logo
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approves Opdivo® (nivolumab) plus Yervoy® (ipilimumab) as a Treatment for Patients with Previously Untreated Microsatellite Instability-High or Mismatch Repair Deficient Unresectable or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer1

U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approves Opdivo® (nivolumab) plus Yervoy® (ipilimumab) as a Treatment for Patients with Previously Untreated Microsatellite Instability-High or Mismatch Repair Deficient Unresectable or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer1

(NYSE: BMY) today announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Opdivo ® (nivolumab) plus Yervoy ® (ipilimumab) as a first-line treatment of adult and pediatric patients (12 years and older) with unresectable or metastatic microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC). 1 This approval is based on the CheckMate-8HW trial, which is the largest Phase 3 trial (n=839) of immunotherapy in patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC, evaluating Opdivo plus Yervoy (n=354) vs. Opdivo monotherapy (n=353) in the all-lines setting and Opdivo plus Yervoy (n=202) vs. investigator's choice chemotherapy (n=101) (mFOLFOX-6 or FOLFIRI with or without bevacizumab or cetuximab) in the first-line setting. 1 Opdivo plus Yervoy met the dual primary endpoints of progression free survival (PFS) when compared to Opdivo monotherapy across all lines of therapy and when compared to chemotherapy in the first-line setting, as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR). 1 This approval, granted more than two months ahead of the June 23, 2025 Prescription Drug User Fee Act goal date, follows the FDA's prior decision to grant the application Breakthrough Therapy Designation and Priority Review status.
'There is an unmet need for additional treatment options such as a dual immunotherapy approach for patients with previously untreated MSI-H/dMMR unresectable or metastatic CRC, which is an aggressive form of cancer and can be particularly difficult to treat,' said Heinz-Josef Lenz, MD, CheckMate-8HW investigator and Deputy Director for Research Programs and Head of the Gastrointestinal Cancers Program at the USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center. 2,3,4,5,6 'The meaningful outcomes in CheckMate-8HW underscore how initiating treatment with the dual immunotherapy combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab may result in a notable survival benefit. 1,5 This approval has the potential to redefine traditional approaches of care for patients with this form of CRC.'
In the CheckMate-8HW trial, Opdivo plus Yervoy demonstrated a 38% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death vs. Opdivo monotherapy in immunotherapy-naïve patients across all lines of therapy (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.62; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.48–0.81; P =0.0003). 1 Assessing the dual primary endpoint of PFS, the trial demonstrated that median PFS was not reached with Opdivo plus Yervoy (95% CI: 53.8-Not Estimable [NE]) and was 39.3 months with Opdivo monotherapy (95% CI: 22.1-NE). 1 PFS rates at 12-, 24-, and 36-months were also numerically higher compared to Opdivo monotherapy (76% vs. 63%, 71% vs. 56%, and 68% vs. 51%, respectively). 1 In Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves showing PFS rates with Opdivo plus Yervoy compared to Opdivo monotherapy, an early separation was observed at two months and sustained at three years. 1 Opdivo plus Yervoy also met a key secondary endpoint, demonstrating superior overall response rate (ORR) by BICR compared to Opdivo monotherapy (n=296, 71% vs. n=286, 58%; P =0.0011). 1 Of the most common all-cause adverse reactions (ARs) occurring in ≥10% of patients, similar rates of grade 3-4 ARs were observed between Opdivo plus Yervoy and Opdivo monotherapy. 1 The safety profile for the dual immunotherapy combination remained consistent with previously reported data and the ARs observed were manageable with established protocols, with no new safety signals identified. 1,5 Additional safety information can be found in the U.S. Full Prescribing Information for Opdivo.
The Opdivo plus Yervoy vs. chemotherapy arm of the CheckMate-8HW trial showed that the combination regimen reduced the risk of cancer progression or death by 79% compared to chemotherapy in first-line patients (HR 0.21; 95% CI: 0.14-0.32; P <0.0001). 1 This arm also assessed the other dual primary endpoint of PFS, where median PFS was not reached with Opdivo plus Yervoy (95% CI: 38.4-NE) compared to 5.8 months with chemotherapy (95% CI: 4.4-7.8). PFS rates were numerically higher with Opdivo plus Yervoy vs. chemotherapy at 12- and 24-months (79% vs. 21% and 72% vs. 14%, respectively). 1 KM curves comparing PFS with Opdivo plus Yervoy vs. chemotherapy showed an early separation at three months, which was sustained through two years. 1
The regimen of Opdivo plus Yervoy represents the first-ever dual immune checkpoint inhibitor combination to demonstrate significant efficacy benefit compared to Opdivo monotherapy and chemotherapy in MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients. 1,5
Opdivo and Yervoy are associated with the following Warnings and Precautions: severe and fatal immune-mediated adverse reactions including pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis and hepatotoxicity, endocrinopathies, nephritis with renal dysfunction, dermatologic adverse reactions, other immune-mediated adverse reactions; infusion-related reactions; complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); embryo-fetal toxicity; and increased mortality in patients with multiple myeloma when Opdivo is added to a thalidomide analogue and dexamethasone, which is not recommended outside of controlled clinical trials. 1 Please see the Important Safety Information section below.
'This approval marks our ninth indication for an Opdivo -based treatment in the gastrointestinal space. 1 We are witnessing the transformative potential of dual immunotherapy in treating GI cancers,' said Wendy Short Bartie, senior vice president of Oncology Commercialization at Bristol Myers Squibb. 2,3,4,5 'People with MSI-H/dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer face high unmet need, and Opdivo plus Yervoy is an important new approach in the first-line setting. 2,3,4,5 This milestone can offer hope, and it underscores our commitment to continue reaching more patients with new treatment options.' 1
'Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second most common cause of cancer-related death for men and women combined in the U.S., and concerning trends show that incidence is increasing in people younger than 50,' said Nicole Sheahan, President of the Global Colon Cancer Association. 6,7 'Despite the prevalence of CRC, there remains a high unmet need, highlighting the urgency for additional treatment options. 2,3,5,6,7 We are thrilled with this FDA approval as Opdivo plus Yervoy offers an exciting new first-line approach for patients with MSI-H/dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer.' 1
Opdivo as a single agent, or in combination with Yervoy, was previously granted accelerated approval in MSI-H/dMMR CRC adult and pediatric patients (12 years and older) that has progressed following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. 1 Today's FDA decision converts this second-line indication to full approval for Opdivo monotherapy and expands the indication for Opdivo plus Yervoy into the first-line setting based on the CheckMate-8HW trial. 1
About CheckMate-8HW
CheckMate-8HW is a Phase 3, randomized, multicenter, open-label trial evaluating Opdivo plus Yervoy compared to Opdivo alone or chemotherapy (mFOLFOX-6 or FOLFIRI with or without bevacizumab or cetuximab) in patients with unresectable MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. 8
In the CheckMate-8HW study, 839 patients were randomized to receive either Opdivo monotherapy ( Opdivo 240 mg Q2W for six doses, followed by Opdivo 480 mg Q4W), Opdivo plus Yervoy ( Opdivo 240 mg plus Yervoy 1 mg/kg Q3W for four doses, followed by Opdivo 480 mg Q4W), or investigator's choice of chemotherapy. 8 The dual primary endpoints of the trial were PFS for Opdivo plus Yervoy compared to Opdivo alone across all lines of therapy and PFS for Opdivo plus Yervoy compared to chemotherapy in the first-line setting, as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR). 8
The study is ongoing to assess various secondary endpoints, including overall survival (OS), and BMS will continue to work with the study investigators to present these data and longer-term follow-up in the future. 8
Select Safety Profile from CheckMate-8HW
The safety analysis in CheckMate-8HW included 288 patients, of whom 200 received Opdivo plus Yervoy. 1 Serious adverse reactions occurred in 46% of patients receiving Opdivo plus Yervoy. 1 The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥1% of patients who received Opdivo plus Yervoy were adrenal insufficiency (2.8%), hypophysitis (2.8%), diarrhea (2.0%), abdominal pain (2.0%), small intestinal obstruction (2.0%), pneumonia (1.7%), acute kidney injury (1.4%), immune mediated enterocolitis (1.4%), pneumonitis (1.4%), colitis (1.1%), large intestinal obstruction (1.1%), and urinary tract infection (1.1%). 1 The most common adverse reactions reported in ≥ 20% of patients treated with Opdivo plus Yervoy were fatigue, diarrhea, pruritis, abdominal pain, musculoskeletal pain, and nausea. 1 Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 2 (0.6%) patients who received Opdivo plus Yervoy; these included myocarditis and pneumonitis, 1 each. 1 Opdivo and/or Yervoy were discontinued in 19% of patients and were delayed in 48% of patients for an adverse reaction. 1
About Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is cancer that develops in the colon or the rectum, which are part of the body's digestive or gastrointestinal system. 9 With more than 154,000 new cases estimated to be diagnosed in the United States in 2025, CRC is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer. 7,10 Trends show that incidence is increasing in people younger than 50, and mortality rates have increased in people younger than 55 since the mid-2000s. 7 Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) occurs when the proteins that repair mismatch errors in DNA replication are missing or non-functional, leading to microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors. 11,12 Up to 7% of people with mCRC have MSI-H/dMMR tumors and may often have poor outcomes with standard chemotherapy. 5
INDICATIONS
OPDIVO ® (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY ® (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older with unresectable or metastatic microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC).
OPDIVO ® (nivolumab), as a single agent, is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older with unresectable or metastatic microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC) that has progressed following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan.
OPDIVO ® (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY ® (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have been previously treated with sorafenib. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.
OPDIVO ® (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable advanced, recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after prior fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy.
OPDIVO ® (nivolumab) is indicated for the adjuvant treatment of completely resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer with residual pathologic disease in adult patients who have received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT).
OPDIVO ® (nivolumab), in combination with fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-containing chemotherapy, is indicated for the first-line treatment of adult patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
OPDIVO ® (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY ® (ipilimumab), is indicated for the first-line treatment of adult patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
OPDIVO ® (nivolumab), in combination with fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-containing chemotherapy, is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, and esophageal adenocarcinoma.
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
Severe and Fatal Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions
Immune-mediated adverse reactions listed herein may not include all possible severe and fatal immune- mediated adverse reactions.
Immune-mediated adverse reactions, which may be severe or fatal, can occur in any organ system or tissue. While immune-mediated adverse reactions usually manifest during treatment, they can also occur after discontinuation of OPDIVO or YERVOY. Early identification and management are essential to ensure safe use of OPDIVO and YERVOY. Monitor for signs and symptoms that may be clinical manifestations of underlying immune-mediated adverse reactions. Evaluate clinical chemistries including liver enzymes, creatinine, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) level, and thyroid function at baseline and periodically during treatment with OPDIVO and before each dose of YERVOY. In cases of suspected immune-mediated adverse reactions, initiate appropriate workup to exclude alternative etiologies, including infection. Institute medical management promptly, including specialty consultation as appropriate.
Withhold or permanently discontinue OPDIVO and YERVOY depending on severity (please see section 2 Dosage and Administration in the accompanying Full Prescribing Information). In general, if OPDIVO or YERVOY interruption or discontinuation is required, administer systemic corticosteroid therapy (1 to 2 mg/kg/day prednisone or equivalent) until improvement to Grade 1 or less. Upon improvement to Grade 1 or less, initiate corticosteroid taper and continue to taper over at least 1 month. Consider administration of other systemic immunosuppressants in patients whose immune-mediated adverse reactions are not controlled with corticosteroid therapy. Toxicity management guidelines for adverse reactions that do not necessarily require systemic steroids (e.g., endocrinopathies and dermatologic reactions) are discussed below.
Immune-Mediated Pneumonitis
OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause immune-mediated pneumonitis. The incidence of pneumonitis is higher in patients who have received prior thoracic radiation. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune- mediated pneumonitis occurred in 3.1% (61/1994) of patients, including Grade 4 (<0.1%), Grade 3 (0.9%), and Grade 2 (2.1%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, immune- mediated pneumonitis occurred in 7% (31/456) of patients, including Grade 4 (0.2%), Grade 3 (2.0%), and Grade 2 (4.4%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, immune- mediated pneumonitis occurred in 3.9% (26/666) of patients, including Grade 3 (1.4%) and Grade 2 (2.6%).
Immune-Mediated Colitis
OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause immune-mediated colitis, which may be fatal. A common symptom included in the definition of colitis was diarrhea. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection/reactivation has been reported in patients with corticosteroid-refractory immune-mediated colitis. In cases of corticosteroid-refractory colitis, consider repeating infectious workup to exclude alternative etiologies. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 2.9% (58/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (1.7%) and Grade 2 (1%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 25% (115/456) of patients, including Grade 4 (0.4%), Grade 3 (14%) and Grade 2 (8%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 9% (60/666) of patients, including Grade 3 (4.4%) and Grade 2 (3.7%).
Immune-Mediated Hepatitis and Hepatotoxicity
OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause immune-mediated hepatitis. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 1.8% (35/1994) of patients, including Grade 4 (0.2%), Grade 3 (1.3%), and Grade 2 (0.4%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, immune- mediated hepatitis occurred in 15% (70/456) of patients, including Grade 4 (2.4%), Grade 3 (11%), and Grade 2 (1.8%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 7% (48/666) of patients, including Grade 4 (1.2%), Grade 3 (4.9%), and Grade 2 (0.4%).
Immune-Mediated Endocrinopathies
OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause primary or secondary adrenal insufficiency, immune-mediated hypophysitis, immune-mediated thyroid disorders, and Type 1 diabetes mellitus, which can present with diabetic ketoacidosis. Withhold OPDIVO and YERVOY depending on severity (please see section 2 Dosage and Administration in the accompanying Full Prescribing Information). For Grade 2 or higher adrenal insufficiency, initiate symptomatic treatment, including hormone replacement as clinically indicated. Hypophysitis can present with acute symptoms associated with mass effect such as headache, photophobia, or visual field defects. Hypophysitis can cause hypopituitarism; initiate hormone replacement as clinically indicated. Thyroiditis can present with or without endocrinopathy. Hypothyroidism can follow hyperthyroidism; initiate hormone replacement or medical management as clinically indicated. Monitor patients for hyperglycemia or other signs and symptoms of diabetes; initiate treatment with insulin as clinically indicated.
In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 1% (20/1994), including Grade 3 (0.4%) and Grade 2 (0.6%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 8% (35/456), including Grade 4 (0.2%), Grade 3 (2.4%), and Grade 2 (4.2%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 7% (48/666) of patients, including Grade 4 (0.3%), Grade 3 (2.5%), and Grade 2 (4.1%).
In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, hypophysitis occurred in 0.6% (12/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (0.2%) and Grade 2 (0.3%).
In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, hypophysitis occurred in 9% (42/456), including Grade 3 (2.4%) and Grade 2 (6%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, hypophysitis occurred in 4.4% (29/666) of patients, including Grade 4 (0.3%), Grade 3 (2.4%), and Grade 2 (0.9%).
In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, thyroiditis occurred in 0.6% (12/1994) of patients, including Grade 2 (0.2%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, thyroiditis occurred in 2.7% (22/666) of patients, including Grade 3 (4.5%) and Grade 2 (2.2%).
In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, hyperthyroidism occurred in 2.7% (54/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (<0.1%) and Grade 2 (1.2%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, hyperthyroidism occurred in 9% (42/456) of patients, including Grade 3 (0.9%) and Grade 2 (4.2%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, hyperthyroidism occurred in 12% (80/666) of patients, including Grade 3 (0.6%) and Grade 2 (4.5%).
In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, hypothyroidism occurred in 8% (163/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (0.2%) and Grade 2 (4.8%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, hypothyroidism occurred in 20% (91/456) of patients, including Grade 3 (0.4%) and Grade 2 (11%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, hypothyroidism occurred in 18% (122/666) of patients, including Grade 3 (0.6%) and Grade 2 (11%).
In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, diabetes occurred in 0.9% (17/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (0.4%) and Grade 2 (0.3%), and 2 cases of diabetic ketoacidosis. In patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, diabetes occurred in 2.7% (15/666) of patients, including Grade 4 (0.6%), Grade 3 (0.3%), and Grade 2 (0.9%).
Immune-Mediated Nephritis with Renal Dysfunction
OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause immune-mediated nephritis. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 1.2% (23/1994) of patients, including Grade 4 (<0.1%), Grade 3 (0.5%), and Grade 2 (0.6%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, immune-mediated nephritis with renal dysfunction occurred in 4.1% (27/666) of patients, including Grade 4 (0.6%), Grade 3 (1.1%), and Grade 2 (2.2%).
Immune-Mediated Dermatologic Adverse Reactions
OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated rash or dermatitis. Exfoliative dermatitis, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) has occurred with PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies. Topical emollients and/or topical corticosteroids may be adequate to treat mild to moderate nonexfoliative rashes.
YERVOY can cause immune-mediated rash or dermatitis, including bullous and exfoliative dermatitis, SJS, TEN, and DRESS. Topical emollients and/or topical corticosteroids may be adequate to treat mild to moderate non-bullous/exfoliative rashes.
Withhold or permanently discontinue OPDIVO and YERVOY depending on severity (please see section 2 Dosage and Administration in the accompanying Full Prescribing Information).
In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated rash occurred in 9% (171/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (1.1%) and Grade 2 (2.2%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, immune-mediated rash occurred in 28% (127/456) of patients, including Grade 3 (4.8%) and Grade 2 (10%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, immune-mediated rash occurred in 16% (108/666) of patients, including Grade 3 (3.5%) and Grade 2 (4.2%).
Other Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions
The following clinically significant immune-mediated adverse reactions occurred at an incidence of <1% (unless otherwise noted) in patients who received OPDIVO monotherapy or OPDIVO in combination with YERVOY or were reported with the use of other PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies. Severe or fatal cases have been reported for some of these adverse reactions: cardiac/vascular: myocarditis, pericarditis, vasculitis; nervous system: meningitis, encephalitis, myelitis and demyelination, myasthenic syndrome/myasthenia gravis (including exacerbation), Guillain-Barré syndrome, nerve paresis, autoimmune neuropathy; ocular: uveitis, iritis, and other ocular inflammatory toxicities can occur; gastrointestinal: pancreatitis to include increases in serum amylase and lipase levels, gastritis, duodenitis; musculoskeletal and connective tissue: myositis/polymyositis, rhabdomyolysis, and associated sequelae including renal failure, arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica; endocrine: hypoparathyroidism; other (hematologic/immune): hemolytic anemia, aplastic anemia, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), systemic inflammatory response syndrome, histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis (Kikuchi lymphadenitis), sarcoidosis, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, solid organ transplant rejection, other transplant (including corneal graft) rejection.
In addition to the immune-mediated adverse reactions listed above, across clinical trials of YERVOY monotherapy or in combination with OPDIVO, the following clinically significant immune-mediated adverse reactions, some with fatal outcome, occurred in <1% of patients unless otherwise specified: nervous system: autoimmune neuropathy (2%), myasthenic syndrome/myasthenia gravis, motor dysfunction; cardiovascular: angiopathy, temporal arteritis; ocular: blepharitis, episcleritis, orbital myositis, scleritis; gastrointestinal: pancreatitis (1.3%); other (hematologic/immune): conjunctivitis, cytopenias (2.5%), eosinophilia (2.1%), erythema multiforme, hypersensitivity vasculitis, neurosensory hypoacusis, psoriasis.
Some ocular IMAR cases can be associated with retinal detachment. Various grades of visual impairment, including blindness, can occur. If uveitis occurs in combination with other immune-mediated adverse reactions, consider a Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada–like syndrome, which has been observed in patients receiving OPDIVO and YERVOY, as this may require treatment with systemic corticosteroids to reduce the risk of permanent vision loss.
Infusion-Related Reactions
OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause severe infusion-related reactions. Discontinue OPDIVO and YERVOY in patients with severe (Grade 3) or life-threatening (Grade 4) infusion-related reactions. Interrupt or slow the rate of infusion in patients with mild (Grade 1) or moderate (Grade 2) infusion-related reactions. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy as a 60-minute infusion, infusion-related reactions occurred in 6.4% (127/1994) of patients. In a separate trial in which patients received OPDIVO monotherapy as a 60-minute infusion or a 30- minute infusion, infusion-related reactions occurred in 2.2% (8/368) and 2.7% (10/369) of patients, respectively. Additionally, 0.5% (2/368) and 1.4% (5/369) of patients, respectively, experienced adverse reactions within 48 hours of infusion that led to dose delay, permanent discontinuation or withholding of OPDIVO. In HCC patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, infusion-related reactions occurred in 8% (4/49) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, infusion-related reactions occurred in 4.2% (5/119) of patients.
Complications of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Fatal and other serious complications can occur in patients who receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) before or after being treated with OPDIVO or YERVOY. Transplant-related complications include hyperacute graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) after reduced intensity conditioning, and steroid-requiring febrile syndrome (without an identified infectious cause). These complications may occur despite intervening therapy between OPDIVO or YERVOY and allogeneic HSCT.
Follow patients closely for evidence of transplant-related complications and intervene promptly. Consider the benefit versus risks of treatment with OPDIVO and YERVOY prior to or after an allogeneic HSCT.
Embryo-Fetal Toxicity
Based on its mechanism of action and findings from animal studies, OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. The effects of YERVOY are likely to be greater during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with OPDIVO and YERVOY and for at least 5 months after the last dose.
Increased Mortality in Patients with Multiple Myeloma when OPDIVO is Added to a Thalidomide Analogue and Dexamethasone
In randomized clinical trials in patients with multiple myeloma, the addition of OPDIVO to a thalidomide analogue plus dexamethasone resulted in increased mortality. Treatment of patients with multiple myeloma with a PD-1 or PD-L1 blocking antibody in combination with a thalidomide analogue plus dexamethasone is not recommended outside of controlled clinical trials.
Lactation
There are no data on the presence of OPDIVO or YERVOY in human milk, the effects on the breastfed child, or the effects on milk production. Because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in breastfed children, advise women not to breastfeed during treatment and for 5 months after the last dose.
Serious Adverse Reactions
In CheckMate-8HW serious adverse reactions occurred in 39% of patients receiving OPDIVO alone. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in >1% of patients who received OPDIVO as a single agent were intestinal obstruction (2.3%), acute kidney injury (1.7%), COVID-19 (1.7%), abdominal pain (1.4%), diarrhea (1.4%), ileus (1.4%), subileus (1.4%), pulmonary embolism (1.4%), adrenal insufficiency (1.1%) and pneumonia (1.1%). Fatal adverse reactions occurring in 3 (0.9%) patients who received OPDIVO as a single agent; these included pneumonitis (n=2) and myasthenia gravis. In CheckMate-8HW, serious adverse reactions occurred in 46% of patients receiving OPDIVO with ipilimumab. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥1% of patients who received OPDIVO with ipilimumab were adrenal insufficiency (2.8%), hypophysitis (2.8%), diarrhea (2.0%), abdominal pain (2.0%), small intestinal obstruction (2.0%), pneumonia (1.7%), acute kidney injury (1.4%), immune mediated enterocolitis (1.4%), pneumonitis (1.4%), colitis (1.1%), large intestinal obstruction (1.1%), and urinary tract infection (1.1%). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in >1% of patients who received OPDIVO, as a single agent, were intestinal obstruction (2.3%), acute kidney injury (1.7%), COVID-19 (1.7%), abdominal pain (1.4%), diarrhea (1.4%), ileus (1.4%), subileus (1.4%), pulmonary embolism (1.4%), adrenal insufficiency (1.1%) and pneumonia (1.1%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 2 (0.6%) patients who received OPDIVO in combination with ipilimumab; these included myocarditis, and pneumonitis (1 each). In CheckMate-040, serious adverse reactions occurred in 59% of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY (n=49). Serious adverse reactions reported in ≥4% of patients were pyrexia, diarrhea, anemia, increased AST, adrenal insufficiency, ascites, esophageal varices hemorrhage, hyponatremia, increased blood bilirubin, and pneumonitis. In Attraction-3, serious adverse reactions occurred in 38% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=209). Serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients who received OPDIVO were pneumonia, esophageal fistula, interstitial lung disease, and pyrexia. The following fatal adverse reactions occurred in patients who received OPDIVO: interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis (1.4%), pneumonia (1.0%), septic shock (0.5%), esophageal fistula (0.5%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (0.5%), pulmonary embolism (0.5%), and sudden death (0.5%). In CheckMate-577, serious adverse reactions occurred in 33% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=532). A serious adverse reaction reported in ≥2% of patients who received OPDIVO was pneumonitis. A fatal reaction of myocardial infarction occurred in one patient who received OPDIVO. In CheckMate-648, serious adverse reactions occurred in 62% of patients receiving OPDIVO in combination with chemotherapy (n=310). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients who received OPDIVO with chemotherapy were pneumonia (11%), dysphagia (7%), esophageal stenosis (2.9%), acute kidney injury (2.9%), and pyrexia (2.3%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 5 (1.6%) patients who received OPDIVO in combination with chemotherapy; these included pneumonitis, pneumatosis intestinalis, pneumonia, and acute kidney injury. In CheckMate-648, serious adverse reactions occurred in 69% of patients receiving OPDIVO in combination with YERVOY (n=322). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% who received OPDIVO in combination with YERVOY were pneumonia (10%), pyrexia (4.3%), pneumonitis (4.0%), aspiration pneumonia (3.7%), dysphagia (3.7%), hepatic function abnormal (2.8%), decreased appetite (2.8%), adrenal insufficiency (2.5%), and dehydration (2.5%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 5 (1.6%) patients who received OPDIVO in combination with YERVOY; these included pneumonitis, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary embolism, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. In CheckMate-649, serious adverse reactions occurred in 52% of patients treated with OPDIVO in combination with chemotherapy (n=782). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients treated with OPDIVO in combination with chemotherapy were vomiting (3.7%), pneumonia (3.6%), anemia (3.6%), pyrexia (2.8%), diarrhea (2.7%), febrile neutropenia (2.6%), and pneumonitis (2.4%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 16 (2.0%) patients who were treated with OPDIVO in combination with chemotherapy; these included pneumonitis (4 patients), febrile neutropenia (2 patients), stroke (2 patients), gastrointestinal toxicity, intestinal mucositis, septic shock, pneumonia, infection, gastrointestinal bleeding, mesenteric vessel thrombosis, and disseminated intravascular coagulation.
Common Adverse Reactions
In CheckMate-8HW the most common adverse reaction reported in ≥20% of patients treated with OPDIVO as a single agent, were fatigue, diarrhea, abdominal pain, pruritus, and musculoskeletal pain. In CheckMate-8HW, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients treated with OPDIVO in combination with ipilimumab were fatigue, diarrhea, pruritus, abdominal pain, musculoskeletal pain and nausea. In CheckMate-040, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY (n=49), were rash (53%), pruritus (53%), musculoskeletal pain (41%), diarrhea (39%), cough (37%), decreased appetite (35%), fatigue (27%), pyrexia (27%), abdominal pain (22%), headache (22%), nausea (20%), dizziness (20%), hypothyroidism (20%), and weight decreased (20%). In Attraction-3, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in OPDIVO- treated patients (n=209) were rash (22%) and decreased appetite (21%). In CheckMate-577, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients receiving OPDIVO (n=532) were fatigue (34%), diarrhea (29%), nausea (23%), rash (21%), musculoskeletal pain (21%), and cough (20%). In CheckMate-648, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients treated with OPDIVO in combination with chemotherapy (n=310) were nausea (65%), decreased appetite (51%), fatigue (47%), constipation (44%), stomatitis (44%), diarrhea (29%), and vomiting (23%). In CheckMate-648, the most common adverse reactions reported in ≥20% of patients treated with OPDIVO in combination with YERVOY were rash (31%), fatigue (28%), pyrexia (23%), nausea (22%), diarrhea (22%), and constipation (20%). In CheckMate-649, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients treated with OPDIVO in combination with chemotherapy (n=782) were peripheral neuropathy (53%), nausea (48%), fatigue (44%), diarrhea (39%), vomiting (31%), decreased appetite (29%), abdominal pain (27%), constipation (25%), and musculoskeletal pain (20%).
Please see U.S. Full Prescribing Information for OPDIVO and YERVOY.
Clinical Trials and Patient Populations
CheckMate-649–previously untreated advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction and esophageal adenocarcinoma; CheckMate-577–adjuvant treatment of esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer; 8HW: Previously CheckMate-142–MSI-H or dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer in combination with YERVOY; 8HW: Previously CheckMate-142–MSI-H or dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer, as a single agent; Attraction-3–esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; CheckMate-648—previously untreated, unresectable advanced recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in combination with chemotherapy; CheckMate-648—previously untreated, unresectable advanced recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma combination with YERVOY; CheckMate-040–hepatocellular carcinoma, in combination with YERVOY.
Bristol Myers Squibb: Creating a Better Future for People with Cancer
Bristol Myers Squibb is inspired by a single vision — transforming patients' lives through science. The goal of the company's cancer research is to deliver medicines that offer each patient a better, healthier life and to make cure a possibility. Building on a legacy across a broad range of cancers that have changed survival expectations for many, Bristol Myers Squibb researchers are exploring new frontiers in personalized medicine and, through innovative digital platforms, are turning data into insights that sharpen their focus. Deep understanding of causal human biology, cutting-edge capabilities and differentiated research platforms uniquely position the company to approach cancer from every angle.
Cancer can have a relentless grasp on many parts of a patient's life, and Bristol Myers Squibb is committed to taking actions to address all aspects of care, from diagnosis to survivorship. As a leader in cancer care, Bristol Myers Squibb is working to empower all people with cancer to have a better future.
About Bristol Myers Squibb's Patient Access Support
Bristol Myers Squibb remains committed to providing assistance so that cancer patients who need our medicines can access them and expedite time to therapy.
BMS Access Support ®, the Bristol Myers Squibb patient access and reimbursement program, is designed to help appropriate patients initiate and maintain access to BMS medicines during their treatment journey. BMS Access Support offers benefit investigation, prior authorization assistance, as well as co-pay assistance for eligible, commercially insured patients. More information about our access and reimbursement support can be obtained by calling BMS Access Support at 1-800-861-0048 or by visiting www.bmsaccesssupport.com.
About the Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical Collaboration
In 2011, through a collaboration agreement with Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb expanded its territorial rights to develop and commercialize Opdivo globally, except in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, where Ono had retained all rights to the compound at the time. On July 23, 2014, Ono and Bristol Myers Squibb further expanded the companies' strategic collaboration agreement to jointly develop and commercialize multiple immunotherapies – as single agents and combination regimens – for patients with cancer in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.
About Bristol Myers Squibb
Bristol Myers Squibb is a global biopharmaceutical company whose mission is to discover, develop and deliver innovative medicines that help patients prevail over serious diseases. For more information about Bristol Myers Squibb, visit us at BMS.com or follow us on LinkedIn, X, YouTube, Facebook and Instagram.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding, among other things, the research, development and commercialization of pharmaceutical products. All statements that are not statements of historical facts are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and projections about our future financial results, goals, plans and objectives and involve inherent risks, assumptions and uncertainties, including internal or external factors that could delay, divert or change any of them in the next several years, that are difficult to predict, may be beyond our control and could cause our future financial results, goals, plans and objectives to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the statements. These risks, assumptions, uncertainties and other factors include, among others, whether Opdivo® (nivolumab) plus Yervoy® (ipilimumab) for the additional indication described in this release will be commercially successful, any marketing approvals, if granted, may have significant limitations on their use, and that continued approval of combination treatment for such indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials. No forward-looking statement can be guaranteed. Forward-looking statements in this press release should be evaluated together with the many risks and uncertainties that affect Bristol Myers Squibb's business and market, particularly those identified in the cautionary statement and risk factors discussion in Bristol Myers Squibb's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, as updated by our subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The forward-looking statements included in this document are made only as of the date of this document and except as otherwise required by applicable law, Bristol Myers Squibb undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or otherwise.
References
Opdivo Prescribing Information. Opdivo U.S. Product Information. Last updated: April 2025. Princeton, NJ: Bristol Myers Squibb Company.
Ganesh K, Stadler Z, Cercek A, et al. Immunotherapy in colorectal cancer: rationale, challenges and potential. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16,361–375.
Himbert C, Figueiredo JC, Shibata D, et al. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer in the ColoCare Study: Differences by Age of Onset. Cancers. 2021;13(15):3817.
Andre T, Shiu KK, Kim TW, et al. Pembrolizumab in Microsatellite-Instability–High Advanced Colorectal Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2207-2218
Andre T, Elez E, Van Cutsem E, et al. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Microsatellite-Instability–High Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024;391:2014-2026
National Cancer Institute. Cancer Stat Facts: Colorectal Cancer. Available at https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/colorect.html. Accessed April 1, 2025.
American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2025. Available at https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2025/2025-cancer-facts-and-figures-acs.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2025.
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04008030. A Study of Nivolumab, Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab, or Investigator's Choice Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Participants With Deficient Mismatch Repair (dMMR)/Microsatellite Instability High (MSI-H) Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) (CheckMate 8HW). Available at https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04008030. Accessed April 1, 2025.
National Cancer Institute. NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms: colorectal cancer. Available at . Accessed April 1, 2025.
American Cancer Society. Key Statistics for Colorectal Cancer. Available at . Accessed April 1, 2025
National Cancer Institute. NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms: dMMR. Available at . Accessed April 1, 2025.
https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/msi-h-cancer. Accessed April 1, 2025.
CONTACT: Bristol Myers Squibb
Media Inquiries:
Investors:
[email protected]
SOURCE: Bristol Myers Squibb
Copyright Business Wire 2025.
PUB: 04/08/2025 03:36 PM/DISC: 04/08/2025 03:37 PM

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Global Anticancer Drugs Market Booms with 11.3% CAGR, Driven by Targeted Therapy & Biomarkers
Global Anticancer Drugs Market Booms with 11.3% CAGR, Driven by Targeted Therapy & Biomarkers

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Global Anticancer Drugs Market Booms with 11.3% CAGR, Driven by Targeted Therapy & Biomarkers

Anticancer Drugs Market is Segmented by Type (Cancer Immunotherapy, Targeted Therapy, Chemotherapy), by Application (Lung Cancer, Breast Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Blood-related Cancer). BANGALORE, India, June 5, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The global market for Anticancer Drugs was valued at USD 206090 Million in the year 2024 and is projected to reach a revised size of USD 430540 Million by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 11.3% during the forecast period. Claim Your Free Report: Major Factors Driving the Growth of Anticancer Drugs Market: The anticancer drugs market is experiencing robust growth fueled by rising cancer incidence, expanding treatment options, and technological advances. With increasing adoption of personalized medicine, immunotherapy, and biosimilars, the landscape is evolving rapidly. Pharmaceutical companies are heavily investing in R&D to develop drugs targeting various cancer types, leading to a strong pipeline. Regulatory agencies are offering expedited approvals for breakthrough therapies, encouraging innovation. The market encompasses chemotherapy, targeted therapy, hormone therapy, and biologics, catering to both early and advanced-stage cancers. As cancer becomes a global health priority, the demand for accessible, effective, and cost-efficient treatment solutions is expected to grow steadily, sustaining long-term market expansion. Unlock Insights: View Full Report Now! TRENDS INFLUENCING THE GROWTH OF THE ANTICANCER DRUGS MARKET: Cancer immunotherapy is significantly propelling the growth of the anticancer drugs market due to its ability to harness the body's immune system to combat malignant cells more effectively than traditional methods. Unlike chemotherapy, which often damages healthy cells, immunotherapy offers targeted action with fewer side effects, increasing patient preference and clinician recommendation. The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors, CAR T-cell therapies, and monoclonal antibodies has broadened treatment options across multiple cancer types. Its success in treating cancers that were previously resistant to standard therapies has generated strong clinical interest. Additionally, rising investments, expanding FDA approvals, and ongoing research collaborations between biotech firms and pharmaceutical companies are further accelerating the market demand for immunotherapy-based anticancer drugs. Targeted therapy is a crucial driver in the anticancer drugs market as it allows for the development of treatments designed to interfere with specific molecular targets associated with cancer progression. This precision-based approach minimizes damage to healthy tissues and improves the effectiveness of cancer treatment. Innovations in genomics and molecular diagnostics have enabled oncologists to identify mutations and biomarkers, leading to tailored therapies for individuals. Drugs targeting proteins like HER2, EGFR, and BRAF are now standard in treating cancers like breast, lung, and melanoma. With fewer side effects and improved patient outcomes, targeted therapies are preferred over conventional cytotoxic drugs. As personalized medicine gains ground globally, targeted therapy continues to fuel steady market expansion. Lung cancer remains a dominant force in driving the anticancer drugs market due to its high global incidence and mortality rate. The complex nature of lung cancer requires a broad arsenal of treatment options, including chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and immunotherapies. With advancements in early detection and biomarker testing, patients are now eligible for precision treatments that significantly improve survival rates. Governments and healthcare agencies are increasing screening programs, particularly in high-risk populations like smokers and the elderly, driving diagnosis rates and treatment uptake. The introduction of novel drugs for advanced stages of lung cancer and increased awareness has led to growing demand, significantly contributing to market revenue. The steady increase in global cancer cases is a primary factor propelling the anticancer drugs market. Factors such as aging populations, lifestyle changes, exposure to carcinogens, and rising obesity rates are contributing to this surge. According to WHO, cancer is now one of the leading causes of death globally, placing immense pressure on healthcare systems to deliver effective treatments. This rising demand compels pharmaceutical companies to accelerate drug development and approval pipelines. Public and private funding for cancer research is also increasing to support this urgency. As a result, the anticancer drugs market is expanding to cater to diverse cancer types and stages, creating a consistent need for innovative and accessible therapies. Government initiatives and healthcare policies play a vital role in boosting the anticancer drugs market. Many countries are expanding public healthcare coverage for cancer treatment, especially in developed regions like North America and Europe. Subsidized treatment programs and insurance reimbursements have made costly anticancer therapies more accessible to a broader patient base. Special provisions for rare cancers and orphan drug designations further incentivize pharmaceutical firms to innovate. Public institutions like the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and Cancer Research UK are increasing investments in clinical trials and drug discovery. Such funding and supportive policies reduce the financial burden on patients and encourage consistent demand for effective cancer medications. Biomarker research is revolutionizing how anticancer drugs are developed, prescribed, and monitored. Biomarkers help predict disease progression, treatment response, and potential side effects, allowing clinicians to personalize therapies for better outcomes. Companion diagnostics, often co-developed with anticancer drugs, guide targeted treatment decisions, improving precision and efficacy. The integration of biomarkers in clinical trials accelerates drug approvals by identifying suitable patient cohorts. This has led to faster commercialization of breakthrough therapies. Biomarker-driven treatments also reduce trial-and-error prescribing, improving healthcare efficiency. As the field of precision oncology expands, biomarker research is becoming indispensable, thereby acting as a powerful growth catalyst for the anticancer drugs market. Emerging markets across Asia, Latin America, and Africa are witnessing improved healthcare infrastructure, which supports wider access to cancer diagnosis and treatment. Governments are investing in public hospitals, telemedicine services, and awareness campaigns to facilitate early detection and treatment. Pharmaceutical companies are also forming partnerships in these regions to launch affordable versions of branded therapies. Access to generics and biosimilars further supports affordability. Mobile health technologies and e-pharmacies are helping bridge urban-rural gaps in drug delivery. With growing income levels and rising cancer burden in these regions, the demand for anticancer drugs is expanding. This regional growth trend adds significant momentum to the global market. Claim Yours Now! ANTICANCER DRUGS MARKET SHARE Global key players of Anticancer Drugs include Merck & Co, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, etc. The top five players hold a share over 55%. North America is the largest market, and has a share of about 55%, followed by Asia-Pacific and Europe with 21% and 19%, separately. Regionally, North America leads the anticancer drugs market due to its advanced healthcare infrastructure, high cancer prevalence, and strong research funding. The U.S. accounts for a significant share, with widespread access to innovative therapies and insurance coverage. In terms of product type, Targeted Therapy is the largest segment, occupied for a share of 58%. In terms of application, Blood-related Cancer has a share of about 23 percent. Key Companies: Novartis Pfizer Inc Amgen Inc Astrazeneca plc Merck AbbVie Johnson & Johnson Gilead Sciences Roche Bristol–Myers Squibb Takeda Merck KGaA Seagen Eli Lilly Ono Pharmaceutical GSK Exelixis Inc Regeneron Innovent Hengrui Medicine Purchase Regional Report: SUBSCRIPTION We have introduced a tailor-made subscription for our customers. Please leave a note in the Comment Section to know about our subscription plans. DISCOVER MORE INSIGHTS: EXPLORE SIMILAR REPORTS! - Anthracycline Anticancer Drugs Market - The global market for Platinum-based Anticancer Drugs was estimated to be worth USD 1541.9 Million in 2023 and is forecast to a readjusted size of USD 1788.9 Million by 2030 with a CAGR of 2.1% during the forecast period 2024-2030. - Oncology Generic Injectable Drugs Market - Ovarian Cancer Treatment Drugs Market - Alkylating Agent Antineoplastic Drugs Market - The global Oncology Drugs Market revenue was USD 197440 Million in 2022 and is forecast to a readjusted size of USD 395270 Million by 2029 with a CAGR of 10.3% during the review period (2023-2029). - The global market for Oncology Treatment Drug was estimated to be worth USD 197440 Million in 2023 and is forecast to a readjusted size of USD 342140 Million by 2030 with a CAGR of 8.0% during the forecast period 2024-2030. - Esophageal Cancer Drugs Market - Mylotarg Market - Pharmaceutical Grade Anhydrous Piperazine Market - Platinum-based Anticancer APIs Market DISCOVER OUR VISION: VISIT ABOUT US! Valuates offers in-depth market insights into various industries. Our extensive report repository is constantly updated to meet your changing industry analysis needs. Our team of market analysts can help you select the best report covering your industry. We understand your niche region-specific requirements and that's why we offer customization of reports. With our customization in place, you can request for any particular information from a report that meets your market analysis needs. To achieve a consistent view of the market, data is gathered from various primary and secondary sources, at each step, data triangulation methodologies are applied to reduce deviance and find a consistent view of the market. Each sample we share contains a detailed research methodology employed to generate the report. Please also reach our sales team to get the complete list of our data sources. GET A FREE QUOTE Valuates Reportssales@ U.S. Toll-Free Call 1-(315)-215-3225WhatsApp: +91-9945648335Website: Logo: View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Valuates Reports Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Neuralink raises $650M to help expand patient access
Neuralink raises $650M to help expand patient access

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Neuralink raises $650M to help expand patient access

This story was originally published on MedTech Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily MedTech Dive newsletter. Elon Musk's Neuralink closed a $650 million funding in a Series E round, the company said Monday. The company said it plans to use the funds to expand patient access and 'innovate future devices that deepen the connection between biological and artificial intelligence.' Neuralink also announced that its brain implant has entered clinical trials in three countries, and that five people with severe paralysis are now using the implant to control digital and physical devices. Neuralink's brain computer interface consists of a chip that is surgically implanted in the skull, as well as electrodes that connect to the brain's cerebral cortex. It's designed to allow people to control a computer or mobile device. The latest fundraise included investors ARK Invest, Founders Fund, G42, Lightspeed, Sequoia Capital and others. Neuralink previously raised $280 million in a Series D round in 2023. Last year, Noland Arbaugh became the first person to receive the implant, which allowed him to move a cursor on a screen and play video games. Since then, Neuralink has sought additional applications. The company said last month it received the Food and Drug Administration's breakthrough designation to help restore communication for individuals with severe speech impairment. In Monday's announcement, Neuralink also said it had received breakthrough designation for vision restoration programs. The FDA determines breakthrough devices based on their potential for more effective treatment of life-threatening or irreversibly debilitating conditions. The designation gives manufacturers the opportunity to meet with FDA experts and have their submissions prioritized for review. Neuralink also said it has started clinical trials at the Barrow Neurological Institute in Phoenix, The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis at the University of Miami, the Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi and the University Health Network in Toronto. Recommended Reading Elon Musk's brain implant company raises $280M to fund clinical trials Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen.

Can healthcare go green without compromising safety?
Can healthcare go green without compromising safety?

Fast Company

time5 hours ago

  • Fast Company

Can healthcare go green without compromising safety?

U.S. hospitals generate nearly six million tons of waste each year, and a single patient can be responsible for more than 30 pounds a day. Much of that waste comes from the operating room (OR), which accounts for up to a third of a hospital's total output and is among the most expensive areas to manage. A large portion comes from single-use devices, packaging, and transport materials. These practices are often criticized, and not without reason. But in settings like transplantation, much of that waste is directly tied to protecting patients. I'm often asked, 'Why not make devices reusable?' or 'What about the environmental impact?' After years in the OR and working alongside transplant teams, I've asked those same questions. The answers aren't black and white, but that doesn't mean we should stop asking. Sustainability often gets reduced to packaging claims or material swaps. But the real impact lies in the systems we build around the product. That's the conversation we need to be having. Why single-use still matters Some of the industry's most criticized practices, like single-use devices, are also the least negotiable. Single-use eliminates the need for sterilization between uses, simplifies prep and cleanup, and reduces the risk of infection. The FDA permits reprocessing of certain single-use tools, but only under strict conditions. Nowhere is that margin tighter than in organ transplantation. There are no do-overs when you're handling a human organ. Transplant patients are especially vulnerable to infection due to immunosuppression, and even small lapses in sterility can lead to serious complications. Device-associated infections, from central lines, catheters, and ventilators, are among the most common and serious complications following transplant. The CDC also notes that while concerns persist about reusing single-use devices, more research is needed to define the risks. Devices that reduce infection risk and prevent complications can lead to fewer readmissions, which means fewer hospital resources used and better sustainability over time. The systems around the product Many conversations about sustainability start and stop with the product itself, whether it's recyclable, biodegradable, or made with 'green' materials. But many of the most wasteful decisions happen in how a product moves through the system that supports it. And when that system spans hospitals, suppliers, procurement teams, and legal departments, it's not built for fast change. Even when the intention is there, funding constraints, liability concerns, and the challenge of making changes across large networks often stand in the way. While a fragmented system can't solve the footprint of a single device, medical device companies still have control over how their products are moved and managed, and that's where meaningful change can start. Flying devices around the world might be fast, but it adds unnecessary emissions to an already resource-intensive process. And it's often done not because it's needed, but because it's familiar. Shifting to road transport takes more coordination, but it significantly cuts emissions and gives teams more control over when and how products arrive. What happens after delivery matters just as much. Without a plan for how products are returned, stocked, or moved, operations can shift into reaction mode. That's when waste shows up through emergency shipments, over-ordering, and unused inventory. In kidney transplant, for example, reusable machine perfusion systems have improved outcomes, but broader use has revealed logistical friction, including turnaround delays and higher discard rates. Inefficient habits tend to stay hidden until the consequences catch up. For years, private air travel has been the default in time-sensitive cases, but it comes with a steep environmental cost. At my current company, our team found that one chartered jet can emit as much carbon as manufacturing 200 single-use medical devices. With better planning, commercial flights can often meet the same clinical timelines and reduce emissions without compromising care. Sustainability has to show up in the operational decisions because if the systems around the product are wasteful, it doesn't matter how recyclable the product is. Recyclability won't negate the carbon footprint of wasteful shipping, inefficient production, or reactive inventory habits. A product isn't sustainable if it arrives on a private jet, was rushed through the supply chain, or sits unused on a shelf. Sustainability starts with better questions Healthcare won't eliminate waste entirely. But small changes matter. Reducing reliance on private air travel. Avoiding emergency shipments. Moving production closer to where products are used. None of it sounds radical. But over time, it adds up. And more often than not, it comes down to refusing to accept waste as the cost of doing business. For healthcare leaders, it's worth stepping back to examine the systems tied to a product and where a few deliberate improvements could make an impact. Not every change requires an overhaul. But the right operational shift, at the right point in the process, can reduce waste without ever touching the safety of patient care. And if enough companies commit to that kind of thinking, that's how you move an industry forward.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store