'I am going to be a resident of Orania' - NC EFF leader Tlhaole
JOHANNESBURG - Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) in the Northern Cape leader, Shadrack Tlhaole, said he would be the first person to move into Orania once black people were allowed into the white Afrikaners-only enclave.On Tuesday, Tlhaole led the EFF's march to the offices of the Northern Cape Premier to demand a legal review on the existence of Orania.Situated in the Karoo region, the controversial town is privately owned and only white people of Afrikaans descent are allowed to live there.Tlhaole said segregated areas cannot exist 31 years into a democratic South Africa."I am going to be a resident of Orania, I am going with my collective, the leadership of the EFF. I am going to fight tooth and nail to be one society, we are going to be inclusive."
Tlhaole said the government needed to send a strong message against discriminatory areas like Orania and Kleinfontein in Pretoria.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
5 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
EFF protests Israeli participation in Comrades Marathon
The EFF in KwaZulu-Natal protested against the participation of Israelis in the Comrades Marathon on Sunday. Members of the red berets carrying placards reading 'stop the genocide' staged a protest along the route from Pietermaritzburg to Durban. The protest was joined by a group of Muslim community members. KZN EFF chairperson Mongezi Twala said his party rejects and condemns the participation of Israelis in the annual Comrades Marathon. 'As a revolutionary left movement committed to justice, human rights and international solidarity, we cannot in good conscience allow individuals who represent a genocidal apartheid state to participate freely in events on our soil, especially during a time when the Israeli regime is actively committing crimes against humanity in Gaza,' said Twala. The government of South Africa, through the department of international relations & cooperation, took Israel to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for its ongoing genocide against the Palestinian people. 'The ICJ has ruled in favour of South Africa's application and found that there is a plausible case of genocide against Israel. This is not a symbolic gesture — it is a legal and moral stand against a regime that is currently slaughtering thousands of innocent civilians, targeting hospitals, refugee camps and schools, and defying all international laws under the leadership of Benjamin Netanyahu,' said Twala.
The Star
10 hours ago
- The Star
EFF's Julius Malema is ‘quietly' singing ‘Hallelujah hosanna' over Trump-Musk fallout
EFF leader Julius Malema is 'quietly enjoying' the dramatic fallout between US President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, the two figures who have long criticised him over his outspoken rhetoric, radical political views, including the controversial "Kill the Boer" chant. The two had previously accused Malema of inciting violence against white farmers. The red berets have denounced the claim. The latest split between the former allies who were once bound by political interests appears to align with Malema's long-standing opposition to both. Trump, in a televised Oval Office tirade, said he was "very disappointed" in Musk after the tech billionaire criticised his spending bill. Musk fired back on X (formerly Twitter), accusing Trump of ingratitude, claiming credit for his 2024 win, and even referencing unverified claims linking Trump to Jeffrey Epstein. The feud has political and economic fallout. Tesla shares dropped, Musk threatened to withdraw from a major US space programme, and Trump also hinted at pulling Musk's government contracts. The clash comes amid rising tensions between the US and South Africa. Tensions between the two countries have intensified since Trump's second term. Last month, during a high-level meeting with President Cyril Ramaphosa and the Trump administration in Washington, aimed at mending diplomatic relations between the two countries, Malema took centre stage. Trump played clips of Malema singing the 'Kill the boer' chant, which he argued incites violence against white farmers, but the red berets rubbished the claim. Trump called for Malema's arrest and denounced South Africa's land reform as 'land seizure.' IOL News previously reported that Malema has vowed to continue singing the controversial song despite strong criticism from Trump. The US also cut HIV/AIDS funding and granted refugee status to 49 white South Africans, claiming racial discrimination, which Pretoria has vehemently rejected. With Musk born in South Africa and now publicly clashing with Trump, Malema 'may' see this as more than political theatre, which is possibly a moment of vindication. Speaking with IOL News, Professor Theo Neethling, from the University of Free State's Department of Political Studies and Governance, said the fallout between Trump and Musk was 'long predictable.' 'The Trump-Musk fallout was long predictable, and even if the EFF delights in it, the fact remains that the United States conducts diplomatic relations with the South African government, not with the EFF…,' he said. 'The EFF is a relatively small party, as President Ramaphosa pointed out to Trump, and it is not relevant in South Africa's international relations.' Neethling emphasised that diplomatic relations are maintained between the US government and South African government, not with political outliers. 'The Trump administration also conducts its relations with the South African government, and what carries much more weight in the US than Elon Musk are the views and roles of top Republican voices like JD Vance, Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz. They will be decisive in the future US-South Africa relations.' Commenting on the developments of Trump and Musk clashing, Neethling said Malema will continue 'loudly in his rhetoric of African self-reliance,' but South Africa's Government of National Unity (GNU) understands the importance of maintaining relations with the US, which is the largest economy in the world. 'Around 600 American companies invest and do business here in South Africa and contribute to job creation,' he told IOL News. 'The Minister of Finance (Enoch Godongwana) also rightly pointed out recently that if the US does not want to do business with a country, it places that country on the periphery of international trade and investment.' According to Neethling, the Trump and Musk fallout will have no impact on future US and South Africa relations. 'Again, top Republican voices like JD Vance, Marco Rubio, and Ted Cruz are what matter, as well as those of senior officials in the White House.' Meanwhile, independent political analyst Goodenough Mashego also expressed his views on the Trump and Musk fallout, adding that Malema is probably 'enjoying' seeing the two clash. 'I think Julius Malema is really enjoying, is really reveling at what is happening because it absorbs him in a way to say, look, two liars are now fighting. You know, they say, do not disturb. Napoleon Bonaparte once said, don't disturb your enemy when he's making a mistake.' Mashego said he believes that Malema is currently not in any mood to disturb what he called 'enemies' as they make mistakes. 'I hope he doesn't tweet. I hope he just watches the show. He just enjoys reading Elon Musk and Donald Trump's Truth Social tweets. So that, you know, I think it's a marvel…' He added, 'think EFF, I think Julius Malema, he now knows that the person who's been whispering into Donald Trump's eye is no longer in the picture, which means the rhetoric from the part of the White House towards him is going to be limited because Trump doesn't have an original opinion.' 'All that he's saying is a megaphone. He's just saying what other people want him to say. So I think this is really the end of the Que de Bois charade that Donald Trump used to stage. And it's the end of that whole obsession by Donald Trump with Elon Musk, because going forward, with the Que de Bois, because going forward, whatever Elon Musk says relating to South Africa, I think one of the people is going to really try to ridicule it will be Donald Trump.' 'So they have two fools, two buffoons, really ridiculing each other,' Mashego added. He described the fallout between Trump and Trump as a Christmas for the EFF. 'Well, I don't think it really gives Malema a chance to push his message of self-reliance because self-reliance needs not be pushed through rhetoric. It needs to be pushed through doing.' IOL News has sent questions to the EFF, requesting their input on the latest development between Trump and Musk, and will be updated once received. [email protected] IOL Politics
IOL News
16 hours ago
- IOL News
The EFF's Political Strategy: Is it Time for a Change?
EFF leader Julius Malema engaging President Cyril Ramaphosa in a recent parliamentary debate. Is it advisable for the EFF to be fixated on micro issues or has the time come for the party to redirect its focus on macro politics?, asks the writer. Image: Phando Jikelo/Parliament of SA Prof. Bheki Mngomezulu ON 26 July 2013, the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) was established as a new political party. It promised to reshape South African politics by breathing life into parliament. This was not a voluntary decision. The party was formed following the expulsion of Julius Malema by the ANC and the subsequent exodus of other then and former ANC Youth League members who sympathized with Malema. Some of the youth who did not belong to any political party at the time saw the EFF as their political home thus giving hope about the future of this party. After the 2014 general election, the EFF emerged as one of the high performers with 25 seats in the National Assembly. It came third following the ANC and the DA which obtained 249 and 89 seats respectively. This enviable upward trajectory continued in the subsequent election in 2019 where the EFF obtained 44 seats. There was optimism that the party would continue to grow until the newly formed MKP emerged on 16 December 2023 and participated in the 2024 general election. The MKP caused an upset to the EFF which was moved to position four and to the ANC which was reduced to 159 seats or 40.18%. But one of the characteristic features of the EFF which gave it popularity was how it changed parliament through its radical stance. Soon after the EFF joined parliament, many South Africans got interested in following parliamentary proceedings. The EFF was also clear that it was going to ensure that politicians did not go to parliament to sleep. It kept its promise. Something unprecedented was when it confronted a sitting president directly and even flouted parliamentary rules. This is what happened with former President Jacob Zuma with its popular slogan 'pay back the money!' President Cyril Ramaphosa had a taste of the EFF's radical stance. Firstly, it blamed him for the Marikana massacre. Later, it took him head-on following the Phala Phala saga. Recently, the EFF was one of the political parties that successfully challenged the 2% VAT hike proposed by Minister of Finance Enoch Godongwana. Following the tabling of Budget 3.0 on 21 May 2025, the EFF approached the High Court challenging the increase of the petrol levy. Although the court dismissed the application, the EFF made its views public. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ While all these actions by the EFF should be understood in context, and while it is true that they have acted in this manner on behalf of the public, critical questions must be asked now, especially following the EFF's declined performance in the 2024 general election. Firstly, should the EFF change its tactics to rebrand itself? In life, there is no strategy that is good and effective for all times and situations. As times change, so should the strategies. With so many political parties emerging and the electorate having more options on election day, some political party strategies could easily be deemed obsolete. Secondly, is it advisable for the EFF to be fixated on micro issues or has the time come for the party to redirect its focus on macro politics? It is true that some micro issues still matter. But given what is happening in the geopolitics it would serve the EFF well to look at how it can contribute to the country's broad agenda of responding to these global issues. Thirdly, following the outcome of the 2024 general election, and given the mishaps in the current coalition government, is it still advisable for the EFF to take a firm stance that it will never work with the MKP with which it shares opposition benches? The DA swallowed its pride and is working with the ANC, which it had been publicly accusing of corruption, inefficiency, theft, and related matters. What would prevent the EFF from working with the MKP which is a new political party? Fourthly, as the EFF continues to lose some of its influential leaders such as Floyd Shivambu, Mzwanele Manyi, Dr Mbuyiseni Ndlozi, Adv. Dali Mpofu, and Adv. Busisiwe Mhkwebane, is it still wise to maintain a radical stance and refuse to work with like-minded political parties? Politics is a numbers game. When party support declines, and when votes go down, the party leadership must revisit its stance. The EFF can draw lessons from COPE which dropped from 30 seats to 3 seats, and then literally dissipated. Fifthly and lastly, should Malema change his leadership style? One of the concerns about the EFF in the public eye has been that his leadership style is making others uncomfortable, which results in other members leaving the organisation. Whether this accusation is true or not is neither here nor there. Perceptions matter in politics. If he were to change his leadership style, that would be good for his party. After all, Malema has done well with his leadership collective to grow the EFF to where it is today. It would be regrettable if he were to contribute to its untimely demise. The significant decline in ANC support coupled with the DA's dismal failure to capitalise on the ANC's mistakes means that chances of one political party winning with an outright majority are very slim at best and non-existent at worst. With the MKP coming into the picture and performing in the manner it did even the so-called 'tried and tested strategies' must be revisited to keep the party relevant, focused and growing. Any party which overlooks or disregards these facts would be doing so for its peril. I don't think that this is the route the EFF would like to go, especially after having worked so hard since its formation in 2013. In a nutshell, it is time for the EFF to grow. The party has made its presence felt in South African politics. It has taken bold decisions and left indelible footprints. But at times political strategies must be changed. This includes the tone, language, actions, focal points, and political alliances. * Prof. Bheki Mngomezulu is Director of the Centre for the Advancement of Non-Racialism and Democracy at Nelson Mandela University. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
