Senior citizen charged with posting offensive remarks against king
SEPANG : An elderly man was charged in the sessions court here today with posting offensive remarks against Yang di-Pertuan Agong Sultan Ibrahim on Facebook in February.
However, the charge was not read out to the 61-year-old due to his health and hearing issues.
Judge Ahmad Fuad Othman granted him permission to undergo a psychiatric assessment, and fixed the case for mention on Aug 15.
Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission deputy public prosecutor Fadhli Wahab and prosecuting officer Azmir Razali appeared for the prosecution.
The court had issued a warrant of arrest on June 20, after two no-shows by the man.
The charge, framed under Section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, punishable under Section 233(3), provides for a fine not exceeding RM50,000, imprisonment of up to a year, or both, upon conviction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
5 hours ago
- Malay Mail
RM336,000 in false claims lands ex-military man a RM48,000 fine in Labuan
LABUAN, Jan 24 — The Labuan Special Corruption Court today fined a former Malaysian Armed Forces (MAF) veteran RM48,000 after he pleaded guilty to 12 alternative charges of submitting false documents in claims exceeding RM336,000. Fairuzul Fazillah Musa, formerly attached to MAF Labuan, had initially been charged under Section 471, read with Section 468 of the Penal Code. He was accused of using forged documents as genuine in claims for local training and annual honorarium allowances between January 2015 and February 2016. The prosecution later offered 12 alternative charges under Section 471 read with Section 465 of the Penal Code, to which he pleaded guilty. Judge Jason Juga also imposed a fine of RM4,000 on each charge, in default four months' imprisonment, amounting to RM48,000, which was fully settled by the accused. Deputy public prosecutor Joe Randy Juster appeared for the prosecution, while the accused was unrepresented. — Bernama
Free Malaysia Today
6 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Court annuls land transfers over RM9.5mil loan
The Court of Appeal ordered the re-transfer of 16 properties to AJ Kasturi Sdn Bhd and MA Joseph Capital Sdn Bhd, with damages to be assessed, and costs of RM320,000. PUTRAJAYA : The Court of Appeal has unanimously ordered the re-transfer of 16 properties to two companies, ruling that the assets were unlawfully pledged as collateral to secure an illegal RM9.5 million loan. Delivering the broad grounds of judgment, Justice Ahmad Fairuz Zainol Abidin said the property transactions were null and void as the loans – given by eight individuals and one company to AJ Kasturi Sdn Bhd and MA Joseph Capital Sdn Bhd – were illegal moneylending transactions. 'The Moneylenders Act 1951 exists to protect borrowers and cannot be circumvented,' he said in allowing appeals brought by AJ Kasturi and MA Joseph Capital. The appeals court set aside a High Court ruling after the two borrower companies successfully established that the 16 sales and purchase agreements (SPAs) were a sham. 'The trial judge erred in law and facts, which warrants appellate intervention,' said Fairuz. The bench also set aside judgment for vacant possession, outstanding rental and damages entered by the High Court in favour of the lenders on their counterclaim. AJ Kasturi and MA Joseph Capital were also awarded general, exemplary and aggravated damages to be assessed by the High Court and RM320,000 in costs. Fairuz said the trial judge was wrong to conclude that the transactions were genuine property sales dealings. The panel was chaired by Justice Nazlan Ghazali, with Justice Faizah Jamaludin sitting as its other member. According to the facts of the case, the two companies had wanted to raise funds urgently for a property acquisition in 2014 after their application for a bank loan was rejected. A representative of the companies then approached lawyer M Pannirselvam who offered to arrange a loan with interest charged at 4% per month. The companies agreed and pledged the properties progressively as security for the loan. The lawyer and the lenders relied heavily on an instrument called a 'letter of option' which the appeals court held was questionable and defied commercial logic. The 'letter of option' was not executed by the lenders. The company repaid the loan in part but subsequently defaulted, whereupon the lawyer facilitated transfers of the properties to the lenders. Dissatisfied, the companies filed three suits to recover the properties, all of which were dismissed by the High Court, giving rise to the present appeal. Lawyers Hariharan Tara Singh and Tan Eng Seng represented the companies, while counsel R Thayalan appeared for the lawyer. Ringo Low and Faiz Abdul Rahim appeared for the lenders.
Free Malaysia Today
6 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Pendang MP denies challenging fellow MP to a fight
Pendang MP Awang Hashim said it was not correct to say he had challenged Jelutong MP RSN Rayer to a fight outside Parliament. PETALING JAYA : Pendang MP Awang Hashim has denied challenging another MP to a fight outside Parliament last week. Awang, who was suspended from the Dewan Rakyat for 10 days on Monday, said it was a 'reminder' to Jelutong MP RSN Rayer to watch out for attacks outside Parliament. 'It is not correct to say I invited him to fight. My hand motions were recorded but it did not show what I really meant. 'I know what it would mean to challenge someone to a fight outside Parliament. 'I only wanted to remind the MP not to touch on religious issues to the point that someone else would punch him outside Parliament,' Berita Harian reported him as saying. Last week, Marang MP Abdul Hadi Awang implied in his debate on the 13th Malaysia Plan that Kuala Lumpur's problems were due to DAP and the unity government. This led to a fiery exchange between MPs from both sides and a walkout by opposition MPs. Several videos that later went viral showed Awang making gestures, apparently challenging others to a fight outside the Dewan Rakyat. In his ruling on Monday, Speaker Johari Abdul said he witnessed the incident and was 'very disappointed'. 'The gallery was open, there were children from school,' he had said, adding that such behaviour did not look good for the nation. Awang said he would abide by the ruling, but regretted that he was not given the opportunity to explain himself over the video which had shown him making a fist. 'I was not called to defend myself. If the punishment has been given by the meeting's rule holders and they say I am guilty, I will accept it,' he said.
