India rejects jurisdiction of international court on water treaty
Pakistan
has welcomed an international court's ruling interpreting design criteria for new run-of-river hydropower projects on the Western Rivers (Chenab, Jhelum and Indus), to be built by India, saying it vindicates its position on the
Indus Waters Treaty
(IWT), which India put in abeyance after the Pahalgam attack.
India, however, has never recognised the Permanent Court of Arbitration, which reportedly ruled that India must "let flow" the waters of the Western Rivers for Pakistan's unrestricted use. India has instead focused on the neutral expert mechanism.
"The specified exceptions for generation of hydro-electric plants must conform strictly to the requirements laid down in the treaty, rather than to what India might consider an 'ideal' or 'best practices' approach," Pakistan's foreign office said Monday.
While India's official response is expected Wednesday, sources recalled it had earlier notified modification of IWT amid prolonged disputes over Kishanganga and Ratle projects in J&K. India never accepted World Bank's decision to simultaneously activate both neutral expert mechanism and, at Pakistan's insistence, Court of Arbitration on the same issues - the reason it sought reconsideration of the treaty's dispute resolution process.
In Oct 2022, World Bank appointed both a neutral expert and a Court of Arbitration despite acknowledging India's concerns that concurrent proceedings posed practical and legal challenges.
Following Monday's ruling, Pakistan reiterated its commitment to implementing IWT and urged India to resume functioning of the same. India maintains IWT will remain in abeyance until Pakistan takes action against cross-border terrorism.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Kerala chief minister denies media restriction allegations and affirms commitment to press freedom
1 2 3 4 T'puram: Chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan said the reports that the govt is imposing restrictions on media freedom in the state were baseless. "No such move has been made by the govt," he said in a statement issued here on Wednesday. However, he accepted that the govt had initiated a probe on how a secret document was leaked to the media. "The govt decided to investigate the circumstances under which a highly confidential letter related to the World Bank's funding for the 'Kera' project was leaked to the media. The leakage and publication of such highly confidential letters can undermine the govt's credibility with financial institutions. Understanding how such a lapse occurred is essential for the smooth functioning of the govt," he said. But portraying this as an action against journalists is negative propaganda. Investigating any lapses or errors in duty by the officials is a natural procedure and not a result of anyone's whims or pressures. The actions taken are lawful and procedural. The perception that journalists will be summoned for evidence as part of this fact-finding is incorrect, said the chief minister. Anyone familiar with the media landscape in Kerala and the govt's approach to the media would not make such an allegation. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like TV providers are furious: this gadget gives you access to all channels Techno Mag Learn More Undo There is a continuous spread of fake news and misinformation targeting the state govt. Even when false news is debunked with evidence, some media outlets persist in spreading misinformation without correction or apology. Malicious and defamatory news against the govt and ministers is published without restraint by print and electronic media. The govt's policy is not to counter these with legal action or suppression. The high media literacy and political awareness of the people of Kerala prevent such news from influencing the public. The mission to expose the creators of fake news is a democratic responsibility taken up by the people of Kerala, said the chief minister. The country experienced emergencies, censorship and numerous press restrictions in the past. It is a fact that media freedom in the country lags behind the global average. Media professionals and institutions face significant challenges and crises in contemporary India for reporting news. This govt does not agree with such actions and has a strong stance against them. The freedom and rights of the media will be protected in every sense. At the same time, efforts to mislead the public and create sentiment against the govt through fake news will be exposed, he said. "Maintaining a good relationship with the media is the govt's clear stance. Deliberately discrediting the govt by leaking misleading news and attempting to undermine trust between institutions is a malicious act. The govt will not compromise with such unscrupulous methods," he pointed out. Unfortunately, there have been attempts to equate Kerala with places where media freedom is being destroyed by repeatedly claiming that a non-existent event has occurred. This is strongly condemned. It is reiterated that no action against media freedom will be allowed in Kerala, he reiterated. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Does Pakistan know why India rejects Indus Water Treaty dispute resolution mechanism?
India has rejected the Permanent Court of Arbitration's role in the Indus Waters Treaty dispute, citing procedural flaws in the World Bank's 2022 decision, as Pakistan escalates rhetoric over water rights. Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Tuesday said that the 'enemy can't snatch even a single drop of water' as he joined the country's military leadership in ramping up rhetoric over the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT). His statement came after India reiterated its decision to hold the treaty's dispute resolution process in abeyance, citing procedural objections that Islamabad has long ignored. At the heart of the disagreement lies India's refusal to recognise the jurisdiction of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in the ongoing dispute. The Hague-based tribunal has reportedly ruled that India must 'let flow' the waters of the Western Rivers the Indus, Jhelum and Chenab for Pakistan's unrestricted use under the treaty. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD New Delhi has consistently maintained that it never accepted the World Bank's 2022 decision to simultaneously activate two parallel processes, a neutral expert mechanism and at Pakistan's insistence, the Court of Arbitration to adjudicate the same set of technical objections. India argued that such concurrent proceedings pose both practical and legal challenges and formally sought a reconsideration of the treaty's dispute settlement provisions. Despite acknowledging India's concerns, the World Bank in October 2022 appointed both a neutral expert and a Court of Arbitration. This, officials in New Delhi say, undermines the procedural safeguards intended by the 1960 treaty and sets a precedent that could weaken the framework for resolving future differences. With Pakistan signalling it will press ahead with its case at the PCA and India refusing to participate in its proceedings, the stalemate over the IWT's dispute resolution mechanism appears far from over and now, political posturing on both sides threatens to overshadow the complex legal issues at its core.
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
National Sports Governance Bill To Be Implemented Within Next Six Months: Mansukh Mandaviya
Its passage through Parliament achieved smoothly, the landmark National Sports Governance Bill will be implemented within the next six months and preparatory work like "drafting of rules and identification of infrastructure" has already started, Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya told PTI on Wednesday. In his first interview after the passing of the bill in both houses, Mandaviya also justified as "standard safeguard" the bill's provision that gives government discretionary power to "impose reasonable restrictions" on international participation of Indian teams and individual athletes under "extraordinary circumstances". "This bill will be implemented as soon as possible. Within the next six months, all procedures will be completed to ensure 100 per cent implementation," Mandaviya said in the exclusive interaction at his residence. The passing of the bill makes India the 21st country to have a sports law. Implementation of its most significant provisions would require the setting up of a National Sports Board (NSB), which would provide affiliation to National Sports Federations (NSFs), a National Sports Tribunal (NST) for dispute resolution and a National Sports Election Panel (NSEP) to oversee NSF elections. "Creation of posts and other administrative approvals will follow established procedures of the Department of Personnel and Training and the Department of Expenditure," Mandaviya said "The aim is to ensure that both institutions (NSB and NST) are fully functional at the earliest possible date consistent with statutory and procedural requirements," he added, while reiterating that the bill is "the single biggest reform in sports since independence". The bill has been largely supported by the NSFs as well as athletes. The Indian Olympic Association, which was at first skeptical, has also backed it after extensive discussions with the minister. Standard safeguards With the passing of the bill, the unsaid understanding of the government having the final say on India's participation in international events has been formalised. This is an issue that crops up mostly when arch-foes Pakistan are involved in times of high border tensions as has been the case since this year's Pahalgam terror attack. Mandaviya said the government discretion in the bill has not been codified with any particular country in consideration. "The provision empowering the government to stop international participation is a standard safeguard seen in sports laws globally, intended for use in extraordinary circumstances," Mandaviya said. "It covers situations such as national security threats, diplomatic boycotts, or global emergencies, and is not directed against any particular country. "In practice, decisions regarding sporting engagements with Pakistan have been shaped by broader government policy and security assessments, particularly after major incidents affecting bilateral relations," he added. He cited the absence of bilateral cricket between the two countries since the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks as a case in point. "...full senior men's cricket tours to Pakistan have not taken place since the 2008 Mumbai attacks, and high-profile matches have often been moved to neutral venues. Such decisions are taken on a case-by-case basis in consultation with the Ministry of External Affairs and security agencies. "The Act formalises the government's ability to act decisively and lawfully in such situations, while ensuring that any decision remains consistent with India's commitments under the Olympic Charter and the statutes of relevant international sporting bodies," he said. "This reflects the Modi government's clarity in protecting national interest while upholding global sporting obligations." Speaking about the challenges that he faced during the consultative stage of the bill, Mandaviya said he took it upon himself to clear doubts with extensive presentations for all stakeholders on the nitty-gritties of the document. "The first major challenge was the fragmented legal landscape, with over 350 ongoing sports-related court cases that had stalled governance in many National Sports Federations. "The second challenge was balancing the demand for autonomy, as required under the Olympic Charter and International Federation statutes, with the need for public accountability and transparency," he explained. "The third challenge was addressing the wide variation in operational capacity, professionalism, and resources across different federations and state associations," he said. Mandaviya said consensus was achieved through more than 60 rounds of structured discussions, including plenary meetings, one-on-one engagements, and a Chintan-Shivir with stakeholders such as state sports ministers from all over the country. "I gave an entire day to NSF representatives, an entire day to athletes, coaches. I gave presentations to explain each and every clause of the bill. I explained to them why I think the clauses were needed. I did not impose, I asked for their feedback. "I told them that they should tell me what kind of bill they wanted, what kind of governance they wanted," he said. "Not just that, I also consulted sports lawyers in the High Court and the Supreme Court. All the suggestions were duly taken into consideration. I also went through each and every one of the 600 public suggestions," he added. A prominent name with whom Mandaviya consulted was former sports minister and Congress leader Ajai Maken, who prepared the draft sports bill in 2011 but could not push it beyond cabinet consultation. "In 2013, honourable Ajay Maken ji brought this bill to the cabinet but it could not be passed. It was because the moment the bill mentioned good governance in federations, vested interests within NSFs, especially those with political background, were against coming under any kind of governance scrutiny," he said. Athletes wanted representation Asked about the specific demands put forth by athletes during his interaction with them, Mandaviya said, "They wanted representation. Women athletes wanted representation, they asked where are we? And it was a legitimate question given that women athletes have been doing well consistently." The bill ensures that at least four women and two athletes of outstanding merit will have to be a part of any NSF's Executive Committee, the overall strength of which has been capped at 15. Confident that India's sporting landscape will go through a positive transformation due to the new law, Mandaviya said next on the agenda is a medal strategy to bring India into the list of top five global performers in the next two decades. "In the coming days, we will bring in a sports medal strategy. It would create the roadmap to figure where we should be in five years, next 25 years. What should be the planning for this. "Athlete is a part of society and sports is a people's movement," he said.
