India to defend interest, pursue US talks in parallel
"The government attaches utmost importance to protecting and promoting the welfare of our farmers, workers, entrepreneurs, exporters, MSMEs and all sections of industry. We will take all necessary steps to secure and advance our national interest," commerce minister Piyush Goyal said in the parliament. The government is examining the implications of these tariffs and is engaged with all stakeholders, he said.
Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump ratcheted up his rhetoric, a day after he announced a 25% tariff plus a penalty on Indian goods from 1 August. India and Russia "can take their dead economies down together", Trump commented, expressing displeasure over the continued trade and defence links between the two countries.
Trump's announcement came ahead of a US trade team visiting India from 25 August. Despite the sour remarks, India will keep its focus on discussions with the US for a bilateral trade agreement (BTA) with a mutually beneficial outcome, said two people who are directly involved in the process. New Delhi has chosen not to retaliate, Mint reported on Wednesday.
On Thursday, India's Nifty 50 index closed at 24,768.35, down 86.70 points or 0.35%, amid volatility triggered by US tariff concerns.
Preliminary analysis suggests India could face a loss of nearly $10 billion in export value to the US if the tariffs stay for long, the first of the two people said, requesting anonymity. The loss would be a significant setback, with labour-intensive sectors such as textiles, footwear, gems and jewellery, and electronics likely to be hit the hardest.
The US is not only India's largest trading partner but also one of the few major economies with which India enjoys a significant trade surplus. India's goods trade surplus with the US rose to $41.18 billion in fiscal year 2025 (FY25), up 16.6% from $35.33 billion a year ago. The increase was driven by an 11.6% rise in exports to $86.51 billion, while imports from the US grew 7.4% to $45.33 billion. In comparison, India's overall goods trade reported a deficit of $282.8 billion in FY25.
According to government estimates, about 75.3% of India's merchandise exports to the US could be impacted by the proposed tariffs.
'There will be no change in priorities and strategies, which will remain the same as during the last five rounds of face-to-face talks that began in March following the joint statement issued by the leadership of both nations on 13 February,' said the second person mentioned above.
Analysts agree that the tariffs will negatively impact India's GDP growth, with Goldman Sachs Economic Research projecting a potential direct hit of 0.2-0.3 percentage points on its CY25 real GDP growth estimate. While acknowledging the potential for a short-term hit, analysts like V.K. Vijayakumar from Geojit Investments and Aditi Raman from Moody's Analytics said that trade talks might lead to a lower final tariff rate and that India's domestically-driven economy offers some resilience against significant long-term impact.
Madhavi Arora, chief economist at Emkay Global Financial Services, said the tariff would significantly raise the effective US duty on Indian goods from an average of 10.7% to about 22%, after factoring in higher duties on exempted sectors such as copper, steel and aluminium. This rate, she added, is already higher than what most Asian economies face, barring China. India exported goods worth $87 billion to the US in FY25, accounting for 2.3% of GDP, said Arora. Of this, engineering goods, electronics, drugs and pharmaceuticals, gems and jewellery, and textiles made up $65 billion.
Meanwhile, India should continue to focus on manufacturing for the world, but with a more diversified 'US-plus' export market, even as the US tariff and penalty for trade with Russia have bared vulnerabilities, said experts.
'The latest set of tariff announcements has indeed exposed vulnerabilities in export-dependent growth models, necessitating a strategic recalibration of India's manufacturing framework,' said Rishi Shah, partner and economic advisory services leader, Grant Thornton Bharat. 'Our 'Make in India' initiative's emphasis on scaling production capacity remains fundamentally sound, but the current trade environment underscores the need for a more nuanced approach centred on innovation-led industrial development.' India must now elevate industrial security to the 'same strategic priority we've accorded food security and energy security over the past decades', said Shah.
On the issue of penalties for buying Russian oil, the second person said that it is not yet clear, as it remains to be seen in what form they might be imposed.
To be sure, Trump had pressed India to change its stance and allow greater access to American goods in the Indian market. Mint was the first to report on 11 June that US has changed its stance and was firm on the demand to open critical sectors like agriculture, dairy and access to US's GM seeds and agricultural products as well as digital trade.
Negotiations for a bilateral trade agreement (BTA) began in March 2025 and have since progressed through five rounds of physical meetings and multiple virtual sessions. The Terms of Reference for the agreement were finalized on 29 March during the first round in New Delhi, Goyal told Parliament. The government is currently examining the implications of the steep tariffs and is actively consulting with exporters and industry stakeholders to assess the impact, he said.
The revised tariff is expected to impact agricultural exports to the US significantly. 'This sudden hike could seriously dent profitability and slow down export momentum for products like basmati rice, pulses, grapes, and makhana,' said Anil Kumar SG, founder of Samunnati, an agri value chain solutions provider.
However, Apparel Export Promotion Council chairman Sudhir Sekhri believes that the 25% tariff is not a major cause for concern as long as tariffs on competing countries like Vietnam and Bangladesh are not revised downward from current levels. 'Apparel exports are expected to slow down until the announcement of an interim BTA, which we hope will be concluded between October and December 2025. The penalty remains a grey area, and we expect the government to negotiate this with the US,' Sekhri said.
The US remains a key market for Indian ready-made garments, accounting for 33% of India's total garment exports in 2024. India's total merchandise exports, excluding petroleum, reached a record $374.1 billion in FY25, up 6% from $352.9 billion a year earlier.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
11 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Death to IDF': Alarming anti-Israel graffiti in St Louis suburb; cars burnt amid ‘hate crime' probe
Anti-Israel graffiti, including 'Death to IDF' messages, were discovered in Clayton in St Louis, Missouri, early on Tuesday. Officials are investigating the antisemitic act, calling it a 'hate crime'. Police also confirmed that several cars were burned in the area. Several cars were burned in Clayton, St Louis on Tuesday(X/StopAntisemitism ) As photos from the scene surfaced on social media, officers responded to the 7500 block of Westmoreland Avenue at around 3 AM local time. They found heavily damaged vehicles, many burned. Authorities are now suspecting that the fire was intentionally set, the Clayton Police Department noted in a statement. However, no injuries have been reported. Read More: 'Making those like India pay for war profiteering…': US Senator on Trump's tariff threat 'Investigation into Suspicious Fire and Hate Crime Ongoing CLAYTON, MO - The Clayton Police Department continues to investigate a suspicious fire in the 7500 block of Westmoreland Avenue early this morning,' the police department said in a press release. 'We believe the victim in this incident, a Clayton resident, was specifically targeted. There are no indications of any further threat to the community. The FBI and the St. Louis Regional Bomb and Arson Unit have been requested to assist with the investigation.' 'Death to IDF' KMOV reported that the phrase 'Death to the IDF' was written on the roadway, referring to the Israel Defense Forces. Another portion of the graffiti included a threat against an unidentified person, the report added. Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon referred to the incident as 'car bombings'. Read More: Trump makes 'weird' gestures from White House roof: 'Building nuclear missiles?' 'I've been briefed about the reported car bombings in St. Louis and alleged antisemitic vandalism. Our PDAAG @JesusOseteDOJ has been in touch with the US Attorney for EDMo. Our office intends to hold the perpetrators accountable for these violent acts,' she posted on X, platform formerly known as Twitter. 'StopAntisemitism is outraged by the vile arson attack targeting the family of a lone IDF soldier in Clayton, Missouri. This is a a clear act of antisemitic hate meant to intimidate and terrorize. We demand that those responsible be swiftly identified & prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,' StopAntisemitism tweeted.
India Today
11 minutes ago
- India Today
Putin remains doubtful of Trump's ultimatum to end war, sources say
Russian President Vladimir Putin is unlikely to bow to a sanctions ultimatum expiring this Friday from U.S. President Donald Trump, and retains the goal of capturing four regions of Ukraine in their entirety, sources close to the Kremlin told has threatened to hit Russia with new sanctions and impose 100% tariffs on countries that buy its oil - of which the biggest are China and India - unless Putin agrees to a ceasefire in Russia's war in determination to keep going is prompted by his belief that Russia is winning and by scepticism that yet more U.S. sanctions will have much of an impact after successive waves of economic penalties during 3-1/2 years of war, according to three sources familiar with discussions in the Kremlin. The Russian leader does not want to anger Trump, and he realises that he may be spurning a chance to improve relations with Washington and the West, but his war goals take precedence, two of the sources goal is to fully capture the Ukrainian regions of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, which Russia has claimed as its own, and then to talk about a peace agreement, one of the sources said."If Putin were able to fully occupy those four regions which he has claimed for Russia he could claim that his war in Ukraine had reached his objectives," said James Rodgers, author of the forthcoming book "The Return of Russia".The current talks process, in which Russian and Ukrainian negotiators have met three times since May, was an attempt by Moscow to convince Trump that Putin was not rejecting peace, the first source said, adding that the talks were devoid of real substance apart from discussions on humanitarian says it is serious about agreeing a long-term peace in the negotiations but that the process is complicated because the two sides' stances are so far apart. Putin last week described the talks as stated demands include a full Ukrainian withdrawal from the four regions and acceptance by Kyiv of neutral status and limits on the size of its military – demands rejected by a sign that there may yet be an opportunity to strike a deal before the deadline, Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff is expected to visit Russia this week, following an escalation in rhetoric between Trump and Moscow over risks of nuclear war. On Monday, Russia said it was no longer bound by a moratorium on short- and medium-range nuclear Kremlin did not respond to a request for comment for this story. All the sources spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the who in the past has praised Putin and held out the prospect of lucrative business deals between their two countries, has lately expressed growing impatience with the Russian president. He has complained about what he called Putin's "bullshit" and described Russia's relentless bombing of Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities as "disgusting".The Kremlin has said it noted Trump's statements but it has declined to respond to Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko last week called on the world to respond with "maximum pressure" after the worst Russian air strike of the year killed 31 people in Kyiv, including five children, in what she called Russia's response to Trump's deadline."President Trump wants to stop the killing, which is why he is selling American-made weapons to NATO members and threatening Putin with biting tariffs and sanctions if he does not agree to a ceasefire," White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said in response to a request for ADVANCEThe first source said Putin was privately concerned about the recent deterioration of U.S. ties. Putin still retains the hope that Russia can again befriend America and trade with the West, and "he is worried" about Trump's irritation, this person with Moscow's forces advancing on the battlefield and Ukraine under heavy military pressure, Putin does not believe now is the time to end the war, the source said, adding that neither the Russian people nor the army would understand if he stops the author, said Putin has invested his political reputation and legacy in the war in Ukraine."We know from his previous writings and statements that he sees himself as part of a strong tradition of standing up to the West and the rest of world to defend Russia's interests," he Kremlin leader values the relationship with Trump and does not want to anger him, however, "he simply has a top priority - Putin cannot afford to end the war just because Trump wants it," the second Russian source said.A third person familiar with Kremlin thinking also said Russia wanted to take all four regions and did not see the logic in stopping at a time of battlefield gains during Russia's summer has suffered some of its biggest territorial losses of 2025 in the past three months, including 502 square kilometres in July, according to Black Bird Group, a Finland-based military analysis centre. In total, Russia has occupied around a fifth of military General Staff has told Putin that the Ukrainian front will crumble in two or three months, the first person Russia's recent gains remain relatively minor in purely territorial terms, with only 5,000 square kilometres (1,930 square miles) of Ukraine taken since the start of last year, less than 1% of the country's overall territory, according to a June report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington-based think and Western military sources, acknowledge that Russia is making gains, but only gradually and with heavy casualties. Russian war bloggers say Moscow's forces have been bogged down during its current summer offensive in areas where the terrain and dense urban landscape favoured Ukraine, but assess that other areas should be faster to take.'HE'S MADE THREATS BEFORE'Trump's sanctions threat was "painful and unpleasant," but not a catastrophe, the second source said. The third source said there was a feeling in Moscow that "there's not much more that they can do to us".It was also not clear if Trump would follow through on his ultimatum, this person said, adding that "he's made threats before" and then not acted, or changed his source also said it was hard to imagine that China would stop buying Russian oil on instructions from Trump, and that his actions risked backfiring by driving oil prices a consequence of previous rounds of sanctions, Russian oil and gas exporters have taken big hits to their revenues, and foreign direct investment in the country fell by 63% last year, according to U.N. trade data. Around $300 billion of central bank assets have been frozen in foreign Russia's ability to wage war has been unimpeded, thanks in part to ammunition supplies from North Korea and imports from China of dual-use components that have sustained a massive rise in weapons production. The Kremlin has repeatedly said that Russia has some "immunity" to has acknowledged Russia's skill in skirting the measures. "They're wily characters and they're pretty good at avoiding sanctions, so we'll see what happens," he told reporters at the weekend, when asked what his response would be if Russia did not agree to a first Russian source noted that Putin, in pursuing the conflict, was turning his back on a U.S. offer made in March that Washington, in return for his agreement to a full ceasefire, would remove U.S. sanctions, recognise Russian possession of Crimea - annexed from Ukraine in 2014 - and acknowledge de facto Russian control of the territory captured by its forces since source called the offer a "fantastic chance," but said stopping a war was much more difficult than starting it.- EndsMust Watch
India.com
11 minutes ago
- India.com
Can A Country Survive Without America? These Nations Already Already Do Without U.S. Ties
New Delhi: The global order has long revolved around the United States. Its economic weight, military power and diplomatic reach have shaped how countries operate. But a handful of nations have taken a different path. They have either walked away from Washington or never entered the room. And despite years of pressure, sanctions and isolation, they continue to function. Among them, Iran stands out. For decades, Tehran has maintained one of the most antagonistic relationships with Washington. The rift deepened after the Islamic Revolution of 1979, which led to sweeping sanctions that strangled its economy. But Iran did not collapse. Instead, it shifted its focus inward, developed its oil and gas sector and invested in domestic industries. It strengthened ties with countries like Russia, China and Turkey to keep its economy running. In 2024, U.S. President Donald Trump intensified tariff threats against several countries. India found itself on Washington's radar. He accused New Delhi of buying large quantities of crude oil from Russia and selling it in global markets at a profit. He announced a 25% tariff on Indian trade and lashed out on Truth Social, claiming New Delhi had no concern for the war in Ukraine. India issued a strong rebuttal. Responding to the threat, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) made it clear that India would act in its national interest. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal explained that India had to turn to Russian oil because European suppliers had redirected their energy exports in the aftermath of the Ukraine conflict. At that time, Washington had supported India's decision. 'This is not a matter of choice. It was a response to the global market's limitations,' he said and pointed out the irony that countries that continue to criticise India are themselves engaged in trade with Russia, even when they face no strategic compulsion to do so. This debate has brought up a question: can a nation survive without engaging with the United States? Are there countries that have built an economic and political existence independent of American support? There are. Iran, Cuba, North Korea and Venezuela have managed to chart out such paths. Their experiences are far from smooth. Each of them has faced significant hardships. Still, they have not collapsed under pressure. Instead, they have sought out new alliances, developed local industries and found ways to adapt. After decades of sanctions, Iran signed a 25-year strategic agreement with China. The deal covers Chinese investments in Iran and steady oil purchases. Tehran also expanded military and economic ties with Moscow. Its domestic defence and technology sectors have grown despite external isolation. Its missile and drone programmes are homegrown. The country's education and healthcare systems, while strained, continue to function. Cuba has followed its own model. Since the 1960s, it has faced stringent U.S. sanctions. After embracing communism under Fidel Castro, the country was cut off from American trade. But it built a healthcare system that earned global praise. Cuban doctors and vaccines have been exported to countries across Latin America and Africa. Its tourism and biotechnology have brought in revenue. Partnerships with Russia, Venezuela and other regional allies have helped it remain afloat. North Korea offers a different case. There are no direct economic ties between Pyongyang and Washington. The two countries remain adversaries. Under Kim Jong Un, North Korea has prioritised its nuclear weapons programme and missile development. It has relied heavily on China for energy, food and essential supplies. Russia has also provided limited support. Despite economic difficulties, North Korea has continued to function under its rigid political system. Venezuela, too, has faced American sanctions, especially targetting its oil exports. But Caracas responded by strengthening its ties with Iran, China and Russia. It used its vast oil reserves as leverage, exchanging energy for investment and support. Each of these countries has followed a different model. Some turned to authoritarianism, while others leaned on regional alliances. But all have demonstrated that an economic existence without the United States, while difficult, is not impossible. These examples do not suggest that global engagement with Washington lacks value. The United States remains the world's largest economy and a central force in international diplomacy. But these nations show that with the right strategies, strong internal planning and alternative partnerships, survival outside the American orbit is not only possible, but it is already happening.
