot. Tesla has also increased testing of autonomous vehicles in California. Tesla test drivers sometimes face risky situations on open streets, as per the reports. ALSO READ: Apple teases stunning all-glass iPhone design - sleek, futuristic, concept that looks straight out of Sci-Fi Recently, a Florida jury found Tesla partly liable for a 2019 crash that killed a 22-year-old woman. Shareholders also sued Tesla and Musk, claiming robotaxis violate traffic laws. Tesla's hiring signals the growing robotaxi race. Lyft is expanding in Europe, and Waymo leads the US market, applying for a NYC robotaxi testing permit in June, as mentioned by Business Insider report. FAQs Q1. How much does a Tesla robotaxi driver make in NYC? Tesla robotaxi drivers in NYC can earn up to $33.66 per hour, depending on shift and experience. Q2. What do Tesla robotaxi drivers have to do? Drivers operate autonomous test cars, collect data, debug software, and give detailed feedback while following safety rules.
