logo
Commonwealth Bank sends jobs to India as it cuts hundreds of workers in Australia

Commonwealth Bank sends jobs to India as it cuts hundreds of workers in Australia

Daily Mail​11 hours ago
Australia's biggest bank has sent 100 jobs to India after retrenching hundreds of local staff with a union accusing it of offshoring work for cheaper labour.
The Commonwealth Bank last month told the Finance Sector Union that 304 Australians would be made redundant in technology and retail roles.
This occurred as 110 jobs, affected by redundancies in Australia, were created at the Commonwealth Bank's Bangalore-based subsidiary, CBA India.
These new jobs in India included job titles that had existed in Australia including staff data engineer, senior software engineers, staff software engineer, engineering manager, software engineer and senior data engineer.
The Commonwealth Bank, Australia's biggest home lender, has more than doubled the number of staff in India in just two years.
The Finance Sector Union's national secretary Julia Angrisano said the Commonwealth Bank had breached faith with its own staff by saying positions were redundant in Australia only to recreate them in India.
'By hiring for the same job, at their own Indian subsidiary, they're showing themselves to have breached the enterprise agreement and essentially lied to their workers,' she said.
'This is the very definition of bad faith. We have known for years that big banks have had a preference for work to be performed offshore.
'Yet we now have the proof that this is happening in real time.
'Our members are outraged by this kind of behaviour and seriously question CBA's commitment to Australian jobs.'
The Commonwealth Bank's number of staff in India more than doubled in two years, growing from 2,854 employees in June 2022 to 5,630 by June 2024, its annual report said.
Ms Angrisano argued this was about CBA benefiting from cheaper labour in India.
'We do not believe that the redundancies outlined in these change processes are in fact genuine redundancies and that in doing so, CBA has breached the terms of the agreement,' she said.
'These jobs are not required to be done in India; they're just moving the work there to take advantage of cheaper labour and further line their own pockets.'
But a Commonwealth Bank spokeswoman told Daily Mail Australia that CBA India was insourcing roles that had previously been done by a third party.
'During the formal consultation on recent workforce changes, the FSU did not raise any concerns with us about like-for-like job changes,' she said.
'We refute their claims and have met with the union this week to respond in detail and assure them that there is no basis to their allegations.'
The Commonwealth Bank's chief executive Matt Comyn was last year paid $8.977million with bonuses.
Specialist recruiter and career coach Tammie Ballis took aim at the big four bank for sending roles offshore.
'Are you telling me, Australia being the multicultural country that we are that they can't find someone that's living here that is bilingual with those skills?,' Ms Ballis said.
'Come on, not only that, if you have a look down here, this is their acknowledgement to country. Paying respect to our First Nations Australians. You're not for Australians.'
During Question Time in Parliament, Senator Gerard Rennick of the Liberal National Party of Queensland pressed the Treasury on whether the government was aware of how much money is being sent offshore in wages.
A senior Treasury official said they didn't have the answer right away and would get back to him later.
'It's not hard to see why Treasury took my question about the Free Trade Agreements with the Philippines and India on notice,' Senator Rennick said.
'It turns out that the Australian Government charges no taxes on wages paid by Australian companies to foreign workers in other countries who are effectively working remotely, taking Australian jobs.
'Not only are we losing jobs, we are losing the tax that those jobs would have paid while Australian corporations still get a tax deduction despite sending money offshore.
'This then means the remaining Australian workers have to pay higher taxes to make up the shortfall. This is selling Australia out plain and simple.'
'This is selling Australia out plain and simple. Furthermore, for those of you who think that working at home is a good thing be careful what you wish for.
'You might be replaced by a foreign worker.'
He also pointed out that some workers are being brought in from other countries.
'For example, I've been told that there are people coming from the Philippines to build the transmission lines between Wagga and South Australia.
'Do we know how much money in remittances is getting sent offshore in terms of wages paid either for outsourcing or people coming onshore?
Aussies unleashed about the increasing globalisation of the workforce.
One said: 'Govt should make it illegal for big banks, those above a certain threshold/size, to offshore IT and call centre jobs, especially given their huge billion $ profits'.
A second added: 'At the end of the day these companies are greedy af and don't care about the average Australian. It's why I will always choose family over work every chance I get bc they wouldn't care if I dropped dead over my desk.'
A third said: 'I worked for Telstra and my job went to Philippines where wages were 1/4 of Australian.
'Lead to seven extra calls per complaint resolution and time factor extended from four days to 14 days.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India markets regulator proposes several changes to mutual fund rules
India markets regulator proposes several changes to mutual fund rules

Reuters

time26 minutes ago

  • Reuters

India markets regulator proposes several changes to mutual fund rules

July 18 (Reuters) - India's markets regulator on Friday proposed a series of changes to mutual fund scheme rules, including allowing asset managers to offer both value and contra funds under certain conditions. The Securities and Exchange Board of India, in a consultation paper published on its website, suggested permitting mutual funds to offer both value and contra funds provided the overlap in their investment portfolios does not exceed 50%. Value funds typically invest in undervalued companies, while contra funds invest against prevailing market trends. Under current regulations, asset managers are allowed to launch only one of these two. India's mutual fund industry hit a new record in June, with net assets under management climbing to nearly 75 trillion rupees ($870.95 billion). SEBI on Friday also sought feedback on whether mutual funds should invest the residual portion of their equity scheme funds in a diversified mix of assets such as debt, gold, silver and real estate investment trusts. Equity schemes must invest a minimum 65% of their funds in equity-related instruments, and the rest can be parked in debt or money market instruments. The regulator sought feedback on whether mutual funds should be permitted to invest the residual portion of debt scheme funds in real estate investment trusts and infrastructure investment trusts, except for schemes with short durations. SEBI has sought comments by August 8. ($1 = 86.1130 Indian rupees)

India's JSW Steel beats first-quarter profit view as margins improve
India's JSW Steel beats first-quarter profit view as margins improve

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

India's JSW Steel beats first-quarter profit view as margins improve

July 18 (Reuters) - India's JSW Steel ( opens new tab reported a bigger-than-expected rise in first-quarter profit on Friday, as easing raw material costs and firmer domestic steel prices lifted margins. Its consolidated net profit more-than-doubled to 21.84 billion rupees ($253.52 million) for the three months ended June 30, above analysts' average estimate of 20.39 billion rupees, as per data compiled by LSEG. ($1 = 86.1475 Indian rupees)

Exclusive: India's top think tank recommends easing investment rules for Chinese firms, sources say
Exclusive: India's top think tank recommends easing investment rules for Chinese firms, sources say

Reuters

time3 hours ago

  • Reuters

Exclusive: India's top think tank recommends easing investment rules for Chinese firms, sources say

NEW DELHI, July 18 (Reuters) - The Indian government's top think tank has proposed easing rules that de facto require extra scrutiny for investments by Chinese companies, arguing that the rules have meant delays for some sizeable deals, three government sources said. Currently, all investment by Chinese entities in Indian companies need to gain a security clearance from both India's home and foreign ministries. The think tank, NITI Aayog, has proposed that Chinese companies can take a stake of up to 24% in an Indian company without any approval being required, said the sources who were not authorised to speak to media and declined to be identified. The proposal, reported for the first time by Reuters, is part of a plan to boost foreign direct investment in India and is being studied by the trade ministry's industries department, the finance and foreign ministries, as well as Prime Minister Narendra Modi's office, the sources said. And while not all of NITI Aayog's ideas are necessarily taken up by the government, the proposal comes at a time when India and China are seeking to mend ties that have been particularly strained since border clashes in 2020. Any decision to ease might be months away and will be taken by political leaders, two of the sources said. They added that the industries department is in favour of easing, but the other government bodies are yet to give their final view. NITI Aayog, the ministries, the industries department and the prime minister's office did not reply to Reuters requests for comment. The rules were put in place in 2020 after border clashes, including hand-to-hand fighting between the two neighbours. They only apply to land bordering nations, which affects Chinese companies the most. By contrast, companies from other countries can freely invest in many sectors such as manufacturing and pharmaceuticals, while some sensitive sectors such as defence, banking and media have restrictions. Deals such as a 2023 plan by China's BYD ( opens new tab to invest $1 billion in an electric car joint venture have been shelved, opens new tab due to the rules, sources have said. While foreign investment has slowed globally since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the rules hampering Chinese investment in India have been seen as a significant factor behind a large drop in the South Asian country's FDI. Net foreign direct investment in India tumbled to a record low of just $353 million in the past financial year, a fraction of the $43.9 billion logged in the year ended March 2021. An easing in military tensions since October has led to more efforts by both countries to mend ties, with plans for the resumption of direct flights and India seeking a "permanent solution" to their decades-old border dispute. Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar's made his first trip to China in five years this week, telling his counterpart that the two nations must settle tensions along their border and avoid restrictive trade measures such as China's curbs on the supply of rare earth magnets. The think tank has also recommended revamping the board that decides on foreign direct investment proposals, the sources said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store