Myanmar security forces involved in systematic torture, UN report says
'We have uncovered significant evidence, including eyewitness testimony, showing systematic torture in Myanmar detention facilities,' Nicholas Koumjian, head of the IIMM, said in a statement accompanying the 16-page report.
The torture sometimes resulted in death, the report said. Children, who are often unlawfully detained as proxies for their missing parents, were among those tortured, it said.
In an email to Reuters, Myanmar's military government said it was conducting 'security measures' lawfully and did not illegally arrest, torture or execute innocent civilians. It said 'terrorists' were responsible for torture and killings.
The military-backed government has not responded to over two dozen requests by the U.N. team for information about the alleged crimes and requests to access the country, the U.N. report said. The military's response to Reuters did not address the U.N. allegation.
The findings in the report covering a one-year period through to June 30 were based on information from more than 1,300 sources, including hundreds of eyewitness testimonies as well as forensic evidence, documents and photographs.
Perpetrators identified so far include high-level commanders, the report said, although names were withheld due to ongoing investigations and concerns about alerting the individuals.
Investigators focused on torture partly because many victims were able to identify perpetrators individually which Koumjian, a former prosecutor, said could help with future convictions.
'People often know the names or they certainly know the faces of those who torture them or who torture their friends,' Koumjian told reporters in Geneva.
Myanmar has been in chaos since a 2021 military coup against an elected civilian government plunged the country into civil war. Tens of thousands of people have been detained since then, the United Nations says.
Junta chief Min Aung Hlaing ended a four-year state of emergency last month and announced the formation of a new government, with himself as acting president, ahead of a planned election.
The IIMM is investigating abuses in Myanmar since 2011, including crimes committed against the mainly Muslim Rohingya minority in 2017 when hundreds of thousands were forced to flee a military crackdown, and those affecting all groups since the coup.
The IIMM is supporting jurisdictions investigating the alleged crimes, such as Britain and the International Criminal Court.
However, Koumjian said U.N. budget cuts threaten its work. Donations for its research on sexual violence and crimes against children as well as funding for witness security are set to run out at year-end, he said.
'All of this would have a very substantial effect on our ability to continue to document the crimes and provide evidence that will be useful to jurisdictions prosecuting these cases,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
Over 93 lakh women benefitted from Kanyashree scheme in Bengal: Mamata Banerjee
Kolkata: West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Thursday said that over 93 lakh women have benefited from the state government's Kanyashree scheme. Taking to the social media platform X, CM Mamata said her government has spent over Rs 17,000 crore in the last 12 years to help women through this scheme. "Today is Kanyashree Day. The Kanyashree project has completed 12 years today. Many congratulations to all the Kanyashree women across the world, across the country, across Bengal. I don't think there is any other government project that has had such a big impact on women's empowerment in society in such a short time! That's why it is so popular in the world - it won the United Nations Public Service Award, winning first place among 552 projects from 62 countries," Banerjee said. 'Kanyashree Prakalpa' is a targeted conditional cash transfer scheme which is aimed at checking child marriage and retaining girls in schools and other educational institutions. In 2017, Kanyashree Prakalpa, which is a targeted conditional cash transfer scheme, received the United Nations' highest award, the first place for Public Service. "I always think that a society where women are not well off can never be well off. Empowerment of women is necessary for the development of society. It is my pride that today there are more than 93 lakh 'Kanyashree women' in our state. Seventeen and a half thousand crore taka has been handed over to them under this project. We don't just talk about women's empowerment. We do it," she said. The Chief Minister concluded by saying, "I would like to tell all the Kanyashree women to grow up in life and make the face of the country and the state shine. You will one day build a world Bengal. You will wear the crown of respect on your heads in the world."
The Wire
3 hours ago
- The Wire
At Geneva, Plastic Pollution Treaty Talks in Disarray
With time running out to seal a deal among the 184 countries gathered at the United Nations in Geneva, several countries slammed a proposed compromise text put forward by talks chair Luis Vayas Valdivieso of Ecuador. Canadian artist Benjamin Von Wong's sculpture 'The Thinker's Burden', sited outside the UN, is being slowly covered in plastic during the treaty talks in Geneva. Photo; AFP Attempts to secure a landmark treaty combating plastic pollution descended into disarray on the penultimate day of talks Wednesday as dozens of countries rejected the latest draft text, leaving the talks in limbo. With time running out to seal a deal among the 184 countries gathered at the United Nations in Geneva, several countries slammed a proposed compromise text put forward by talks chair Luis Vayas Valdivieso of Ecuador. A larger bloc of countries seeking more ambitious actions blasted what they consider a dearth of legally binding action, saying the draft text was the lowest common denominator and would reduce the treaty to a toothless waste-management agreement. But oil-producing states said the text went too far for their liking, crossing their red lines too and not doing enough in paring down the scope of the treaty. The talks towards striking a legally binding instrument on tackling plastic pollution opened on August 5. Five previous rounds of talks over the past two and a half years failed to seal an agreement, including a supposedly final round in South Korea last year. But countries seem no closer on a consensus on what to do about the ever-growing tide of plastic rubbish polluting land, sea and human health. With a day left to go, Vayas presented a new draft but the discussions quickly unravelled as the text was savaged from all quarters. 'Without ambition entirely' Panama said the goal was to end plastic pollution, not simply to reach an agreement. "It is not ambition: it is surrender," their negotiator said. The European Union said the proposal was "not acceptable" and lacked "clear, robust and actionable measures", while Kenya said there were "no global binding obligations on anything". Tuvalu, speaking for 14 Pacific island developing states, said the draft risked producing a treaty "that fails to protect our people, culture and ecosystem from the existential threat of plastic pollution". Britain called it a text that drives countries "towards the lowest common denominator", and Norway said "It's not delivering on our promise... to end plastic pollution." Bangladesh said the draft "fundamentally fails" to reflect the "urgency of the crisis", saying that it did not address the full life cycle of plastic items, nor their toxic chemical ingredients and their health impacts. "This is, as such, without ambition entirely," it said. 'Not worth signing' A cluster of mostly oil-producing states calling themselves the Like-Minded Group – including Saudi Arabia, Russia and Iran – want the treaty to focus primarily on waste management. Kuwait, speaking for the club, said the text had "gone beyond our red lines", adding that "Without consensus, there is no treaty worth signing." "This is not about lowering ambition: it's about making ambition possible for all," it said. Saudi Arabia said there were "many red lines crossed for the Arab Group" and reiterated calls for the scope of the treaty to be defined "once and for all". The United Arab Emirates said the draft "goes beyond the mandate" for the talks, while Qatar said that without a clear definition of scope, "we don't understand what obligations we are entering into". India, while backing Kuwait, saw the draft as "a good enough starting point " to go forward on finalising the text. 'Betrayal of humanity' Environmental non-governmental organisations also blasted the draft. The proposed text "is a gift to the petrochemical industry and a betrayal of humanity", said Greenpeace delegation chief Graham Forbes. The World Wide Fund for Nature called the draft text a "devastating blow" to people suffering from the impact of plastic pollution. The Center for International Environmental Law delegation chief David Azoulay said it "all but ensures that nothing will change" and would "damn future generations". More than 400 million tonnes of plastic are produced globally each year, half of which is for single-use items. While 15% of plastic waste is collected for recycling, only 9% is actually recycled. Nearly half, or 46%, ends up in landfills, while 17% is incinerated and 22% is mismanaged and becomes litter. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Advertisement
Economic Times
3 hours ago
- Economic Times
As Trump pushes international students away, Asian schools scoop them up
NYT News Service For Jess Concepcion, a microbiology student from the Philippines, obtaining a doctorate from a university in the United States had been a dream. It was where most of his academic mentors had studied and done research, and he wanted to follow in their footsteps. But when the United States, under President Donald Trump, started pausing visa interviews during peak season this spring, threatening to deport international students for political speech and slashing funding for academic research, he quickly changed plans. Applications for doctoral programs take years and have to be tailored to specific schools, so he is aiming for programs in Switzerland and Singapore instead. "That uncertainty made me stop in my tracks and choose another country," Concepcion, 24, said. "Immigration policy is quite restrictive, and I'm on a different side of the world. So living in that kind of instability that far away isn't healthy for me." It's a quandary facing many young people around the world. According to the United Nations, 6.9 million people studied outside their home country in 2022. The United States has long attracted the most foreign students, 1.1 million in the 2023-24 academic year. It's too soon to know whether more foreign students will choose not to attend U.S. schools. But warning signs abound. Major international education search platforms, including IDP and Keystone Education Group, have detected a marked decline in student interest in American programs. Among academic administrators polled by the Institute for International Education this spring, more than usual reported drops in international applications for the coming year. These are not the first signs that American higher education is losing its dominant position. For years, countries in Asia have been strengthening their universities and marketing them to students around the world. With more appealing alternatives, the Trump administration's hostile stance may hasten the decline in U.S. higher education preeminence. "We're shifting from a world in which there were only a few primary target destination countries to a much more multipolar world," said Clay Harmon, the executive director of the Association of International Enrollment Management, which represents recruitment agencies. "It's all adding up to this narrative that 'maybe that's not the right destination for me after all,'" Harmon said. "'And there are a whole bunch of other countries that are eager to take my money instead.'" Asia steps up For decades, in the English-speaking world, Oxford and Cambridge in Britain, the Ivy League in the United States, and other name-brand universities in Australia and Canada tended to top application checklists. Gradually, schools in China, Japan, Taiwan and Singapore started showing up in annual rankings of the top universities -- with lower price tags. Governments dispatched representatives to college fairs and set goals for the number of students they wanted to bring in every year. So when Trump, soon after starting his second term, began pushing international students away, Asian nations started welcoming students who couldn't continue their studies at American schools. Take South Korea, where Concepcion went for his master's degree after winning a scholarship from the South Korean government that covered living expenses and tuition. He added a year of mandatory language study and enrolled at Korea University in Seoul, where his program starts in earnest this fall. In the spring, Korea University was among several institutions to offer relief measures as the U.S. government began canceling some student visas and terminating funding programs. Another South Korean school, Yonsei University, will open rolling admissions for undergraduate transfers year round starting in 2026 and is planning a customized visiting program for students whose coursework is interrupted in the United States. Trump has added urgency to such plans, but this effort has been underway in Asia for decades. South Korea has for years sent students to other countries, while attracting few from overseas. In the early 2000s, leaders started to think of that imbalance as a kind of trade deficit and set out to boost their international recruitment. They took guidance from a similar effort in Japan, which had about 337,000 foreign students last year and is aiming for 400,000 by 2033. South Korea's latest target was set in 2023: 300,000 international students by 2027. For 2026, Seoul was named the top city for international students in the closely followed Quacquarelli Symonds World University Rankings. Early on, the South Korean government's work was intended to buoy flagging schools in smaller towns, where low birthrates and emigration to larger cities have shrunk classes of high school graduates. Foreign students are also not subject to tuition caps that apply to domestic students, creating a new revenue stream to keep universities afloat. Meekyung Shin, the director of educational globalization for South Korea's Ministry of Education, said that at first those foreign students were generally expected to return home after their studies. More recently, officials have started to see foreign students as an answer to the nation's labor shortage as well. Seoul established a support center to help foreign students get jobs, and visa policies have been loosened to help them work after graduation. "Now we are very interested in how we help them decide to stay here," Shin are about 70,000 students in South Korea from China and 50,000 from Vietnam. Myanmar and Nepal send thousands each year. For South Korean companies, the students offer an opportunity: potential hires who could help expand the business into their home countries, or manage overseas factories. Hyundai, for example, makes many of its cars in Vietnam and is trying to sell them in Singapore. Kyle Guadana is a Singaporean student studying at Yonsei University, where he leads the Foreign Student Union. He said Hyundai, among other companies, had reached out directly. "They are looking for foreigners who will be able to work with them," Gaudana, 24, said. "They are specifically targeting Southeast Asian students, because they are trying to expand their bases here."The recruiting drive has had some complications, however. To hit its targets, the government has accepted a wider range of language proficiency tests and lowered the minimum bank balance required to obtain a visa. It has also increased the number of hours students can work in a week. Some students have used university enrollment primarily as a way to earn money in South Korea, which is not otherwise easy to particularly true outside Seoul, according to Jun Hyun Hong, a professor at Chung-Ang University who was involved in earlier efforts to bring international students to South Korea's higher education system. Local governments are happy to have more people willing to work in factories and on farms, something that colleges facilitate. "If we focus mainly on achieving the numerical goal," Hong said, "and ignore the quality of international students and the educational capacity of the university, there are concerns about whether maintaining these numbers will be sustainable in the long term." Shin, the education official, said the government was working to ensure the quality of the programs. Right now, international students make up about 10% of the total student population, and she thinks that's a good ratio to the larger challenge may be making sure that those who come primarily to study are able to work in South Korea when they graduate -- and that they want to stay. Keity Rose Mendes, 21, grew up in Mozambique and received the same scholarship granted to Concepcion, studying industrial engineering at Seoul National University. She chose South Korea for its safety and because she wanted to learn about its manufacturing techniques. But after three years of classes, she felt that collaboration wasn't valued and that foreign students weren't well integrated. "A lot of them, especially non-Asian international students, just want to finish their studies and leave," said Mendes, who is the president of the school's International Student Association. "I wish that the same effort that they're putting into bringing international students, they also tried to put into creating facilities to maintain them here." Hedging their bets For millions of students deciding where to study, the United States is still the leading destination. Degrees from top American universities command societal respect -- and lucrative job offers -- in countries like South Korea. But even that shine has been dulled by new obstacles since Trump took office, said Pierre Huguet, the CEO of the global admissions consulting firm H&C Education. "Many saw the U.S. as offering more freedom and an escape from rigid social pressures in Korea," Huguet said. "Now they fear visa revocations, invasive online presence reviews and a chilled campus climate, which is the opposite of what they were hoping for." Huguet said his clients were focusing on Britain and Australia. The number of South Korean students studying abroad overall has been dropping as the country's own universities climb the rankings. And the United States isn't the only developed country to push back against international students. Canada and Australia limited international student visas last year, while Britain raised visa fees and was contemplating shortening postgraduate work visas. "No country is being extremely welcoming at this stage," said Yash Sharma, who runs an admissions consultancy called Longshore Education focused on the market in India. "Everywhere in the English-speaking world there is anti-immigration sentiment going around."To add to political uncertainty, postgraduation job opportunities are changing. Tech companies, which have long been a strong draw to the United States, have pulled back on hiring entry-level workers as artificial intelligence reduces the number of people needed to do simpler tasks. That's what ultimately changed Divyank Rawat's mind. After working as a data analyst in India after college, he decided to pursue a master's degree in the United States because he felt it was the only place he could learn certain skills. Rawat, 25, was admitted to a handful of good programs. But after he spoke with other Indians who had recently graduated in the United States, the job market looked grim. Combined with the risk of not getting a student visa and new threats to the three-year, postgraduation period when students are allowed to work using their student visas, he decided to stay in India to work for the time being. "Let's suppose I end up in the U.S. with $70,000 debt and no kind of job security," Rawat said. "It is really scary to imagine that." He regrets not applying to European programs: "The mistake was that I didn't have a backup plan." This article originally appeared in The New York Times. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Tariffs, tantrums, and tech: How Trump's trade drama is keeping Indian IT on tenterhooks Good, bad, ugly: How will higher ethanol in petrol play out for you? As big fat Indian wedding slims to budget, Manyavar loses lustre As 50% US tariff looms, 6 key steps that can safeguard Indian economy Stock Radar: JSPL forms Ascending Triangle pattern on weekly charts, could hit fresh 52-week high soon Nifty and business are different species: 5 small-cap stocks from different sectors with upside potential of up to 30% F&O Radar | Deploy Bear Put Spread in Nifty to play index's negative stance amid volatility Wealth creation: Look beyond the obvious in some things; 10 fertilizer sector companies worth watching
