
Rural New York's health care crisis deepens amid federal funding battle
The report found the state lacking in primary care doctors, pediatricians, OB-GYNs, dentists and mental health professionals.
According to DiNapoli's office, they conducted the system-wide analysis following roundtable discussions in the Hudson Valley and Finger Lakes, where health care access represents a major concern. Per the report, which you can read at the bottom of this story, several counties do not have access to a variety of specialty medical providers.
On average, the 16 rural counties examined — Allegany, Cattaraugus, Chenango, Delaware, Essex, Franklin, Greene, Hamilton, Herkimer, Lewis, Schuyler, Steuben, Sullivan, Washington, Wyoming, and Yates — had just four primary care physicians for every 10,000 people. That's less than half the statewide ratio of 8.1 and further still below the national average of 8.4.
And that disparity gets worse in designated 'primary care health professional shortage areas,' where nearly 173,000 New Yorkers live. In those regions, it's down to just 0.12 physicians per 10,000.
The 16 rural counties have just 0.5 pediatricians for every 10,000 people, less than a fifth of the state ratio of 2.8. Chenango, Schuyler, and Yates Counties have no pediatricians at all, per the audit.
The ratio of obstetrician-gynecologists is 0.4 per 10,000, translating to about one for every 23,000 people. Hamilton, Herkimer, Schuyler, and Yates Counties have no OB-GYNs.
For dentists, these rural counties had 3.6 per 10,000 people, below half of the state's ratio of 8.3. Ten of the 16 counties have dental primary care health professional shortage areas for those eligible for Medicaid, which includes 134,248 people. And according to the comptroller, Hamilton County has no dentists at all.
The audit determined a ratio of 6.9 mental health practitioners per 10,000 people in rural New York. The ratio for the entire state, meanwhile, is 16.1. All 16 counties are mental health primary care health professional shortage areas, either for the entire population or specific groups, like the Medicaid-eligible population. That means that almost 41 percent of the population in these counties — over 305,265 New Yorkers — are considered underserved in mental health care.
The audit also reported a lack of physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners, positions meant to address doctor shortages in the 1960s. These professionals now deliver as many as 25 percent of health visits in the U.S. The ratio of PAs per 10,000 people in the rural counties is 4.2, less than half of the state ratio, 9.2. NPs are also lower, at 10.5 per 10,000 compared to the state's 16.4.
The comptroller audit, which built on a 2023 comptroller report about rural New York, found that many of these areas struggle with population loss, an aging population, and decreases in the labor force. Low population densities and limited public transportation mean that people have to spend to maintain personal vehicles to access health care.
The report recommends creating mobile clinics and school-based health centers to increase access to care, alongside expanded transportation and telemedicine programs. It also suggests offering loan forgiveness and stipends to new healthcare professionals in rural areas and creating educational opportunities for nursing staff to advance their degrees and bolster the workforce. And it proposes that four-year SUNY schools offer satellite programs at local community colleges that blend online and in-person coursework.
The federal government has a huge impact on rural hospitals. A new federal law — Public Law No. 119-21, or the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) — earmarks $50 billion from 2026 to 2030 for a Rural Hospital Transformation Program, but it's not guaranteed to offer funding to all states. According to the American Hospital Association, the law would reduce federal Medicaid spending on New York's rural hospitals by $1.125 billion over 10 years.
And that law also reduces eligibility for Medicaid and the Essential Plan, which is likely to worsen the situation for rural hospitals operating on narrow profit margins. That's because they need Medicaid funding to stay open.
The law also enacts new student loan limits of $50,000 annually for professional students and an aggregate limit of $200,000. This would make it harder for proposed loan forgiveness programs to attract any new doctors to rural New York.
An April 2025 analysis from the Center for American Progress found that federal funding cuts to Medicaid threaten these hospitals across the country. They determined that close to a third of those in New York would be at immediate risk of closing.
The numbers from another April analysis, this from the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform, were broadly aligned in finding that close to 200 rural hospitals in 34 Medicaid expansion states were already at immediate risk of closing because of financial instability.
In New York, they found that over a third of rural hospitals were at risk of immediate closure. They also counted three having closed since 2015, and 62 percent of the state's rural hospitals reported financial losses in 2023-2024, even with Medicaid funding intact.
According to the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), rural hospitals survive best in states that increase Medicaid enrollment and eligibility. New York has six rural hospitals in the top 10 percent nationwide for their Medicaid payer mix, and five more have had negative margins for three consecutive years. In the 16 rural counties examined, 27 percent of the population was on Medicaid as of May 2025. That's close to 205,000 people.
The Healthcare Association of New York State (HANYS) and the Greater New York Hospital Association (GNYHA) have opposed the OBBB. In letters sent to New York's congressional delegation in May, both organizations warned of the bill's catastrophic impact on the state's healthcare infrastructure. HANYS stated that the bill would cost the Empire State almost $13.5 billion per year. GNYHA also argued that the bill's cuts would be unsustainable for the state and wreck its hospital system.
A June analysis from the Fiscal Policy Institute found that hospitals at immediate risk for closure in New York get over 25 percent of their net patient revenue from Medicaid or other government appropriations. They also reported that 94 hospitals in the state would see their annual profits disappear altogether with just a 10 percent cut to Medicaid revenue, because the program already pays less than half of what commercial insurance pays for the same services.
According to the Fiscal Policy Institute, two Republican lawmakers who voted for the bill, Reps. Nicholas Langworthy and Elise Stefanik, represent districts with some of the highest numbers of at-risk hospitals. Eight are in Langworthy's, and seven in Stefanik's.
In fact, five Republican members of the state's congressional delegation— including Stefanik and Langworthy —even published a letter in June on the topic. While they said they support OBBB's 'intent to prioritize federal benefits for citizens and long-term residents,' they asked to delay the implementation of two sections. They argued that states and healthcare providers avoid 'drastically disruptive consequences' for the healthcare system with a less abrupt transition.
Their letter asked for sections 112101 and 112102, modifying tax credit eligibility for certain lawful immigrants, to not take effect until January 2029.
The law would force 500,000 immigrant New Yorkers who live here legally onto state-only Medicaid — because New York is constitutionally required to provide coverage—with state and county taxpayers footing the bill. This could cause 'unsustainable spikes in uncompensated costs' for local health services and destabilize the state's Essential Plan, they warned.
Take a look at the comptroller's report below:
rural-health-shortages Download

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indianapolis Star
8 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Texas AG sues Eli Lilly for allegedly bribing medical providers to prescribe Lilly drugs
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is suing Eli Lilly, alleging the Indianapolis pharmaceutical company offered kickbacks to medical providers in exchange for prescribing more than a dozen of the company's drugs, including blockbuster GLP-1 weight loss drugs Mounjaro and Zepbound. Eli Lilly offered illegal incentives to Texas medical providers, including a "free nurse" program and reimbursement support services, to steer providers to provide the company's drugs, Paxton alleges in a lawsuit filed August 11 in a Texas district court. Lilly, one of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies, denied the allegations in an August 12 statement to IndyStar. The Lilly programs mentioned in the suit offered free trainings for nurses and medical providers, which helped Lilly market their drugs when they launched, the suit says. According to Paxton's office, many Texas residents prescribed these drugs were on state Medicaid, so these actions violated the Texas Health Care Program Fraud Prevention Act. 'Big Pharma compromised medical decision-making by engaging in an illegal kickback scheme,' Paxton said in a news release. 'Eli Lilly fraudulently sought to maximize profits at taxpayer expense and put corporate greed over people's health. I will not stand by while corporations unlawfully manipulate our healthcare system to line their own pockets.' A spokesperson for Eli Lilly said the company denies the allegations and plans to defend against them in court. It's not the first time Paxton has taken a stab at Lilly in the courts. In October, Paxton sued insulin manufacturers and pharmacy benefit managers, including Lilly, Express Scripts and CVS, for allegedly concocting a conspiracy to increase insulin prices. Health Choice Alliance LLC, a New Jersey based company, joined Texas as a plaintiff. Health Choice has sued Lilly in the past, alleging the company engages in kickbacks. 'Multiple courts and the federal government have rejected claims by this same corporate relator against Lilly as meritless," a Lilly spokesperson said in a statement. "In fact, the United States government determined that 'the relators' allegations lack sufficient factual and legal support' in a prior case, explaining that 'federal healthcare programs have a strong interest in ensuring that, after a physician has appropriately prescribed a medication, patients have access to basic product support relating to their medication.' We intend to vigorously defend against these allegations.' At the heart of the Texas lawsuit is a class of drugs named GLP-1s prescribed for diabetes and weight loss. Named for the gut hormone receptor the drug targets, injectable GLP-1s have exploded in popularity since Zepbound hit the market in late 2023. Weight loss drugs: Eli Lilly closer to breakthrough weight loss drug; shares tumble as some question results The kickback lawsuit against Lilly is one way Paxton is protecting Texas patients "from corporate schemes that undermine the integrity of the healthcare system," according to his office.


New York Post
9 hours ago
- New York Post
Mayor Eric Adams celebrates $33M plan expanding mental health services for New Yorkers at city clubhouses
Mayor Eric Adams $30 million plan to expand services for mentally ill New Yorkers is finally complete — with 13 large 'clubhouses' now operating across the five boroughs, he announced Tuesday. Adams spearheaded the state-and city-funded initiative beginning in 2023 to develop the large centers serving 300 or more New Yorkers each, according to the mayor's office. 'Not feeling like you're part of a community, not feeling like you're part of a group, it actually has an impact on your physical health,' Adams said speaking at a press conference at one of the centers, Venture House in The Bronx. 'That's why it's so important to have places like these clubhouses.' 3 Mayor Eric Adams served rice to himself at Venture House, a mental health clubhouse in the Bronx. Michael Appleton/Mayoral Photography Office Six of the clubhouses were already operating and used the funding to grow their capacity, while the other seven are brand-new. The last of those, Phoenix House, opened in July in Manhattan, City Hall officials said. With the changes, enrollment at city clubhouses will double to 6,600 members by 2027, the officials said. The centers are operated by nonprofits and offer health, social and job resources to members with varying degrees of psychological troubles. Members also have jobs and responsibilities at the clubhouses, such as giving tours, serving food, cleaning and helping out at the reception area. 3 Adams also played part of a pool game with Venture House members Tuesday after a press conference. Haley Brown / NY Post Manhattan now has four clubhouses; Brooklyn and The Bronx have three each; Queens has two; and Staten Island has one. The city health department also plans to gather and analyze more data on members, according to Health Commissioner Michelle Morse. 'Part of our goal is actually to really improve the data and demonstrate the outcomes,' Morse said. City officials celebrated the initiative as part of Adams' 'End the Culture of Anything Goes' campaign, which highlights his administration's work on mental health. Hizzoner took the podium to cheers from Venture House members, who will now be able to use the brand new Bronx clubhouse because of the investment, according to City Hall. 'I am at home here,' Adams said, crying at times during his address. 3 Adams posed with members of Venture House. Michael Appleton/Mayoral Photography Office The Adams administration nearly doubled previous investments in mental health clubhouses, but the focus on larger locations, edged out nine smaller clubhouses that were no longer eligible to apply for Department of Health contracts because of new capacity requirements. Six of the smaller clubhouses have been able to maintain operations because the City Council carved out $5 million in funding over the last two annual budgets. 'We've been working with city council, who's been supporting some of the additional clubhouses,' Morse said. 'We're very thankful, of course, that there are lots of clubhouses across the city.'


Health Line
10 hours ago
- Health Line
6 Ways Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Could Limit Healthcare Access
The tax and spending bill approved by Congress last month will cut $1 trillion from health-related programs over the next decade. The 'One Big Beautiful Bill' will hit Medicaid hardest with $790 million chopped from its budget. Experts say these reductions will greatly impact health programs across the country, particularly those serving rural communities, children, and lower-income households. The so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), signed by President Donald Trump in early July, will impact virtually every health-related program in the United States. The bill, officially known as House Resolution 1, is expected to reduce federal spending on health-related programs by $1 trillion between now and 2034. It's estimated that those cuts will cause at least 10 million people to lose health insurance coverage during the next nine years. It calls for a reduction in funding for food assistance programs and rural hospitals, as well as reduced funding for Planned Parenthood services, which have been temporarily blocked by a federal judge. Some of these impacts will take years to be felt. Other provisions, however, could directly affect people's lives in the next year or two. 'It is the biggest cut to our social safety net in history,' Liz Fowler, PhD, a distinguished scholar in Health Policy and Management at the Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University in Maryland, said in a news release from the college. Here's a look at six key areas affected by spending reductions outlined in President Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill.' Medicaid bears the brunt of the cuts Federal funding for Medicaid is expected to be reduced by more than $790 billion over the next decade. More than 70 million people currently receive Medicaid benefits, but various factors could significantly reduce this estimate. Work requirements will mandate that most 'able-bodied' recipients between the ages of 19 and 64 will be required to work, receive work training, volunteer, or be in school for at least 80 hours per month while receiving benefits. The new work requirements take effect on January 1, 2027. As many as 5 million people could lose health insurance due to this requirement, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF). More frequent eligibility checks will require states to verify beneficiaries' eligibility for Medicaid more often, causing some recipients to be removed from the program. Immigration restrictions will reduce the number of foreign-born residents receiving benefits. The cuts may also affect hospitals, as Medicaid is responsible for 20% of revenue at these medical facilities nationwide. Experts also point out that people who are no longer on Medicaid will not seek preventive care and end up in hospital emergency rooms due to more serious medical issues. 'Cutting Medicaid means millions lose access to basic care, leading to sicker patients, overwhelmed ERs, and rising costs for everyone,' said Kanwar Kelley, MD, a specialist in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery, obesity medicine, and lifestyle medicine as well as the co-founder and chief executive officer of Side Health. 'Lack of access to preventive care leads to a sicker population, which leads to more medical expenses,' Kelley told Healthline. Impacts to Medicare Medicare is a federal program founded in 1965 that provides health insurance coverage to people 65 years and older. About 66 million Americans are enrolled. Trump's bill does not directly mention Medicare cuts, but there are measures that could impact recipients. Under a 2010 budget mechanism law known as PAYGO, the Congressional Budget Office estimates the Trump bill could trigger more than $500 billion in Medicare cuts between 2026 and 2034, KFF reports. The Center for Medicare Advocacy notes the bill will also reduce the number of people eligible for Medicare. They say some non-citizens who meet Medicare eligibility requirements through work history or residency length will no longer be covered. In addition, the bill imposes a nine-year ban on implementing improvements to Medicare Savings Programs that help lower-income Medicare beneficiaries pay for premiums and out-of-pocket costs. Older adults who are enrolled in both Medicaid and Medicare could hit with a double impact. 'The [bill] will affect this [older] age range by reducing access to care,' Kelley said. 'Creating restrictions based on work requirements and new regulations for exemptions will exclude many in this age group from qualifying. Those in this age range will have a harder time re-entering the workforce to continue their coverage.' Fewer people enrolled in Obamacare The bill will make it more difficult for people to join or remain in programs offered by the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare. This difficulty will be due to several changes. They include: Requiring enrollees to update their information regularly. This may include updating income, immigration status, and other details each year. Requiring individuals to manually reenroll every year during open enrollment. Last year, 10 million people were automatically reenrolled. Shortening the open enrollment period by a month. That period will now end on December 15 rather than January 15. For the current plan year, 40% of people signed up after December 15. Some immigrants will also no longer be eligible for ACA coverage. In addition, financial assistance that helps people afford insurance in ACA marketplaces will be allowed to expire at the end of this year. The Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University predicts these changes will cause ACA premiums to rise by 75% next year. Kelley agrees that premiums will likely go up, causing a cascade of events. 'Removing or cutting these subsidies will lead to more expensive plans offered on the marketplace. By raising these prices, many will choose to live without health insurance and risk catastrophic medical debt,' he said. 'Making access to healthcare harder for individuals creates gaps in care for patients, which is crucial in screening for life-altering illnesses.' Strains on rural hospitals The bill does provide rural hospitals with $50 billion over the next five years to help reduce the effects from the cuts in Medicaid spending. However, the Center for American Progress reports that funding will not be nearly enough to make up the difference. The organization states that slightly more than 2,000 rural hospitals receive $12 billion per year in net revenue from Medicaid. At some rural hospitals, Medicaid represents 40–50% of their revenue. The organization added that children, non-elderly adults, and people with disabilities would be the people in rural areas most affected. Kelley agreed that the effects could be far-reaching. 'This loss of funding will hit rural hospitals hard, leading to closures and increasing healthcare disparities in marginalized neighborhoods,' he said. The Center for American Progress also notes that rural hospitals have low operating margins. They project that more than 300 rural hospitals could be at risk of closure. 'Rural communities already face challenges with adequate staffing and medically necessary equipment as they usually operate on tight margins with the subsidies,' Kelley said. 'Reducing the number of providers will lead to closures, which forces those in the community to travel farther for their regular and emergency care.' Fewer families will receive food assistance The bill would cut $120 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) over the next decade, according to estimates. About 40 million people currently receive assistance from the SNAP program. The League of Women Voters projects the cuts could impact 22 million families. Kelley said the impact is beyond just food. 'Food insecurity leads to bad health outcomes,' he said. 'Cutting programs directed at addressing hunger will lead to increased rates of obesity, diabetes, and poor nutrition in kids.' 'Hunger in children leads to poor educational outcomes. Cutting SNAP and other food programs will lead to children going to school hungry, seniors skipping meals, and families making decisions between food and other necessities, including health,' Kelley added. Cuts to Planned Parenthood The bill impacts Planned Parenthood operations by banning people from using Medicaid at healthcare non-profit facilities that provide abortion services outside of cases of rape, incest, or when the pregnant person's life is in danger. Planned Parenthood estimates that the new law could close nearly 200 of its facilities. About 60% of those centers are in medically underserved communities. In addition, the organization states that more than 1 million people could lose access to afford healthcare services such as STI testing and birth control. Miller Morris, MA, MPH, is a women's health researcher and founder of Comma, a service focusing on menstrual health. She notes that a court injunction has temporarily blocked the bill's ban on Medicaid use at reproductive health clinics like Planned Parenthood. However, she said if the provisions are eventually upheld, they could have far-ranging effects. 'If the court's injunction were to be lifted, the defunding of Planned Parenthood would mean fewer resources for all the preventative and primary care services they offer, leading to reduced access for millions of women, especially those in low-income and rural communities,' Morris told Healthline. 'This reduction in Medicaid funding will see catastrophic consequences for the millions of women who rely on Planned Parenthood and similar low-cost organizations for vital, life saving care,' she added.