Sacking of Rajanna exposes Congress' ‘anti-Dalit' face, says BJP
In a social media post, BJP State president B.Y. Vijayendra said: 'This is the true face of Congress — anti-Dalit, anti-democratic and anti-truth. It also exposes the hollowness of Mr. Siddaramaiah's claims of championing the Ahinda cause. When leaders from these communities are targeted, he does not defend them. Instead, he bows to the diktats of the Delhi high command to safeguard his own position as Chief Minister.'
He said that Mr. Rajanna, a senior Dalit leader, was removed from the State Cabinet 'for merely speaking the truth.'
'Clear pattern'
Mr. Vijayendra further claimed: 'The pattern is clear. In the case of erstwhile ST Welfare Minister Nagendra, funds earmarked for the development of the community were siphoned off to finance Congress's election expenses. Instead of holding the CM and Deputy CM accountable, the blame was placed entirely on Mr. Nagendra, and the matter was quietly closed.'
Meanwhile in the Legislative Assembly, the BJP members led by Leader of the Opposition R. Ashok raised the issue as soon as speculations about Mr. Rajanna either quitting or being sacked started doing the rounds.
Mr. Ashok urged the government and Mr. Rajanna to clarify on the issue. He even argued that Mr. Rajanna should not be sitting in the place earmarked for Ministers if he is no longer a part of the ministry.
While Law and Parliamentary Affairs Minister H.K. Patil said that Chief Minister Siddaramaiah would respond to them later, Mr. Rajanna said he was told by the Law Minister not to speak. 'Whether I have resigned or not will be told by the Chief Minister,' he said.
But the Chief Minister stayed away from the session, while Deputy Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar, who was in the session, chose not to comment on the floor of the House.
Taking exception to Mr. Rajanna and the government remaining mum, Mr. Ashok sought to remind them that it was during the protest over the honey-trap allegations made by Mr. Rajanna that 18 of the BJP MLAs had been suspended.
Meanwhile, Deputy Leader of the Opposition Arvind Bellad maintained that the sacking of Mr. Rajanna, a close aide of Mr. Siddaramaiah, was 'a big blow' delivered to the Chief Minister by his deputy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
28 minutes ago
- NDTV
Delhi Has Zero State-Run Shelters. How Will It House 10 Lakh Stray Dogs?
The Supreme Court's directive on Monday that all stray dogs in Delhi and the National Capital Region should be removed from the streets and permanently housed in shelters has raised an outcry amongst dog lovers and animal rights activists who say that the order is unjust, unscientific, unimplementable and inhuman. This is, of course, a deeply polarising ruling. While many have welcomed the apex court's decision, pointing to the growing incidence of dog bites and attacks on children by street dogs, animal lovers feel that picking up strays and housing them in shelters, which do not even exist as yet, is tantamount to passing a death sentence on them. From Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Maneka Gandhi to neighbourhood animal rights activists who feed and care for strays, everyone is of the view that the court has acted thoughtlessly and without due regard to their concerns for the welfare of these voiceless animals. The fact that this ruling overturns the existing Animal Birth Control Rules, which state that strays should be sterilised and released back on the streets, has also incensed animal lovers. They insist that street dogs are community animals and should be allowed to remain in the neighbourhoods to which they are accustomed, and that effective sterilisation is the best way to reduce the population of street dogs over time. Let us look at what the bench comprising Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan, which issued the directive in the suo motu case taken up by it, actually said. First, it asked governments and civic authorities in Delhi and the National Capital Region (NCR) to immediately start setting up dog shelters and report on the progress of this exercise within eight weeks. Second, it said that the authorities should begin by providing shelters for 5,000 dogs within the next six to eight weeks and progressively ramp up this effort. Third, civic bodies should immediately start rounding up stray dogs from every locality. "This should be the first and foremost exercise to make all localities within the city and outskirts free of stray dogs," the bench said. Fourth, it has warned that anyone who tries to prevent stray dogs from being picked up will face penal action. To be sure, the apex court's directive seems to be oblivious of several realities on the ground. At present, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) does not have a single dog pound, and the only shelters that exist are run by NGOs. At last count, Delhi had an estimated 10 lakh stray dogs. With successive governments failing to carry out a robust sterilisation programme and leaving the job primarily to resource-strapped animal welfare organisations, that number could have gone up significantly. The judges have not given a deadline for housing all stray dogs in shelters, choosing to give six to eight weeks for setting up shelters for 5,000 dogs to begin with. But no matter what that deadline may eventually be, the civic authorities in Delhi and NCR will have to find the funds (likely to be hundreds of crores per month), the land, and the manpower needed to build the infrastructure, run the shelters efficiently, and ensure that they provide a safe and hygienic environment for the strays. This is a mammoth, and some say, unachievable task. And given the government's abysmal record in conducting the much simpler job of sterilising stray dogs, animal rights activists are right to be apprehensive that the implementation of the Supreme Court directive may well degenerate into a brutal drive to round up strays, carry them off to unnamed places, and consign them to a potentially fatal end. This must not be allowed to happen. And the Supreme Court must ensure that it does not. However, the question to ask here is not whether the task of getting strays off the streets is unimplementable for a variety of reasons. The question to ask is, is it fundamentally the right thing to do, and is it a goal worth working towards in order to put an end to stray dogs coming into conflict with humans in Delhi and elsewhere? Many animal lovers believe that making India's public spaces free of stray dogs is inherently, almost morally, wrong. They believe that strays should be allowed to roam free after sterilisation - even though this is not the case in any developed country, where animal rights groups are no less vocal or active. The argument that the norm does not apply to India because we are not a developed nation does not wash, since, by that token, we must never take any steps to put in place systems and infrastructure that are the mark of economically advanced countries. There is no doubt that this is a hugely emotive issue, one that involves people's deep love for the animals they care for. Hence, it is not enough for the Supreme Court to merely pass an order to make the streets of Delhi-NCR free of stray dogs. It must allay all apprehensions. Indeed, the ruling will be meaningful only if the court takes all factors into account and exercises oversight every step of the way - not just in the short term but also in the long term. If, eventually, this order is to be acceptable to all, the Supreme Court must take concrete steps to ensure that the implementation of the ruling does not become an excuse for cruelty to the animals, ensure that governments and civic bodies allocate realistic budgets for setting up the shelters within a specified time frame, and that they work with all stakeholders to conduct the exercise in a just and humane way.
Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Maharashtra Cabinet okays recruitment of 15,000 police personnel
The Maharashtra Cabinet on Tuesday approved the recruitment of around 15,000 police personnel in the state police force. The decision follows the announcement by Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, who heads the Home Department, during the monsoon session of the Assembly that a recruitment drive for the police department is underway. The initiative is part of a 150-day programme aimed at restructuring the police department, updating rules, ensuring compassionate appointments, and identifying vacancies. CM Fadnavis had said that the state government has already recruited 38,802 police personnel between 2022 and 2025, and a proposal for recruiting an additional 13,560 police posts has also been submitted. The Cabinet also cleared the decision to increase the margins of ration shopkeepers in the state. Minister of Food and Civil Supplies Chhagan Bhujbal said that the Cabinet gave the approval to increase the margin amount of ration shopkeepers who provide food grain to eligible beneficiaries of the National Food Security Scheme (Antyodaya Anna Yojana and Priority Households) under the state's public distribution system. Bhujbal said, 'The margin rate currently being given to the fair price shopkeepers for distribution of food grains to ration card holders through e-POS machines under the public distribution system in the state has been increased by Rs 20 per quintal (Rs 200 per metric tonne). This will result in an estimated annual additional financial burden of Rs 92.71 crore on the State Exchequer.' In other decisions, the Cabinet also decided to provide viability gap funding for Solapur-Pune-Mumbai air travel. The government also gave approval to relax the guarantor conditions in various loan schemes implemented by corporations under the jurisdiction of the Department of Social Justice and Special Assistance. The government guarantee has been extended for five years.
Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Priyanka Gandhi slams Centre's ‘silence and inaction' on Israel's actions on Palestine; envoy hits back
Congress MP and general secretary Priyanka Gandhi Vadra on Tuesday hit out at the BJP-led central government for staying silent as Israel 'unleashed…devastation on the people of Palestine', saying that enabling crimes by 'silence and inaction' was a crime in itself. The social media post sparked a strong reaction from Reuven Azar, the Israeli ambassador to India, who said she should not 'buy Hamas numbers'. While the Congress has treaded a careful line on the Palestine issue, mindful of how the BJP projects it, Vadra has been outspoken, calling attacks on Palestine 'barbaric' and 'genocidal', and seeking pressure on Israel to end the war. In a post on X on Tuesday morning, Vadra wrote that the Israeli state is committing genocide and has murdered over 60,000 people, 18,430 of whom were children. 'It has starved hundreds to death including many children and is threatening to starve millions. Enabling these crimes by silence and inaction is a crime in itself,' she said. Targeting the Centre, Vadra said that it is 'shameful that the Indian Government stands silent as Israel unleashes this devastation on the people of Palestine'. Azar replied to her post, saying, 'What is shameful is your deceit'. 'Israel killed 25,000 Hamas terrorists. The terrible cost in human lives derives from Hamas's heinous tactics of hiding behind civilians, their shooting of people trying to evacuate or receive assistance and their rocket fire,' he said. 'Israel facilitated 2 million tonnes of food into Gaza while Hamas tries to sequestrate them, thereby creating hunger. Gaza population has grown 450% in the last 50 years, no genocide there. Don't buy Hamas numbers,' he added. In December last year, Vadra had carried a bag with 'Palestine' emblazoned on it to Parliament. The bag also had Palestinian emblems, including a watermelon, seen as a symbol of Palestinian solidarity. At the time, the BJP had accused her of 'appeasement' politics. In June last year, Vadra had slammed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over what she had said were the Israeli government's 'genocidal actions' in Gaza, as she accused him and his government of 'barbarism'. She had also criticised the Narendra Modi government for abstaining from voting on a resolution on the Israel-Hamas conflict at the United Nations General Assembly in October last year.
