logo
Capital gains tax UK: What is it and how does it work?

Capital gains tax UK: What is it and how does it work?

Telegraph16 hours ago

Capital gains tax (CGT) in the UK is payable when an individual sells a valuable asset they own – most commonly, this will be a property that's not their main residence, or shares.
It's important to understand how this tax works to make sure you're clear when it's due, when you need to inform HMRC of the profit income, and how much you'll need to pay.
Here, Telegraph Money explains how to navigate the UK's CGT rules and ensure you don't pay more tax than you need to. In this article, we will cover:
What is capital gains tax?
How does CGT work on property?
How does it work on shares?
Capital gains tax FAQs
What is capital gains tax?
Capital gains tax in the UK is a tax levied on the profit you make when you sell an asset that has increased in value.
CGT is triggered when an asset is sold for a profit, provided you have exceeded the annual exempt amount of £3,000.
The tax is paid at different rates, depending on your income tax band. There used to be one rate for selling property (except for your main home, which remains exempt) and another for other assets, but these rates were brought in line in last year's Autumn Budget.
For the 2025-2026 tax year (6 April 2025 to 5 April 2026), for gains exceeding the annual exempt allowance, the following rates apply to most assets:
Basic-rate taxpayers: 18pc on capital gains from assets
Higher-rate taxpayers: 24pc on capital gains from assets
For disposals made between April 6 2024 and October 29 2024:
Basic-rate taxpayers: 10pc on gains from assets other than residential property; 18pc on gains from residential property.
Higher-rate taxpayers: 20pc on gains from assets other than residential property; 28pc on gains from residential property.
Assets held in an Isa are free from capital gains tax.
How does CGT work on property?
You don't typically pay capital gains tax on the property you live in, only on properties like a second home or buy-to-let.
The rate of tax charged depends on your level of income – if you're a basic-rate taxpayer (with income of less than £50,270), you'll pay 18pc on gains from property, whereas those who pay higher-rate tax will pay 24pc for disposals in the 2024-25 tax year.
How does it work on your primary residential property?
If you own one home and have lived there since you bought it, then it should be a straightforward case that no CGT is due on any profit made when you sell up. This is thanks to a relief known as private residence relief.
However, should you own other properties it may not be so clear cut. For example, if you have ever rented out the property you now live in – perhaps while you worked abroad, or moved in with a partner for a spell – then you might be liable to pay a proportion of CGT when you sell, based on how long the property was rented for.
Zoe Davies, of accountancy firm Forvis Mazars, added that second homeowners can declare which property is their main residence, to make it clear where tax is due.
She said: 'If you have a second home you can nominate which is your primary home – that is, where you actually live – to help make sure you benefit from private residence relief if you sell.'
To nominate which property is your home, you'll need to write to HMRC.
To do this (which you can do within two years every time your combination of homes changes), write to HMRC at: Capital Gains Tax Queries, HM Revenue and Customs, BX9 1AS.
You'll need to provide the address of the home you want to nominate, and all the owners of the property must sign the letter.
Private residence relief cannot be claimed on parts of property used exclusively for business use, although having a 'temporary or occasional' home office is allowed.
Therefore, as long as your home office is not solely dedicated to business use, it should be exempt from CGT.
How does it work for second homes?
Tax is due on the gains you make from the sale of a second home, which exceed your annual capital gains tax allowance.
For property, CGT is set at:
24pc for higher-rate taxpayers
18pc for basic rate taxpayers.
Prior to April 6, 2024 the higher rate was charged at 28pc.
You will be taxed at the relevant rate on the sale profits of your second home, and you must report the sale to HMRC via a 'residential property return', and pay the estimated liability within 60 days of completing your sale.
You'll also declare this on a self-assessment tax return as capital gains count as a source of income.
Ms Davies added: 'If you spend significant time [living in] a second home, however, it may be that you are eligible for a reduced tax bill through private residence relief.'
How does capital gains tax work on rental property?
For capital gains tax purposes, selling buy-to-let properties works in the same way as selling a second home.
Therefore, you need to report a sale of a buy-to-let property to HMRC and pay any tax due within 60 days of the sale completing. The rates are also the same – 24pc for higher-rate taxpayers (in 2024-25) and 18pc for basic-rate taxpayers.
Capital gains example for landlords
If a landlord bought a property 10 years ago for £200,000 and they are now selling it for £300,000, that would be a gain of £100,000.
Minus the £3,000 allowance, the taxable gain is therefore £97,000.
Basic-rate taxpayer
Rather than pocket the £97,000 profit, a basic-rate taxpayer (paying 18pc) would have to pay £17,460 in CGT
This would leave them with a taxable gain of £79,540
Total profit would be £79,540 + £3,000 (tax-free allowance) = £82,540
Higher-rate taxpayer
For a higher-rate taxpayer (paying 24pc), the tax bill would be £23,280
This would leave a taxable gain of £73,720
Total profit would be £73,720 + £3,000 (tax-free allowance) = £76,720
When selling a second home or buy-to-let property, you can lower the CGT bill by ensuring you take into account the cost of refurbishments you've made in the years you've owned the property.
The cost of any improvements made to the property while you owned it, such as a new bathroom or conservatory, should be added to your initial outgoings, as should stamp duty and legal fees.
You can also deduct expenses like solicitor's fees from the selling price – instead, use the amount of money which you actually end up receiving.
It's also possible to offset losses from previous tax years, or from the sale of other properties, from your overall gain.
How does capital gains tax work on shares?
If you sell some investments and they are held outside an Isa, then you must pay CGT on profits over the annual allowance of £3,000.
The rates are now equal to those you pay for property – so, basic-rate taxpayers pay 18pc, while those on a higher-rate pay 24pc.
This changed on October 30, following Labour's Autumn Budget. For assets disposed of before this date, basic-rate taxpayers pay a CGT rate of 10pc, and for higher- and top-rate taxpayers, it's 20pc.
You'll include the gains on your self-assessment tax return – there's no rush to declare or pay within a more immediate time frame, as is the case of selling property.
However, be aware that tax may still be due even if you don't sell the shares in a traditional way.
Ms Davies said: 'Some investors fall foul of the rules when they give shares to, say, their son or daughter, thinking there's no capital gains tax due because they're not selling them. However, the HMRC definition is that capital gains tax is triggered on the 'disposal of assets', so even though no money is changing hands, they could still trigger a tax bill. Any shares gifted should be declared on a self- assessment tax return.'
Others might get caught out thinking they owe capital gains tax when it's actually income tax that's applicable in some cases.
Ms Davies said: 'For example, if you own a company and sell some of your shares back to the company, the money received may actually be classed as income by HMRC, and so income tax is due rather than capital gains tax.'
How does capital gains tax work on cryptocurrency?
Profits from selling cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are assets and subject to capital gains tax.
Cryptocurrency is treated as a form of investment, and regulated in a similar way to stocks and shares. As such, profits on selling some or all of your crypto holdings will be taxable.
Giving away crypto won't solve the tax issue (unless it's to your spouse or civil partner) because, as with shares, you're still 'disposing' of the tokens and so will trigger capital gains tax if you've made a profit on your investment.
It's not just when you sell crypto that CGT might be payable. It can also be due if you use it to pay for goods or services.
In December 2023, HMRC launched a voluntary disclosure campaign, encouraging investors who had not declared any gains from crypto assets to come forward and pay up.
Make sure you have a record of transactions, including dates, amounts, and values in pounds at the time of each transaction.
Capital gains tax FAQs
How is capital gains tax calculated?
The rate of capital gains tax you pay is determined by a combination of your overall earnings, and the type of asset you're selling.
However, other factors can also come into play. For example, if you've made any losses on some assets you're selling, you'll be able to offset those against your gains in order to reduce your bill.
You can also carry losses forward from past tax years, but only up to four years after the end of the tax year in which you sold the asset.
What percentage of capital gains tax do I pay?
This depends on your income tax rate. For the 2025-26 tax year, capital gains tax is charged at the rate of either 18pc for basic-rate taxpayers, or 24pc for higher- or additional-rate taxpayers.
As your gains are added to your annual income, it's possible for gains to push you into a higher tax band. If that happens, then you'll have to pay the higher rate of CGT on your gains.
How does HMRC know about capital gains?
The onus is on you to report any capital gain that gives rise to a tax liability. If you're selling a property, you should declare it and pay the bill within 60 days of the sale completion date. You need to declare it on a self-assessment tax return, too.
For selling shares, you just need to include the figures on your self-assessment tax return. If you don't already do one each year, you will need to complete one for the tax year in which you had a capital gain.
There are various ways HMRC can tell if assets have been sold – be it Land Registry records for property sales, stamp duty returns, trading records – and there can be drastic consequences if it finds out about disposals you have failed to declare.
Receiving taxable income and failing to report it to HMRC counts as tax evasion, and can result in fines, penalties and even criminal proceedings.
How do I report and pay CGT?
To report and pay capital gains tax, you need to:
For property, use the capital gains tax on UK property service for property sales within 60 days of completion. You must also report again via self-assessment by January 31 of the following tax year.
For other assets, report and pay the tax owed via self-assessment by January 31 of the following tax year.
What is the three-year rule for selling property?
You may have heard of the 'three-year rule' for property sales and capital gains tax, which is also known as the 36-month rule. However, for most situations in the UK, this no longer applies. This is due to the rules changing around final period of ownership and Private Residence Relief.
This is the current situation for the 2025-26 tax year:
The standard final period exemption is nine months. If a property has been your only or primary home at any point when you have owned it, the last nine months of your ownership period are exempt from CGT as part of Private Residence Relief.
The three-year or 36 month exemption period now only applies in special circumstances, such as for disabled individuals or for those moving into a long-term care home.
How long do you have to keep a property to avoid capital gains tax in the UK?
In Britain, you don't avoid capital gains tax by keeping a property for a certain amount of time. The tax will apply when you sell a property that's not your main residence, regardless of how long you've owned it for.
How are long-term capital gains taxed?
Assets you've held for a long time are taxed in the same way as any other asset.
Ms Davies added: 'There were previous tax laws which incentivised holding assets for longer, but these no longer apply.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Huge fashion retailer with over 250 UK stores ‘drawing up radical rescue plan' with shops and jobs at risk
Huge fashion retailer with over 250 UK stores ‘drawing up radical rescue plan' with shops and jobs at risk

The Sun

time16 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Huge fashion retailer with over 250 UK stores ‘drawing up radical rescue plan' with shops and jobs at risk

A HUGE fashion retailer with over 250 UK stores is reportedly drawing up a radical rescue plan which could see shops and jobs axed. The high street giant - which is being forced to restructure due to tough trading standards - employs around 5,500 people and was founded in London in 1948. 2 2 The chain's owners have brought in advisers from PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) to come up with money-saving solutions, reports Sky News. The proposals are expected to be finalised in a matter of weeks, though sources have reportedly claimed no decisions have been green lit on the retailer's future. Accounts for River Island Clothing Co for the year ending December 30 2023 showed the firm made a £33.2 million pre-tax loss. Then the turnover during the following 12 months fell by more than 19% to £578.1 million. The firm's latest accounts at Companies House, warned of growing financial and operational risks. "The market for retailing of fashion clothing is fast changing with customer preferences for more diverse, convenient and speedier shopping journeys and with increasing competition especially in the digital space," it said. "The key business risks for the group are the pressures of a highly competitive and changing retail environment combined with increased economic uncertainty. "A number of geopolitical events have resulted in continuing supply chain disruption as well as energy, labour and food price increases, driving inflation and interest rates higher and resulting in weaker disposable income and lower consumer confidence." In January, River Island hired consulting firm, AlixPartners, to undertake work on cost reductions and profit improvement. It's understood PwC has now taken over. Why are so many pubs and bars closing? In recent months, a number of River Island stores have been closing, including in Corby and Chesterfield. Originally named Lewis Separates and then Chelsea Girl, the chain was founded by Bernard Lewis in 1948 and became influential during the 1960s fashion scene, including the iconic mini-dress trend. It was re-branded as River Island in 1988 and throughout the next two decades expanded to become a leading high street force in the UK. It now has a presence in over 125 worldwide markets, in stores and online. Why are retailers closing shops? EMPTY shops have become an eyesore on many British high streets and are often symbolic of a town centre's decline. The Sun's business editor Ashley Armstrong explains why so many retailers are shutting their doors. In many cases, retailers are shutting stores because they are no longer the money-makers they once were because of the rise of online shopping. Falling store sales and rising staff costs have made it even more expensive for shops to stay open. The British Retail Consortium has predicted that the Treasury's hike to employer NICs from April 2025, will cost the retail sector £2.3billion. At the same time, the minimum wage will rise to £12.21 an hour from April, and the minimum wage for people aged 18-20 will rise to £10 an hour, an increase of £1.40. In some cases, retailers are shutting a store and reopening a new shop at the other end of a high street to reflect how a town has changed. The problem is that when a big shop closes, footfall falls across the local high street, which puts more shops at risk of closing. Retail parks are increasingly popular with shoppers, who want to be able to get easy, free parking at a time when local councils have hiked parking charges in towns. Many retailers including Next and Marks & Spencer have been shutting stores on the high street and taking bigger stores in better-performing retail parks instead. In some cases, stores have been shut when a retailer goes bust, as in the case of Carpetright, Debenhams, Dorothy Perkins, Paperchase, Ted Baker, The Body Shop, Topshop and Wilko to name a few. What's increasingly common is when a chain goes bust a rival retailer or private equity firm snaps up the intellectual property rights so they can own the brand and sell it online. They may go on to open a handful of stores if there is customer demand, but there are rarely ever as many stores or in the same places. The Centre for Retail Research (CRR) has warned that around 17,350 retail sites are expected to shut down this year.

Jack Grealish is at a crossroads – and the next step is far from obvious
Jack Grealish is at a crossroads – and the next step is far from obvious

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Jack Grealish is at a crossroads – and the next step is far from obvious

Sometimes a career can be measured by what happens over summers. In 2021, Jack Grealish became the most expensive Englishman in history, the Premier League 's record signing, the £100m man. In 2023, he was the treble winner whose celebrations in Ibiza felt the stuff of legend. In 2024, he was, to his surprise, omitted from England's European Championships squad. In 2025, it would be rather less of a shock if he is excluded from Manchester City 's Club World Cup squad. It could be seen as the rise and fall of Grealish. He may be deemed to be at a crossroads, though one interpretation is that he has reached a dead end, at least as far as City is concerned. Grealish, 29, has started one Premier League match in 2025, appeared for a grand total of four minutes in City's last seven top-flight fixtures and did not make the bench for their final-day win at Fulham. Pep Guardiola has said he dislikes having to leave players out of the matchday squad, that the players and the club have to find the 'best way' forward. He both wants a smaller squad and is busy making signings. Something has to give. Someone has to go. Leaving Grealish at home when City go to the United States would be an unsubtle hint that he will be the most high-profile casualty. Bidding farewell to him altogether could be a rather lengthier process. Grealish has two years left on his contract, wages that would be prohibitive to most other clubs and which would probably require City to substantially subsidise even a loan deal. The easy answer is to suggest Grealish returns to his beloved Aston Villa. Yet they are shorn of Champions League revenues next season and, in any case, possess more compelling choices in the attacking midfield spots: the Grealish of the last two years is an inferior player to Morgan Rogers, Jacob Ramsey and John McGinn. Grealish has the high profile and high fee, but has had a low output. The feeling is that he is aware of the criticism. In a social media post this week, Grealish argued he had scored in his last three appearances that lasted at least 45 minutes. It isn't entirely true – he omitted the FA Cup ties against Leyton Orient, Plymouth and Nottingham Forest – but it was an attempt to alter the perception. Except that the perception is true. He has one league goal since 2023. He did not score for City in any competition in 2024. The last two seasons have brought just five assists in total. The City Grealish can win free-kicks and retain possession – his pass completion rate in last season's Premier League was 91 per cent – but that may reflect the way the risk and excitement have been stripped from his game. And even Guardiola, who doesn't tend to judge players on goals, may have belatedly realised Grealish provides too few. He only really flourished as a City player with others delivering the goals and assists he didn't: of four seasons, only one has been a personal success. And in 2022-23, Kevin De Bruyne contributed an extraordinary 29 assists, Ilkay Gundogan got vital goals and, though none even started the Champions League final, Julian Alvarez, Phil Foden and Riyad Mahrez all scored at least 15 times. It remains to be seen how the post-De Bruyne era shapes up and who comprises the supporting cast and supply line to Erling Haaland. Yet, after City recorded their lowest tally of Premier League goals in a season under Guardiola, there seems a recognition that they require players who can make them prolific. The January addition Omar Marmoush scored 28 times last year, 20 of them for Eintracht Frankfurt. Of two proposed midfield additions, Tijjani Reijnders scored 15 goals for AC Milan last season and Rayan Cherki got 20 assists for Lyon, including the most (eight) of anyone in the Europa League. Then there is Grealish, the increasingly conservative dribbler. Jeremy Doku and Savinho have displaced him as the wide men who run at defenders. Meanwhile, central-midfield additions are likely to end Guardiola's brief experiments – against Forest and Juventus – of Grealish in a deeper role. It leaves him looking the odd man out. Which, again, should be no shock. Grealish has only started 17 of 76 league games for City since winning the Champions League. He ranked 19th in Premier League minutes for City last season, behind the January buys Nico Gonzalez and Marmoush. For Guardiola to have the compact squad he wants, he needs players who stay fit but Grealish has had two stop-start campaigns with injuries. For now, and perhaps permanently, there is the impression that the Guardiola and Grealish bromance is over. They were always the odd couple, the nerd and the Jack the lad. At City, there are plenty of examples of Grealish's common touch, his genuine concern for fans, but his fondness for a night out may have started to count against him. Or maybe it would have been forgiven if he were delivering on the pitch. He hasn't in the last two years, a reality which is compounded by his price tag. It made him a luxury in one respect; many of City's signings – and most of their finest ones – in the last decade came for between £35m and £65m. It also means City face a bigger loss. And any prospective buyer or borrower would have to factor in an adjustment period, to answer the question, can Grealish return to the player City bought? Because who, really, needs an attacking midfielder who has too little involvement in goals? Grealish would need a process of de-Guardiola-isation, to restore him to the free spirit from the player who was reprogrammed at City. The Kalvin Phillips precedent is scarcely encouraging. Another likeable Englishman has not recaptured the qualities that made him excel before he joined City. Grealish at least had the heights of the treble. But it came at the cost of making him a duller footballer. And, two years on, as he faces a personal summer of discontent, it is hard to see where he would fit in now.

Why banks may no longer refund fraud victims
Why banks may no longer refund fraud victims

Telegraph

time25 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Why banks may no longer refund fraud victims

Lenders are lobbying for new fraud reimbursement rules to be watered down over fears scam victims are being told to lie to their banks. Since last October, companies which handle payments have been required to give victims of 'Authorised Push Payment' (APP) fraud their money back, up to a limit of £85,000. In the first three months, 86pc of money lost to the scams – approximately £27m – was reimbursed to consumers by 60 firms. The current rules mean that, other than a £100 'excess' which firms can remove from payments, the only reasons that customers can be denied a payout are if they've ignored warnings, failed to quickly notify their bank of the fraud, refused to share information about the scam or do not consent to a police report being made. But in meetings in May, banks demanded that requirements for victims to act reasonably – and not to lie to their bank – were made stronger. This would mean that customers could be denied refunds in more cases. The Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) will hold an independent review of the mandatory scheme in October, and will then recommend changes. Problems raised include the high reimbursement limit, compliance monitoring by which administers the scheme, and the limited number of exemptions for refusing payouts. Lenders also said they should be able to give clear warnings about lying to them, as victims are often guided to do by fraudsters. One bank told industry magazine The Banker that: 'The [consumer negligence] bar is set so high that in almost all these cases a customer can be incredibly reckless, can lie to their bank, can ignore warnings and still get their money back.' Riccardo Tordera, director of policy and government relations at The Payments Association (TPA), said: 'The PSR says just 2pc of claims are rejected on this basis yet acknowledges no clear shift in consumer behaviour. 'Meanwhile, the Financial Ombudsman Service and the PSR both apply a stricter definition of gross negligence than common law, which could make enforcement of reimbursement policies challenging in a British court.' Under the previous voluntary code – called the Contingent Reimbursement Model (CRM) – customers could be refused for ignoring warnings or failing to verify the payee. Now the test is much stricter. Reimbursement numbers never jumped above 75pc under the old scheme – compared to 86pc for the mandatory payouts. APP scams see victims convinced to move their money themselves, eventually into a 'safe' account controlled by the fraudsters, at which point it is lost. Ticket sale scams, such as those experienced by Oasis and Taylor Swift fans, are also considered APP frauds. At first glance, the implementation has gone well. The amount lost in APP frauds dropped by 2pc between 2023 and 2024, according to UK Finance, and the number of cases fell by a fifth. But £450.7m was still lost to fraudsters last year. But the scheme has not been without its critics. Before the scheme was implemented, some parts of the industry warned of the potential problems of moral hazard – which is when consumers are incentivised to lie – and that fraudsters would pose as victims. This, it was claimed, would drive a significant spike in claims. But these fears have not materialised. Originally, the reimbursement limit was set to £415,000 – with firms expected to pay out just days after claims were made. But lobbying saw the limit dropped to £85,000, the same as the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS), which protects money deposited with banks. Smaller and medium-sized payment companies had said that one large claim could wipe them out. David Geale, managing director of the Payment Services Regulator (PSR), which is responsible for the scheme, said in May that: 'While it is too early to draw firm conclusions based on the period covered by this data, we have not seen evidence of spikes in claim volumes that some had feared would occur under the policy.' Before the scheme was introduced, there was a voluntary code which most of the major banks were signed up to, run by the Lending Standards Board. Sources at the LSB said last year, before reimbursement was mandatory, that they had not seen fraudulent claims. Rocio Concha, director of policy and advocacy at Which?, said: 'Based on the available data from the PSR, the new mandatory scheme appears to be performing well, with more fraud victims getting their money back. 'Sections of the industry had tried – without producing any evidence – to claim that mandatory reimbursement would lead to consumers acting irresponsibly or even teaming up with criminals to con banks out of cash. This seemed ludicrous at the time and initial insights have borne that out.' Ms Concha added that while the number of cases were down, there was another worrying trend. She said: 'Latest industry figures suggest more victims are being tricked into sending money to bank accounts overseas controlled by fraudsters. That is concerning as these transfers aren't covered by the new mandatory reimbursement rules.' A spokesman for the PSR said: 'We have always been clear that we would have an independent review following the implementation of the policy. 'If we think there are key learnings or adjustments to make to our policy, we will consider those carefully before making any changes.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store