
Medicaid On The Brink: For Medical Centers, The Time To Prepare Is Now
Dr. Ara J. Baghdasarian, Physician Executive & CEO of SCMC, an FQHC championing health equity and policy advocacy in Southern California.
Across the nation, healthcare leaders are bracing for one of the most dramatic overhauls to Medicaid in decades. For those of us running community-based health centers, the stakes could not be higher.
At Southern California Medical Center (SCMC), a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) serving over 150,000 patient visits annually across eight clinics, we are on the front lines of the Medicaid transformation. The federal budget reconciliation bill moving through Congress, paired with California's preliminary budget, threatens to pull the rug out from under millions of patients and the providers who care for them.
The proposed federal legislation includes sweeping changes: new work requirements for Medicaid eligibility, cuts to provider payments and reductions in federal match rates. In California, the preliminary budget takes it a step further by eliminating Prop 56 supplemental payments, capping overtime and travel hours for in-home supportive services (IHSS) and freezing enrollment for undocumented adults.
These aren't abstract policy shifts. They are real, dangerous changes that would limit access to care for countless individuals who rely on community-based health centers for everything from prenatal care to chronic disease management. They would eliminate our reimbursement for serving undocumented patients. They would force us to make impossible decisions about staffing, services and scope. And the ripple effects would be devastating—not just for our clinics, but for our state's economy, schools and hospitals.
Getting Ahead Of It
We are proactively taking steps now in anticipation of these proposals potentially becoming law. Fellow healthcare leaders looking for ideas on how to prepare can consider the following actions:
1. Educate patients. We've launched targeted outreach to help patients understand how these policy changes could affect their coverage and what steps they can take to stay enrolled. This is about preserving trust in a time of fear and uncertainty.
2. Conduct financial modeling. We're analyzing how reduced PPS reimbursements, cost-sharing shifts and premium impositions might impact our budget and service lines. Every dollar lost in reimbursement is a service denied to someone who needs it most.
3. Adjust operations. We're revisiting workflows and provider capacity models to stay nimble if demand increases from displaced patients elsewhere.
4. Address broader impact. In 2022, California was home to 1.8 million unauthorized immigrants. Many of these individuals rely on FQHCs like ours for essential preventive care. If these individuals lose access, the result will likely be a surge in ER visits for conditions that should have been treated earlier—and far more affordably—in a clinic setting. This is a looming education and economic disaster. The majority of children we serve attend inner-city public schools. If their parents lose access to care, it will compromise the health, attendance and stability of these students. That's a direct hit to educational outcomes and to the state's long-term financial stability.
5. Advocate. We're actively working with Community Clinic Association of Los Angeles County (CCALAC) and the California Primary Care Association (CPCA) while also meeting regularly with local, state and federal government officials. The message is clear: Politics have no place in deciding who deserves healthcare. Healthcare leaders cannot stand by while harmful provisions dismantle the safety net our communities rely on.
6. Promote internal resilience. We're prioritizing staff training and mental health supports to prepare our team for the emotional toll of doing more with less. Burnout is a real threat to continuity of care, and healthcare leaders must guard against it.
Prepare Now—And Make Your Voice Heard
The reality is: Healthcare cannot become a casualty of political theater. Denying care to low-income families and undocumented residents is not a solution—it's a setup for systemic collapse. Emergency rooms will be inundated. Public schools will be strained. Communities will suffer.
As we face these potential changes, I urge fellow healthcare leaders to prepare now. Audit your patient base, run financial simulations, strengthen community partnerships and invest in advocacy infrastructure. Stay engaged, stay responsive and, most importantly, stay vocal.
At SCMC, our mission is rooted in equity. While these policies may reshape the healthcare landscape, they only deepen our resolve to adapt, advocate and act in the best interest of our patients and community. Whether it's at the statehouse, in budget meetings or in exam rooms, we will continue to fight for our patients.
Healthcare shouldn't be a political casualty. It should be a promise we keep—especially to those who need it most.
Forbes Nonprofit Council is an invitation-only organization for chief executives in successful nonprofit organizations. Do I qualify?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Politico
21 minutes ago
- Politico
White House: Megabill's July 4 deadline stands
The White House is forging ahead with its demand that Congress pass its sweeping megabill by July 4, insisting that the legislative effort remain on track despite mounting doubts about its viability on Capitol Hill. Trump administration officials on Thursday downplayed a fresh set of rulings by the Senate parliamentarian that appeared to jeopardize core elements of the bill, casting it as a minor setback that lawmakers were already working to remedy. And President Donald Trump is still planning to hold a 'One Big Beautiful Event' later in the afternoon touting the merits of the megabill, packing allies into the White House to urge the bill's passage even amid deepening divisions among Hill Republicans. 'We expect that bill to be on the president's desk for signature by July 4,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday, acknowledging the parliamentarian ruling setback. 'This is part of the inner workings of the United States Senate, but the president is adamant about seeing this bill on his desk here at the White House by Independence Day.' The White House pressure campaign comes as the administration enters a key stretch that could determine the fate of its legislative ambitions — and shape the critical first year of Trump's term. The president and his advisers have warned in a flurry of calls and meetings with lawmakers in recent days that a failure to push through the legislation could deal a major blow to the White House's agenda and damage the party's chances in the midterms. 'Run against the president on anything, you're in trouble — but if it's his No. 1 priority, you've got a real problem,' said one longtime Trump ally, granted anonymity to characterize the administration's message. 'If I were advising a United States senator who's teetering on the precipice of opposing, I would definitely tell them to think twice on this.' White House officials expressed confidence that congressional Republicans would be able to rewrite the portions of the bill now under threat, ruling out — at least for now — a more combative effort to overrule the parliamentarian's decisions. Leavitt on Thursday punted on directly saying whether Trump would support such a move, which Senate Majority Leader John Thune has already ruled out. Some close Trump allies in Congress are nevertheless pushing to ignore or remove the parliamentarian, with Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) writingThursday that she 'SHOULD BE FIRED ASAP.' In private, the setbacks have further dismayed some Trump advisers as well who were already frustrated by Senate Republicans' inability to coalesce behind a final version of the megabill. A handful of senators refuse to back the bill over Medicaid policies projected to cut coverage for millions of people and damage the finances of rural hospitals. Some others, meanwhile, have pushed for deeper health care cuts to help fund the bill's tax breaks. Trump earlier this week met privately with some of those hardliners, including Sens. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah). But Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), who has raised alarms about the bill's impact on rural hospitals, later claimed that Trump expressed support in his own one-on-one conversation for a more moderate version of the cuts. 'Trump needs to be more engaged directly,' Stephen Moore, an outside economic adviser to the president, said of the effort to get the holdouts to fall in line. 'Failure is not an option. We have to get this done.' Otherwise, Moore warned, 'it would be a political disaster for Republicans — and an economic disaster for the country.'


Politico
21 minutes ago
- Politico
Dems: Medicaid cuts complicate health AI dreams
WASHINGTON WATCH House Republicans and Democrats clashed during a Ways and Means Health Subcommittee hearing Wednesday over how to fund and advance the use of digital health technologies. 'We live in a time where Americans have access to better technology and more health information than ever to truly be the 'CEO of their health,'' subcommittee Chair Vern Buchanan (R-Fla.) said, noting that despite high spending on health care, Americans are getting sicker. Digital health tools and artificial intelligence are central to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s strategy to cure chronic disease and reduce costs. But Democrats warned that the GOP's proposed Medicaid cuts in President Donald Trump's megabill could hamper the adoption of AI and other innovations in health care. 'I'm a bit in the twilight light zone. At the same time that we're here talking about this issue, my colleagues on the other side just passed a bill that would effectively take away health care for 16 million Americans,' said Rep. Steven Horsford (D-Nev.). At the heart of the disagreement is cost. 'People cannot take advantage of technological advances in health care if they do not have health insurance coverage or face insurmountable financial barriers to health care services,' said Sabrina Corlette, co-director of the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University. For health systems, that means less revenue to invest in innovative technologies, especially ones with no or low reimbursement rates. A few ideas that were floated: — The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should set reimbursement rates for some digital technologies and raise the rates for technology that's already reimbursed. — Congress should expand tax-advantaged health savings accounts so Americans can use them to buy health and fitness wearables like WHOOP bands and Oura Rings. — Lawmakers should consider the impact Medicaid cuts would have on doctors' ability to implement AI. What's next: Republicans have waffled on whether to include an expansion of health savings accounts in the 'Big Beautiful Bill' because they'll add to the budget. But Senate Republicans are feeling pressure from their House counterparts to keep them in. WELCOME TO FUTURE PULSE This is where we explore the ideas and innovators shaping health care. Life science company Verily is re-upping its work on the research platform that powers All of Us, a NIH-funded, big data project that seeks to understand risk factors for disease, better treatments, and how technology can help make people healthier. The contract with Vanderbilt University Medical Center, one of the NIH's key partners on the program, is for the next five years. Share any thoughts, news, tips and feedback with Danny Nguyen at dnguyen@ Carmen Paun at cpaun@ Ruth Reader at rreader@ or Erin Schumaker at eschumaker@ Want to share a tip securely? Message us on Signal: Dannyn516.70, CarmenP.82, RuthReader.02 or ErinSchumaker.01. CONNECTING THE DOTS Federal agencies developed or used more than 2,000 artificial intelligence tools or programs in 2024, according to an analysis by POLITICO's Rosmery Izaguirre. Agencies reported that, in about 16 percent of use cases, their tools or programs posed safety concerns or had the potential to infringe on users' civil rights or rights to data or privacy. The Department of Health and Human Services reported the highest total number of AI use cases among its agencies, with four use cases presenting rights or safety concerns. The Justice Department reported the second-highest number of AI use cases, with 124 use cases presenting concerns, and the Department of Veterans Affairs reported the third-highest number of AI use cases with 145 use cases presenting concerns. The Trump administration is poised to expand AI use across federal agencies. In January, President Donald Trump issued an executive order rescinding Biden-era legislation that promoted a more cautious approach to developing and testing use cases for AI. In an April memo, the Trump administration set its own disclosure requirements for agencies using AI, repealing the previous administration's conditions. Several rules were rescinded, including those related to rights and safety reporting, but the requirement for agencies to track and report their use of AI was maintained. What's next for HHS: AI is used widely across HHS, from analyzing big public health datasets and detecting health trends to more rote tasks like summarizing documents. But not all of the departments' AI efforts are rolling out smoothly. Earlier this year, the Food and Drug Administration deployed a general-use chatbot to shorten reviews throughout the agency. But two current and two former agency employees granted anonymity to discuss sensitive internal matters told POLITICO that the bot isn't capable of meaningfully reducing review time.


Washington Post
26 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Days after Iran strikes, Trump administration to brief Congress
Four Trump administration officials will brief senators Thursday afternoon on the U.S. bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities, as lawmakers and the White House clash over access to intelligence about the strikes. Senate Democrats have pressed the administration for days to fill them in on the extent to which strikes damaged Iran's nuclear program. The White House plans to limit how much classified intelligence it shares with Congress after the leak of a preliminary intelligence assessment this week undercut President Donald Trump's claims about the impact. The Trump administration has pushed back on the leaked Defense Intelligence Agency assessment, which found the strikes had set Iran's nuclear program back by just months. CIA Director John Ratcliffe said in a statement Wednesday that several Iranian nuclear facilities had been 'destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.' And Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth dismissed the leaked assessment as 'low-confidence' and cited the Israel Atomic Energy Commission's determination that the strikes set back Iran's nuclear program by years. The briefing will give senators the chance to question Ratcliffe and Hegseth behind closed doors. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, are also set to join the briefing. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is not expected to join. Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-New York) said Wednesday that he wanted to know how much enriched uranium Iran possesses and how long it would take the country to build a nuclear weapon. He also called on the White House to 'immediately undo' its plans to limit intelligence sharing with Congress. 'The administration has no right to stonewall Congress on matters of national security,' Schumer said on the Senate floor. 'Senators deserve information, and the administration has a legal obligation to inform Congress precisely about what is happening right now abroad.' Democrats have fumed that the administration has not moved faster to fill in lawmakers on the strikes, but they have split on how to respond to them. Most House Democrats voted to dismiss an effort by Rep. Al Green (D-Texas) to impeach Trump for striking Iran without consulting Congress — but 79 Democrats voted to advance it. 'Yes, it's probably wrong for the president not to come to Congress,' Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-California), the former House speaker, told reporters this week when asked about the impeachment effort. But 'we can't ignore what is at stake, which is our national security to make sure Iran does not have a nuclear weapon and our friendship with Israel.' The Senate is set to vote this week on a resolution from Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Virginia) to block Trump from using military force against Iran without congressional authorization, but its prospects are uncertain after Trump helped broker a fragile ceasefire between Iran and Israel, ending the conflict at least temporarily. No Republicans have committed publicly to voting for it. And Kaine has said he expects one Democrat — Sen. John Fetterman (Pennsylvania), an outspoken supporter of Israel — to oppose it. Fetterman defended the effectiveness of the strikes ahead of the briefing. 'To those who were 'unimpressed' or borderline gloating on a leak: Operation Midnight Hammer worked,' Fetterman wrote Thursday, citing comments from Rafael Mariano Grossi of the International Atomic Energy Agency on French radio that the centrifuges at Iran's Fordow uranium enrichment facility were no longer operational. 'I've been calling for and fully supported those strikes, and it made the world safer. It should transcend partisan politics.' Marianna Sotomayor contributed to this report.