Amherst Cinema cutting back on showtimes
AMHERST, Mass. (WWLP)– An iconic arthouse movie theater in Amherst is looking to cut costs while still serving the community.
The Amherst Cinema says they have seen losses for the past three years due to ticket sales and memberships not returning to pre-covid sales and an increase in overhead costs. As a result, they have decided to discontinue showtimes that show the least attendance: Sundays at 9pm and Wednesdays at 2pm and 9pm. The Masked Morning program is now on Sundays only.
These western Mass. colleges compete in NCAA Div. III tournament
The Cinema decided that reducing its operations from four to three screens is the mostsustainable path forward. As a result, in mid-May, the Cinema will permanently shutter its Studio Theater (a space it leases rather than owns) and proportionally reduce staff to align with operations.
'We're taking measures to reduce costs as part of a broader organization-wide sustainability plan, directing resources where they can have the greatest impact and safeguarding our ability to deliver on our mission. We will also redouble efforts to increase membership levels and philanthropic gifts,' said Barton Byg, president and chair of the Cinema's Board of Directors.
Despite the losses, the Cinema is still committed to bringing the same caliber and quality of films and special event programs, and has invested in upgrades with the latest equipment for improved projection and sound quality.
The Amherst Cinema is an independent nonprofit arts and education center and will be celebrating its 20th anniversary in 2026.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geek Girl Authority
33 minutes ago
- Geek Girl Authority
The Phoenician Scheme Archives
Categories Select Category Games GGA Columns Movies Stuff We Like The Daily Bugle TV & Streaming Does The Phoenician Scheme fit into the comfy pantheon of Wes Anderson goodness? Or does this one hit a rare sour note? Read on for our review.
Forbes
14 hours ago
- Forbes
How Big Is Keanu Reeves' John Wick Role In Ana De Armas' ‘Ballerina'?
Keanu Reeves and Ana de Armas' character posters for "From the World of John Wick: Ballerina." Keanu Reeves reprises John Wick opposite Ana de Armas in From the World of John Wick: Ballerina, but how much is he actually in the movie? Reeves, of course, has starred in four films in the crime thriller franchise, beginning with John Wick in 2014, followed by the sequels John Wick: Chapter 2 in 2017, John Wick: Chapter 3 – Parabellum in 2019 and John Wick: Chapter 4 in 2023. The 2023 film appeared to be Reeves' last because of his character's "death" at the conclusion, but its studio Lionsgate and creatives announced at CinemaCon in April that Reeves' dog-avenging assassin would be returning for a fifth John Wick movie. Formally titled From the World of John Wick: Ballerina, the John Wick franchise prequel movie opens in theaters everywhere on Friday. The summary for the movie reads, 'Taking place during the events of John Wick: Chapter 3 – Parabellum, the film follows Eve Macarro (Armas) who is beginning her training in the assassin traditions of the Ruska Roma.' Ballerina also features the return of some key characters from earlier films in the John Wick franchise, including Winston (Ian McShane), The Director (Anjelica Huston) and Charon (the late Lance Reddick). Rated R, Ballerina also introduces a slate of new characters to the franchise, including the vicious crime boss The Chancellor (Gabriel Byrne), the assassin Lena (Catalina Sandino Moreno) and a rogue hitman, Daniel Pine (Norman Reedus). Reeves plays Wick in a supporting capacity in Ballerina, but how pivotal is the character to the story and how much does he appear in the film? Note: The next section includes spoilers from 'Ballerina.' Producer Chad Stahelski — the director behind the first four John Wick films — director Len Wiseman and screenwriter Shay Hatten had a tricky balancing actor to pull off with From the World of John Wick: Ballerina. Not only did the creatives have to introduce a new character in the franchise to lead the narrative, they had to bring back Keanu Reeves' larger-than-life John Wick in a way that compliments the story yet does not overshadow Ana de Armas. The good news is, they succeed in bringing a proper balance to Ballerina but do it in a way for de Armas to make the film her own while not stepping on the John Wick series' legacy. Reeves doesn't show up in Ballerina until about 30 minutes into the film, where Wiseman cleverly restages a scene from John Wick: Chapter 3 – Parabellum where Wick seeks refuge from his old ally The Director in her theater. In the original film, there's a scene where The Director and her bodyguards are walking down a set of stairs in the theaters, where Anjelica Huston's character questions why Wick's path of revenge was 'over a puppy.' In Ballerina, though, the sequence takes place from Eve's vantage point, and she eventually crosses paths with Wick for a brief conversation about escaping the life of an assassin. In total, the sequence on the stairs and Eve and Wick's encounter lasts around two minutes. The crux of Ballerina is Eve's path of revenge, where she seeks The Chancellor and his assassins to pay for the death of her father, Javier (David Castañeda). The Chancellor, as it turns out, is not only Javier's father-in-law, but Eve's (Victoria Comte) grandfather, and he wants to kidnap the young girl to ensure she will be able to carry on his crime organization's bloodline when she becomes an adult. The problem is, The Director fears Eve's revenge will begin a war between the Roma Ruska and the vicious cult of assassins, so she sends John Wick to the ballerina's location to eliminate the potential of that happening. As such, Wick returns about an hour after his initial scene in Ballerina, where he — without giving away any major spoilers — locates and tries to neutralize Eve in a secret location of The Chancellor's group. The sequence, while full of hyperkinetic action, again only lasts a couple of minutes. From there, Wick remains on the grounds of The Chancellor's compound — which essentially is a seemingly quaint Austrian town — while Eve continues her path of revenge. Wick remerges about 15 minutes after his last appearance as Eve finds herself in a do-or-die situation, only to disappear again near the conclusion of the movie. All told, Reeves appears as Wick in Ballerina for about 10 minutes at best, but thankfully, the character's appearance is not reduced to a set of walk-on cameos. In fact, Wick has such a looming presence in the last half-hour of Ballerina that the role feels bigger than it actually is. Smartly, Chad Stahelski, Len Wiseman Shay Hatten allow Ana de Armas ample room to establish a presence for Eve in the world of John Wick that's just as indomitable as Reeves'. Wherever Eve ends up — whether it be in another Ballerina prequel film or John Wick 5, de Armas has definitely earned her place at the (high) table. From the World of John Wick: Ballerina opens in theaters everywhere on Friday.
Gizmodo
15 hours ago
- Gizmodo
‘The Life of Chuck' May Change the Way You Look at Movies and Yourself
This review of The Life of Chuck, the new film by Mike Flanagan based on a novella by Stephen King, starts in 1994. I was only 14 years old, still educating myself in the world of movies, when I found myself sitting down to see this new one everyone was talking about called Pulp Fiction. As it got toward the end, however, I found myself incredibly confused. Wasn't John Travolta's character dead? How was he back? I may have only been a kid, but I knew I'd watched him die, and now he was alive again. It wasn't until a little later when my formative teenage brain realized director Quentin Tarantino was telling his story out of order that I began to understand. That was something I had yet to encounter in burgeoning film fandom, and it helped turn Pulp Fiction into one of my favorite films ever. I mention this in a review of The Life of Chuck because the first time I saw it, I had a similar reaction. The Life of Chuck is very purposefully told backwards, and when characters from the third act (which you see first) appeared in illogical ways in the first act (which you see third), it didn't quite click. I was absolutely loving the movie, but one tiny piece was missing. Then, once that piece clicked for me, everything came together. It was a perfect puzzle that needed a touch more effort than most movies do. That's not to say The Life of Chuck will have the kind of infinite cultural impact Pulp Fiction did, but both films are beautiful in part because of their faith in the audience. Both are films bold enough to leave things to the imagination, to not connect every dot, and then let you figure it out for yourself. And, like Pulp Fiction, when you watch The Life of Chuck a second time—which I had the privilege of doing before writing this review—it's like watching a new movie. You can see every piece of foreshadowing in the story. Every clue that's subtly laced in there. And absent from any confusion, you can think about the film's bigger intentions and choices, which is where The Life of Chuck truly shines. The Life of Chuck stars Tom Hiddleston as the title character, Charles 'Chuck' Kranz, who in the first part of the film is described as 'Oz of the apocalypse.' Chiwetel Ejiofor and Karen Gillan lead a wholly intriguing, provocative, and terrifying story of the end of the world, where Chuck's image just so happens to keep popping up. Hiddleston takes over the role in the second act, which dramatizes a short but memorable moment in his life, and then the role is passed to three young actors—Cody Flanagan, Benjamin Pajak, and Jacob Tremblay—in the last third, as we see Chuck's childhood. As the story dives deeper into who Chuck really was, Flanagan lets both the character and the audience consider the universe and our place in it. The film is filled with mind-bending philosophical conversations about dancing, math, the universe, and more, most of which we learn as Chuck does. It's funny, it's sweet, and it continually keeps you on your toes. Along the way, the film asks us to never forget the first third of the movie where Chuck was the star of another story, and slowly start to work it all out. We're watching this beautiful rumination on the simple pleasures of life, all while this large mystery of 'What the hell was that?' looms over it like a cloud. Flanagan fills his story with fantastic actors giving career-best performances. There's Ejiofor and Gillan of course, but also Mia Sara (Ferris Bueller's Day Off), Carl Lumbly (Captain America: Brave New World), and even Mark Freaking Hamill. All of the actors playing Chuck are delightful too, with Pajak having the largest role and thereby making the most impact. Some of these characters appear in more than one segment, but most don't, a choice that makes a lot of sense once you understand what the film is actually doing. But, I have to admit, without piecing that puzzle together, The Life of Chuck does feel a little empty. It may, in fact, but a little too subtle with its intentions on a first pass. There's a fine line with making your narrative too obvious to be powerful and too subtle to be clear, and Flanagan walks that line throughout the whole movie. However, if you watch the movie a second time, you can see it's much less subtle than you thought on a first watch. It's just about paying attention and remaining engaged. The Life of Chuck is a powerful and beautiful movie. It's filled with humor and heart, as well as incredible conversations and revelations. It's also more than a little out there, and certainly not for everyone. When you see it for what it truly is, though, it may just change not just how you look at movies, but your own life as well. The Life of Chuck is now playing in limited release and opens wide June 13.
