
1981 Ford Escort GLX Test: World-Class Shrinky Dink
The editorial we have been feeling the hot breath of America on the backs of our necks while working on this road test. Everybody right down to the butcher, the baker, and the candlestick maker has been looking over our shoulders, trying to get a rating on the new Ford Escort. No Ford in memory has produced such widespread interest ("concern" may be a better word). Some of the concerned are potential customers looking for the latest development in fuel-efficient cars: they wonder if the Escort is it. Others have a more academic question: is the Escort the long-awaited import fighter from Detroit? All that heavy breathing ruffling our collars tells us you really want to know. So let's get down to business.
Conclusion No. 1: The Escort is indeed a world-class small car with a combination of interior space and fuel economy that should make it one of the top choices in its class. It may not have the most interior space, or the best economy, or the lowest trunk liftover height, or the highest marks in any other category of small-car virtue you might name, but it's competitive on every front.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
Conclusion No. 2: The Escort is the first small car from anywhere to offer Mr. and Mrs. America big-car comfort and luxury in a small package. Moreover, the long options list will make them feel right at home. This is a cushy car that just happens to be small.
Conclusion No. 3: We don't want to sound elitist or anything like that, but we think Mr. and Mrs. America will probably be happier in Escorts than will car enthusiasts. This is no fling-about Fiesta, no rompin' Rabbit. There are no come-on-and-flog-me urgings coursing up the shift lever and the steering column. The Escort is just trying to be another nice car in the Ford family of nice cars—a mini LTD.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
Naturally, we would have preferred an Escort with verve, but the mini-LTD personality has a charm of its own. You find it strongest in the interior. The test car is a GLX in a range of models that starts with a plain Escort and moves up in steps called L, GL, GLX, and SS. So it's not the grandest, but it's right up there. And the first thing you see when you open the door is American Plush. The carpets are deep. The door panels are soft. The seats are foamy. The instrument panel is a big, bluff-faced molding just like those of the larger Fords, and it contains only a speedometer and a gas gauge, a layout also just like those of the larger Fords. And the luxo, poly-spoke steering wheel is outfitted with thumb buttons for the optional cruise control, just as the larger Fords are. Can Toyota and Volkswagen match this? No way.
It's easy to be cynical about such frills, to say that if Ford had spent more time working on the basics like engine performance (which we'll get to later) instead of diddling around with the money-grubbing options, it might have produced a car we'd all be foaming over. But never mind. You can't get mad at the GLX when it's such a nice (well, it is) package. The seats are foam-filled, have adjustable recliners, and are as good as the best Detroit has ever made. The dash has four big, swiveling vents to move air in a hurry. The top of the dash has been molded into a huge travel tray for cigarettes, sunglasses, or in case you need some place to melt your Hershey bars. This is American-car comfort and convenience all the way.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
You also get gadgets to play with. The blue-glowing electronic digital clock has buttons for date, elapsed time, and time of day. A map light on a stalk swings down out of the ceiling and swivels around in case you want to check somebody's tonsils. The AM/FM-stereo has a little button hidden down by your knee marked "Amplifier On-Off," and when you give it a pull, a pilot light comes on and the music gets really wonderful. None of this stuff has anything to do with economy or efficiency or engineering for the Eighties. It's just that Ford always made LTDs this way, so it's making mini LTDs this way too. What could be more natural? Sure, you can have a hair-shirt Escort if you want one, but that sort of low-calorie aspiration is not what made Detroit great. The Escort is an American small car.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
Not that there hasn't been inspiration from elsewhere. You can tell that Ford designers have been combing over the Honda Accord, trying to steal the essence of that car, to transplant its considerable appeal into the Escort. But typical of Detroit, they saw only the gimmicks. Honda's most notable innovation in instrument-panel design is the "pictograph," a green-glowing outline drawing of the car styled along the theme of a directional gyro in an airplane. All it does is tell you when a door is open, the tailgate ajar, or the like. But it looks very space-age and makes first-timers say, "Oh, lookit that!" So Ford swiped the idea. If you go GLX or better, you get a little pictograph down by your ankle on the console with warning lights that glow red for low fluids or malfunctioning head, tail, or brake lights, and yellow in the case of low fuel. Honda also dazzled the industry with its coin trays for parking-meter money. Ditto the Escort.
But getting back to the point, Ford wants you to open the Escort door and see American-style luxury and Japanese-style gimmicks (called "product content" in the industry): the best of both worlds, as they say. Thus overwhelmed, you then sign the check.
The assumption is that Americans will buy comfort, they'll buy features, they'll buy flash, and they'll buy economy as defined by EPA mpg numbers. So those areas are where the design effort was concentrated. And in those areas the Escort does very well. But driving fun? What's that?
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
Just the way the clutch works says a lot about the direction of Escort engineering. The pedal has a rather long travel, but the machinery all hooks up in the space of about an eighth-inch: clunk. And pedal effort does not diminish in a predictable way as you let out the clutch either. You just have to feel it out, feel it out, feel it out: clunk. Mr. and Mrs. America probably won't notice, but you will. And you'll conclude that the Escort is transportation rather than fun.
The numb-clutch syndrome is also apparent in the suspension. It acts as though it has very little free travel. A brisk boogie on an expressway ramp has it rocking laterally, feeling very much as though it was bouncing off the bump stops. Put a couple people in the car, encounter a modest chuckhole, and again it recoils off the bump stops. Even straight down the freeway it's a little bouncy ("vertically active" in engineer talk). The Escort's suspension just wasn't endowed with the resilience and precision an enthusiast hopes for. However, ultimate cornering forces are not bad at all for a front-drive car, particularly a new-generation Detroiter with tires optimized for low rolling resistance. The Escort circulated the skidpad at 0.71 g, which is a laudable accomplishment. Some of the credit must be given to the optional alloy wheels, which are 5.5 inches wide, up a half-inch from the optional steel wheels and up a full inch from the standard equipment.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
The Escort's 1600 cc hemi engine is another component that falls short of the enthusiast's hopes. Ford went to a lot of trouble with the hardware parts of this engine—an aluminum head, an electron-beam-welded intake manifold, a crossflow port arrangement with angled valves and fully machined combustion chambers—but then tried to get by without the sophisticated on-board computers that all GM and many Chrysler models are using to optimize fuel flow, spark advance, EGR, and the like. The results have been nearly disastrous. The Escort does reasonably well in economy—30 mpg EPA with a four-speed manual transmission and a short options list—but the sacrifices necessary to get economy and meet emissions without the aid of a computer have killed performance dead as a hammer. The car is very slow—zero to sixty in 14.6 seconds, standing quarter-mile in 19.4 seconds at 69 mph. This is more leisurely performance than even the Honda Accord's, which typically brings up the rear in small-car acceleration.
Moreover, the Escort labors mightily to attain whatever speed it can. Under hard acceleration, the engine climbs through several stages of roar—like a Weed Eater progressing from quack grass through the petunia patch and into a stand of maple saplings. This mastication is accompanied by vigorous buzzings transmitted up through your leg by the accelerator. The sound-level meter reports 89 dBA at the driver's ear during such a forced march, and that is louder than almost any other small car in the class.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
Yet here's the contradiction. We think Mr. and Mrs. America will find the Escort a quiet car. For one thing, they won't run it to 50 mph in second gear in fits of enthusiastic driving. And that sort of flat-out operation is the only circumstance in which it is really noisy. Everyday driving for everyday citizens consists mostly of idling at traffic lights and constant-speed cruising at speeds below 65 mph. Here the Escort is quieter than most of the competition. And this, in turn, means that one of the main annoyances associated with travel in small cars—the auditory assault factor—just isn't a problem in an Escort.
The other problem with small cars on long trips—lack of interior space—is also handled nicely in the Escort. The hatchback lifts to expose an uncommonly deep trunk, the sort of compartment that allows you to stow suitcases vertically; and if this isn't enough, the rear seat folds flat in typical hatchback style to open up just over 30 cubic feet of luggage space.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
If your cargo is just people, they fare well too. The universal standard for people packaging is the VW Rabbit. We find the back-seat room of the Escort to be even better. Headroom is slightly less, but still good enough for six-footers, and the Escort has better knee clearance. The VW achieves much of its comfort with "chair-height" seats and a high roofline for head clearance; the Escort provides a similar feeling in a lower car by depressing the floorpan in the area a back-seat passenger uses for footroom. This is an old Detroit trick, done for years in low-roof coupes, and usually the depressions were about the size and shape of dishpans and just reinforced the feeling of cramped quarters. But for a small tunnel, the Escort has a low floor from sill to sill. Your feet are treated to as much room as the rest of you, which is to say, a very generous amount for such a small car.
So much for the coach-class passengers. Those up front have royal treatment, at least in a GLX-trim car loaded with options. On the surface, however, this complement of extras seems contradictory to the concept of a small car. How are we going to know if the Escort is successful as an import fighter when we're looking at an example loaded like the typical domestic?
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
Let us answer this way. First, the Escort isn't really intended to be a bottom-of-the-market economy car. The Honda Civic, Toyota Tercel, Toyota Starlet, and Datsun 210 come in under it. And second, we suspect the real role of the Escort is less to fight imports and more to provide a next step for Americans who wish to downsize. These motorists are accustomed to a certain level of comfort and luxury; the Escort offers it in a smaller package with better fuel economy. In this regard, the test GLX is enormously successful. And for that reason, we're going to keep it around for another year as a long-term test car. We'll report back to you from time to time on its durability and on how well it adapts to life in a changing America. Watch this space.
Counterpoints
Do we have an irreversible inferiority complex over here? The home team has again failed to grasp the importance of building good small cars. Ford, oblivious to better examples, has fallen into the trap of building merely small cars, thinking that would be good enough.
This Escort should have been called the Squirrel. Its handling and braking are thoroughly unpredictable, having been rubbered to death by the ride brigade. Performance is anemic, and mileage is nowhere near the best. The steering is wishy-washy on the highway, the clutch snaps over center with a clunk, and the shifter plings like a fingernail on a tin can. And Ford should get some sort of perpetual prize for coarse engine harmonics.
High marks (these are compliments, now) for seating comfort, driving position, roominess, and outward visibility. Too bad you have to go inside the cheap-looking interior to find a few high points. Fortunately for Ford, the low points will probably creep right under the noses of a multitude of Escort buyers, who will go home thinking they're safe for the winter, nuts gathered by Ford's Squirrel. —Larry Griffin
Somewhere in the management ranks of Ford Motor Company North America there must be a man who gets paid a lot of money to insist that Americans will be most comfortable with little cars designed to be just as out of touch as the big cars they replace. If there is such a man, the introduction of the new American Escort is his finest hour. Our test car is well appointed, quiet, and comfortable at rest, but a sore trial in motion. It suffers from a nasty pitching moment, a fore-and-aft hobby-horsing that is guaranteed to bring back carsickness as an adult affliction. The little devil's engine and drivetrain would be delighted to cruise all day at 75 or 80, but the ride quality makes that almost unendurable. Europeans are now getting their first look at Escorts that go faster, ride more smoothly, handle better, and are infinitely more handsome than the one done up by the troubled technoids in Dearborn. My advice to the reader would be to go buy a Fiesta. My advice to Ford North America would be to call Ford Germany and ask Bob Lutz to come over and make our Escort as nice as theirs. —David E. Davis. Jr.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
This is one unhappy little lump of a car. The fit and finish of the interior are below par. The engine drones. The steering is rubbery. The ride is undisciplined. The tall gearing works against the engine. In general, the Escort reminds me of an adolescent, all awkward and self-conscious.
All of this tells me that Ford's American design team cut too many corners, thinking the masses wouldn't notice, or that the product planners misjudged what America expects of an econobox, or that the engineers simply lacked the know-how to create a world-class world car.
This is not to say that the Escort is without merit. The overall packaging is excellent. Rear-seat comfort is exceptional. And its gas mileage is good as well. So the Escort should do well enough in the workaday world, serving people who think of cars as nothing more than travel appliances.
All of the ingredients for a sparkling small sedan are here—on paper at least. Let's hope Ford management has a change of heart and sees fit to finish what it started. —Rich Ceppos
Specifications
Specifications
1981 Ford Escort GLX
Vehicle Type: front-engine, front-wheel-drive, 4-passenger, 2-door hatchback
PRICE
Base/As Tested: $6476/$7789
Options: air conditioning, $524; aluminum wheels, $183; cruise control, $128; AM/FM·stereo radio, $100; rear wiper·washer, $94; premium sound system, $91; power brakes, $76; tinted glass, $70; cloth and vinyl upholstery, $27; heavy-duty battery, $20.
ENGINE
SOHC 8-valve inline-4, iron block and aluminum head
Displacement: 97 in3, 1600 cm3
Power: 69 bhp @ 5000 rpm
Torque: 86 lb-ft @ 3200 rpm
TRANSMISSION
4-speed manual
CHASSIS
Suspension, F/R: struts/struts
Brakes, F/R: 9.3-in vented disc/7.1-in drum
Tires: Goodyear Arriva
P165/80R-13
DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 94.2 in
Length: 163.9 in
Width: 65.9 in
Height: 53.3 in
Passenger Volume, F/R: 47/39 ft3
Trunk Volume: 16 ft3
Curb Weight: 2140 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 14.6 sec
1/4-Mile: 19.4 sec @ 69 mph
80 mph: 31.8 sec
Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 15.2 sec
Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 20.4 sec
Top Speed: 87 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 217 ft
Roadholding, 282-ft Skidpad: 0.71 g
C/D FUEL ECONOMY
Observed: 24 mpg
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
Combined/City/Highway: 33/28/44 mpg
C/D TESTING EXPLAINED
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
6 minutes ago
- Forbes
What Ford Taught Me About Fixing America's Supply Chain
By Dave Evans, Co-Founder and CEO, Fictiv CAD design I learned the complexities of manufacturing firsthand during my time at Ford. When I joined the Silicon Valley lab—a research center focused on advancing automotive technology—as its first hire, I thought I'd be helping revolutionize how cars are built. I'd come from startups where speed was everything. I remember my shock the first time someone at Ford explained that developing a new vehicle platform takes four to six years. My gut reaction was: Six years? Why does this take so long? Years later, I left with the opposite feeling: How is it even possible to build a car in only six years? The truth is, automotive supply chains are a web of suppliers, sub-suppliers, regulators, safety standards, legacy systems, and global logistics complexity. They're marvels of coordination, but are often held back by processes that haven't fundamentally changed in decades. That gap is exactly why digital manufacturing is more crucial than ever. In software, new code can ship in hours, but in hardware, producing a single part often takes eight to twelve weeks or longer. Digital manufacturing solves this by streamlining and simplifying processes like quoting and sourcing, enabling rapid prototyping through on-demand production networks, and minimizing the number of feedback loops and handoffs between engineering, sourcing, and manufacturing teams—all of which help shorten iterative cycles and reduce the time from design to finished parts. If we want to see the future—self-driving cars, life-saving medical devices, and Mars rockets—we have to close that gap. We have to build hardware at the speed of software. To do that, we need to turn manufacturing from a bottleneck into a competitive advantage. The Reshoring Surge: Bringing Production Back Home Supply chain management ensures efficient operations. Now more than ever, speed to market matters. Renewed investment in U.S. manufacturing helps companies produce parts faster, closer to home, and with greater agility. A big part of the manufacturing comeback in the U.S. is happening in the automotive industry. General Motors recently announced a $4 billion commitment to U.S. production. Other manufacturers are making similar bets, driven by new realities in global trade, consumer demand for local production, and the need for resilient supply chains. GM isn't alone. In fact 68% of manufacturing leaders say reshoring is a critical component of their supply chain strategy. It's also happening in industries like robotics, medtech, and cleantech. Companies like Form Energy are transforming local economies and bringing factories back to life. If we want reshoring to stick, however, we can't just rebuild factories the old way. We have to modernize how manufacturing operates and build supply chains that can withstand an increasingly turbulent trade environment. That's where digital manufacturing comes in. How Strategic Sourcing Went Digital Technician programs and monitors automated manufacturing equipment using a laptop, working in the ... More field of industrial automation and electronics production. Traditionally, if you wanted to source a commodity like sheet metal enclosures, you'd hire a global supply manager (GSM). That GSM would: That process is thorough—but time-consuming and expensive. It can take months (or years). In a distributed, digital model, you can plug into a global supply chain where suppliers are pre-vetted, onboarded, and price-competitive. Instead of reinventing the wheel every time, you access a Fortune 500-level supply chain on demand. This model saves time, reduces risk, and frees up companies to focus on innovation rather than logistics. Digital Factories and Smart Manufacturing Smart industry robot arms for digital factory production technology showing automation manufacturing ... More process of the Industry 4.0 or 4th industrial revolution and IOT software to control operation . The future isn't just about physical parts. It's about digital twins, real-time factory data, and predictive maintenance. Companies like GE, Deloitte, Toyota, and Stanley Black & Decker have built what the World Economic Forum calls 'lighthouse factories'—facilities that use Industry 4.0 tools to operate smarter and faster. Sharing these stories can inspire others and accelerate the adoption of new technologies. Sustainability: The Other Reshoring Driver Beyond geopolitics and technology, sustainability is becoming a critical driver for reshoring and distributed manufacturing. Consumers care more than ever about where their products come from and their environmental impact. One of my favorite examples of companies making a difference is Purcell, which makes bulk food dispensers to reduce plastic food waste in the oceans. Their sustainable food solutions are making their way into large grocery chains. The intersection of sustainability and advanced manufacturing is where I believe some of the biggest innovations of the next decade will emerge. The Role of AI in Manufacturing female automation machine engineer student study and inspection control robot arm machine in ... More university or factory workshop. AI robot technology are new innovation trean for manufacturing in industry 5.0 Finally, let's talk about AI. We're on the brink of an AI-driven revolution in manufacturing. Tools like help engineers choose the best materials for a given application. In the past, I'd have called up Randy, the 30-year resin expert at Ford, to ask about plastic choices for an infotainment system. Experts like Randy are invaluable. But not every company has a Randy. AI can democratize that expertise. AI also powers our DFM (Design for Manufacturability) feedback, analyzing parts for manufacturability and catching issues early to avoid redesigns later on. AI won't replace skilled people—it will support them by taking care of repetitive, time-consuming tasks. That means engineers can spend less time chasing quotes and more time solving tough design challenges and bringing great products to life. A New Industrial Revolution As I reflect on the past decade, I believe we're at the dawn of the next industrial revolution. Manufacturing today goes far beyond production. It's about: Whether you're GM investing billions in U.S. plants, a robotics startup launching a new product, or a mid-sized manufacturer wrestling with tariffs, the questions are the same: How do we build faster? Smarter? And with more resilience? The answer lies in embracing new ways of working, from digital supply chains to distributed manufacturing networks. It's about shifting from reactive to proactive—turning manufacturing into a competitive advantage rather than a bottleneck. It's a future I'm incredibly excited to help build.


CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
Stellantis warns of $1.7 billion earnings hit from tariffs
Stellantis, the maker of more than a dozen automotive brands, on Tuesday said that President Trump's tariffs will cost the auto manufacturer 1.5 billion euros, or about $1.7 billion, in 2025. The parent company of brands like Chrysler, Fiat, Jeep and Peugeot announced the projected earnings hit as Mr. Trump clinches deals with U.S. trade partners that include steep tariffs on U.S. imports, ahead of an Aug. 1 deadline. Stellantis said it expects the majority of the hit, about 1.2 billion euros, will come in the second half of 2025. "Stellantis updates its estimate of 2025 net tariff impact to approximately €1.5 billion, of which €0.3 billion was incurred in H1 2025. The Company remains highly engaged with relevant policymakers, while continuing long-term scenario planning," the company said in a statement Tuesday as it reported financial results for the first half of 2025. The automaker acknowledged that Mr. Trump's 25% tariffs on imports of autos and auto parts to the U.S. are hurting its business, particularly in North America. Stellantis builds its Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep brand vehicles in factories in Canada and Mexico, meaning they're subject to the new levies. While Mr. Trump's deal with the EU, calling for 15% tariffs across the board will make BMW and Mercedes-Benz vehicles more expensive for U.S. consumers, according to analysts. Stellantis is largely unaffected by the EU agreement. "Stellantis isn't much affected by the EU/US tariff news — the question for STLA is if the Detroit-3 will want to renegotiate the [U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA)] tariff after the EU and Japan got a better deal," UBS analysts said in a research note. Other automobile manufacturers, including General Motors, have been bracing for impact from tariffs. GM CEO Mary Barra said the company took a $1.1 billion hit from tariffs in the second quarter, and that the company is taking steps to reduce its tariff exposure by investing in U.S. assembly plants. European automaker Volkswagen also said last week that tariffs cost the company $1.5 billion in the first half of 2025.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ford Stock Dips on Mustang Price News
Ford (NYSE:F) shares slid nearly 1.5% after news that the 2026 Mustang will dodge big price hikes and keep most trims flat. You read that rightonly the base model ticks up $400 while the EcoBoost Premium actually drops $1,200 versus last year. Some 2025 configs can still be had for roughly $2,500 less once incentives kick in. Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! Great Rates and Award-Winning Service The Insurance Savings You Expect Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with F. The catch? Ford moved its Magnesium Framed Curved Glass Display off the standard sheet and slapped a $1,000 option charge on it. Meanwhile, rumblings around reviving the fun?sized Ranger Splash pickup hint at Ford trying to recapture younger buyers with its No Boring Cars push. From the chart above, we can see Ford stock is trading more than 8% higher than its consensus estimates, and comfortably higher than its GF value, suggesting considerable downside potential. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio