Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump
The decision came seven months after the Republican returned to the White House. A panel of five judges in New York's mid-level Appellate Division said the verdict, which stood to cost Trump more than $515 million and rock his real estate empire, was 'excessive.'
After finding that Trump engaged in fraud by flagrantly padding financial statements that went to lenders and insurers, Judge Arthur Engoron ordered him last year to pay $355 million in penalties. With interest, the sum has topped $515 million.
The total — combined with penalties levied on some other Trump Organization executives, including Trump's sons Eric and Donald Jr. — now exceeds $527 million, with interest.
'While the injunctive relief ordered by the court is well crafted to curb defendants' business culture, the court's disgorgement order, which directs that defendants pay nearly half a billion dollars to the State of New York, is an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution,' Judges Dianne T. Renwick and Peter H. Moulton wrote in one of several opinions shaping the appeals court's ruling.
Engoron also imposed other punishments, such as banning Trump and his two eldest sons from serving in corporate leadership for a few years. Those provisions have been on pause during Trump's appeal, and he was able to hold off collection of the money by posting a $175 million bond.
The court, which was split on the merits of the lawsuit and the lower court's fraud finding, dismissed the penalty Engoron imposed in its entirety while also leaving a pathway for further appeals to the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals.
The appeals court, the Appellate Division of the state's trial court, took an unusually long time to rule, weighing Trump's appeal for nearly 11 months after oral arguments last fall. Normally, appeals are decided in a matter of weeks or a few months.
New York Attorney General Letitia James, who brought the suit on the state's behalf, has said the businessman-turned-politician engaged in 'lying, cheating, and staggering fraud.'
Trump and his co-defendants denied wrongdoing. In a six-minute summation of sorts after a monthslong trial, Trump proclaimed in January 2024 that he was 'an innocent man' and the case was a 'fraud on me.' He has repeatedly maintained that the case and verdict were political moves by James and Engoron, who are both Democrats.
Trump's Justice Department has subpoenaed James for records related to the lawsuit, among other documents, as part of an investigation into whether she violated the president's civil rights. James' personal attorney, Abbe D. Lowell, has said that investigating the fraud case is 'the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign.'
Trump and his lawyers said his financial statements weren't deceptive, since they came with disclaimers noting they weren't audited. The defense also noted that bankers and insurers independently evaluated the numbers, and the loans were repaid.
Despite such discrepancies as tripling the size of his Trump Tower penthouse, he said the financial statements were, if anything, lowball estimates of his fortune.
During an appellate court hearing in September, Trump's lawyers argued that many of the case's allegations were too old, an assertion they made unsuccessfully before trial. The defense also contends that James misused a consumer-protection law to sue Trump and improperly policed private business transactions that were satisfactory to those involved.
State attorneys said the law in question applies to fraudulent or illegal business conduct, whether it targets everyday consumers or big corporations. Though Trump insists no one was harmed by the financial statements, the state contends that the numbers led lenders to make riskier loans than they knew, and that honest borrowers lose out when others game their net-worth numbers.
The state has argued that the verdict rests on ample evidence and that the scale of the penalty comports with Trump's gains, including his profits on properties financed with the loans and the interest he saved by getting favorable terms offered to wealthy borrowers.
The civil fraud case was just one of several legal obstacles for Trump as he campaigned, won and segued to a second term as president.
On Jan. 10, he was sentenced in his criminal hush money case to what's known as an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction on the books but sparing him jail, probation, a fine or other punishment. He is appealing the conviction.
And in December, a federal appeals court upheld a jury's finding that Trump sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll in the mid-1990s and later defamed her, affirming a $5 million judgment against him. The appeals court declined in June to reconsider; he still can try to get the Supreme Court to hear his appeal.
___
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Texas Republicans passed their redistricting map. Now they're taking aim at the tactic Democrats used to delay it.
Democrats successfully stalled the plan for weeks by fleeing the state. New proposed rules would strictly limit their ability to do that in the future. Shortly after the Texas House of Representatives finally approved its redistricting plan following weeks of delays, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott proposed legislation that would strictly limit the kinds of walkouts that Democrats used to hold up the bill in the future. The Texas Legislature is currently holding a special session to consider a long list of bills in addition to the redistricting plan, which needs to be approved one more time by the state Senate before it can be signed into law. Abbott has added the new restrictions on walkouts to their agenda for the rest of the session. 'We need to ensure that rogue lawmakers cannot hijack the important business of Texans during a legislative session by fleeing the state,' he wrote in a statement announcing the proposal. The redistricting plan, which would redraw the lines of Texas's congressional districts to potentially secure the GOP five more seats in Congress in next year's midterms, appeared to be on an easy path toward passage early this month until dozens of Democrats fled the state to block the Republican-dominated Legislature from being able to meet. The walkout successfully prevented Republicans from holding a vote on the plan for roughly two weeks. Each of the Democrats was fined $500 a day during their absence. Abbott also threatened to have them removed from office and civil warrants were issued for their arrest. The Democrats eventually chose to return to Texas in order to lay the groundwork for a legal challenge they plan to mount against the new maps. Their presence allowed the House to meet and approve the proposal. What would the new rules do? The bill would create new penalties for 'excessive absence' by lawmakers. If it becomes law, any member of the Texas House or Senate who misses seven consecutive days of legislative proceedings, without being granted a leave of absence, would lose their seat in the Legislature. Walkouts would still be possible under the proposed rules, but they could only last for so long before any absent lawmakers would be booted from their seats. Under current rules, walkouts can last as long as absent members are able to remain out of the state. The new restrictions would go into effect immediately if they're passed by a two-thirds majority in both houses of the state Legislature. In the more likely event that they pass with a simple majority, they will go into effect 90 days after the special session ends. Where does the redistricting battle go from here? Once Texas's new map is signed into law, the fight will shift to the courts. Democrats argue that the GOP's district lines violate laws against racial gerrymandering. Republicans counter that the map was drawn purely for political reasons, which is legal under current Supreme Court precedent. Another thing the Democrats accomplished with their walkout was turning redistricting into a national issue. California has started the process of redrawing its own maps specifically to counter any gains the GOP makes through redistricting in Texas. Democrats in a few other blue states, most notably New York and Illinois, have considered whether they too should enact new district lines. Republicans also have their eyes on potential seats elsewhere in the country. GOP leaders in Ohio, Missouri, Indiana and Florida have all said they could consider trying to get new maps in place ahead of next year's midterms. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
US DOJ to back off money transmitter cases in shift backed by crypto
By Chris Prentice (Reuters) -The U.S. Justice Department does not plan to target software developers that create decentralized platforms for transmitting cryptocurrencies without criminal intent, a Justice official said on Thursday. Marking the latest sign of the U.S. government's changing views on crypto, acting Assistant Attorney General Matthew Galeotti of the DOJ's criminal division said the department will move away from bringing charges over failure to register as a money transmitter business. "Our view is that merely writing code, without ill-intent, is not a crime," Galeotti said in remarks prepared for a crypto summit in Wyoming. Money transmitters, such as Western Union and payment apps like Venmo, need to be licensed and follow certain rules for vetting customers and reporting suspicious activity to prevent money laundering. Such rules have become a flashpoint for the crypto sector, especially for decentralized exchanges which often say they have no visibility or oversight over transactions on their platforms. A jury earlier this month found a co-founder of Tornado Cash, a firm which makes cryptocurrency transactions harder to track, guilty of a conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business. Anti-corruption advocates say such firms make it easier to launder illicit funds. But critics of the case said the co-founder, Roman Storm, merely created the computer code. The jury in the case deadlocked over whether he was guilty of money laundering and sanctions evasion. Those charges were brought by the U.S. attorney's office in Manhattan under the Biden administration. The DOJ under Republican President Donald Trump, whose family has been building a crypto business, has dramatically shifted its approach to the crypto sector. The Justice Department has disbanded its crypto enforcement team, and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, a civil regulator, has walked away from a number of cases against crypto firms and executives. (Additional reporting by Hannah Lang in New York; Editing by Leslie Adler)
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Trump set to join DC police for patrols tonight as he pushes crackdown on crime
President Trump says he will hit the streets of Washington, D.C., on Thursday night to join patrols as part of his administration's extraordinary federal takeover of law enforcement in the capital. 'I'm going to be going out tonight with the police and with the military, of course,' Trump said Thursday in an interview with radio host Todd Starnes. 'So we're going to do a job. The National Guard is great. They've done a fantastic job.' The outing, one that would likely involve in-depth security planning under normal circumstances, was not announced as part of the president's public schedule. White House officials told Politico that details about the appearance are 'forthcoming.' Earlier this month, the president placed the Washington police force under federal control and began deploying hundreds of federal agents and D.C. National Guard troops to the city for a crackdown on what he claimed was rampant crime, despite statistics showing a sharp recent decline in most major categories of crime. Republican states later sent additional Guard troops of their own to join in. The federal operation has low public support within the capital. An estimated 8 in 10 D.C. residents oppose the takeover, according to a Washington Post survey released on Wednesday. Officials have also pushed back, and Attorney General Pam Bondi returned control of the D.C. police to its chief last week after the city sued Trump over the 'hostile takeover.' City police are still ordered to cooperate with federal officials. Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary were met with boos and chants of 'free D.C.' on Wednesday when they visited National Guard troops deployed to Union Station. More than 450 people have been arrested since August 7, the White House announced on Tuesday, though information about the arrests remains limited. It is unclear, for example, whether federal officials are counting all arrests in Washington in their announcements or only those related to the Trump-led operation. Though the president has framed the operation as a crackdown on street crime, nearly half of those arrested in the push have been immigrants in the country illegally, according to the White House, and immigration agents have been a visible presence throughout the capital. Masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers were seen last week in the Mount Pleasant neighborhood, which has a large Hispanic population, tearing down an anti-ICE banner. 'We're taking America back, baby,' one agent said in a video later posted by the agency. Critics have accused the more than 2,000 National Guard troops in the capital of largely focusing their efforts on high-visibility areas like the Washington Monument and Union Station, rather than the city's most high-crime areas. An armored National Guard vehicle collided with a civilian car near the Capitol on Wednesday, temporarily trapping one person inside. The civilian was later freed using the Jaws of Life and treated for minor injuries.
