
Russians worry what happens when the soldiers come home
To make predictions, you first need to know exactly who these soldiers are and where Russia found them. Throughout the war, Putin has avoided, as far as possible, recruiting in St Petersburg and Moscow and has concentrated instead on Russia's smaller, more far-flung towns and cities in Bashkiria, Tuva, and other Siberian provinces. Typically, these men come from disadvantaged families who, for various reasons, view military service as their only opportunity to improve their circumstances. For these men, life has never held much value to begin with. Their lives aren't cheap by choice; they've simply never known otherwise. Salaries may run as low as £225 a month. Many around them have alcohol problems, and many have been in jail. In these circumstances, you tend not to plan for tomorrow – nobody has ever taught you how to – and life expectancy is low.
Here, patriotism isn't just a political tool, it's a lifeline, and being part of a 'great and powerful country' is the only way to feel like you matter. Every day, TV and social media bombard you with one message: 'You have a chance to change your fate.' You see strong, heroic men in military uniforms. They promise adventure, honour, and money – as a Russia volunteer, you're reportedly offered around £14,000 as a sign-on bonus. You receive a monthly wage two and a half times the national average, and there are potentially vast payoffs to your relatives should you die in battle. 'Do something useful for the country and the family,' your wife shouts. 'You're not a man if you don't go!'
Are you afraid of dying or being crippled? You try not to think about it. You just want to become a hero, to finally earn the respect of your family, to stop being a drunken nobody, and instead, become part of the 'elite' that the television keeps talking about.
But we all know how this ends. The public's perception of these soldiers, even before they return home, is already deeply cynical. Putin's decision, back in 2022, to allow the late Evgeny Prigozhin, Wagner Group commander, to recruit from among Russia's prison population has come back to bite the country. While volunteers and conscripts were kept ruthlessly on the battlefield, the criminals, convicted murderers and rapists among them, were allowed to return home.
Getting back, many reverted to their old ways – leaving a trail of rape, arson, and murder. In the two-and-a-half years since the war began, several hundred 'civilians' have already fallen victim to them (at least 242 people have died, and another 227 received life-threatening injuries).
Naturally, since these men were the first to come back, they've set the tone for how returning soldiers are perceived. There's now widespread anxiety about what will happen when more 'heroes' arrive back in Russia, many with PTSD and unrealistically high expectations of the treatment they'll get back home. This is often the very opposite of what they've been promised. Already, we're seeing incidents of veterans being denied entry to cafes or shops, or even beaten or mocked. When the trickle becomes a flood, few will be happy to see these men, who will in all likelihood bring aggression, demands, and problems with them.
The locals aren't the only ones bracing themselves. The authorities, too, will be deeply concerned about the return of these soldiers: they could potentially challenge the existing order and spark social unrest. They may even become opposition figures, speaking with the authority of hard-won experience and bringing about significant shifts in public attitudes. On all these things, the Kremlin will cast the coldest of eyes.
Most probably, the returning soldiers will be reintegrated as gradually as possible. The government will either keep them on contract or resettle them in new territories, giving them jobs on military bases. The goal will be to keep them occupied and ensure they continue to receive their salaries. Even if some return to cities, the majority will likely go back to small towns or villages far from urban centres. Here, it won't matter much to the Kremlin if they're unhappy or want something more. Their voices count for little.
For all the state's promises these soldiers will return as the 'new elite', no one has any eagerness to give them power. Bureaucrats fight fiercely for control over budgets and resources – this is how great careers and businesses are built, both in Moscow and the provinces – and they'll certainly fight for their jobs.
Already, Russian bureaucrats have two strategies to hold onto power. The first is to reinvent themselves as war heroes, briefly joining special units, taking selfies in new uniforms safely away from real combat, and returning home as self-proclaimed 'veterans'. A number of officials have used a brief, safe stint at the front to launder their reputations.
The second strategy is to appoint real veterans – those who weren't previously officials – to symbolic positions. Perhaps they'll become deputy mayors responsible for the social protection of other war veterans. They might be appointed to staff positions in the presidential administration, or hold some other symbolic, non-executive, or non-influential position to showcase social mobility for war veterans. They can meet, drink vodka, complain about their experiences, sing songs, and reminisce about the war. But these roles won't offer any real power or access to resources. It's all just for show, pure propaganda. In public, they will be fêted; in private, live in abject poverty.
But what of the severely wounded? Won't their sacrifice earn them better treatment? If historical precedents after World War II are anything to go by, quite the reverse. Back then, veterans who returned visibly disabled were seen as tarnishing the image of socialism and were smartly packed off to care homes, hospice-like places in former monasteries where they lived out their days without limbs, eyes, or proper attention. A similar fate, I suspect, awaits those coming back from this war, especially the badly disfigured. They're a living reminder of the catastrophic price Russia has paid for Putin's imperial ambitions, a price the Kremlin desperately wants everyone to forget. At least, until they're ready to start another war…

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Glasgow Times
6 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Russian missiles hit Ukrainian army training ground, killing at least three
It is the latest attack to embarrass military officials as they struggle to make up a severe manpower shortage in the more than three-year war. Russia's Defence Ministry said Ukraine's 169th training centre near Honcharivske in the Chernihiv region was hit with two Iskander missiles, one armed with multiple submunitions and another with high explosives, killing or wounding about 200 troops. A Russian missile on a residential area in Kharkiv (Anatolii Lysianskyi/AP) Meanwhile, Moscow continued its stepped-up aerial campaign against Ukrainian civilian targets, launching 78 attack drones overnight, including up to eight newly developed jet-powered drones, Ukraine's air force said on Wednesday. At least five people were wounded. The UN mission in Ukraine says there has been a worsening trend in civilian casualties from Russian attacks this year, with 6,754 killed or injured in the first half of 2025 — a 54% increase from the same period in 2024. Since Moscow launched an all-out invasion of neighbouring Ukraine on February 24 2022, at least 13,580 Ukrainian civilians, including 716 children, have been killed, according to the UN. In an effort to stop that, US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that he is giving Vladimir Putin until August 8 for peace efforts to make progress or Washington will impose punitive sanctions and tariffs. Western leaders have accused the Russian president of dragging his feet in US-led peace efforts in an attempt to capture more Ukrainian land. Ukrainian forces are mostly hanging on against a grinding summer push by Russia's bigger army, though the Russian Defence Ministry has claimed some recent small advances at places along the 620-mile front line. Ukrainian ground forces acknowledged that a Russian strike hit a military training ground in the Chernihiv region of northern Ukraine, but its casualty report differed widely from the one issued by Moscow. A damaged building in a prison hit by a Russian strike in Zaporizhzhia region (Olexander Pavlov/AP) A Russian Defence Ministry video showed multiple small explosions apparently caused by a missile with a shrapnel warhead followed by one big blast, apparently from the other one armed with a high-explosive warhead. A similar Russian strike occurred last September when two ballistic missiles blasted a Ukrainian military academy and nearby hospital, killing more than 50 people and wounding over 200 others. Ukrainian authorities said a commission led by the head of the Military Law Enforcement Service has been formed to determine whether negligence or misconduct by officials contributed to the casualties in Chernihiv. The attack was the fourth deadly strike in five months on Ukrainian military facilities. The three previous strikes killed at least 46 soldiers and wounded more than 160, according to official reports. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky signed a bill on Tuesday that allows Ukrainian men over the age of 60 to voluntarily sign contracts with the armed forces. The law assists those who want to contribute their experience and skills, particularly in non-combat or specialised roles. In February, Ukraine's Defence Ministry began offering new financial and other benefits it hoped would attract men between the ages of 18 and 24 to military service. Men in that age group are exempt from the country's draft, which covers those aged 25 to 60. Ukraine lowered its conscription age from 27 to 25, but that has failed to replenish ranks or replace battlefield losses.


Reuters
6 hours ago
- Reuters
Russia has developed immunity to sanctions, Kremlin says after Trump tightens ceasefire deadline
MOSCOW, July 30 (Reuters) - The Kremlin said on Wednesday it continues to monitor statements by U.S. President Donald Trump regarding sanctions against Moscow, but that Russia had acquired immunity to such measures thanks to long experience. Trump said on Tuesday that the United States would start imposing tariffs and other measures on Russia in 10 days if Moscow showed no progress towards ending its more than three-year-long war in Ukraine. "We have been living under a huge number of sanctions for quite a long time, our economy operates under a huge number of restrictions," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters. "Therefore, of course, we have already developed a certain immunity in this regard, and we continue to note all statements that come from President Trump, from other international representatives on this matter." Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova called the threat of new sanctions "routine" and said it was odd that the U.S. and the West had not yet understood that imposing such measures did not work and only served to hurt Western economies. "We see that the West simply cannot let go of the issue of sanctions. It seems as if they are constantly stuck in a rut," Zakharova told a news briefing in Moscow. "Apparently, there are no other options left - they have been exhausted. We are responding and taking measures to counteract all of this or even turn it to our own advantage."


ITV News
6 hours ago
- ITV News
'I want people to remember how close it is': Oscar-winning Ukrainian filmmaker on new documentary
Two thousand meters; it isn't very far. A short stroll; no more than that. But in Ukraine, as film-maker Mstyslav Chernov tells me: 'Every meter of land is someone's life and someone's blood.'' His new documentary, 2000 Meters to Andriivka, is raw reportage from the front line of a single battle; harrowing, heart-breaking and often very hard to watch. The fight is through a narrow strip of woodland to recapture a village seized by the invading Russians. Chernov walked every step of the way with Ukraine's Third Assault Brigade. He returned alive. Many more did not. "My main goal was to keep the memory of those people - and to honour them and their names,'' he says. ''To express the strength of Ukrainian soldiers who are protecting the land that I call home.'' Almost every soldier we meet along the way is ultimately doomed. There are no Hollywood heroes; just men, filled with fear, doing their duty. And yet Hollywood has already honoured Chernov for his previous film, 20 Days in Mariupol. In his Oscar's acceptance speech last year, he said he would gladly swap the award for a Russian retreat from Ukraine. It can't be easy to inhabit such different worlds; to tread the red carpet one moment and then to cower in a muddy trench. "It is a paradox,'' he says. "The existence of those red carpets in normal life… and then you travel across a couple thousands of kilometres and you just cross the border, take a train, take a car, and you are back in time 100 years. "Or sometimes it feels like another planet. It's so different. "But if you turn on the Russian television, they will keep saying that it takes only 20 minutes for a Russian nuclear bomb hit London, or it will take only 24 hours for Russian tanks to reach Berlin. "I just want people to remember how close it is and how real it is." It is, he says a film, about distance and how deceptive that can be; the length of the woods becomes a chasm the solders must bridge; the thousands of miles between the front line where so many sacrifice their lives and the political leaders making the actual decisions likely to decide Ukraine's fate. As we speak, America seems to be losing faith that Vladimir Putin will agree a ceasefire. I ask him if he'd like to screen the film for President Trump. "I would love to screen this film for the political establishment in US,'' he replies. "Just to pierce the bubble. The political bubble, abstract bubble, and just bring a little bit of reality. "There is so much false information that reaches the ears of politicians who are making big decisions. I'd love them to see things how they really are.'' 2000 Meters to Ardriivka brings the grim reality far too close for comfortable viewing. In the end, the soldiers achieve their objective but it's a costly and fleeting victory. The Russians soon return. No film, I have seen, captures so well the futility of war – nor, its absolute necessity for those defending their homeland. 2000 Meters To Andriivka is in cinemas from Friday.