Judge orders Trump administration to halt indiscriminate immigration stops, arrests in California
LOS ANGELES — A federal judge on Friday ordered the Trump administration to halt indiscriminate immigration stops and arrests in seven California counties, including Los Angeles.
Immigrant advocacy groups filed the lawsuit last week accusing U.S. President Donald Trump's administration of systematically targeting brown-skinned people in Southern California during its ongoing immigration crackdown. The plaintiffs include three detained immigrants and two U.S. citizens, one who was held despite showing agents his identification.
The filing in U.S. District Court asked a judge to block the administration from using what they call unconstitutional tactics in immigration raids. Immigrant advocates accuse immigration officials of detaining someone based on their race, carrying out warrantless arrests, and denying detainees access to legal counsel at a holding facility in downtown L.A.
Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, said in an email that 'any claims that individuals have been 'targeted' by law enforcement because of their skin color are disgusting and categorically FALSE.'
McLaughlin said 'enforcement operations are highly targeted, and officers do their due diligence' before making arrests.
Judge Maame E. Frimpong also issued a separate order barring the federal government from restricting attorney access at a Los Angeles immigration detention facility.
Frimpong issued the orders the day after a hearing during which advocacy groups argued that the government was violating the Fourth and Fifth amendments of the constitution.
Immigrants and Latino communities across Southern California have been on edge for weeks since the Trump administration stepped up arrests at car washes, Home Depot parking lots, immigration courts and a range of businesses. Tens of thousands of people have participated in rallies in the region over the raids and the subsequent deployment of the National Guard and Marines.
The order also applies to Ventura County, where busloads of workers were detained Thursday while the court hearing was underway after federal agents descended on a cannabis farm, leading to clashes with protesters and multiple injuries.
According to the American Civil Liberties Union, the recent wave of immigration enforcement has been driven by an 'arbitrary arrest quota' and based on 'broad stereotypes based on race or ethnicity.'
When detaining the three day laborers who are plaintiffs in the lawsuit, all immigration agents knew about them is that they were Latino and were dressed in construction work clothes, the filing said. It goes on to describe raids at swap meets and Home Depots where witnesses say federal agents grabbed anyone who 'looked Hispanic.'
ACLU attorney Mohammad Tajsar said Brian Gavidia, one of the U.S. citizens who was detained, was 'physically assaulted ... for no other reason than he was Latino and working at a tow yard in a predominantly Latin American neighborhood.'
Tajsar asked why immigration agents detained everyone at a car wash except two white workers, according to a declaration by a car wash worker, if race wasn't involved.
Representing the government, attorney Sean Skedzielewski said there was no evidence that federal immigration agents considered race in their arrests, and that they only considered appearance as part of the 'totality of the circumstances' including prior surveillance and interactions with people in the field.
In some cases, they also operated off 'targeted, individualized packages,' he said.
'The Department of Homeland Security has policy and training to ensure compliance with the Fourth Amendment,' Skedzielewski said.
Lawyers from Immigrant Defenders Law Center and other groups say they also have been denied access to a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in downtown LA known as 'B-18' on several occasions since June, according to court documents.
Lawyer Mark Rosenbaum said in one incident on June 7 attorneys 'attempted to shout out basic rights' at a bus of people detained by immigration agents in downtown LA when the government drivers honked their horns to drown them out and chemical munitions akin to tear gas were deployed.
Skedzielewski said access was only restricted to 'protect the employees and the detainees' during violent protests and it has since been restored.
Rosenbaum said lawyers were denied access even on days without any demonstrations nearby, and that the people detained are also not given sufficient access to phones or informed that lawyers were available to them.
He said the facility lacks adequate food and beds, which he called 'coercive' to getting people to sign papers to agree to leave the country before consulting an attorney.
Attorneys general for 18 Democratic states also filed briefs in support of the orders.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents were already barred from making warrantless arrests in a large swath of eastern California after a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction in April.
By Jaimie Ding.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
3 hours ago
- CTV News
Doug Ford walks back pledge to issue work permits to asylum seekers
Ontario Premier Doug Ford speaks to the media during the meeting of Canada's premiers in Huntsville, Ont., on Wednesday, July 23, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Nathan Denette TORONTO — Ontario Premier Doug Ford has walked back last week's pledge to wrestle some control away from the federal government to issue work permits to asylum seekers. He did not explain why he changed his mind. 'I don't want to take the responsibility off the federal government, but in saying that, if you have a pulse and you're healthy, you need to be working,' Ford said Monday. Ford and the rest of the country's premiers said at their gathering last week they wanted more control over immigration, usually a purview of the federal government. The Ontario premier pointed to Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, who cited Section 95 of the Constitution that they believed gave provinces the power to make decisions on immigration. 'We will be issuing our own work permits,' Ford said last week when all the premiers met in Huntsville, Ont. He said the federal government was taking up to two years to issue work permits to asylum seekers. But Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada said work permits are usually processed within 45 days of an asylum claimant submitting a completed application that includes a medical examination and an updated address. 'The Government of Canada will continue to work collaboratively with provinces and territories to achieve our shared economic immigration objectives,' said Jeffrey MacDonald, a spokesman for the department. He said immigration is within both federal and provincial jurisdictions and Ottawa enters into legally binding agreements with each province and territory to administer, co-ordinate and implement federal legislation on immigration. MacDonald said the department is still in the midst of planning immigration levels from 2026 to 2028 with input from all provinces and territories. Despite Ford's change of mind, he still said the federal government is taking far too long to issue work permits. He said 70,000 work permits were issued to asylum claimants last year, but there were 90,000 such claimants in the province and he wants the backlog cleared. New Democrat Leader Marit Stiles said Ford needs to focus on the problems he can control. 'He wants to talk about a whole bunch of stuff that is not his responsibility in the first place,' Stiles said. 'I think that the premier needs to start actually showing up for work for the people of this province and that means showing up to fix our health-care system, showing up to address the crumbling infrastructure in this province, showing up for the post-secondary institutions.' —With files from Sarah Ritchie in Ottawa This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 28, 2025. Liam Casey, The Canadian Press
CTV News
3 hours ago
- CTV News
U.S. to allow federal workers to promote religion in workplaces
U.S. and agency flags fly outside the U.S. Office of Personnel Management in Washington on Feb. 13, 2024. (Mark Schiefelbein / AP Photo) WASHINGTON - Federal employees may discuss and promote their religious beliefs in the workplace, the Trump administration said on Monday, citing religious freedoms protected by the U.S. Constitution. Agency employees may seek to 'persuade others of the correctness of their own religious views' in the office, wrote Scott Kupor, director of the Office of Personnel Management, the U.S. government's human resources agency. Supervisors can attempt to recruit their employees to their religion, so long as the efforts aren't 'harassing in nature,' according to Kupor's statement. Agencies can't discipline their employees for declining to talk to their coworkers about their religious views. The statement represents the latest effort of the six-month-old Republican Trump administration to expand the role of religion in the federal workplace. Courts have long held that employers cannot suppress all religious expression in the workplace, but can lawfully curb conduct that is disruptive or imposes an undue hardship as long as it applies equally to members of any religion. The U.S. Constitution's First Amendment protects individuals' rights to practice their religion while preventing the government from favoring one religion or another or religion in general. OPM in mid-July said agency workers can get permission to work from home or adjust their hours to accommodate religious prayers, after previously demanding that workers report to offices fulltime. The new statement cites President Donald Trump's February executive order calling on agencies to eliminate the 'anti-Christian weaponization of government.' That order directs cabinet secretaries to identify federal actions hostile to Christians. Trump has embraced the conservative Christian world view and promoted policies that speak to concerns that their religious liberty is under attack. Federal employees can also set up prayer groups in the workplace, so long as they don't meet during work hours, Kupor's statement said. The memo references Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a law that prohibits workplace discrimination based on a person's religion or religious practices. Kupor in the memo said that means the law requires employers to allow workers to proselytize, organize prayer groups on non-working time, and display religious icons. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which enforces Title VII, has said that proselytizing in the workplace can amount to unlawful religious harassment if it is unwelcome and is so severe or pervasive that it creates a hostile or abusive work environment. 'A consensual conversation about religious views, even if quite spirited, does not constitute harassment if it is not unwelcome,' the agency said in a 2008 guidance document. Kupor's memo is not legally binding, and any court that reviews it could disagree about the scope of Title VII's protections. But the memo could be difficult to challenge directly in court, as judges in many past cases have said they lack the power to review internal agency documents. (Reporting by Courtney Rozen; Editing by Howard Goller) Courtney Rozen and Daniel Wiessner, Reuters
CTV News
3 hours ago
- CTV News
English school boards threaten to sue Quebec over budget cuts in education network
English Montreal School Board Chair Joe Ortona holds up a copy of the ruling as he comments on the Quebec Court of Appeal ruling in favour of Bill 21, Quebec's religious symbols law, in Montreal, Thursday, Feb. 29, 2024. (Ryan Remiorz/The Canadian Press) English school boards are threatening to sue the Quebec government over 'astronomical' cuts to the education network that they argue are unconstitutional. The controversial cuts were announced at the end of the school year when the Ministry of Education said it would have to slash spending by more than half a billion dollars by fall 2025. English school boards and French-language service centres were asked to cut $510.8 million from the 2025-2026 fiscal year, and an additional $56.9 million from the private schools – for a total of $567.7 million. The Quebec English School Boards Association (QESBA) intends to file the lawsuit in the coming weeks. President Joe Ortona said one of the main sticking points is the government's directive that bars the school boards from dipping into surplus money accumulated over the years to use as needed. He said QESBA has made it clear that the government can't micromanage how English school boards spend their money and doing so would be in breach of the Court of Appeal judgment on Bill 40 earlier this year. 'It's been radio silence on their part, so they either don't understand it or don't care,' Ortona told CTV News. 'The government puts us in a position where we have no choice but to file a lawsuit because they think that they can run the education system in the English sector like it's a service centre, and we are not service centres. We fought for the right to keep school boards and fought for the right to have local management and control. As long as the government doesn't get that, it's unfortunate, but court challenges are going to keep mounting.' Following mounting pressure from opposition parties and unions about the cuts, Education Minister Bernard Drainville said that the province would invest 'up to' $540 million for the school network and that all funds 'must be used to finance direct services to students, not for anything else.' The announcement on July 16 did not mention whether or not the requested budget cuts still stand. The funding is conditional on many unreachable targets, Ortona said, including caps on hiring, despite school boards having already made hiring decisions for the next school year 'in conformity with the collective agreements that the government themselves negotiated with the union.' 'So the government's turning around and saying, 'You can't hire the jobs that you guaranteed to hire. And by the way, if the unions grieve and sue the school boards, you're left on your own to deal with that as well,'' he said. Minister Drainville's office did not respond to a request for comment on Monday. Ortona could not say how many school boards are planning to join the proposed lawsuit as they are in the middle of reviewing how the budget cuts will affect them.
